Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2509.25815 · Physical Review A

Physically motivated guiding states for local Hamiltonians

Gabriel Waite, Karl Lin, Samuel J. Elman, Michael J. Bremner

Published Jun 8, 2026• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We study the computational complexity of the Guided Local Hamiltonian problem: given a local Hamiltonian $H$ together with a classical description of a guiding state that has non-negligible overlap with the ground state of $H$, estimate the ground-state energy within inverse-polynomial precision. This setting captures real-world scenarios in quantum chemistry and many-body physics, where trial states derived from classical heuristics can be used to guide quantum algorithms. We identify families of physically-motivated guiding states for which the computational hardness of ground-state energy estimation persists in the guided setting. Extending prior results for semi-classical subset states, we prove BQP-hardness for classes including fixed-weight states, matrix product states, Gaussian states, and Fendley states. Our hardness results are obtained via refined Feynman-Kitaev circuit-to-Hamiltonian constructions that explicitly expose the structural role of the guiding state in the reduction. Complementing these results, we give a constructive proof of BQP containment when the guiding state admits a polynomial-size classical description, establishing BQP-completeness for the canonical formulation of the problem. Our results show that quantum advantage persists for the newly introduced state classes, and classical methods also remain viable when said guiding states admit appropriate descriptions. Together, our results identify a Goldilocks zone of guiding states that are efficiently preparable, succinctly described, and sample-query accessible, within which quantum advantage for ground-state estimation can be meaningfully assessed. We additionally formalise the Guided Fermi-Hubbard Hamiltonian problem and prove BQP-completeness on 2D square and triangular lattices, both with and without magnetic fields, when provided with an appropriate fermionic guiding state.

DOI
10.1103/clj1-v2zz

Related papers

Improved Hardness Results for the Guided Local Hamiltonian Problem

Chris Cade, Marten Folkertsma, Sevag Gharibian +4 more

Estimating the ground state energy of a local Hamiltonian is a central problem in quantum chemistry. In order to further investigate its complexity and the potential of quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry, Gharibian and Le Gall (STOC 2022) recently introduced the guided local Hamiltonian problem (GLH), which is a variant of the local Hamiltonian problem where an approximation of a ground state (which is called a guiding state) is given as an additional input. Gharibian and Le Gall showed quantum advantage (more precisely, BQP-completeness) for GLH with $6$-local Hamiltonians when the guiding state has fidelity (inverse-polynomially) close to $1/2$ with a ground state. In this paper, we optimally improve both the locality and the fidelity parameter: we show that the BQP-completeness persists even with 2-local Hamiltonians, and even when the guiding state has fidelity (inverse-polynomially) close to 1 with a ground state. Moreover, we show that the BQP-completeness also holds for 2-local physically motivated Hamiltonians on a 2D square lattice or a 2D triangular lattice. Beyond the hardness of estimating the ground state energy, we also show BQP-hardness persists when considering estimating energies of excited states of these Hamiltonians instead. Those make further steps towards establishing practical quantum advantage in quantum chemistry.

arXiv:2207.10250•Jul 21, 2022•2 citations

On the Computational Complexity of Guided Berry Phase Estimation

Gabriel Waite

We prove that deciding the Berry phase for parameterised 2-local qubit Hamiltonians is BQP-complete when presented with a classical description of a guiding state, promised to overlap with the ground state of the system. Our results extend to systems with weighted Heisenberg interactions and when restricted to a 2D square or triangular lattice geometry. The techniques we develop leverage the Schrieffer--Wolff transformation, typically used in the construction of perturbative gadget reductions for local Hamiltonian problems, extending it to parameterised families of Hamiltonians. We demonstrate that there exists a choice of parameterised simulator Hamiltonians whose Berry phase well-approximates that of a parameterised target family. Using the perturbative gadget reduction framework of Oliveira and Terhal and of Schuch and Verstraete, we adapt the arguments to parameterised interactions and demonstrate the error bounds in the resulting simulation can be controlled. Additionally, we provide an explicit proof that families of 1-local Hamiltonians have a Berry phase that can be efficiently computed to inverse-polynomial precision. This establishes a complexity transition between 1-local and 2-local Hamiltonian families.

quant-pharXiv:2609.25929•Sep 23, 2026•0 citations

Complexity of the Guided Local Hamiltonian Problem: Improved Parameters and Extension to Excited States

