Bell Timing Audit: Code and Derived Data

Maximilian Ralph Peter von Liechtenstein

Published Jun 17, 2026• 0 citations

Abstract

Public photon Bell-test records retain timing structure that is lost in aggregate statistics. This paper tests whether that structure survives quantitative response controls in three experimental archives. In the Weihs data, a rectangular contrast of four channel-pair timing centroids tests whether accepted signal delays can be written as a sum of local channel contributions. For longdist1, the contrast is 1.405 ns and 1.515 ns in disjoint chronological halves, with pointwise 95% block intervals [1.018, 1.791] ns and [1.193, 1.836] ns. Both survive the enumerated centroid scan under the specified 20-block inference at an 8-ns coincidence half-width and remain positive under clock, background, and gate checks. A flexible empirical timing model, however, transfers between chronological halves after clock-drift calibration. In the Christensen archive, the suppressed setting-pair channel is strongly enriched in coincidence tails, but a cross-fitted signal–accidental model predicts 714.6 of 730 counts beyond 300 ns; the residual is 15.4 counts with interval [−54.6, 85.3]. NIST timing-offset records exhibit a terminal-mask excess accompanied by an Alice-side singles-rate change and compatible with a separately calibrated local-setting mixture. The evidence separates reproducible structure, failure of an additive accepted-centroid model, and effects accommodated by explicit response controls. Finite coincidence selection and known switching-related populations prevent the centroid contrast alone from establishing intrinsic polarization–time coupling or a failure of quantum theory. Statistical scope. The analyses are exploratory. Coarser clustering weakens scan-adjusted significance: with ten blocks per half, the highlighted Weihs contrast has adjusted approximate p values of 0.087 and 0.014. The residual is specific to the accepted-centroid model and does not establish a discrepancy beyond all independently calibrated temporal-response models. Files and reproducibility. Bell_manuscript.pdf is the self-contained, 13-page preprint dated 30 October 2026. Bell_Reanalysis_Source.zip contains the editable LaTeX manuscript, numerical figure code, reconstruction and analysis scripts, derived records, source manifests and hashes, full comparison tables, calibration and sensitivity results, and reproduction instructions. The NIST analysis uses 60 prescribed samples of 500,000 trials, rather than complete runs. The full upstream Christensen archive and Weihs time-tag files are retrieved by the supplied fetchers and are not bundled. A clean internal rerun reproduced the checked numerical outputs exactly; external independent reproduction is not claimed. Publication status and assistance. This research preprint has not been peer reviewed. AI tools assisted programming, analysis, and manuscript preparation; responsibility for the work remains with the author. License scope. The manuscript and original figures are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. Original analysis code is licensed under MIT. Third-party source data and derived excerpts retain applicable source terms and attribution; this deposit does not relicense upstream material.

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20736969

Related papers

Artian's Completed-Record Fan-Out and Timing-Access Reference Framework

Attar Ali

A timing signature is not physics until its reference operator survives a representation audit. \[ \boxed{ \mathcal C_V^\star=F_R^2, \qquad \mathcal U_T^\star=1-F_R^2, \qquad \mathcal C_V^\star+\mathcal U_T^\star=1 } \] This framework separates three objects that must not be merged: a completed historical event, the record support still accessible to a laboratory, and a separately calibrated timing observable. Standard quantum theory closes the optimized coherent-recovery envelope. QTT adds a distinct, falsifiable timing complement only after a physical intertwining certificate proves that the laboratory record operator and the central timing projector are the same physical object in two representations. A public 11,009-trace test of explanatory burden Version 1.4 executes the complete usable public archive associated with Gosling et al., Probing the memory of a superconducting qubit environment. Every trace is split chronologically into training, a discarded guard interval, and held-out testing. The ordinary one-TLS Solomon camera learns two rates per trace, while the memoryless comparator learns one. \[ \boxed{ \operatorname{median}\!\left( \frac{\mathrm{RMSE}_{0}-\mathrm{RMSE}_{\rm TLS}} {\mathrm{RMSE}_{0}} \right)=0.36015, \qquad P(\mathrm{TLS\ wins})=\frac{10{,}169}{11{,}009}=0.92370 } \] The fitted TLS camera is therefore a successful held-out effective model. Its resolved trajectory is not a parameter-free derivation: the values of $\Gamma_q$ and $\Gamma_{qt}$ are learned from each target-bearing trace's training segment. Version 1.4 makes that distinction machine-auditable through the target-fit burden vector \[ \boxed{ \mathbf B_M=(N_c,N_d,N_w,N_n,N_u,N_h), \qquad \mathbf B_M\ne\mathbf0 \Longrightarrow \text{the fitted output is not derived parameter-free.} } \] The QTT result A public QTT source statement from 12 November 2025, before the Gosling preprint, already required complete reset to erase distributed record support beyond the visible carrier. That statement contains no Gosling-fitted rate, hidden-mode count, target window, or trajectory coefficient. The resulting comparative verdict is \[ \boxed{ \texttt{QTT-ZERO-FIT-SOURCE-EXPLANATORY-VICTORY} \;/\; \texttt{TRAJECTORY-VERDICT-OPEN}. } \] This is a scientific victory at the source/ontology layer, not a claim that QTT has already predicted the same resolved qubit trajectory. The stronger same-observable verdict remains locked because the public archive does not independently provide the residual record fidelity $F_{\rm res}$, leakage diagnostic $D$, timing complement $\mathcal U_T$, or physical intertwiner $W$. The paper prints the exact next experiment that would close or falsify that bridge. Reproducibility 11,009 row-level held-out results are included. The 840 traces favoring or tying the memoryless camera are retained. No false significance is assigned to correlated sweep windows. All three official archive objects pass their published MD5 checks. The release verifier passes 30/30 scientific and provenance checks. Three adversarial reviews cover observable equality, leakage and selection, chronology, and claim scope. Version: 1.4 Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21902886 Author: Ali Attar Website: quantumtraction.org Reader anchors Completed-record timing blind test Dynamic-circuit record-timing extension Observation as Access Quantum Traction Theory: Main Book Gosling public data archive The PDF is the default preview. The reconstruction archive contains the LaTeX source, row-level CSV, public-data integrity receipt, chronology certificate, fit-burden certificate, analysis scripts, exact source checks, adversarial and render audits, metadata, and checksum manifest.

