Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Particle Physics

Maliki Javier Martinez

Published Jun 16, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Particle paths are skewed by a sea of gravitational waves. I snuck in lambda into this because I remembered reading about that theory a long time ago. And I enjoy pilot wave theory as well, I dont like quantum spookiness like Einstein. The physics is more straightforward in my head. The partial derivative of x with respect to y is the tradeoff between predictability of an object's path and size of an object. And I built some aspects of particle motion/interaction around it. I dont want to say more for fun.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.20709855

Related papers

Particle Physics

Maliki Javier Martinez

Particle paths are skewed by a sea of gravitational waves. I snuck in lambda into this because I remembered reading about that theory a long time ago. And I enjoy pilot wave theory as well, I dont like quantum spookiness like Einstein. The physics is more straightforward in my head. The partial derivative of x with respect to y is the tradeoff between predictability of an object's path and size of an object. And I built some aspects of particle motion/interaction around it. I dont want to say more for fun.

•Jun 16, 2026•0 citations

Many Particle Physics as a Quantum Field Theory

Gordon Walter Semenoff

Graduate texts in physics•Jan 1, 2023•0 citations

Shrodinger equation as particle distance from fundamental mode and bit array

Maliki Javier Martinez

Its getting very difficult to explain things without math..I just realized particles lock into a fixed position with bits every global tick and it makes the uncertainty principle solvable. And i decided that quantum probabilities could be distance from a bit in the bit lattice or from an eigenvalue and its frequency. I said that to myself a couple days ago and then asked chatgpt to do that chain rule the way it defined it just now. I saw lighting in the sky a few nights ago. I imagined that its zig zagging is because of the allowed paths through a bit lattice. Like cardinak directions, but with more directions. And the lighting is a bundle proportional to it's field strength..thats off the top of my head as well. Ill leave it as a prediction. Oh yeah..I was trying to model mass in my head and i saw bits can sit in between particles that are entangled to an object. I smiled at the partial derivative of Epsilon with respect to N and "spectral/informational geometry". I think I really need to let go of this now..im not thinking about it. I want to sleep and study more calculus..

•May 12, 2026•0 citations

Relativistic particle mechanics and Schrödinger’s quantum wave theory

James Murray Hill

Acta Mechanica•Dec 1, 2025•0 citations

Walking droplets, pilot waves, and word choices

Jeffery Winkler

After reading John Bush’s article “The new wave of pilot-wave theory” (Physics Today, August 2015, page 47), I want to remind readers of the limitations of the analogy. The oil-drop experiments provide a tangible partial analogue of the pilot-wave picture, but one that is restricted to single-particle phenomena. Such experiments cannot reproduce the types of phenomena that depend on entanglement; only in the case of a single particle does the wavefunction have the same mathematical form—a scalar function over space—as the waves in the oil.Once two particles are involved, the fact that the wavefunction is defined over the configuration space of the system rather than over physical space becomes crucial, and the partial analogy to the oil drops fails. In other words, the analogy does not extend to what most people consider the most interesting aspects of quantum mechanics.© 2016 American Institute of Physics.

Physics Today•Mar 31, 2016•1 citation

Particle Wave Function and Experimental Analysis Based on Relativity Theory

先金 吴

Modern Physics•Jan 1, 2018•2 citations
Particle paths are skewed by a sea of gravitational waves. I snuck in lambda into this because I remembered reading about that theory a long time ago. And I enjoy pilot wave theory as well, I dont like quantum spookiness like Einstein. The physics is more straightforward in my head. The partial derivative of x with respect to y is the tradeoff between predictability of an object's path and size of an object. And I built some aspects of particle motion/interaction around it. I dont want to say more for fun.
Particle paths are skewed by a sea of gravitational waves. I snuck in lambda into this because I remembered reading about that theory a long time ago. And I enjoy pilot wave theory as well, I dont like quantum spookiness like Einstein. The physics is more straightforward in my head. The partial derivative of x with respect to y is the tradeoff between predictability of an object's path and size of an object. And I built some aspects of particle motion/interaction around it. I dont want to say more for fun.
Its getting very difficult to explain things without math..I just realized particles lock into a fixed position with bits every global tick and it makes the uncertainty principle solvable. And i decided that quantum probabilities could be distance from a bit in the bit lattice or from an eigenvalue and its frequency. I said that to myself a couple days ago and then asked chatgpt to do that chain rule the way it defined it just now. I saw lighting in the sky a few nights ago. I imagined that its zig zagging is because of the allowed paths through a bit lattice. Like cardinak directions, but with more directions. And the lighting is a bundle proportional to it's field strength..thats off the top of my head as well. Ill leave it as a prediction. Oh yeah..I was trying to model mass in my head and i saw bits can sit in between particles that are entangled to an object. I smiled at the partial derivative of Epsilon with respect to N and "spectral/informational geometry". I think I really need to let go of this now..im not thinking about it. I want to sleep and study more calculus..
After reading John Bush’s article “The new wave of pilot-wave theory” (Physics Today, August 2015, page 47), I want to remind readers of the limitations of the analogy. The oil-drop experiments provide a tangible partial analogue of the pilot-wave picture, but one that is restricted to single-particle phenomena. Such experiments cannot reproduce the types of phenomena that depend on entanglement; only in the case of a single particle does the wavefunction have the same mathematical form—a scalar function over space—as the waves in the oil.Once two particles are involved, the fact that the wavefunction is defined over the configuration space of the system rather than over physical space becomes crucial, and the partial analogy to the oil drops fails. In other words, the analogy does not extend to what most people consider the most interesting aspects of quantum mechanics.© 2016 American Institute of Physics.