Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Raw-count visualization and classical reconstruction of quantum-correlation landscapes on IBM Quantum hardware

Koji Matsubara

Published Jun 21, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This record contains an English manuscript, the Japanese original manuscript, and selected structured CSV/JSON raw-count logs from IBM Quantum and simulator/control runs. The work visualizes quantum-correlation structures predicted by standard quantum mechanics as multi-shot raw-count landscapes on IBM Quantum hardware. It records four-outcome pair distributions, 00, 01, 10, and 11, and connects the resulting correlation landscape to pre-shared classical classification rules. This record does not claim superluminal communication, unconditional information transfer, or a modification of quantum mechanics. The purpose is to preserve the raw-count evidence and manuscript materials for reproducibility, review, and future journal submission.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.20786472

Related papers

Quantum-Geometric Visualizations

Hugo marcelo Perez

This component contains conceptual quantum-geometric visualizations generated to support the theoretical framework presented in the main project. The figures do not represent empirical measurements or simulations, but serve as abstract, coherence-based representations of non-decodable interaction structures. These visualizations were produced as part of an AI-assisted conceptual modeling process and later analyzed under stress-testing conditions to explore structural consistency.

•Apr 8, 2026•0 citations

Madmartigan: A 96 Active Qubit Structured Output Benchmark on NISQ Hardware

Frank Drew

This record contains the Madmartigan 96-Active-Qubit Structured-Output Benchmark package developed under the Quantum State Command Encoding (QSCE) research program. The benchmark documents the progression from an original 16-qubit Madmartigan structured-output circuit into a controlled 96-active-qubit, six-tile NISQ benchmark executed on IBM superconducting quantum hardware. The objective was not merely to increase qubit count, but to test whether a designed quantum circuit could preserve a reference-specific structured-output band across multiple physical tile regions under real hardware constraints. The final benchmark package includes execution on IBM Marrakesh using 96 active qubits, 156 measured qubits, six simultaneous 16-qubit tiles, 4096 shots per run, no quantum error correction, and no post-selection. The primary GLOBALPACK T6 rank-2 layout is accompanied by calibration-aware 64-active-qubit replication results, multi-seed robustness testing, an 831-depth 96-active-qubit stress layout, same-layout generic RCS controls, phase-scrambled architecture-adjacent controls, and partial-entanglement ablation analysis. The central finding is that the Madmartigan circuit preserved repeatable, reference-specific structured-output behavior across tiled hardware execution, while same-layout generic RCS controls and phase-scrambled controls failed to reproduce the Madmartigan reference band. The package includes statistical raw-versus-control separation, physical tile-map visualizations, and reproducibility artifacts to support independent technical review. Included materials may include some or all of the following: benchmark report, QASM3 circuit exports, QPY circuit artifacts, raw hardware counts, metadata, analysis CSVs, physical tile maps, scanner outputs, statistical comparison files, figures, and supporting run scripts. These artifacts are provided to support auditability, reproducibility review, and continued evaluation of QSCE/Madmartigan structured-output preservation as a potential near-term NISQ utility pathway. This work is positioned as a structured-output preservation benchmark rather than a universal quantum advantage claim. Its relevance lies in testing whether quantum hardware output can be engineered into stable, classifiable, reference-specific signal bands that may support future quantum-to-classical handoff, signaling, authentication, command validation, and cyber-hardening primitives. Reproducibility package available upon request at frank@quantummidiposse.com

•May 15, 2026•0 citations

Matched Presents, Different Futures: History-Dependent Relational Response Geometry on a Superconducting Quantum Processor

Joel Pearcey

Can systems matched on a declared present nevertheless show different future responses because they retain different relational organisation? We test this in a six-qubit hybrid quantum-classical architecture on IBM Heron hardware. Written and sham preparations use exactly the same five coupling values and the same number of native two-qubit operations; only the edge assignment differs. Under a frozen preregistered decision rule with randomised block orders, matched fast preparations displayed different later directional responses when the prepared slow classical relational configuration differed. Because the full-sample cosine alignment and norm-based retention estimates sat outside their original percentile intervals, a post hoc audit was performed from the sealed raw-count archive. That audit is reported alongside, and does not replace, the frozen rule. Claim boundary. The result is real under its frozen analysis. It is not autonomous cross-job quantum memory, and it is not evidence of a hidden quantum degree of freedom persisting between jobs. The classical coupling configuration is part of the preparation and is named as such throughout. No claim is made about quantum coherence surviving between executions. This deposit contains the manuscript in PDF and DOCX form together with the complete evidence archive: protocol freezes, compiled QPY circuits, inspection tables, randomised block orders, backend snapshots, raw-count files for both runs, IBM job ledgers, point estimates, blockwise endpoints, the frozen decision JSON, an artefact inventory and a checksum ledger.