Aug 12, 20262 citations

Paper 32B: CHSH Evaluation of the Alice/Bob Timing Continua Real-Valued Correlators, Corridor Gating, and Window Dependence

Sarnowski, Michael

Dec 12, 20250 citations

Paper 32A: Timing Continua Meet Symmetry Selection From Weihs Peak–Shoulder–Cutoff to a T4–Math Selector on S2

Sarnowski, Michael

Dec 5, 20250 citations

How Clean Are Bell-Test Data? Classical Routes to S > 2, the Synchronisation Question, and an Auditability Standard

Dmitrii Stanislavovich Losinets, Viacheslav Agafurov

Jul 8, 20260 citations

Artian's Completed-Event Bell Reconstruction: Real Source Geometry, Access, and Durable Records

Attar Ali

Sep 25, 20262 citations

Bell Audit v5: How Binarization and Pairing Semantics Shape CHSH Headlines

Hui Wang

Apr 30, 20260 citations

Bell Timing Audit: Code and Derived Data

Maximilian Ralph Peter von Liechtenstein

Published Jun 17, 2026• 0 citations

Publisher

Abstract

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20736969

Related papers

Artian's Completed-Record Fan-Out and Timing-Access Reference Framework

Attar Ali

A timing signature is not physics until its reference operator survives a representation audit. $\boxed{ \mathcal C_V^\star=F_R^2, \qquad \mathcal U_T^\star=1-F_R^2, \qquad \mathcal C_V^\star+\mathcal U_T^\star=1 }$ This framework separates three objects that must not be merged: a completed historical event, the record support still accessible to a laboratory, and a separately calibrated timing observable. Standard quantum theory closes the optimized coherent-recovery envelope. QTT adds a distinct, falsifiable timing complement only after a physical intertwining certificate proves that the laboratory record operator and the central timing projector are the same physical object in two representations. A public 11,009-trace test of explanatory burden Version 1.4 executes the complete usable public archive associated with Gosling et al., Probing the memory of a superconducting qubit environment. Every trace is split chronologically into training, a discarded guard interval, and held-out testing. The ordinary one-TLS Solomon camera learns two rates per trace, while the memoryless comparator learns one. $\boxed{ \operatorname{median}\!\left( \frac{\mathrm{RMSE}_{0}-\mathrm{RMSE}_{\rm TLS}} {\mathrm{RMSE}_{0}} \right)=0.36015, \qquad P(\mathrm{TLS\ wins})=\frac{10{,}169}{11{,}009}=0.92370 }$ The fitted TLS camera is therefore a successful held-out effective model. Its resolved trajectory is not a parameter-free derivation: the values of $\Gamma_q$ and $\Gamma_{qt}$ are learned from each target-bearing trace's training segment. Version 1.4 makes that distinction machine-auditable through the target-fit burden vector $\boxed{ \mathbf B_M=(N_c,N_d,N_w,N_n,N_u,N_h), \qquad \mathbf B_M\ne\mathbf0 \Longrightarrow \text{the fitted output is not derived parameter-free.} }$ The QTT result A public QTT source statement from 12 November 2025, before the Gosling preprint, already required complete reset to erase distributed record support beyond the visible carrier. That statement contains no Gosling-fitted rate, hidden-mode count, target window, or trajectory coefficient. The resulting comparative verdict is $\boxed{ \texttt{QTT-ZERO-FIT-SOURCE-EXPLANATORY-VICTORY} \;/\; \texttt{TRAJECTORY-VERDICT-OPEN}. }$ This is a scientific victory at the source/ontology layer, not a claim that QTT has already predicted the same resolved qubit trajectory. The stronger same-observable verdict remains locked because the public archive does not independently provide the residual record fidelity $F_{\rm res}$ , leakage diagnostic $D$ , timing complement $\mathcal U_T$ , or physical intertwiner $W$ . The paper prints the exact next experiment that would close or falsify that bridge. Reproducibility 11,009 row-level held-out results are included. The 840 traces favoring or tying the memoryless camera are retained. No false significance is assigned to correlated sweep windows. All three official archive objects pass their published MD5 checks. The release verifier passes 30/30 scientific and provenance checks. Three adversarial reviews cover observable equality, leakage and selection, chronology, and claim scope. Version: 1.4 Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21902886 Author: Ali Attar Website: quantumtraction.org Reader anchors Completed-record timing blind test Dynamic-circuit record-timing extension Observation as Access Quantum Traction Theory: Main Book Gosling public data archive The PDF is the default preview. The reconstruction archive contains the LaTeX source, row-level CSV, public-data integrity receipt, chronology certificate, fit-burden certificate, analysis scripts, exact source checks, adversarial and render audits, metadata, and checksum manifest.A timing signature is not physics until its reference operator survives a representation audit. \[ \boxed{ \mathcal C_V^\star=F_R^2, \qquad \mathcal U_T^\star=1-F_R^2, \qquad \mathcal C_V^\star+\mathcal U_T^\star=1 } \] This framework separates three objects that must not be merged: a completed historical event, the record support still accessible to a laboratory, and a separately calibrated timing observable. Standard quantum theory closes the optimized coherent-recovery envelope. QTT adds a distinct, falsifiable timing complement only after a physical intertwining certificate proves that the laboratory record operator and the central timing projector are the same physical object in two representations. A public 11,009-trace test of explanatory burden Version 1.4 executes the complete usable public archive associated with Gosling et al., Probing the memory of a superconducting qubit environment. Every trace is split chronologically into training, a discarded guard interval, and held-out testing. The ordinary one-TLS Solomon camera learns two rates per trace, while the memoryless comparator learns one. \[ \boxed{ \operatorname{median}\!\left( \frac{\mathrm{RMSE}_{0}-\mathrm{RMSE}_{\rm TLS}} {\mathrm{RMSE}_{0}} \right)=0.36015, \qquad P(\mathrm{TLS\ wins})=\frac{10{,}169}{11{,}009}=0.92370 } \] The fitted TLS camera is therefore a successful held-out effective model. Its resolved trajectory is not a parameter-free derivation: the values of $\Gamma_q$ and $\Gamma_{qt}$ are learned from each target-bearing trace's training segment. Version 1.4 makes that distinction machine-auditable through the target-fit burden vector \[ \boxed{ \mathbf B_M=(N_c,N_d,N_w,N_n,N_u,N_h), \qquad \mathbf B_M\ne\mathbf0 \Longrightarrow \text{the fitted output is not derived parameter-free.} } \] The QTT result A public QTT source statement from 12 November 2025, before the Gosling preprint, already required complete reset to erase distributed record support beyond the visible carrier. That statement contains no Gosling-fitted rate, hidden-mode count, target window, or trajectory coefficient. The resulting comparative verdict is \[ \boxed{ \texttt{QTT-ZERO-FIT-SOURCE-EXPLANATORY-VICTORY} \;/\; \texttt{TRAJECTORY-VERDICT-OPEN}. } \] This is a scientific victory at the source/ontology layer, not a claim that QTT has already predicted the same resolved qubit trajectory. The stronger same-observable verdict remains locked because the public archive does not independently provide the residual record fidelity $F_{\rm res}$, leakage diagnostic $D$, timing complement $\mathcal U_T$, or physical intertwiner $W$. The paper prints the exact next experiment that would close or falsify that bridge. Reproducibility 11,009 row-level held-out results are included. The 840 traces favoring or tying the memoryless camera are retained. No false significance is assigned to correlated sweep windows. All three official archive objects pass their published MD5 checks. The release verifier passes 30/30 scientific and provenance checks. Three adversarial reviews cover observable equality, leakage and selection, chronology, and claim scope. Version: 1.4 Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21902886 Author: Ali Attar Website: quantumtraction.org Reader anchors Completed-record timing blind test Dynamic-circuit record-timing extension Observation as Access Quantum Traction Theory: Main Book Gosling public data archive The PDF is the default preview. The reconstruction archive contains the LaTeX source, row-level CSV, public-data integrity receipt, chronology certificate, fit-burden certificate, analysis scripts, exact source checks, adversarial and render audits, metadata, and checksum manifest.

Aug 12, 20262 citations

Paper 32B: CHSH Evaluation of the Alice/Bob Timing Continua Real-Valued Correlators, Corridor Gating, and Window Dependence