Chris Cade, Marten Folkertsma, Gharibian, Sevag +4 more

Estimating the ground state energy of a local Hamiltonian is a central problem in quantum chemistry. In order to further investigate its complexity and the potential of quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry, Gharibian and Le Gall (STOC 2022) recently introduced the guided local Hamiltonian problem (GLH), which is a variant of the local Hamiltonian problem where an approximation of a ground state (which is called a guiding state) is given as an additional input. Gharibian and Le Gall showed quantum advantage (more precisely, BQP-completeness) for GLH with 6-local Hamiltonians when the guiding state has fidelity (inverse-polynomially) close to 1/2 with a ground state. In this paper, we optimally improve both the locality and the fidelity parameter: we show that the BQP-completeness persists even with 2-local Hamiltonians, and even when the guiding state has fidelity (inverse-polynomially) close to 1 with a ground state. Moreover, we show that the BQP-completeness also holds for 2-local physically motivated Hamiltonians on a 2D square lattice or a 2D triangular lattice. Beyond the hardness of estimating the ground state energy, we also show BQP-hardness persists when considering estimating energies of excited states of these Hamiltonians instead. Those make further steps towards establishing practical quantum advantage in quantum chemistry.

arXiv:2207.10097•Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Jul 20, 2022•4 citations

Ground state energy estimation and preparation by the truncated power method

Savero Lukianto Chandra, Daochen Wang, Carolyn Zhang

The Guided Local Hamiltonian Problem (GLHP) is the problem of ground state energy estimation and preparation given a guiding state having good overlap with the true ground state. The problem is known to be BQP-complete for small error but is classically tractable for larger error. In this work, we identify an orthogonal regime in which the problem is classically tractable, namely when the true ground state $ψ$ has polynomially bounded $\ell_1$-norm. In particular, we show that the Truncated Power Method (TPM), a classical algorithm introduced by Kirby et al. in the quantum context, has a runtime that is polynomially comparable to quantum algorithms for GLHP in all relevant parameters, except for an extra factor of $\|ψ\|_1^2$. In other words, if $\|ψ\|_1^2$ is polynomially bounded, then TPM dequantizes quantum algorithms for GLHP.

quant-pharXiv:2610.05627•Oct 6, 2026•0 citations

Guidable Local Hamiltonian Problems with Implications to Heuristic Ansatz State Preparation and the Quantum PCP Conjecture

Jordi R. Weggemans, Marten Folkertsma, Chris Cade

We study 'Merlinized' versions of the recently defined Guided Local Hamiltonian problem, which we call 'Guidable Local Hamiltonian' problems. Unlike their guided counterparts, these problems do not have a guiding state provided as a part of the input, but merely come with the promise that one exists. We consider in particular two classes of guiding states: those that can be prepared efficiently by a quantum circuit; and those belonging to a class of quantum states we call classically evaluatable, for which it is possible to efficiently compute expectation values of local observables classically. We show that guidable local Hamiltonian problems for both classes of guiding states are $\mathsf{QCMA}$-complete in the inverse-polynomial precision setting, but lie within $\mathsf{NP}$ (or $\mathsf{NqP}$) in the constant precision regime when the guiding state is classically evaluatable. Our completeness results show that, from a complexity-theoretic perspective, classical Ansätze selected by classical heuristics are just as powerful as quantum Ansätze prepared by quantum heuristics, as long as one has access to quantum phase estimation. In relation to the quantum PCP conjecture, we (i) define a complexity class capturing quantum-classical probabilistically checkable proof systems and show that it is contained in $\mathsf{BQP}^{\mathsf{NP}[1]}$ for constant proof queries; (ii) give a no-go result on 'dequantizing' the known quantum reduction which maps a $\mathsf{QPCP}$-verification circuit to a local Hamiltonian with constant promise gap; (iii) give several no-go results for the existence of quantum gap amplification procedures that preserve certain ground state properties; and (iv) propose two conjectures that can be viewed as stronger versions of the NLTS theorem. Finally, we show that many of our results can be directly modified to obtain similar results for the class $\mathsf{MA}$.

arXiv:2302.11578•Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Feb 22, 2023•2 citations

Guidable local Hamiltonian problems with implications to heuristic Ansatz state preparation and the quantum PCP conjecture

Jordi R. Weggemans, Marten Folkertsma, Chris Cade

We study “Merlinized” versions of the recently defined Guided Local Hamiltonian problem, which we call “Guidable Local Hamiltonian” problems. Unlike their guided counterparts, these problems do not have a guiding state provided as a part of the input, but merely come with the promise that one exists. We consider in particular two classes of guiding states: those that can be prepared efficiently by a quantum circuit; and those belonging to a class of quantum states we call classically evaluatable, for which it is possible to efficiently compute expectation values of local observables classically. We show that guidable local Hamiltonian problems for both classes of guiding states are QCMA-complete in the inverse-polynomial precision setting, but lie within NP (or NqP) in the constant precision regime when the guiding state is classically evaluatable. Our completeness results show that, from a complexity-theoretic perspective, classical Ansätze selected by classical heuristics are just as powerful as quantum Ansätze prepared by quantum heuristics, as long as one has access to quantum phase estimation. In relation to the quantum PCP conjecture, we (i) define a complexity class capturing quantum-classical probabilistically checkable proof systems and show that it is contained in BQPNP[1] for constant proof queries; (ii) give a no-go result on “dequantizing” the known quantum reduction which maps a QPCP-verification circuit to a local Hamiltonian with constant promise gap; (iii) give several no-go results for the existence of quantum gap amplification procedures that preserve certain ground state properties; and (iv) propose two conjectures that can be viewed as stronger versions of the NLTS theorem. Finally, we show that many of our results can be directly modified to obtain similar results for the class MA.

