Paper 32A audits finite timing-continuum structure in the public Weihs Alice/Bob archive and explains why the coincidence-counting rule matters. Using the bluesine series, the paper reconstructs timing profiles for coincidence half-windows of 3, 5, and 7 nanoseconds. The profiles show a central timing peak near zero offset, shoulders near plus or minus 10 nanoseconds, and a flat far-offset baseline. A central result is that one-to-one matching and all-pairs matching require different statistics. Under one-to-one matching, each event is used at most once, so window parity remains a meaningful summary. Under all-pairs matching, the central bin can grow combinatorially because many Alice events can pair with many Bob events inside the same window. In that case, parity at zero offset can become misleading. The paper therefore replaces parity-at-zero with a full-profile shape statistic: a baseline plus three fixed spikes at zero and plus or minus 10 nanoseconds. The paper also presents a declared calibration model on S2 using a rail-squared target density. Because the selector equation explicitly relaxes toward this target, convergence is treated as a contractivity and calibration-stability check, not as an independent derivation of the target from the Weihs data. This paper does not claim a complete Bell-test analysis or a direct physical identification of Weihs events with the S2 selector. Its contribution is narrower: it establishes timing-profile governance, kernel-dependent statistic selection, and a reproducible calibration scaffold for future setting-resolved and null-model tests.
Paper 32A audits finite timing-continuum structure in the public Weihs Alice/Bob archive and explains why the coincidence-counting rule matters. Using the bluesine series, the paper reconstructs timing profiles for coincidence half-windows of 3, 5, and 7 nanoseconds. The profiles show a central timing peak near zero offset, shoulders near plus or minus 10 nanoseconds, and a flat far-offset baseline. A central result is that one-to-one matching and all-pairs matching require different statistics. Under one-to-one matching, each event is used at most once, so window parity remains a meaningful summary. Under all-pairs matching, the central bin can grow combinatorially because many Alice events can pair with many Bob events inside the same window. In that case, parity at zero offset can become misleading. The paper therefore replaces parity-at-zero with a full-profile shape statistic: a baseline plus three fixed spikes at zero and plus or minus 10 nanoseconds. The paper also presents a declared calibration model on S2 using a rail-squared target density. Because the selector equation explicitly relaxes toward this target, convergence is treated as a contractivity and calibration-stability check, not as an independent derivation of the target from the Weihs data. This paper does not claim a complete Bell-test analysis or a direct physical identification of Weihs events with the S2 selector. Its contribution is narrower: it establishes timing-profile governance, kernel-dependent statistic selection, and a reproducible calibration scaffold for future setting-resolved and null-model tests.
Paper 32B analyzes the public Weihs Alice/Bob archive with a focus on separating timing diagnostics from setting-resolved Bell-test statistics. The bluesine data are used as a timing-acceptance lane, showing a finite timing continuum with a central peak near zero offset, shoulders near plus or minus 10 nanoseconds, and a flat far-offset baseline. As the coincidence half-window widens from 3 to 5 to 7 nanoseconds, total coincidences increase while aggregate parity decreases, showing the expected throughput-versus-contrast tradeoff. The paper keeps this timing analysis separate from Bell-sector claims because bluesine does not provide a recoverable settings timeline. For the CHSH benchmark, the paper uses the longdist32 Coincidence Evaluation report, which includes setting-resolved correlators. The reported value is S = 2.702 plus or minus 0.078, which is well above the classical bound of 2 and below the Tsirelson bound of about 2.828. Raw longdist32 timetag scans are used only as timing and ingestion sanity checks, not as an independent reconstruction of CHSH. The result is a reproducible audit framework that separates timing-continuum validation, report-based CHSH benchmarking, and future raw-event reconstruction. The paper does not claim a new Bell bound, a proof of Holosphere theory, or evidence for superdeterminism; it establishes a disciplined baseline for later setting-resolved and theory-specific tests.
