SSAF's central falsifiable prediction, NS1, requires that under a witness-confirmed fixed classical context, the reduced dynamics of a probe carry no dependence on the quantum state: all fitted rate parameters are functions of the context alone. This record reports a preregistered pilot execution of the NS1 protocol on the superconducting processor ibm_fez, using target qubit 6 and independent witness qubit 10. The independent context witness passed its two-part gate. Raw stability gave p = 0.3617, and witness-rate homogeneity gave p = 0.9998. The primary endpoint found that one shared affine reduced-evolution law accounted for an informationally complete set of eight target preparations, with a leave-one-out statistic of 176.21 against a parametric-bootstrap null 95% quantile of 253.40 and a cross-validation p-value of 0.6167. The secondary endpoint found no preparation-dependent heterogeneity among six fitted transverse decay rates, with a homogeneity p-value of 0.4003 and a maximum fractional deviation of 2.5%. The result is evidence of consistency with the preregistered NS1 prediction at the stated experimental sensitivity. It is not unique confirmation of SSAF, and it does not exclude state dependence below the achieved resolution. Standard fixed-context open-system quantum mechanics also predicts consistency with this result. The deposited record includes the manuscript, TeX source, submitted Python and notebook protocol, preregistration and preflight records, raw and processed data, machine-readable results, figures, run provenance, licensing information, and checksums. The hardware run was executed on July 17, 2026, with 7,424 shots per effective circuit and 435.0 seconds of QPU usage.
SSAF's central falsifiable prediction, NS1, requires that under a witness-confirmed fixed classical context, the reduced dynamics of a probe carry no dependence on the quantum state: all fitted rate parameters are functions of the context alone. This record reports a preregistered pilot execution of the NS1 protocol on the superconducting processor ibm_fez, using target qubit 6 and independent witness qubit 10. The independent context witness passed its two-part gate. Raw stability gave p = 0.3617, and witness-rate homogeneity gave p = 0.9998. The primary endpoint found that one shared affine reduced-evolution law accounted for an informationally complete set of eight target preparations, with a leave-one-out statistic of 176.21 against a parametric-bootstrap null 95% quantile of 253.40 and a cross-validation p-value of 0.6167. The secondary endpoint found no preparation-dependent heterogeneity among six fitted transverse decay rates, with a homogeneity p-value of 0.4003 and a maximum fractional deviation of 2.5%. The result is evidence of consistency with the preregistered NS1 prediction at the stated experimental sensitivity. It is not unique confirmation of SSAF, and it does not exclude state dependence below the achieved resolution. Standard fixed-context open-system quantum mechanics also predicts consistency with this result. The deposited record includes the manuscript, TeX source, submitted Python and notebook protocol, preregistration and preflight records, raw and processed data, machine-readable results, figures, run provenance, licensing information, and checksums. The hardware run was executed on July 17, 2026, with 7,424 shots per effective circuit and 435.0 seconds of QPU usage.
Preprint; not peer reviewed. We report a hardware-oriented quantum sampling experiment motivated by Hidden Code Sampling (HCS), while explicitly not claiming an end-to-end implementation of the original HCS PeakVerification–SyndromeVerification protocol. A full-width 60-qubit circuit derived from a sparse trivariate-bicycle CSS construction was embedded without swaps on a 108-qubit superconducting processor and compiled to native RX, RZ, and controlled-Z operations. The base circuit contains 180 logical two-qubit rotations and 360 native controlled-Z gates. Local unitary folding produced stress instances with factors 1, 3, and 5, containing respectively 360, 1080, and 1800 controlled-Z gates. A pilot run was used only to identify and freeze an endian-corrected two-feature local parity witness. The confirmatory dataset consists of three completed QPU executions at folding factors 1, 3, and 5. The final analysis includes only execution records whose frozen QASM identities and authorization hashes match the preregistered confirmatory panel. Each science circuit received 10,000 shots, and each of four calibration patterns received 4,000 shots in both the pre- and post-experiment calibration periods. Simultaneous finite-shot lower confidence bounds combine Clopper–Pearson calibration intervals, a pre/post drift hull, inverse assignment-channel correction, an empirical Bernstein bound, and worst-case optimization over the calibration box. The certified margins are 0.2953, 0.2858, and 0.3148 at folding factors 1, 3, and 5, respectively. All three folds pass, and the maximum calibration-parameter drift is 0.0065. Within a preregistered classical attack suite, the conditional operation-count gap is γ = 6.555, above the registered target of 6.0. This result is an operation-count certificate relative to the registered classical attacks. It is not a wall-clock quantum advantage claim, not a full-distribution total-variation certificate, and not an experimental implementation of the exact HCS protocol. Quantum circuits were submitted to the Rigetti Cepheus-1-108Q superconducting processor through the Open Quantum platform, operated by Quantum Rings, using the Open Quantum Python SDK. This acknowledgment does not imply endorsement by Quantum Rings of the findings, interpretations, or conclusions reported in this work. The deposited files include the preprint, LaTeX sources, sanitized confirmatory QASM files, aggregate certificate metrics, integrity manifests, and publication-compliance documentation. Authentication credentials, account metadata, organization identifiers, provider job identifiers, private provider records, and the private audit archive are excluded.
