We study “Merlinized” versions of the recently defined Guided Local Hamiltonian problem, which we call “Guidable Local Hamiltonian” problems. Unlike their guided counterparts, these problems do not have a guiding state provided as a part of the input, but merely come with the promise that one exists. We consider in particular two classes of guiding states: those that can be prepared efficiently by a quantum circuit; and those belonging to a class of quantum states we call classically evaluatable, for which it is possible to efficiently compute expectation values of local observables classically. We show that guidable local Hamiltonian problems for both classes of guiding states are QCMA-complete in the inverse-polynomial precision setting, but lie within NP (or NqP) in the constant precision regime when the guiding state is classically evaluatable. Our completeness results show that, from a complexity-theoretic perspective, classical Ansätze selected by classical heuristics are just as powerful as quantum Ansätze prepared by quantum heuristics, as long as one has access to quantum phase estimation. In relation to the quantum PCP conjecture, we (i) define a complexity class capturing quantum-classical probabilistically checkable proof systems and show that it is contained in BQPNP[1] for constant proof queries; (ii) give a no-go result on “dequantizing” the known quantum reduction which maps a QPCP-verification circuit to a local Hamiltonian with constant promise gap; (iii) give several no-go results for the existence of quantum gap amplification procedures that preserve certain ground state properties; and (iv) propose two conjectures that can be viewed as stronger versions of the NLTS theorem. Finally, we show that many of our results can be directly modified to obtain similar results for the class MA.
We study “Merlinized” versions of the recently defined Guided Local Hamiltonian problem, which we call “Guidable Local Hamiltonian” problems. Unlike their guided counterparts, these problems do not have a guiding state provided as a part of the input, but merely come with the promise that one exists. We consider in particular two classes of guiding states: those that can be prepared efficiently by a quantum circuit; and those belonging to a class of quantum states we call classically evaluatable, for which it is possible to efficiently compute expectation values of local observables classically. We show that guidable local Hamiltonian problems for both classes of guiding states are QCMA-complete in the inverse-polynomial precision setting, but lie within NP (or NqP) in the constant precision regime when the guiding state is classically evaluatable. Our completeness results show that, from a complexity-theoretic perspective, classical Ansätze selected by classical heuristics are just as powerful as quantum Ansätze prepared by quantum heuristics, as long as one has access to quantum phase estimation. In relation to the quantum PCP conjecture, we (i) define a complexity class capturing quantum-classical probabilistically checkable proof systems and show that it is contained in BQPNP[1] for constant proof queries; (ii) give a no-go result on “dequantizing” the known quantum reduction which maps a QPCP-verification circuit to a local Hamiltonian with constant promise gap; (iii) give several no-go results for the existence of quantum gap amplification procedures that preserve certain ground state properties; and (iv) propose two conjectures that can be viewed as stronger versions of the NLTS theorem. Finally, we show that many of our results can be directly modified to obtain similar results for the class MA.
We study 'Merlinized' versions of the recently defined Guided Local Hamiltonian problem, which we call 'Guidable Local Hamiltonian' problems. Unlike their guided counterparts, these problems do not have a guiding state provided as a part of the input, but merely come with the promise that one exists. We consider in particular two classes of guiding states: those that can be prepared efficiently by a quantum circuit; and those belonging to a class of quantum states we call classically evaluatable, for which it is possible to efficiently compute expectation values of local observables classically. We show that guidable local Hamiltonian problems for both classes of guiding states are QCMA-complete in the inverse-polynomial precision setting, but lie within NP (or NqP) in the constant precision regime when the guiding state is classically evaluatable. Our completeness results show that, from a complexity-theoretic perspective, classical Ansätze selected by classical heuristics are just as powerful as quantum Ansätze prepared by quantum heuristics, as long as one has access to quantum phase estimation. In relation to the quantum PCP conjecture, we (i) define a complexity class capturing quantum-classical probabilistically checkable proof systems and show that it is contained in BQPNP[1] for constant proof queries; (ii) give a no-go result on 'dequantizing' the known quantum reduction which maps a QPCP-verification circuit to a local Hamiltonian with constant promise gap; (iii) give several no-go results for the existence of quantum gap amplification procedures that preserve certain ground state properties; and (iv) propose two conjectures that can be viewed as stronger versions of the NLTS theorem. Finally, we show that many of our results can be directly modified to obtain similar results for the class MA.
The quantum PCP conjecture is one of the major open problems in quantum complexity theory. It has resisted attack in part because many primitives used in the proof of the classical PCP theorem, such as locality-preserving gap amplification and alphabet reduction, have no obvious quantum analogues due to quantum no-cloning. Locality-preserving gap amplification is a procedure that takes as input a local Hamiltonian problem instance and produces a new instance with a larger promise gap, without increasing the locality of the Hamiltonian, and instead moderately increasing its local qudit dimension. Obtaining this kind of control over the locality during gap amplification is critical to the success of many known strategies for proving the classical PCP theorem. In this work, we put forth the first known viable template for quantum locality-preserving gap amplification, and we prove that our procedure amplifies the combinatorial gap of local Hamiltonians. Our work introduces a new framework for reasoning about quantum gap amplification in terms of fault-tolerant computation, and illuminates a route toward importing one of the central ingredients in classical PCPs into the quantum setting. In particular, we build upon ideas from the recent classical PCP of Bafna--Minzer--Vyas based on high-dimensional expanders, and the circuit-to-Hamiltonian construction of Anshu--Breuckmann--Nguyen, in addition to several recent advances in quantum coding theory.
