In the standard Copenhagen interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, the norm of the Schrödinger wave function is interpreted as the probability density of finding the particle at a certain small volume in space at a given time. This means that particle positions are very fuzzy and cannot be known until a position measurement is made. In the famous two-slit experiment, particles are emitted from a known source position and then are detected at definite screen positions, but the path any particle took to get to that detected position on the screen, in particular, which slit the particle went through to get to the detector, cannot be known. Such travel path questions are even regarded as illegitimate, since between position measurements the particle is said to behave not as a particle but as a wave, which is spread out through all available space without any particular defined position and without any defined path. It is only at the source point and at the points of detection that the particle can be said to have a position in the standard Copenhagen interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. This paper presents an alternative interpretation, and experiments to verify or disprove this interpretation are also presented.
In the standard Copenhagen interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, the norm of the Schrödinger wave function is interpreted as the probability density of finding the particle at a certain small volume in space at a given time. This means that particle positions are very fuzzy and cannot be known until a position measurement is made. In the famous two-slit experiment, particles are emitted from a known source position and then are detected at definite screen positions, but the path any particle took to get to that detected position on the screen, in particular, which slit the particle went through to get to the detector, cannot be known. Such travel path questions are even regarded as illegitimate, since between position measurements the particle is said to behave not as a particle but as a wave, which is spread out through all available space without any particular defined position and without any defined path. It is only at the source point and at the points of detection that the particle can be said to have a position in the standard Copenhagen interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. This paper presents an alternative interpretation, and experiments to verify or disprove this interpretation are also presented.
Starting with a down to earth interpretation of quantum mechanics for a free particle, the disappearance and reappearance of interference in the 2 slit problem with a detector behind one are treated in detail. A partial interpretation of quantum theory is employed which is simple, emphasizing description, yet adequate for addressing the present problem. Given that the eigenvalue equation is essential to predict a free particle's probability of collision, it is argued that there is equal need for a realistic theory to describe its possible motion. Feynman's point-to-point space-time wave packet is put forth and used as the appropriate description of the field-free motion between collisions. For a particle in a conventional 2-slit experiment with attempted detection behind one, the disappearance of interference is explained - both when the detection succeeds and when it doesn't. Also a definite prediction is made, when the inter-slit distance is reduced, of where the first signs of interference should appear on the detection screen.
The double-slit experiment has stood for a century as the paradigmatic demonstration of quantum superposition: the standard interpretation holds that a particle passes through both slits simultaneously, existing in a superposition of two spatially separated states. This paper proposes a physically distinct alternative: the particle's matter wave — a real physical wave propagating through space in accordance with de Broglie's relation λ = h/p — passes through both slits, while the particle itself (matter) remains in an undetermined state until a constructive interference maximum is formed at the detection screen. The particle does not simultaneously occupy two locations; the wave does. This distinction eliminates the need for superposition as an ontological commitment while fully reproducing the observed interference pattern. We further show that the disappearance of the interference pattern upon which-path measurement is explained without invoking wavefunction collapse: the measurement interaction redirects the matter wave to a single-slit geometry, eliminating the two-wave interference condition. Three experimentally testable predictions distinguish this framework from the standard interpretation: (1) weak-measurement trajectory reconstruction should reveal single particle paths inconsistent with simultaneous two-slit passage; (2) diffraction fringe spacing should depend on the mass density of the slit material, because denser slit edges generate a steeper refractive-index gradient for the matter wave; (3) the fringe pattern should exhibit a density-dependent phase shift measurable with current matter-wave interferometry technology. This reinterpretation requires no new mathematical formalism — the Schrödinger equation and Born's rule are retained — but replaces the ontological claim of simultaneous multi-location existence with the physically consistent picture of matter-wave propagation through an undetermined-state particle.
The particle-interference-experiments, with the photons and electrons have clearly shown that they are always detected as localized ‘particles’; and the density of their detections exhibit a pattern similar to the interference of waves. This experimental-observation is alternatively interpreted here, different from the current, ‘probabilistic interpretation’. The ‘particle’ is first mathematically characterized as an ‘impulse function’ in space; and then Fourier-transformed into the wave-number-domain, as a wide band of constituent-waves as shown in the fig. 1&2. The ‘particle’ is an ‘event’ of constructive-superimposition of a wide band of ‘pre-quantum-waves’. This ‘event’ occurs in space at regular distances; and at regular instances in time. In the particle-interference-experiments, they are the wide band of ‘pre-quantum-waves which interfere physically. This physical interference of the pre-quantum-waves determines the position and time of emergence of the ‘impulse in space’ detectable as the ‘particle’. In the real-world-situation, the ‘pre-quantum-waves of a wide bandwidth arrive from all the directions, so the amplitude and phase of every constituent wave keep changing; so the place of constructive superimposition of all the spectral-components, keep varying unpredictably; and only the ‘probability’ of detection in a given volume is possible in practice. Thus, form the theoretical view-point, there are only the pre-quantum-waves; and ‘particle’ is a specific situation of constructive-superimposition of all the spectral-components of pre-quantum-waves; so there is no wave-particle-duality. The ‘probabilistic-interpretation’ is only a ‘practical-limitation’, detector being able to detect only the ‘particle’, and not the spectrum of constituent waves.
Abstract The theoretical results of quantum mechanics (QM) have been verified by experiments, but the probabilistic Copenhagen interpretation is still controversial, and many counterintuitive phenomena are still difficult to understand. To trace the origin of probability in QM, we construct the superimposed amplitudes of a space-time position in a multiparticle quantum objective system and find that the probability in QM originates from the particle number distribution rate in a unit volume near position r at time t in the multiparticle quantum objective system. Based on the origin of probability, We find that the state function of an elementary particle (hereinafter called particle for short) has precise physical meaning; that is, the particle periodically and alternately exhibits the particle state and wave state in time and space, obtain the localized and nonlocalized spatiotemporal range of the particle, the apparent trajectory of the particle motion. Based on this, through rigorous mathematical derivation and analysis, we propose new physical interpretations of the quantum superposition state, wave-particle duality, the double-slit experiment, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, and the quantum tunnelling effect, and these interpretations are physically logical and not counterintuitive.
Quantum mechanics is often praised as a theory which unifies classical mechanics and classical wave theory. Quanta are said to behave either as particles or waves, depending on the type of experiment they are subjected to. But where in the standard formalism can a pointlike particle structure actually be found? Perhaps only to some degree in the reduction postulate applied to position measurements. In reaction to this unsatisfactory state of affairs, Bohmian mechanics introduces a mathematically precise particle concept into quantum mechanical theory. The fuzzy wave functions are supplemented by sharp particle world-lines. Through this additional structure some quantum phenomena like the double slit experiment have lost their mystery.
Abstract The theoretical results of quantum mechanics (QM) have been verified by experiments, but the probabilistic Copenhagen interpretation is still controversial, and many counterintuitive phenomena are still difficult to understand. To trace the origin of probability in QM, we construct the state function of a multiparticle quantum objective system and find that the probability in QM originates from the particle number distribution rate in a unit volume near position r at time t in the multiparticle quantum objective system. Based on the origin of probability, We find that the state function of the particle has precise physical meaning; that is, the particle periodically and alternately exhibits the particle state and wave state in time and space, obtain the localized and nonlocalized spatiotemporal range of the particle, the apparent trajectory of the particle motion. Based on this, through rigorous mathematical derivation and analysis, we propose new physical interpretations of the quantum superposition state, wave-particle duality, the double-slit experiment, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, and the quantum tunnelling effect, and these interpretations are physically logical and not counterintuitive.