Sarnowski, Michael

Paper 32B analyzes the public Weihs Alice/Bob archive with a focus on separating timing diagnostics from setting-resolved Bell-test statistics. The bluesine data are used as a timing-acceptance lane, showing a finite timing continuum with a central peak near zero offset, shoulders near plus or minus 10 nanoseconds, and a flat far-offset baseline. As the coincidence half-window widens from 3 to 5 to 7 nanoseconds, total coincidences increase while aggregate parity decreases, showing the expected throughput-versus-contrast tradeoff. The paper keeps this timing analysis separate from Bell-sector claims because bluesine does not provide a recoverable settings timeline. For the CHSH benchmark, the paper uses the longdist32 Coincidence Evaluation report, which includes setting-resolved correlators. The reported value is S = 2.702 plus or minus 0.078, which is well above the classical bound of 2 and below the Tsirelson bound of about 2.828. Raw longdist32 timetag scans are used only as timing and ingestion sanity checks, not as an independent reconstruction of CHSH. The result is a reproducible audit framework that separates timing-continuum validation, report-based CHSH benchmarking, and future raw-event reconstruction. The paper does not claim a new Bell bound, a proof of Holosphere theory, or evidence for superdeterminism; it establishes a disciplined baseline for later setting-resolved and theory-specific tests.Paper 32B analyzes the public Weihs Alice/Bob archive with a focus on separating timing diagnostics from setting-resolved Bell-test statistics. The bluesine data are used as a timing-acceptance lane, showing a finite timing continuum with a central peak near zero offset, shoulders near plus or minus 10 nanoseconds, and a flat far-offset baseline. As the coincidence half-window widens from 3 to 5 to 7 nanoseconds, total coincidences increase while aggregate parity decreases, showing the expected throughput-versus-contrast tradeoff. The paper keeps this timing analysis separate from Bell-sector claims because bluesine does not provide a recoverable settings timeline. For the CHSH benchmark, the paper uses the longdist32 Coincidence Evaluation report, which includes setting-resolved correlators. The reported value is S = 2.702 plus or minus 0.078, which is well above the classical bound of 2 and below the Tsirelson bound of about 2.828. Raw longdist32 timetag scans are used only as timing and ingestion sanity checks, not as an independent reconstruction of CHSH. The result is a reproducible audit framework that separates timing-continuum validation, report-based CHSH benchmarking, and future raw-event reconstruction. The paper does not claim a new Bell bound, a proof of Holosphere theory, or evidence for superdeterminism; it establishes a disciplined baseline for later setting-resolved and theory-specific tests.

Dec 12, 20250 citations

Paper 32A: Timing Continua Meet Symmetry Selection From Weihs Peak–Shoulder–Cutoff to a T4–Math Selector on S2

Sarnowski, Michael

Paper 32A audits finite timing-continuum structure in the public Weihs Alice/Bob archive and explains why the coincidence-counting rule matters. Using the bluesine series, the paper reconstructs timing profiles for coincidence half-windows of 3, 5, and 7 nanoseconds. The profiles show a central timing peak near zero offset, shoulders near plus or minus 10 nanoseconds, and a flat far-offset baseline. A central result is that one-to-one matching and all-pairs matching require different statistics. Under one-to-one matching, each event is used at most once, so window parity remains a meaningful summary. Under all-pairs matching, the central bin can grow combinatorially because many Alice events can pair with many Bob events inside the same window. In that case, parity at zero offset can become misleading. The paper therefore replaces parity-at-zero with a full-profile shape statistic: a baseline plus three fixed spikes at zero and plus or minus 10 nanoseconds. The paper also presents a declared calibration model on S2 using a rail-squared target density. Because the selector equation explicitly relaxes toward this target, convergence is treated as a contractivity and calibration-stability check, not as an independent derivation of the target from the Weihs data. This paper does not claim a complete Bell-test analysis or a direct physical identification of Weihs events with the S2 selector. Its contribution is narrower: it establishes timing-profile governance, kernel-dependent statistic selection, and a reproducible calibration scaffold for future setting-resolved and null-model tests.Paper 32A audits finite timing-continuum structure in the public Weihs Alice/Bob archive and explains why the coincidence-counting rule matters. Using the bluesine series, the paper reconstructs timing profiles for coincidence half-windows of 3, 5, and 7 nanoseconds. The profiles show a central timing peak near zero offset, shoulders near plus or minus 10 nanoseconds, and a flat far-offset baseline. A central result is that one-to-one matching and all-pairs matching require different statistics. Under one-to-one matching, each event is used at most once, so window parity remains a meaningful summary. Under all-pairs matching, the central bin can grow combinatorially because many Alice events can pair with many Bob events inside the same window. In that case, parity at zero offset can become misleading. The paper therefore replaces parity-at-zero with a full-profile shape statistic: a baseline plus three fixed spikes at zero and plus or minus 10 nanoseconds. The paper also presents a declared calibration model on S2 using a rail-squared target density. Because the selector equation explicitly relaxes toward this target, convergence is treated as a contractivity and calibration-stability check, not as an independent derivation of the target from the Weihs data. This paper does not claim a complete Bell-test analysis or a direct physical identification of Weihs events with the S2 selector. Its contribution is narrower: it establishes timing-profile governance, kernel-dependent statistic selection, and a reproducible calibration scaffold for future setting-resolved and null-model tests.

Dec 5, 20250 citations

How Clean Are Bell-Test Data? Classical Routes to S > 2, the Synchronisation Question, and an Auditability Standard