•Sep 13, 2026•0 citations

Classical–Quantum Correlation Structures:A Conceptual Reconstruction Across Scales

Albert Briffoz

This article aims to reconstruct these connections by highlighting how oscillatory templates and potential landscapes serve as unifying principles that bridge classical mechanics, thermodynamics, and quantum theory.

•Dec 24, 2025•0 citations

Reproducible Collective Burst Modes on 156 Qubits: Experimental Results of the Decentralized Per-Qubit QITE Lambda Field on IBM Heron R2 — Multi-Shock Hardware Demonstration with 150 Cycles and 6-of-6 Reproducible Bursts

Bernd Westrick

On 1 June 2026, a decentralized per-qubit lambda field was implemented on the IBM Heron R2 processor (ibm_kingston, 156 qubits) and probed with a multi-shock excitation protocol. Unlike the predecessor work (Westrick, QITE Hardware Results 156Q, 8-12 April 2026), which tested a globally controlled QITE quantum collective, each qubit here carries its own lambda state and receives, in the feedback loop, only its own measurement statistic p1_i. The only inter-qubit coupling propagates physically through the CZ gates of the Heavy-Hex topology. Six shocks were applied at six different positions on the chip: central (q*=78), nearest neighbor (d=1), intermediate (d=3, d=5), deep (d=8), and edge (d=12). Each individual shock triggered a chip-wide burst within 1-8 cycles (peak |delta p1| between 0.308 and 0.366; 10 to 22 simultaneously active qubits). Four additional spontaneous bursts were detected between shocks, for a total of 10 bursts in 150 cycles. The 6/6 reproducibility was verified by four independent non-parametric statistical tests, all positive: (1) permutation test p = 0.008 against chance alignment; (2) pairwise burst-vector Pearson correlation r_mean = +0.65 with all 15 pairs above noise; (3) cross-session reproducibility 9/10 qubit overlap between two independent IBM Quantum sessions, hypergeometric p = 0.008; (4) Mann-Whitney U test of burst amplitude versus Phase-A baseline, ratio 2.7, p < 0.0001. This bundle contains the complete primary data (raw JSON logs, NumPy matrices), all 27 visualizations, IBM job IDs of every submitted job, console logs of all runs, the pre-registration documents with locked detection thresholds, and SHA-256 checksums of every file (MANIFEST.json) for independent verification. Backend: IBM Heron R2 (ibm_kingston), 156 qubits, 4096 shots/cycle. Patent filings: DPMA Az. 10 2025 003 906.9 (QITE), 10 2025 004 891.2 (QISE). Predecessor: Westrick, QITE Hardware Results 156Q (8-12 April 2026).

•Jan 6, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Correlations and Communications

Armin Tavakoli

The ontology of quantum theory, with features such as superpositions, entanglement and quantum measurements, is fascinating and radically different to that of many established physical models. It gives rise to predictions of correlations in laboratory data that distinguish quantum theory in the broader landscape of physical models. In this thesis, I broadly investigate quantum correlations in several physical scenarios with various notions of classicality. The questions considered are of a broad scope, including purely foundational matters, tasks motivated by quantum information science as well as entirely applied considerations.

