Physicists have spent many centuries developing theories for light. It is a problem that was tackled by the best of the best (Newton and Einstein) and many, many others. Understanding the quantum nature of light is complex, but it is something every one of us should understand to be a well-educated individual. It encompasses some of the most bizarre features of quantum mechanics. We begin our encounter with light in this chapter focusing on examples that include partial reflection of light from glass, single-slit diffraction, two-slit diffraction, mirrors, diffraction gratings, and lenses.
Physicists have spent many centuries developing theories for light. It is a problem that was tackled by the best of the best (Newton and Einstein) and many, many others. Understanding the quantum nature of light is complex, but it is something every one of us should understand to be a well-educated individual. It encompasses some of the most bizarre features of quantum mechanics. We begin our encounter with light in this chapter focusing on examples that include partial reflection of light from glass, single-slit diffraction, two-slit diffraction, mirrors, diffraction gratings, and lenses.
Have you ever tried to define light? If so, your definition is probably related to vision, the ability to see things. The Merriam-Webster English dictionary defines light as “something that makes vision possible”. However, the definition of the “nature of light” is a complex term already discussed by philosophers of Ancient Greece. In the 17th century, the debate on the matter focused on whether light was a particle or a wave, based on the different properties of light that had been gradually discovered over time. Isaac Newton (1642−1727) was a defender of the corpuscular theory of light, which considered light to be formed by particles, i.e., small pieces of matter, like dust or grains of sand. He was the author of Opticks (1706), the front cover of which appears in Fig. 1.1. Christian Huygens (1629–1695), on the other hand, supported the theory that light is a wave. These are two completely different definitions of the same physical concept. A range of experiments were developed to attempt to clarify this dilemma, but it was only until 1900 when Max Planck (1858-1947) introduced the basis of a theory that would go on to revolutionize scientific thinking, marking the beginning of modern physics: quantum theory. Developed during the 20th century thanks to advances made by scientists such as Niels Bohr, Born, Heisenberg, Schrödinger, Pauli, Dirac, Einstein or de Broglie, quantum theory clarified that light is neither a particle nor a wave, but that it has a dual nature: it behaves like a wave as it spreads but like a particle in its interactions with matter. In this book, we will specify where necessary whether light behaves as a particle or as a wave, although in most cases we refer to rays of light, which always represent the direction of propagation of light.
The study of light through the centuries has produced a number of theories and experiments. Newton advanced the corpuscular theory, building on the early Greek view of matter composed of atoms. Then Young essentially proved the wave nature of light through the interference experiments. Maxwell provided the firm theoretical basis for the wave nature. During the late 1800s and early 1900s, further experiments showed predictions based on a continuous wave led to the well-known ultraviolet catastrophe. Plank and Einstein originated and developed the notion of the photon as an elementary quantum of propagating electromagnetic (EM) energy. The first half of the 20th century saw the development of the field quantization and the quantum electrodynamics (QED). Feynmann labeled QED as ‘‘the best theory we have’’ to describe the matter-light interaction. The second half of the 20th century witnessed the development of the coherent and squeezed optical states attributable to Glauber and Yuen. The study of light and electromagnetic fields has a long history. This chapter explores the nature of light in terms of quantum optics.
Unlike special relativity, quantum mechanics was not the inspired product of one mind. It developed, in fits and starts, over a period of 25 years (1900–1925), and many cooks stirred the broth. Even now, a century later, quantum mechanics raises profound conceptual questions. Every competent physicist can “do” quantum mechanics, and the predictions it makes are in spectacularly good agreement with experimental results; there can be little doubt that quantum mechanics is “right.” On the other hand, as Richard Feynman once remarked, “nobody understands quantum mechanics.” I'll tell the story in two parts. First the history (how the essential pieces of the puzzle were assembled), and then the implications (what the finished picture has to say about our world). Photons Like relativity, quantum mechanics began with the study of light. In both cases, this historical association is misleading. Relativity, really, has nothing to do with light – to be sure, it involves that magic speed limit, c , and of course the most familiar thing that travels at speed c is light. So light is a convenient vehicle for introducing the subject. But it is perfectly possible to imagine a universe in which there is no such thing as light, and yet relativity might still be valid. Quantum mechanics, too, starts with light – in this case the “quantum” of light (the photon). But, as it turns out, this is just one rather specialized example of much more general principles – in fact, a rather bad example, because photons are by their nature relativistic (they travel at the speed of light), and it would be more natural to begin with the quantum mechanics of slow-moving objects, in analogy with Newtonian mechanics.
The beginning of the 20th century is marked by tremendous new scientific developments and specifically by the birth of quantum mechanics. It starts with Max Planck and Max Einstein, who introduce and apply the concept of quanta to characterize the energy of light. Quantum computers can considerably decrease the time it takes to complete calculations and solve extremely complex problems. Until the 18th century, very little is understood about light. According to the philosophers Euclid and Plato, light is produced by our eyes. Light is clearly capable of traveling through an interstellar void, while a wave needs a medium for material propagation to exist. However, because of Isaac Newton’s reputation, the corpuscular theory persists until the 19th century. When light is beamed on the top layer, it frees and pushes an electron that moves towards the bottom layer, creating a current. This current is then used to power engines for electric cars.
This authoritative, advanced introduction provides a complete, modern perspective on quantum mechanics. It clarifies many common misconceptions regarding wave/particle duality and the correct interpretation of measurements. The author develops the text from the ground up, starting from the fundamentals and presenting information at an elementary level, avoiding unnecessarily detailed and complex derivations in favor of simple, clear explanations. He begins in the simplest context of a two-state system and shows why quantum mechanics is inevitable, and what its relationship is to classical mechanics. He also outlines the decoherence approach to interpreting quantum mechanics. Distinguishing features: Provides a thorough grounding in the principles and practice of quantum mechanics, including a core understanding of the behavior of atoms, molecules, solids, and light. Utilizes easy-to-follow examples and analogies to illustrate important concepts. Helps develop an intuitive sense for the field, by guiding the reader to understand how the correct formulas reduce to the non-relativistic ones. Includes numerous worked examples and problems for each chapter.
Elements of quantum mechanics Quantum mechanics was discovered in 1925 through groping efforts to compromise two apparently contradictory pictures on the fundamental entities in nature. One was the wave picture for light which was later extended to matter by de Broglie, another was the corpuscular picture of matter which was later extended to light by Einstein. Schrödinger's wave equation came as a natural development of the first stream, while Heisenberg's matrix mechanics was presented as a unique proposal from the second stream. In spite of completely different appearances, the two theories proved, within a couple of years after their discoveries, to be equivalent. This is a most beautiful example that the physical reality exists independent of the mathematical framework formulated for its description. In this chapter, we will give a very brief review of the principles of quantum mechanics, 1–3 mainly with the harmonic oscillator as a model system for the following reasons. The first is historical: the electromagnetic wave, whose interaction with matter is the subject of this book, is a harmonic oscillator, a system which was for the first time subject to “quantization”, thus opening a way to the discovery of quantum mechanics. The second is technical: the harmonic oscillator is one of very few examples of analytically soluble problems in quantum mechanics. The third is pedagogical: the harmonic oscillator is a system best suited for realization of the equivalence of the two different pictures mentioned above and hence for a deeper understanding of the principles of quantum mechanics.