Dmitrii Stanislavovich Losinets, Viacheslav Agafurov

The reported violations of Bell inequalities are routinely read as an experimental refutation of local realism. This preprint asks how firmly the record supports that reading. We catalogue the classical routes by which a strictly local apparatus can report |S| > 2 - from outcome-dependent loss and coincidence-window selection (demonstrated in hardware) to synchronisation, electronics-level click shifts and analysis-parameter selection - and show that below the Eberhard efficiency the exact quantum correlation curve certifies nothing, being reproduced exactly by a known local detection model. We then define the first family-level synchronisation audit (plateau membership, bias index, sub-bound fraction), validate it on synthetic data with known ground truth, and execute it under preregistered protocols on three public archives. The raw Innsbruck record passes: across the full longdist series, every standard-configuration violation is a property of the raw data, not of the calibration. On the Delft event-ready data, a 50,000-member heralding-acceptance family answers the standing postselection critique: the violation is generic, not an acceptance choice. On the NIST 2015 record, an outsider reconstruction of the certified pipeline recovers the Bell geometry and gate optima but stalls at undisclosed cleaning parameters - a documented limit of third-party reproducibility. The programme distils into seven cleanliness criteria (C1–C7) for any dataset and eight provenance requirements (M1–M8) for future experiments. All figures and numbers are reproducible from the supplementary scripts (deterministic, fixed seeds, minutes on a laptop); raw data are fetched from the official public archives.The reported violations of Bell inequalities are routinely read as an experimental refutation of local realism. This preprint asks how firmly the record supports that reading. We catalogue the classical routes by which a strictly local apparatus can report |S| > 2 - from outcome-dependent loss and coincidence-window selection (demonstrated in hardware) to synchronisation, electronics-level click shifts and analysis-parameter selection - and show that below the Eberhard efficiency the exact quantum correlation curve certifies nothing, being reproduced exactly by a known local detection model. We then define the first family-level synchronisation audit (plateau membership, bias index, sub-bound fraction), validate it on synthetic data with known ground truth, and execute it under preregistered protocols on three public archives. The raw Innsbruck record passes: across the full longdist series, every standard-configuration violation is a property of the raw data, not of the calibration. On the Delft event-ready data, a 50,000-member heralding-acceptance family answers the standing postselection critique: the violation is generic, not an acceptance choice. On the NIST 2015 record, an outsider reconstruction of the certified pipeline recovers the Bell geometry and gate optima but stalls at undisclosed cleaning parameters - a documented limit of third-party reproducibility. The programme distils into seven cleanliness criteria (C1–C7) for any dataset and eight provenance requirements (M1–M8) for future experiments. All figures and numbers are reproducible from the supplementary scripts (deterministic, fixed seeds, minutes on a laptop); raw data are fetched from the official public archives.

Jul 8, 20260 citations

Artian's Completed-Event Bell Reconstruction: Real Source Geometry, Access, and Durable Records