•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations
This record contains an English manuscript, the Japanese original manuscript, and selected structured CSV/JSON raw-count logs from IBM Quantum and simulator/control runs. The work visualizes quantum-correlation structures predicted by standard quantum mechanics as multi-shot raw-count landscapes on IBM Quantum hardware. It records four-outcome pair distributions, 00, 01, 10, and 11, and connects the resulting correlation landscape to pre-shared classical classification rules. This record does not claim superluminal communication, unconditional information transfer, or a modification of quantum mechanics. The purpose is to preserve the raw-count evidence and manuscript materials for reproducibility, review, and future journal submission.
This record contains the Madmartigan 96-Active-Qubit Structured-Output Benchmark package developed under the Quantum State Command Encoding (QSCE) research program. The benchmark documents the progression from an original 16-qubit Madmartigan structured-output circuit into a controlled 96-active-qubit, six-tile NISQ benchmark executed on IBM superconducting quantum hardware. The objective was not merely to increase qubit count, but to test whether a designed quantum circuit could preserve a reference-specific structured-output band across multiple physical tile regions under real hardware constraints. The final benchmark package includes execution on IBM Marrakesh using 96 active qubits, 156 measured qubits, six simultaneous 16-qubit tiles, 4096 shots per run, no quantum error correction, and no post-selection. The primary GLOBALPACK T6 rank-2 layout is accompanied by calibration-aware 64-active-qubit replication results, multi-seed robustness testing, an 831-depth 96-active-qubit stress layout, same-layout generic RCS controls, phase-scrambled architecture-adjacent controls, and partial-entanglement ablation analysis. The central finding is that the Madmartigan circuit preserved repeatable, reference-specific structured-output behavior across tiled hardware execution, while same-layout generic RCS controls and phase-scrambled controls failed to reproduce the Madmartigan reference band. The package includes statistical raw-versus-control separation, physical tile-map visualizations, and reproducibility artifacts to support independent technical review. Included materials may include some or all of the following: benchmark report, QASM3 circuit exports, QPY circuit artifacts, raw hardware counts, metadata, analysis CSVs, physical tile maps, scanner outputs, statistical comparison files, figures, and supporting run scripts. These artifacts are provided to support auditability, reproducibility review, and continued evaluation of QSCE/Madmartigan structured-output preservation as a potential near-term NISQ utility pathway. This work is positioned as a structured-output preservation benchmark rather than a universal quantum advantage claim. Its relevance lies in testing whether quantum hardware output can be engineered into stable, classifiable, reference-specific signal bands that may support future quantum-to-classical handoff, signaling, authentication, command validation, and cyber-hardening primitives. Reproducibility package available upon request at frank@quantummidiposse.com
Can systems matched on a declared present nevertheless show different future responses because they retain different relational organisation? We test this in a six-qubit hybrid quantum-classical architecture on IBM Heron hardware. Written and sham preparations use exactly the same five coupling values and the same number of native two-qubit operations; only the edge assignment differs. Under a frozen preregistered decision rule with randomised block orders, matched fast preparations displayed different later directional responses when the prepared slow classical relational configuration differed. Because the full-sample cosine alignment and norm-based retention estimates sat outside their original percentile intervals, a post hoc audit was performed from the sealed raw-count archive. That audit is reported alongside, and does not replace, the frozen rule. Claim boundary. The result is real under its frozen analysis. It is not autonomous cross-job quantum memory, and it is not evidence of a hidden quantum degree of freedom persisting between jobs. The classical coupling configuration is part of the preparation and is named as such throughout. No claim is made about quantum coherence surviving between executions. This deposit contains the manuscript in PDF and DOCX form together with the complete evidence archive: protocol freezes, compiled QPY circuits, inspection tables, randomised block orders, backend snapshots, raw-count files for both runs, IBM job ledgers, point estimates, blockwise endpoints, the frozen decision JSON, an artefact inventory and a checksum ledger.
On 1 June 2026, a decentralized per-qubit lambda field was implemented on the IBM Heron R2 processor (ibm_kingston, 156 qubits) and probed with a multi-shock excitation protocol. Unlike the predecessor work (Westrick, QITE Hardware Results 156Q, 8-12 April 2026), which tested a globally controlled QITE quantum collective, each qubit here carries its own lambda state and receives, in the feedback loop, only its own measurement statistic p1_i. The only inter-qubit coupling propagates physically through the CZ gates of the Heavy-Hex topology. Six shocks were applied at six different positions on the chip: central (q*=78), nearest neighbor (d=1), intermediate (d=3, d=5), deep (d=8), and edge (d=12). Each individual shock triggered a chip-wide burst within 1-8 cycles (peak |delta p1| between 0.308 and 0.366; 10 to 22 simultaneously active qubits). Four additional spontaneous bursts were detected between shocks, for a total of 10 bursts in 150 cycles. The 6/6 reproducibility was verified by four independent non-parametric statistical tests, all positive: (1) permutation test p = 0.008 against chance alignment; (2) pairwise burst-vector Pearson correlation r_mean = +0.65 with all 15 pairs above noise; (3) cross-session reproducibility 9/10 qubit overlap between two independent IBM Quantum sessions, hypergeometric p = 0.008; (4) Mann-Whitney U test of burst amplitude versus Phase-A baseline, ratio 2.7, p < 0.0001. This bundle contains the complete primary data (raw JSON logs, NumPy matrices), all 27 visualizations, IBM job IDs of every submitted job, console logs of all runs, the pre-registration documents with locked detection thresholds, and SHA-256 checksums of every file (MANIFEST.json) for independent verification. Backend: IBM Heron R2 (ibm_kingston), 156 qubits, 4096 shots/cycle. Patent filings: DPMA Az. 10 2025 003 906.9 (QITE), 10 2025 004 891.2 (QISE). Predecessor: Westrick, QITE Hardware Results 156Q (8-12 April 2026).
The ontology of quantum theory, with features such as superpositions, entanglement and quantum measurements, is fascinating and radically different to that of many established physical models. It gives rise to predictions of correlations in laboratory data that distinguish quantum theory in the broader landscape of physical models. In this thesis, I broadly investigate quantum correlations in several physical scenarios with various notions of classicality. The questions considered are of a broad scope, including purely foundational matters, tasks motivated by quantum information science as well as entirely applied considerations.