•Aug 26, 2024•0 citations
We study the computational complexity of the Guided Local Hamiltonian problem: given a local Hamiltonian HHH together with a classical description of a guiding state that has non-negligible overlap with the ground state of HHH, estimate the ground-state energy within inverse-polynomial precision. This setting captures real-world scenarios in quantum chemistry and many-body physics, where trial states derived from classical heuristics can be used to guide quantum algorithms. We identify families of physically-motivated guiding states for which the computational hardness of ground-state energy estimation persists in the guided setting. Extending prior results for semi-classical subset states, we prove BQP-hardness for classes including fixed-weight states, matrix product states, Gaussian states, and Fendley states. Our hardness results are obtained via refined Feynman-Kitaev circuit-to-Hamiltonian constructions that explicitly expose the structural role of the guiding state in the reduction. Complementing these results, we give a constructive proof of BQP containment when the guiding state admits a polynomial-size classical description, establishing BQP-completeness for the canonical formulation of the problem. Our results show that quantum advantage persists for the newly introduced state classes, and classical methods also remain viable when said guiding states admit appropriate descriptions. Together, our results identify a Goldilocks zone of guiding states that are efficiently preparable, succinctly described, and sample-query accessible, within which quantum advantage for ground-state estimation can be meaningfully assessed. We additionally formalise the Guided Fermi-Hubbard Hamiltonian problem and prove BQP-completeness on 2D square and triangular lattices, both with and without magnetic fields, when provided with an appropriate fermionic guiding state.
Estimating the ground state energy of a local Hamiltonian is a central problem in quantum chemistry. In order to further investigate its complexity and the potential of quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry, Gharibian and Le Gall (STOC 2022) recently introduced the guided local Hamiltonian problem (GLH), which is a variant of the local Hamiltonian problem where an approximation of a ground state (which is called a guiding state) is given as an additional input. Gharibian and Le Gall showed quantum advantage (more precisely, BQP-completeness) for GLH with 666-local Hamiltonians when the guiding state has fidelity (inverse-polynomially) close to 1/21/21/2 with a ground state. In this paper, we optimally improve both the locality and the fidelity parameter: we show that the BQP-completeness persists even with 2-local Hamiltonians, and even when the guiding state has fidelity (inverse-polynomially) close to 1 with a ground state. Moreover, we show that the BQP-completeness also holds for 2-local physically motivated Hamiltonians on a 2D square lattice or a 2D triangular lattice. Beyond the hardness of estimating the ground state energy, we also show BQP-hardness persists when considering estimating energies of excited states of these Hamiltonians instead. Those make further steps towards establishing practical quantum advantage in quantum chemistry.
We prove that deciding the Berry phase for parameterised 2-local qubit Hamiltonians is BQP-complete when presented with a classical description of a guiding state, promised to overlap with the ground state of the system. Our results extend to systems with weighted Heisenberg interactions and when restricted to a 2D square or triangular lattice geometry. The techniques we develop leverage the Schrieffer--Wolff transformation, typically used in the construction of perturbative gadget reductions for local Hamiltonian problems, extending it to parameterised families of Hamiltonians. We demonstrate that there exists a choice of parameterised simulator Hamiltonians whose Berry phase well-approximates that of a parameterised target family. Using the perturbative gadget reduction framework of Oliveira and Terhal and of Schuch and Verstraete, we adapt the arguments to parameterised interactions and demonstrate the error bounds in the resulting simulation can be controlled. Additionally, we provide an explicit proof that families of 1-local Hamiltonians have a Berry phase that can be efficiently computed to inverse-polynomial precision. This establishes a complexity transition between 1-local and 2-local Hamiltonian families.
Estimating the ground state energy of a local Hamiltonian is a central problem in quantum chemistry. In order to further investigate its complexity and the potential of quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry, Gharibian and Le Gall (STOC 2022) recently introduced the guided local Hamiltonian problem (GLH), which is a variant of the local Hamiltonian problem where an approximation of a ground state (which is called a guiding state) is given as an additional input. Gharibian and Le Gall showed quantum advantage (more precisely, BQP-completeness) for GLH with 6-local Hamiltonians when the guiding state has fidelity (inverse-polynomially) close to 1/2 with a ground state. In this paper, we optimally improve both the locality and the fidelity parameter: we show that the BQP-completeness persists even with 2-local Hamiltonians, and even when the guiding state has fidelity (inverse-polynomially) close to 1 with a ground state. Moreover, we show that the BQP-completeness also holds for 2-local physically motivated Hamiltonians on a 2D square lattice or a 2D triangular lattice. Beyond the hardness of estimating the ground state energy, we also show BQP-hardness persists when considering estimating energies of excited states of these Hamiltonians instead. Those make further steps towards establishing practical quantum advantage in quantum chemistry.
