Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Beyond DFT Methods

Shivani Bhardwaj, Sudhir K. Pandey

Published Jan 1, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-981-95-9745-1_10

Related papers

Spectral function database for correlated materials using beyond-DFT methods

Subhasish Mandal, Kristjan Haule, Karin M. Rabe +1 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 4, 2020•0 citations

Wavefunction-Based Methods

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Oct 1, 2012•0 citations

Progress and Challenges with Luttinger-Ward Approaches for Going Beyond DFT

Sohrab Ismail‐Beigi

The well-known and well-used Density Functional Theory (DFT) is a variational theory for the ground-state. There are no guarantees that it delivers good results for excited state properties such as quasiparticle energies or wave function. All that is guaranteed is that the total energy is exact, the chemical potential is correct, and that the eective electronic states (Kohn-Sham states) generate the right electron density at the variational minimum. Luttinger-Ward approaches to electronic structure are attractive as beyond-DFT schemes since, in principle, they oer a variational functional of the one-electron Green’s function that yields both the correct total energy and all one-particle properties at the variational extremum. However, compared to DFT, these methods face a number of additional challenges beyond the familiar problem of choosing an exchange-correlation functional: (a) they have a much greater computational cost compared to DFT, (b) one must choose some set of trial Green’s functions, and (c) one must locate an extremum (not necessarily a minimum). This talk aims both to be pedagogical and to provide a summary of our most recent work in this area. We focus mainly on the random-phase approximation (RPA) for the correlation functional which yields the GW self-energy for the Green’s function. We will describe ecient approaches for computing the RPA correlation energy; how various types of approximations to the correlation energy create a ladder of approximate self-energy operators and what type of physics is included in these approximations (exchange, screening, Hubbard U, etc.); and how the extremization is in fact highly problematic. We will end with some ideas for making practical progress with the extremization and their relation to the successful Quasiparticle Self-consistent GW (QSGW) scheme [1].

•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

EFT for DFT

R. J. Furnstahl

arXiv:nucl-th/0702040•Lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2012•21 citations

EFT Applied to DFT in a Finite System : A Computational Example

Anirban Bhattacharyya, R. J. Furnstahl, S. J. Puglia

APS•Oct 1, 2002•0 citations

Excited State Dynamics with Quantum Trajectories

Basile F. E. Curchod, Ursula Röthlisberger, Ivano Tavernelli

Nuclear quantum dynamics beyond the Born-Oppenheimer approximation is performed using quantum trajectories. Withintheadiabaticrepresentationoftheelectronicstates, NABDY(NonAdiabaticBohmianDYnamics) is used in combination with DFT and LR-TDDFT to perform on-the-fly nonadiabatic quantum dynamics. Simple numerical test systems and current limitations of the method are discussed.

CHIMIA International Journal for Chemistry•Apr 25, 2012•8 citations
The well-known and well-used Density Functional Theory (DFT) is a variational theory for the ground-state. There are no guarantees that it delivers good results for excited state properties such as quasiparticle energies or wave function. All that is guaranteed is that the total energy is exact, the chemical potential is correct, and that the eective electronic states (Kohn-Sham states) generate the right electron density at the variational minimum. Luttinger-Ward approaches to electronic structure are attractive as beyond-DFT schemes since, in principle, they oer a variational functional of the one-electron Green’s function that yields both the correct total energy and all one-particle properties at the variational extremum. However, compared to DFT, these methods face a number of additional challenges beyond the familiar problem of choosing an exchange-correlation functional: (a) they have a much greater computational cost compared to DFT, (b) one must choose some set of trial Green’s functions, and (c) one must locate an extremum (not necessarily a minimum). This talk aims both to be pedagogical and to provide a summary of our most recent work in this area. We focus mainly on the random-phase approximation (RPA) for the correlation functional which yields the GW self-energy for the Green’s function. We will describe ecient approaches for computing the RPA correlation energy; how various types of approximations to the correlation energy create a ladder of approximate self-energy operators and what type of physics is included in these approximations (exchange, screening, Hubbard U, etc.); and how the extremization is in fact highly problematic. We will end with some ideas for making practical progress with the extremization and their relation to the successful Quasiparticle Self-consistent GW (QSGW) scheme [1].