TSR-Q-1 presents a preregistered and falsifiable experimental protocol designed to test for structured late-time coherence residuals in superconducting transmon qubits. The protocol does not treat generic recoherence, non-exponential decay, or non-Markovian behavior as evidence for the proposed framework, since such phenomena may arise from conventional open-system mechanisms. Instead, it targets a specific normalized temporal scaling law, tₙ/T₂ = nᵏ, with the preregistered theoretical value k* = 1.4706, corresponding to the first two target locations t₂/T₂ = 2.7714 and t₃/T₂ = 5.0310. If the associated amplitude-scaling hypothesis is retained, the predicted ratio is A₃/A₂ ≈ 0.551. The accompanying computational validation package develops the analysis pipeline through five stages: preliminary signal injection, blind null testing, blind injection-recovery, multi-qubit global-k inference, and sensitivity mapping. The synthetic null models include stretched-exponential decay, 1/f^α correlated noise, random-telegraph/TLS-like contributions, slow drift, white noise, and device-to-device variability. These simulations validate the detectability, specificity, and sensitivity of the proposed analysis procedure under the tested synthetic noise families. They do not constitute experimental evidence for the existence of the predicted physical effect. The next stage is a preregistered hardware implementation using superconducting qubits, with device-specific null calibration, blind analysis, systematic controls, held-out replication, and, ultimately, independent experimental replication.
A preregistered Ramsey test (v4.1, job d94hi4lgc6cc73ff4cc0, ibm_fez, July 2026) of Quantum Resonance Theory's coherence-enhancement prediction (Anson 2024, DOI https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21263717) returned a QRT-consistent result: G_A = +2.87%, 95% CI [+2.35%, +3.46%], at the theory-designated ωr = 10 MHz with R0 = 10⁻³ rad. Per that registration's own terms, the result is treated as an artifact until it survives escalation. This study executes the highest-information single-session adjudication available within remaining hardware quota, exploiting two facts: (1) a genuine drive-coupled effect must scale with drive amplitude, while calibration-floor and noise-spectrum artifacts at milliradian angles do not — so a 10× amplitude arm converts a marginal effect into a decisively resolvable one; (2) the packed six-qubit layout carries six conditions per circuit, so amplitude scaling, second-device replication at original amplitude, neighbor peak structure, drive-phase randomization, and an undriven reference all execute in the same 24 circuits. The primary decision rests on the amplitude arm alone; all other vectors are declared secondary and descriptive. The backend is required in code to differ from ibm_fez (the v4.1 device). The result will be published regardless of outcome.
This technical report packages a set of hardware component-witness experiments run on IBM superconducting quantum processors. The experiments test whether a hidden auxiliary phase can affect a later system-qubit measurement, whether that phase can be recovered from basis-resolved readout, and whether two auxiliary registers can produce a nonadditive response rather than a simple sum of their individual effects. The package includes the report draft, figures, raw hardware result JSONs, raw-count appendix, and scripts for regenerating the figures and count tables. The central result chain is: echo/phase response on real hardware, basis-resolved phase readout without density-matrix tomography, and a two-register Y-basis nonadditivity test where the first run remains a frozen FAIL and an independent higher-shot replication reaches STRONG_PASS. The longer-term motivation is to develop small, testable quantum hardware primitives for systems that can preserve, read out, and combine latent histories or unchosen alternatives, instead of reducing every intermediate state to a single classical output immediately. In that sense, these experiments are intended as early building blocks for future quantum-assisted sequence or language-model architectures. This work does not claim a completed quantum language model, natural-language processing on a quantum computer, consciousness, selfhood, classical impossibility, or quantum advantage. It reports only hardware component witnesses on specific IBM backends, edges, and calibration windows, with the possibility of richer classical explanations left open.