Public photon Bell-test records retain timing structure that is lost in aggregate statistics. This paper tests whether that structure survives quantitative response controls in three experimental archives. In the Weihs data, a rectangular contrast of four channel-pair timing centroids tests whether accepted signal delays can be written as a sum of local channel contributions. For longdist1, the contrast is 1.405 ns and 1.515 ns in disjoint chronological halves, with pointwise 95% block intervals [1.018, 1.791] ns and [1.193, 1.836] ns. Both survive the enumerated centroid scan under the specified 20-block inference at an 8-ns coincidence half-width and remain positive under clock, background, and gate checks. A flexible empirical timing model, however, transfers between chronological halves after clock-drift calibration. In the Christensen archive, the suppressed setting-pair channel is strongly enriched in coincidence tails, but a cross-fitted signal–accidental model predicts 714.6 of 730 counts beyond 300 ns; the residual is 15.4 counts with interval [−54.6, 85.3]. NIST timing-offset records exhibit a terminal-mask excess accompanied by an Alice-side singles-rate change and compatible with a separately calibrated local-setting mixture. The evidence separates reproducible structure, failure of an additive accepted-centroid model, and effects accommodated by explicit response controls. Finite coincidence selection and known switching-related populations prevent the centroid contrast alone from establishing intrinsic polarization–time coupling or a failure of quantum theory. Statistical scope. The analyses are exploratory. Coarser clustering weakens scan-adjusted significance: with ten blocks per half, the highlighted Weihs contrast has adjusted approximate p values of 0.087 and 0.014. The residual is specific to the accepted-centroid model and does not establish a discrepancy beyond all independently calibrated temporal-response models. Files and reproducibility. Bell_manuscript.pdf is the self-contained, 13-page preprint dated 30 October 2026. Bell_Reanalysis_Source.zip contains the editable LaTeX manuscript, numerical figure code, reconstruction and analysis scripts, derived records, source manifests and hashes, full comparison tables, calibration and sensitivity results, and reproduction instructions. The NIST analysis uses 60 prescribed samples of 500,000 trials, rather than complete runs. The full upstream Christensen archive and Weihs time-tag files are retrieved by the supplied fetchers and are not bundled. A clean internal rerun reproduced the checked numerical outputs exactly; external independent reproduction is not claimed. Publication status and assistance. This research preprint has not been peer reviewed. AI tools assisted programming, analysis, and manuscript preparation; responsibility for the work remains with the author. License scope. The manuscript and original figures are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. Original analysis code is licensed under MIT. Third-party source data and derived excerpts retain applicable source terms and attribution; this deposit does not relicense upstream material.
Paper 31B applies the Paper 31 activation protocol to a fast-switching, setting-explicit Bell-test dataset to test a discriminative corridor-gating claim: whether coincidence timing structure depends on setting compatibility itself, not only on detector identity or coincidence-window logic. Using NIST 2015 run3 raw server streams with explicit RNG-setting pulses and SYNC markers, we reconstruct per-trial settings, align Alice/Bob timebases via SYNC, and trialize the readout so each trial contributes at most one click per side (earliest click in a declared post-SYNC gate). We then compute setting-resolved coincidence curves C(τ∣A=a,B=b)C(\tau\mid A=a,B=b)C(τ∣A=a,B=b) for the four setting cells and the aggregates CORR(00+11) and ANTI(01+10), reporting audit-grade KPIs (τ\*\tau^\*τ\*, peak, τ50\tau_{50}τ50 bounds, knee width) under declared windows and scan ranges. On this dataset and scan domain, CORR and ANTI do not exhibit a decision-grade, policy-stable shape difference in timing-knee structure; the discriminator yields a constrained null at the stated resolution. The contribution is a governed, reproducible discriminator pipeline with concrete artifacts (curve CSVs, KPI table, manifest) that can be applied unchanged to other fast-switching datasets.
A timing signature is not physics until its reference operator survives a representation audit. CV⋆=FR2,UT⋆=1−FR2,CV⋆+UT⋆=1 This framework separates three objects that must not be merged: a completed historical event, the record support still accessible to a laboratory, and a separately calibrated timing observable. Standard quantum theory closes the optimized coherent-recovery envelope. QTT adds a distinct, falsifiable timing complement only after a physical intertwining certificate proves that the laboratory record operator and the central timing projector are the same physical object in two representations. A public 11,009-trace test of explanatory burden Version 1.4 executes the complete usable public archive associated with Gosling et al., Probing the memory of a superconducting qubit environment. Every trace is split chronologically into training, a discarded guard interval, and held-out testing. The ordinary one-TLS Solomon camera learns two rates per trace, while the memoryless comparator learns one. median(RMSE0RMSE0−RMSETLS)=0.36015,P(TLSwins)=11,00910,169=0.92370 The fitted TLS camera is therefore a successful held-out effective model. Its resolved trajectory is not a parameter-free derivation: the values of Γq and Γqt are learned from