Attar Ali

From a finite event record to Bell correlations and their loss under recording A pair is prepared together, read at two separated instruments, and allowed to leave a material record. This paper builds the correlation law from a real source geometry in Artian's Quantum Traction Theory. Its source-to-access equation is $\boxed{p_K(r,s\mid\mathbf a,\mathbf b)=\frac{C\!\left[(\Pi_r(\mathbf a)\otimes\Pi_s(\mathbf b)\otimes I)K\Omega\right]}{C(K\Omega)}}$ Here C is an additive, basis-invariant event capacity, Omega is the normalized orientation-neutral two-channel source, K is a specified record contact, and the projectors select the two instrument outputs. A real quarter-turn and a qualified shared-reference composition generate the readout algebra. Capacity symmetry fixes its quadratic weight. A separately stated capacity-to-frequency condition connects that weight to laboratory counts. The correlation follows before the Bell comparison For a phase-compensated record contact with overlap g between its two normalized record profiles, the construction gives $E_K(\mathbf a,\mathbf b)=-a_zb_z-g(a_xb_x+a_yb_y),\qquad 0\leq g\leq1.$ The intact-source limit is E = -a dot b. The same calculation yields the fixed-setting and optimized Bell responses: $\boxed{S_{45}=\sqrt{2}(1+g),\qquad S_{\mathrm{opt}}=2\sqrt{1+g^2}.}$ Fresh independent record contacts multiply their overlaps. The paper derives the repeated-contact law, a capacity-based overlap calibration, uncertainty bounds, and a protocol that separates calibration from the Bell observations being judged. A source-first account with an explicit dependency map A1 supplies event-time labels and the clock-angle correspondence; A4 supplies the real dial; A5-X supplies completed-event support, with its inherited A6/A7 conditions. The two-channel preparation, balanced composition, capacity symmetry, frequency bridge, and record coupling are printed separately. Each theorem states exactly which conditions it uses. The Access uncertainty commutator is treated as a distinct inherited algebraic premise, rather than inferred from Bell correlations. When a receiver follows the source Version 2.0 constructs a matched receiver rather than assigning its transformation by name. Preserving every probability of the stated bilinear contact forces its transport to be the conjugate of the source transport, up to an overall phase: $\boxed{|r^{\mathrm T}V^{\mathrm T}Us|^2=|r^{\mathrm T}s|^2\ \text{for all }r,s\quad\Longrightarrow\quad V=e^{i\alpha}\overline U.}$ A finite set of basis and sum probes certifies this relation. A robust extension converts imperfect probe probabilities into an operator-error bound. Finite clock and shift operations then produce the comparison loop $\boxed{\mathcal L=M+\omega(I-M),\qquad \omega=e^{2\pi i/d}.}$ The matched sector cancels the comparison phase while the unmatched sector retains it. This is a joint comparison law; each local readout can remain incompatible. The paper identifies the binary loop's ambiguity, provides additional probes that distinguish it, and transfers the Bell correlations into a complete detector record when the original carrier is consumed. One contact, two observable roles A specified marker contact supplies both the Bell record overlap and a resolved weak-measurement instrument: $\begin{aligned}\gamma&=\sin\theta,\\K_0&=\operatorname{diag}(\cos(\theta/2),\sin(\theta/2)),\\K_1&=\operatorname{diag}(\sin(\theta/2),\cos(\theta/2)).\end{aligned}$ An independent replay executes this instrument on all 40,032 tree records in the public Feng and colleagues archive, reproducing every stored decoder success/failure score. The main five-setting batch contains 32,000 records; the complete archive has six settings. The reproduced job-cluster residual probabilities are p = 0.0188753 and p = 0.0442603, respectively. These diagnose modest tension with the ideal instrument under the stated retrospective covariance. The matched QTT and quantum representations make the same archival predictions, so this replay is not a significance test between them. The package preserves the complete source-first Bell construction and adds finite receiver certificates, physical transport-error bounds, a common-contact derivation, five vector figures, a twelve-item achievements ledger, and offline reproducibility materials. The next operational question is precise: which independently qualified physical contact fixes both the record overlap and the receiver comparison response? Dependencies: QTT Main Book; finite address-capacity counting; real source histories and composition; A1-CHSH spinor character; Observation as Access.From a finite event record to Bell correlations and their loss under recording A pair is prepared together, read at two separated instruments, and allowed to leave a material record. This paper builds the correlation law from a real source geometry in Artian's Quantum Traction Theory. Its source-to-access equation is \[\boxed{p_K(r,s\mid\mathbf a,\mathbf b)=\frac{C\!