We define a general formulation of quantum PCPs, which captures adaptivity and multiple unentangled provers, and give a detailed construction of the quantum reduction to a local Hamiltonian with a constant promise gap. The reduction turns out to be a versatile subroutine to prove properties of quantum PCPs, allowing us to show: (i) Non-adaptive quantum PCPs can simulate adaptive quantum PCPs when the number of proof queries is constant. In fact, this can even be shown to hold when the non-adaptive quantum PCP picks the proof indices simply uniformly at random from a subset of all possible index combinations, answering an open question by Aharonov, Arad, Landau and Vazirani (STOC '09). (ii) If the q -local Hamiltonian problem with constant promise gap can be solved in QCMA , then QPCP[q]⊆QCMA for any q∈O(1) . (iii) If QMA(k) has a quantum PCP for any k≤poly(n) , then QMA(2)=QMA , connecting two of the longest-standing open problems in quantum complexity theory. Moreover, we also show that there exist (quantum) oracles relative to which certain quantum PCP statements are false. Hence, any attempt to prove the quantum PCP conjecture requires, just as was the case for the classical PCP theorem, (quantumly) non-relativizing techniques.
The derandomization of MA, the probabilistic version of NP, is a long standing open question. In this work, we connect this problem to a variant of another major problem: the quantum PCP conjecture. Our connection goes through the surprising quantum characterization of MA by Bravyi and Terhal. They proved the MA-completeness of the problem of deciding whether the groundenergy of a uniform stoquastic local Hamiltonian is zero or inverse polynomial. We show that the gapped version of this problem, i.e. deciding if a given uniform stoquastic local Hamiltonian is frustration-free or has energy at least some constant ε, is in NP. Thus, if there exists a gap-amplification procedure for uniform stoquastic Local Hamiltonians (in analogy to the gap amplification procedure for constraint satisfaction problems in the original PCP theorem), then MA = NP (and vice versa). Furthermore, if this gap amplification procedure exhibits some additional (natural) properties, then P = RP. We feel this work opens up a rich set of new directions to explore, which might lead to progress on both quantum PCP and derandomization. We also provide two small side results of potential interest. First, we are able to generalize our result by showing that deciding if a uniform stoquastic Local Hamiltonian has negligible or constant frustration can be also solved in NP. Additionally, our work reveals a new MA-complete problem which we call SetCSP, stated in terms of classical constraints on strings of bits, which we define in the appendix. As far as we know this is the first (arguably) natural MA-complete problem stated in non-quantum CSP language.
We study the computational complexity of the Guided Local Hamiltonian problem: given a local Hamiltonian H together with a classical description of a guiding state that has non-negligible overlap with the ground state of H, estimate the ground-state energy within inverse-polynomial precision. This setting captures real-world scenarios in quantum chemistry and many-body physics, where trial states derived from classical heuristics can be used to guide quantum algorithms. We identify families of physically-motivated guiding states for which the computational hardness of ground-state energy estimation persists in the guided setting. Extending prior results for semi-classical subset states, we prove BQP-hardness for classes including fixed-weight states, matrix product states, Gaussian states, and Fendley states. Our hardness results are obtained via refined Feynman-Kitaev circuit-to-Hamiltonian constructions that explicitly expose the structural role of the guiding state in the reduction. Complementing these results, we give a constructive proof of BQP containment when the guiding state admits a polynomial-size classical description, establishing BQP-completeness for the canonical formulation of the problem. Our results show that quantum advantage persists for the newly introduced state classes, and classical methods also remain viable when said guiding states admit appropriate descriptions. Together, our results identify a Goldilocks zone of guiding states that are efficiently preparable, succinctly described, and sample-query accessible, within which quantum advantage for ground-state estimation can be meaningfully assessed. We additionally formalise the Guided Fermi-Hubbard Hamiltonian problem and prove BQP-completeness on 2D square and triangular lattices, both with and without magnetic fields, when provided with an appropriate fermionic guiding state.
In this work we define a new classical constraint satisfaction problem that shares many of the properties of the quantum local Hamiltonian problem, distinguishing it from the usual classical k-SAT problem. The problem consists of minimizing the number of violated local constraints over a restricted set of distributions of assignments. We show that these distributions can be 1-to-1 mapped to a superset of the quantum states, which we call k-local quasi-quantum states. Nevertheless, we claim that our optimization problem is essentially classical, by proving that it is an NP-complete problem. Interestingly, the optimal distribution shares many of the properties of quantum states. In particular, it is not determined straightforwardly by its local marginals, and consequently, it can be used as a classical toy model to study several aspects of Hamiltonian complexity that are different from their classical counter parts. These include the complexity of 1D systems (which is in P for classical CSPs, but is QMA-hard for quantum systems), and the lack of an easy search-to-decision reduction. Finally, we believe that our model can be used to gain insights into the quantum PCP conjecture. Indeed, while we have shown that approximating the minimal number of unsatisfiable constraints to within an Θ(1) is NP-hard, it is not clear if the problem remains hard if we want to approximate the minimal fraction of unsatisfiable constraints to within an Θ(1); as in the quantum PCP conjecture, naive quantization of the classical proofs does not seem to work.