Two registered experiments with the QITE equilibrium law on the IBM Heron processor ibm_marrakesh, one day apart in nothing but the place where the law runs: outside the processor on a microcontroller board, and inside one shot in the processor's own feed-forward. Each experiment has its own registration, hashed before its first registered job, its own frozen scripts, complete raw data, verdict and write-up; the two archives in this record are independent of each other. QITE Hold (zenodo_qite_hold_20260923.zip, SHA-256 97853e20d86c146c16d6011191e9c038dddc743dfd5392476993187654f6e1d3; write-up custodia_paper_v1.pdf; working name Custodia). A microcontroller board (ESP32-C3) holds one pair of numbers per qubit for 144 qubits and turns each pair into a rotation angle. Every tick, one circuit of 144 single-qubit rotations is measured 4096 times; the fraction of ones per qubit goes to the board, the board updates its numbers by its fixed law and returns the angles of the next circuit; it never reads the processor's calibration. A registered programme of eight blocks ran over 280 ticks and 290 jobs: square waves, a hold, a staircase, a checkerboard of 18 zones up and 18 down, two state shocks written into the board, two disturbances written into the circuits, and a comparison with an open-loop reference of frozen angles. Of the seven binding lines, six were run and held; the seventh (drift against the open-loop reference) could not be run because the device did not drift by the registered minimum. The square waves came back with a gain of 0.231 of the commanded swing (the law: 0.25), the checkerboard put 98.5 % of (tick, zone) pairs on the commanded side, the disturbances were rejected to 0.557 and 0.539 of their open-loop size (the law: 4/7). A first registration (v1.0) ended at tick 130 through a design flaw of the host and is included in full. Registration SHA-256 1de82ab12a53c1da349196e8ef07851e6b2f176efc6bd1ca6ba14cacd1f7d54b. QITE In-Shot (zenodo_qite_inshot_20260923.zip, SHA-256 a087f88a95f17c6f8023d5ff40aff35901b5e3e87db531dcd76728511f7ae944; write-up qite_inshot_paper_v1.pdf). On each of 54 qubits, twenty rounds of a measurement followed by a rotation conditioned on that measurement, with angles that set the target level and the memory g; the records of a qubit form a two-state Markov chain whose second eigenvalue is 1 - g. The lines test that eigenvalue, not the level: the autocorrelations of the records for g = 0.3, 0.6 and 1.0 were +0.607, +0.366 and +0.046, the two memories in the ratio 1.657 (the law: 1.75); the relaxation from |0> came back at 0.690 and 0.446 per round (the law: 0.70 and 0.40, lowered by T1 during a round); a step of the target proceeded at 0.658 per round and, with g = 1, completed in one round; a kick of the state was followed by a return to within 0.012 of the unkicked hold; over the same twenty rounds an open-loop state lost 0.451 while the closed loop held within 0.006; 98 % of the qubits with a clean read-out showed their own rate within the registered band. All seven binding lines held; 17 jobs. The size is what the service's compiler accepted on the day (144, 72 and 64 qubits failed with an internal compiler error; every attempt is recorded with its job id). Registration SHA-256 51933de4196bfdd7998e6a5305f7576bb7d35ac137e8b6ce0109965372b4fe5c. Nothing here is a claim of quantum advantage: the observables are classical bits and the circuits contain no two-qubit gate. The claim of both experiments is one of control: a fixed law, registered in advance, holding a public quantum processor at commanded levels with the numbers the law says, once from a board over minutes and once inside the coherence time of the qubits. The board's firmware and the serial link layer are not part of the record; both are identified by their SHA-256 in the registration of QITE Hold. Licence: CC BY 4.0.