\left[(\Pi_r(\mathbf a)\otimes\Pi_s(\mathbf b)\otimes I)K\Omega\right]}{C(K\Omega)}}\] Here C is an additive, basis-invariant event capacity, Omega is the normalized orientation-neutral two-channel source, K is a specified record contact, and the projectors select the two instrument outputs. A real quarter-turn and a qualified shared-reference composition generate the readout algebra. Capacity symmetry fixes its quadratic weight. A separately stated capacity-to-frequency condition connects that weight to laboratory counts. The correlation follows before the Bell comparison For a phase-compensated record contact with overlap g between its two normalized record profiles, the construction gives \[E_K(\mathbf a,\mathbf b)=-a_zb_z-g(a_xb_x+a_yb_y),\qquad 0\leq g\leq1.\] The intact-source limit is E = -a dot b. The same calculation yields the fixed-setting and optimized Bell responses: \[\boxed{S_{45}=\sqrt{2}(1+g),\qquad S_{\mathrm{opt}}=2\sqrt{1+g^2}.}\] Fresh independent record contacts multiply their overlaps. The paper derives the repeated-contact law, a capacity-based overlap calibration, uncertainty bounds, and a protocol that separates calibration from the Bell observations being judged. A source-first account with an explicit dependency map A1 supplies event-time labels and the clock-angle correspondence; A4 supplies the real dial; A5-X supplies completed-event support, with its inherited A6/A7 conditions. The two-channel preparation, balanced composition, capacity symmetry, frequency bridge, and record coupling are printed separately. Each theorem states exactly which conditions it uses. The Access uncertainty commutator is treated as a distinct inherited algebraic premise, rather than inferred from Bell correlations. When a receiver follows the source Version 2.0 constructs a matched receiver rather than assigning its transformation by name. Preserving every probability of the stated bilinear contact forces its transport to be the conjugate of the source transport, up to an overall phase: \[\boxed{|r^{\mathrm T}V^{\mathrm T}Us|^2=|r^{\mathrm T}s|^2\ \text{for all }r,s\quad\Longrightarrow\quad V=e^{i\alpha}\overline U.}\] A finite set of basis and sum probes certifies this relation. A robust extension converts imperfect probe probabilities into an operator-error bound. Finite clock and shift operations then produce the comparison loop \[\boxed{\mathcal L=M+\omega(I-M),\qquad \omega=e^{2\pi i/d}.}\] The matched sector cancels the comparison phase while the unmatched sector retains it. This is a joint comparison law; each local readout can remain incompatible. The paper identifies the binary loop's ambiguity, provides additional probes that distinguish it, and transfers the Bell correlations into a complete detector record when the original carrier is consumed. One contact, two observable roles A specified marker contact supplies both the Bell record overlap and a resolved weak-measurement instrument: \[\begin{aligned}\gamma&=\sin\theta,\\K_0&=\operatorname{diag}(\cos(\theta/2),\sin(\theta/2)),\\K_1&=\operatorname{diag}(\sin(\theta/2),\cos(\theta/2)).\end{aligned}\] An independent replay executes this instrument on all 40,032 tree records in the public Feng and colleagues archive, reproducing every stored decoder success/failure score. The main five-setting batch contains 32,000 records; the complete archive has six settings. The reproduced job-cluster residual probabilities are p = 0.0188753 and p = 0.0442603, respectively. These diagnose modest tension with the ideal instrument under the stated retrospective covariance. The matched QTT and quantum representations make the same archival predictions, so this replay is not a significance test between them. The package preserves the complete source-first Bell construction and adds finite receiver certificates, physical transport-error bounds, a common-contact derivation, five vector figures, a twelve-item achievements ledger, and offline reproducibility materials. The next operational question is precise: which independently qualified physical contact fixes both the record overlap and the receiver comparison response? Dependencies: QTT Main Book; finite address-capacity counting; real source histories and composition; A1-CHSH spinor character; Observation as Access.

