A Field Cannot Both Broadcast and Entangle: The Quantum Darwinism of Gravity
Rolando P. Hong Enriquez
Abstract
In the Bose–Marletto–Vedral (BMV) proposal, two masses placed in superposition become entangled only if the gravitational field between them is quantum — a proposed table-top test of whether gravity is quantum. This paper reframes the question through quantum Darwinism. A mass's Newtonian field is a record of its position imprinted on nearby matter; a classical field is one that broadcasts that record objectively, whereas a genuinely quantum field can remain in superposition and refuses to copy a which-path record. The paper models exactly a source in superposition, its recording environment, and its partner mass, and proves an objectivity–entanglement monogamy: if the field records the position redundantly across many fragments, the entanglement it can generate is exponentially small in that redundancy — a field cannot both broadcast and entangle. Several results follow. The field record is extensive. A sharp classical-versus-quantum dichotomy is carried by an information measure that rises from zero to one bit as the field becomes classical. The source's position is the unique objective observable. And earlier black-hole decoherence results reappear as the single-fragment limit. A measured entanglement therefore bounds the field's objective redundancy from above. The results are finite-dimensional theorems with exact numerics reproduced by self-testing code, and two algebraic cores are additionally verified by proof-checking software; the gravitational couplings and decoherence rates are imported, not re-derived. In short: a field cannot both broadcast and entangle — so the entanglement a BMV experiment measures is precisely the price gravity pays for not being classical.