The Guided Local Hamiltonian Problem (GLHP) is the problem of ground state energy estimation and preparation given a guiding state having good overlap with the true ground state. The problem is known to be BQP-complete for small error but is classically tractable for larger error. In this work, we identify an orthogonal regime in which the problem is classically tractable, namely when the true ground state ψψψ has polynomially bounded ℓ1\ell_1ℓ1​-norm. In particular, we show that the Truncated Power Method (TPM), a classical algorithm introduced by Kirby et al. in the quantum context, has a runtime that is polynomially comparable to quantum algorithms for GLHP in all relevant parameters, except for an extra factor of ∥ψ∥12\|ψ\|_1^2∥ψ∥12​. In other words, if ∥ψ∥12\|ψ\|_1^2∥ψ∥12​ is polynomially bounded, then TPM dequantizes quantum algorithms for GLHP.
We study 'Merlinized' versions of the recently defined Guided Local Hamiltonian problem, which we call 'Guidable Local Hamiltonian' problems. Unlike their guided counterparts, these problems do not have a guiding state provided as a part of the input, but merely come with the promise that one exists. We consider in particular two classes of guiding states: those that can be prepared efficiently by a quantum circuit; and those belonging to a class of quantum states we call classically evaluatable, for which it is possible to efficiently compute expectation values of local observables classically. We show that guidable local Hamiltonian problems for both classes of guiding states are QCMA\mathsf{QCMA}QCMA-complete in the inverse-polynomial precision setting, but lie within NP\mathsf{NP}NP (or NqP\mathsf{NqP}NqP) in the constant precision regime when the guiding state is classically evaluatable. Our completeness results show that, from a complexity-theoretic perspective, classical Ansätze selected by classical heuristics are just as powerful as quantum Ansätze prepared by quantum heuristics, as long as one has access to quantum phase estimation. In relation to the quantum PCP conjecture, we (i) define a complexity class capturing quantum-classical probabilistically checkable proof systems and show that it is contained in BQPNP[1]\mathsf{BQP}^{\mathsf{NP}[1]}BQPNP[1] for constant proof queries; (ii) give a no-go result on 'dequantizing' the known quantum reduction which maps a QPCP\mathsf{QPCP}QPCP-verification circuit to a local Hamiltonian with constant promise gap; (iii) give several no-go results for the existence of quantum gap amplification procedures that preserve certain ground state properties; and (iv) propose two conjectures that can be viewed as stronger versions of the NLTS theorem. Finally, we show that many of our results can be directly modified to obtain similar results for the class MA\mathsf{MA}MA.
We study “Merlinized” versions of the recently defined Guided Local Hamiltonian problem, which we call “Guidable Local Hamiltonian” problems. Unlike their guided counterparts, these problems do not have a guiding state provided as a part of the input, but merely come with the promise that one exists. We consider in particular two classes of guiding states: those that can be prepared efficiently by a quantum circuit; and those belonging to a class of quantum states we call classically evaluatable, for which it is possible to efficiently compute expectation values of local observables classically. We show that guidable local Hamiltonian problems for both classes of guiding states are QCMA-complete in the inverse-polynomial precision setting, but lie within NP (or NqP) in the constant precision regime when the guiding state is classically evaluatable. Our completeness results show that, from a complexity-theoretic perspective, classical Ansätze selected by classical heuristics are just as powerful as quantum Ansätze prepared by quantum heuristics, as long as one has access to quantum phase estimation. In relation to the quantum PCP conjecture, we (i) define a complexity class capturing quantum-classical probabilistically checkable proof systems and show that it is contained in BQPNP[1] for constant proof queries; (ii) give a no-go result on “dequantizing” the known quantum reduction which maps a QPCP-verification circuit to a local Hamiltonian with constant promise gap; (iii) give several no-go results for the existence of quantum gap amplification procedures that preserve certain ground state properties; and (iv) propose two conjectures that can be viewed as stronger versions of the NLTS theorem. Finally, we show that many of our results can be directly modified to obtain similar results for the class MA.