Sep 25, 20262 citations

Bell Audit v5: How Binarization and Pairing Semantics Shape CHSH Headlines

Hui Wang

This deposit provides a professional Bell audit rewrite based on the Apr-29 v4 evidence package and is designed for reviewer-level traceability. Key quantitative findings on a fixed event stream: Binarization shift: S_raw(continuous) = 1.117683 vs S_raw(quant_2) = 2.297779. Semantic premium staircase: same_index = 2.329417, external_bucket_all = 2.775687 (+0.446270), event_anchor_nearest = 2.834670 (+0.058983). Closure checks: same_index_not_near_2p82 = True, pure_bucket_in_2p8_zone = True, anchor_asymmetry_small = True (delta_abs = 0.001356), edge_sensitivity_bounded = True. Experimental principle and method: Principle: CHSH headline values can be altered by representation and inclusion rules even when the underlying row/event stream is unchanged. Method chain: same data -> quantization choice -> pairing semantics -> denominator inclusion policy -> CHSH report. Scope: methodological reproducibility and protocol sensitivity audit. Not claimed: ontology-final conclusion or direct falsification of all competing theories. Primary manuscripts: papers_final/05_Bell_Audit/version_01/【0】_Bell_Audit/files/01_Bell_Audit_Professional_CN.md papers_final/05_Bell_Audit/version_01/【0】_Bell_Audit/files/02_Bell_Audit_Professional_EN.md Reproducibility Run from repository root: python scripts/explore/nist_same_index_quantization_sweep_v4.py python scripts/explore/nist_unified_semantics_audit_v4.py python scripts/explore/nist_revival_20pct_closure_v4.pyThis deposit provides a professional Bell audit rewrite based on the Apr-29 v4 evidence package and is designed for reviewer-level traceability. Key quantitative findings on a fixed event stream: Binarization shift: S_raw(continuous) = 1.117683 vs S_raw(quant_2) = 2.297779. Semantic premium staircase: same_index = 2.329417, external_bucket_all = 2.775687 (+0.446270), event_anchor_nearest = 2.834670 (+0.058983). Closure checks: same_index_not_near_2p82 = True, pure_bucket_in_2p8_zone = True, anchor_asymmetry_small = True (delta_abs = 0.001356), edge_sensitivity_bounded = True. Experimental principle and method: Principle: CHSH headline values can be altered by representation and inclusion rules even when the underlying row/event stream is unchanged. Method chain: same data -> quantization choice -> pairing semantics -> denominator inclusion policy -> CHSH report. Scope: methodological reproducibility and protocol sensitivity audit. Not claimed: ontology-final conclusion or direct falsification of all competing theories. Primary manuscripts: papers_final/05_Bell_Audit/version_01/【0】_Bell_Audit/files/01_Bell_Audit_Professional_CN.md papers_final/05_Bell_Audit/version_01/【0】_Bell_Audit/files/02_Bell_Audit_Professional_EN.md Reproducibility Run from repository root: python scripts/explore/nist_same_index_quantization_sweep_v4.py python scripts/explore/nist_unified_semantics_audit_v4.py python scripts/explore/nist_revival_20pct_closure_v4.py

Apr 30, 20260 citations

A timing signature is not physics until its reference operator survives a representation audit.

\boxed{ \mathcal C_V^\star=F_R^2, \qquad \mathcal U_T^\star=1-F_R^2, \qquad \mathcal C_V^\star+\mathcal U_T^\star=1 }

This framework separates three objects that must not be merged: a completed historical event, the record support still accessible to a laboratory, and a separately calibrated timing observable. Standard quantum theory closes the optimized coherent-recovery envelope. QTT adds a distinct, falsifiable timing complement only after a physical intertwining certificate proves that the laboratory record operator and the central timing projector are the same physical object in two representations. A public 11,009-trace test of explanatory burden Version 1.4 executes the complete usable public archive associated with Gosling et al., Probing the memory of a superconducting qubit environment. Every trace is split chronologically into training, a discarded guard interval, and held-out testing. The ordinary one-TLS Solomon camera learns two rates per trace, while the memoryless comparator learns one.

\boxed{ \operatorname{median}\!\left( \frac{\mathrm{RMSE}_{0}-\mathrm{RMSE}_{\rm TLS}} {\mathrm{RMSE}_{0}} \right)=0.36015, \qquad P(\mathrm{TLS\ wins})=\frac{10{,}169}{11{,}009}=0.92370 }

The fitted TLS camera is therefore a successful held-out effective model. Its resolved trajectory is not a parameter-free derivation: the values of

\Gamma_q

and

\Gamma_{qt}

are learned from each target-bearing trace's training segment. Version 1.4 makes that distinction machine-auditable through the target-fit burden vector

\boxed{ \mathbf B_M=(N_c,N_d,N_w,N_n,N_u,N_h), \qquad \mathbf B_M\ne\mathbf0 \Longrightarrow \text{the fitted output is not derived parameter-free.} }

The QTT result A public QTT source statement from 12 November 2025, before the Gosling preprint, already required complete reset to erase distributed record support beyond the visible carrier. That statement contains no Gosling-fitted rate, hidden-mode count, target window, or trajectory coefficient. The resulting comparative verdict is