each target-bearing trace's training segment. Version 1.4 makes that distinction machine-auditable through the target-fit burden vector BM=(Nc,Nd,Nw,Nn,Nu,Nh),BM=0⟹the fitted output is not derived parameter-free. The QTT result A public QTT source statement from 12 November 2025, before the Gosling preprint, already required complete reset to erase distributed record support beyond the visible carrier. That statement contains no Gosling-fitted rate, hidden-mode count, target window, or trajectory coefficient. The resulting comparative verdict is QTT-ZERO-FIT-SOURCE-EXPLANATORY-VICTORY/TRAJECTORY-VERDICT-OPEN. This is a scientific victory at the source/ontology layer, not a claim that QTT has already predicted the same resolved qubit trajectory. The stronger same-observable verdict remains locked because the public archive does not independently provide the residual record fidelity Fres, leakage diagnostic D, timing complement UT, or physical intertwiner W. The paper prints the exact next experiment that would close or falsify that bridge. Reproducibility 11,009 row-level held-out results are included. The 840 traces favoring or tying the memoryless camera are retained. No false significance is assigned to correlated sweep windows. All three official archive objects pass their published MD5 checks. The release verifier passes 30/30 scientific and provenance checks. Three adversarial reviews cover observable equality, leakage and selection, chronology, and claim scope. Version: 1.4 Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21902886 Author: Ali Attar Website: quantumtraction.org Reader anchors Completed-record timing blind test Dynamic-circuit record-timing extension Observation as Access Quantum Traction Theory: Main Book Gosling public data archive The PDF is the default preview. The reconstruction archive contains the LaTeX source, row-level CSV, public-data integrity receipt, chronology certificate, fit-burden certificate, analysis scripts, exact source checks, adversarial and render audits, metadata, and checksum manifest.
From independently qualified work to one interaction and several observations LkerB={0}. When does a device's independently specified work already determine its interaction? In a finite affine constructor, the answer is exact: every unresolved calibration direction must disappear from the observable interaction. The paper proves necessity and sufficiency, constructs a dual certificate, and counts the additional linear probes needed when selection fails. The QTT source-to-contact construction connects geometry, supported work, mode participation and the actual electrode waveform to a single coupling. That same coupling predicts one-excitation transfer, two-excitation redistribution, phase response and parity controls. A finite future-memory theorem identifies what must remain in the retained packet so that later operations cannot reveal something the model discarded. For independently specified insertion magnitudes, the cross-occupation prediction is P11=cos2(FΘ),F2=f2,a2+f2,b2. For symmetric-slot modes, the corresponding frequency ratio obeys (2Ω1Ω2)2=1−2Ka1−2Kb1. Version 2.0 adds complete feasible-set selection, a harmonic three-dimensional drive, unequal-capacity transfer, and the full preparation-to-detector calculation. A cross-Kerr counterexample shows why a perfect one-excitation calibration alone cannot settle the two-excitation prediction. The package contains the manuscript, proofs, executable checks, synthetic examples and a reproducible audit of the public Hou trapped-ion tables. The selection and transfer results are proved within their stated finite classes. The canonical realization shares laboratory probabilities with matched microscopic quantum mechanics; finite-slot discrimination requires independently qualified physical capacities and instruments. The archive is a retrospective eligibility audit. The separate prospective test commits the measurement design before a laboratory supplies its physical capsule. Companion: Artian's Physical Contact Transfer Test. Source dependencies: Completed-Event Transport and Quantum Coherence; QTT Main Book. Independent experimental context: Hou et al., Nature Physics (2024). Browse the corpus. The main PDF is the preview; the ZIP contains the full reconstruction package.
Paper 31C applies the Paper 31B CORR/ANTI timing discriminator to the Delft event-ready Bell datasets as an independent, trial-native cross-check. Because Delft is recorded as one row per trial, the analysis avoids cross-party clock alignment and coincidence-window multi-match ambiguity that can obscure setting-resolved timing tests in continuous timetag logs. We test whether coincidence timing structure depends on setting compatibility itself by comparing CORR(00+11) to ANTI(01+10). To strengthen the discriminator beyond half-maximum knee widths, we use a robust timing-shape metric: the quantile width Q90–Q10 of residual timing r = dt − τ*, where dt = tB − tA is the per-trial timing difference and τ* maximizes acceptance under a declared half-window W ∈ {3,5,7}. Uncertainty is quantified by 50,000 bootstrap resamples per W. Across Delft 2015 and both Delft 2016 detector configurations, the bootstrap confidence intervals for the CORR/ANTI width difference include zero and the sign is not stable across W. The decision bundle therefore yields a constrained null on Delft at the stated resolution: no decision-grade, direction-stable CORR/ANTI timing-shape separation is detected under robust quantile-width metrics. The paper provides audit-grade artifacts (curve CSVs, bootstrap KPI tables, and manifests) to support independent reproduction and future timing-stress experiments.