On 4-5 July 2026, an identical shock protocol was executed on the same 156-qubit IBM Heron R2 architecture (ibm_fez) but with the QITE lambda feedback replaced by uniformly random rotation angles per cycle. This random-angle null control preserves every structural variable — RY+RZ+CZ layer, Heavy-Hex CZ coupling, 4096 shots/cycle, seed 20260602, the same 150 cycles, and the same six shocks at the same cycles (20/40/60/80/100/120), the same target qubits (q78, q69, q67, q47, q37, q16) with the same amplitudes (l1,l2) — while removing only the decentralized per-qubit lambda feedback dynamics. Backend selection was driven by queue availability; both are 156-qubit Heron R2 devices with identical architecture, and calibration differences cannot account for the qualitative burst-count contrast reported below. The result is a clean negative: zero collective bursts across all six shocks. The four non-parametric statistical tests (identical methodology to v1) all confirm the absence of shock-driven collective response: (1) permutation test yields p = 1.0 for shock alignment against the noise-saturated per-cycle transitions; (2) pairwise Pearson correlation between per-transition delta-p1 vectors drops from r_mean = +0.65 in the multi-shock run to r_mean = +0.017 in the null; (3) cross-session hypergeometric overlap between null "top-active" qubits and the v1 multi-shock top-active set is not significant (Jaccard = 0.11, p = 0.24); (4) Mann-Whitney U on shock-cycle max|delta p1| versus baseline shows ratio 0.989 with p = 0.89 — statistically indistinguishable from noise. Baseline global coherence exp(-8*Var(p1)) sits at 0.413 +/- 0.022 across all 150 cycles under random angles, versus 0.99 +/- 0.01 under QITE feedback in v1 — two distinct dynamical regimes. That the shock protocol itself executed correctly on the null run is verified locally at the target qubit: for each of the six shocks, the measured p1[q_target] at the shock cycle agrees with the theoretical prediction from theta_shock = 2*atan2(l2, l1) to within <5% (q78 shock: predicted 0.016, measured 0.018; q69 shock: predicted 0.985, measured 0.939; and so on for all six). One cycle after each shock, the target qubit returns to the random baseline distribution — with no feedback dynamics, there is no restoring trajectory. The shocks are physically executed; what is absent is the collective response. Causal conclusion: the QITE per-qubit lambda feedback dynamics are necessary for the observed collective burst phenomenology. The circuit structure (RY+RZ+CZ on Heron R2 Heavy-Hex topology) and shock protocol alone do not produce bursts. Six identical shocks on QITE-stabilized baseline produce 10 collective bursts with 6/10 shock-aligned (p = 0.008); the same six shocks on random baseline produce zero. This 10-vs-0 hardware contrast, verified by four independent non-parametric tests, establishes feedback necessity as a falsifiable causal claim rather than a phenomenological observation. The v2 bundle contains the complete null-control primary data (150-cycle JSONL, consolidated JSON, p1 numpy matrix), all IBM Runtime job IDs with per-cycle timestamps, Tee'd console logs of both the initial run and the resume run (a mid-run job-poll stall on 4 July required a resume from cycle 7 with deterministic per-cycle RNG seeds), five analysis figures including direct null-vs-multi comparison plots, the full side-by-side statistical comparison JSON, the v1 multi-shock p1 matrix and statistical test outputs for reanalysis, an 8-page supplement PDF (Section 5) integrating with the v1 paper, and SHA-256 checksums of every file in MANIFEST_v2.json. Backend (v2 null control): IBM Heron R2 (ibm_fez), 156 qubits, 4096 shots/cycle.Companion patents: DPMA Az. 10 2025 003 906.9 (QITE), 10 2025 004 891.2 (QISE).Predecessor (v1): Westrick, Reproducible Collective Burst Modes on 156 Qubits: Decentralized Per-Qubit QITE Lambda Field on IBM Heron R2, 1 June 2026. On 1 June 2026, a decentralized per-qubit lambda field was implemented on the IBM Heron R2 processor (ibm_kingston, 156 qubits) and probed with a multi-shock excitation protocol. Unlike the predecessor work (Westrick, Controllable Quantum Collective States on 156 Qubits: Experimental Results of the QITE Formalism on IBM Heron R2, 12 April 2026), which tested a globally controlled QITE quantum collective, each qubit here carries its own lambda state and receives, in the feedback loop, only its own measurement statistic p1_i. The only inter-qubit coupling propagates physically through the CZ gates of the Heavy-Hex topology. Six shocks were applied at six different positions on the chip: central (q*=78), nearest neighbor (d=1), intermediate (d=3, d=5), deep (d=8), and edge (d=12). Each individual shock triggered a chip-wide burst within 1-8 cycles (peak |delta p1| between 0.308 and 0.366; 10 to 22 simultaneously active qubits). Four additional spontaneous bursts were detected between shocks, for a total of 10 bursts in 150 cycles. The 6/6 reproducibility was verified by four independent non-parametric statistical tests, all positive: (1) permutation test p = 0.008 against chance alignment; (2) pairwise burst-vector Pearson correlation r_mean = +0.65 with all 15 pairs above noise; (3) cross-session reproducibility 9/10 qubit overlap between two independent IBM Quantum sessions, hypergeometric p = 0.008; (4) Mann-Whitney U test of burst amplitude versus Phase-A baseline, ratio 2.7, p < 0.0001. This bundle contains the complete primary data (raw JSON logs, NumPy matrices), all 27 visualizations, IBM job IDs of every submitted job, console logs of all runs, the pre-registration documents with locked detection thresholds, and SHA-256 checksums of every file (MANIFEST.json) for independent verification. Backend: IBM Heron R2 (ibm_kingston), 156 qubits, 4096 shots/cycle.Patent filings: DPMA Az. 10 2025 003 906.9 (QITE), 10 2025 004 891.2 (QISE).Predecessor: Westrick, Controllable Quantum Collective States on 156 Qubits, 12 April 2026.