\boxed{ \texttt{QTT-ZERO-FIT-SOURCE-EXPLANATORY-VICTORY} \;/\; \texttt{TRAJECTORY-VERDICT-OPEN}. }

This is a scientific victory at the source/ontology layer, not a claim that QTT has already predicted the same resolved qubit trajectory. The stronger same-observable verdict remains locked because the public archive does not independently provide the residual record fidelity

F_{\rm res}

, leakage diagnostic

D

, timing complement

\mathcal U_T

, or physical intertwiner

W

. The paper prints the exact next experiment that would close or falsify that bridge. Reproducibility 11,009 row-level held-out results are included. The 840 traces favoring or tying the memoryless camera are retained. No false significance is assigned to correlated sweep windows. All three official archive objects pass their published MD5 checks. The release verifier passes 30/30 scientific and provenance checks. Three adversarial reviews cover observable equality, leakage and selection, chronology, and claim scope. Version: 1.4 Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21902886 Author: Ali Attar Website: quantumtraction.org Reader anchors Completed-record timing blind test Dynamic-circuit record-timing extension Observation as Access Quantum Traction Theory: Main Book Gosling public data archive The PDF is the default preview. The reconstruction archive contains the LaTeX source, row-level CSV, public-data integrity receipt, chronology certificate, fit-burden certificate, analysis scripts, exact source checks, adversarial and render audits, metadata, and checksum manifest.

\boxed{p_K(r,s\mid\mathbf a,\mathbf b)=\frac{C\!\left[(\Pi_r(\mathbf a)\otimes\Pi_s(\mathbf b)\otimes I)K\Omega\right]}{C(K\Omega)}}

Here C is an additive, basis-invariant event capacity, Omega is the normalized orientation-neutral two-channel source, K is a specified record contact, and the projectors select the two instrument outputs. A real quarter-turn and a qualified shared-reference composition generate the readout algebra. Capacity symmetry fixes its quadratic weight. A separately stated capacity-to-frequency condition connects that weight to laboratory counts. The correlation follows before the Bell comparison For a phase-compensated record contact with overlap g between its two normalized record profiles, the construction gives

E_K(\mathbf a,\mathbf b)=-a_zb_z-g(a_xb_x+a_yb_y),\qquad 0\leq g\leq1.

The intact-source limit is E = -a dot b. The same calculation yields the fixed-setting and optimized Bell responses:

\boxed{S_{45}=\sqrt{2}(1+g),\qquad S_{\mathrm{opt}}=2\sqrt{1+g^2}.}

Fresh independent record contacts multiply their overlaps. The paper derives the repeated-contact law, a capacity-based overlap calibration, uncertainty bounds, and a protocol that separates calibration from the Bell observations being judged. A source-first account with an explicit dependency map A1 supplies event-time labels and the clock-angle correspondence; A4 supplies the real dial; A5-X supplies completed-event support, with its inherited A6/A7 conditions. The two-channel preparation, balanced composition, capacity symmetry, frequency bridge, and record coupling are printed separately. Each theorem states exactly which conditions it uses. The Access uncertainty commutator is treated as a distinct inherited algebraic premise, rather than inferred from Bell correlations. When a receiver follows the source Version 2.0 constructs a matched receiver rather than assigning its transformation by name. Preserving every probability of the stated bilinear contact forces its transport to be the conjugate of the source transport, up to an overall phase:

\boxed{|r^{\mathrm T}V^{\mathrm T}Us|^2=|r^{\mathrm T}s|^2\ \text{for all }r,s\quad\Longrightarrow\quad V=e^{i\alpha}\overline U.}

A finite set of basis and sum probes certifies this relation. A robust extension converts imperfect probe probabilities into an operator-error bound. Finite clock and shift operations then produce the comparison loop

\boxed{\mathcal L=M+\omega(I-M),\qquad \omega=e^{2\pi i/d}.}

The matched sector cancels the comparison phase while the unmatched sector retains it. This is a joint comparison law; each local readout can remain incompatible. The paper identifies the binary loop's ambiguity, provides additional probes that distinguish it, and transfers the Bell correlations into a complete detector record when the original carrier is consumed. One contact, two observable roles A specified marker contact supplies both the Bell record overlap and a resolved weak-measurement instrument:

\begin{aligned}\gamma&=\sin\theta,\\K_0&=\operatorname{diag}(\cos(\theta/2),\sin(\theta/2)),\\K_1&=\operatorname{diag}(\sin(\theta/2),\cos(\theta/2)).\end{aligned}

An independent replay executes this instrument on all 40,032 tree records in the public Feng and colleagues archive, reproducing every stored decoder success/failure score. The main five-setting batch contains 32,000 records; the complete archive has six settings. The reproduced job-cluster residual probabilities are p = 0.0188753 and p = 0.0442603, respectively. These diagnose modest tension with the ideal instrument under the stated retrospective covariance. The matched QTT and quantum representations make the same archival predictions, so this replay is not a significance test between them. The package preserves the complete source-first Bell construction and adds finite receiver certificates, physical transport-error bounds, a common-contact derivation, five vector figures, a twelve-item achievements ledger, and offline reproducibility materials. The next operational question is precise: which independently qualified physical contact fixes both the record overlap and the receiver comparison response? Dependencies: QTT Main Book; finite address-capacity counting; real source histories and composition; A1-CHSH spinor character; Observation as Access.