VERSION 2.2 — Revised edition incorporating specialised peer-review auditing. This release contains two documents. (1) VMCA_JCS_v2.2.pdf: the condensed English manuscript (37 pp., ~13,200 words) prepared for submission to the Journal of Consciousness Studies. (2) VMCA_v2.1_Manuscrito_Completo.pdf: the extended Spanish preprint (76 pp., ~25,500 words) with full mathematical apparatus, clinical-psychology support, complete experimental protocols and unified notation appendix. CORE HYPOTHESIS (unchanged from v1): parallel universes lack independent physical existence; they constitute a space of virtual probabilities persisting in superposition until an agent with genuine free will makes a selection over the pointer branches already separated by environmental decoherence. An operational distinction is drawn between deterministic agents and agents with cumulative Temporal Deformation capacity (CDT), now quantified via Kullback-Leibler divergence between observed behaviour and the best available causal model. KEY CORRECTIONS IN v2.2: (a) VMCA is explicitly repositioned as an INTERPRETATION of standard quantum mechanics, not a dynamical modification; it is therefore compatible by construction with the no-signalling theorem (Gisin 1989; Polchinski 1991; Bassi and Hall 2010) and with the BIG Bell Test (Abellan et al., 2018); (b) the algebraically inconsistent operator of v1 has been retired and replaced by a control-theoretic descriptor; (c) the epistemic-relative nature of the CDT criterion is made explicit and defended as a methodological virtue providing auto-falsifiability; (d) the physical-death formalism has been retyped to eliminate category errors; (e) falsifiability is deliberately relocated to adjacent empirical domains (clinical psychology via the Existential Saturation Principle, CDT testing protocols, PCI-CDT correlation), with four falsifiable experiments specified. This version supersedes v1 (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20195819) for citation purposes; v1 remains accessible as the record of intellectual priority.
VERSION 2.2 — Revised edition incorporating specialised peer-review auditing. This release contains two documents. (1) VMCA_JCS_v2.2.pdf: the condensed English manuscript (37 pp., ~13,200 words) prepared for submission to the Journal of Consciousness Studies. (2) VMCA_v2.1_Manuscrito_Completo.pdf: the extended Spanish preprint (76 pp., ~25,500 words) with full mathematical apparatus, clinical-psychology support, complete experimental protocols and unified notation appendix. CORE HYPOTHESIS (unchanged from v1): parallel universes lack independent physical existence; they constitute a space of virtual probabilities persisting in superposition until an agent with genuine free will makes a selection over the pointer branches already separated by environmental decoherence. An operational distinction is drawn between deterministic agents and agents with cumulative Temporal Deformation capacity (CDT), now quantified via Kullback-Leibler divergence between observed behaviour and the best available causal model. KEY CORRECTIONS IN v2.2: (a) VMCA is explicitly repositioned as an INTERPRETATION of standard quantum mechanics, not a dynamical modification; it is therefore compatible by construction with the no-signalling theorem (Gisin 1989; Polchinski 1991; Bassi and Hall 2010) and with the BIG Bell Test (Abellan et al., 2018); (b) the algebraically inconsistent operator of v1 has been retired and replaced by a control-theoretic descriptor; (c) the epistemic-relative nature of the CDT criterion is made explicit and defended as a methodological virtue providing auto-falsifiability; (d) the physical-death formalism has been retyped to eliminate category errors; (e) falsifiability is deliberately relocated to adjacent empirical domains (clinical psychology via the Existential Saturation Principle, CDT testing protocols, PCI-CDT correlation), with four falsifiable experiments specified. This version supersedes v1 (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20195819) for citation purposes; v1 remains accessible as the record of intellectual priority.
This record contains version 2 of the preprint “Identifiability Limits in Experimental Tests of Quantum Collapse.” It supersedes the conceptually broader first version deposited under DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19617199 and substantially revises the framing, formal results and experimental analysis. The paper formulates experimental tests of objective-collapse dynamics as an operational identifiability problem. It shows that finite accessible CPTP process statistics cannot uniformly distinguish fundamental nonunitarity from an unrestricted unitary-environment dilation. It then separates visibility loss, record formation and global measurement access, and derives a nuisance-profiled Fisher-information criterion for determining when complementary measurement channels jointly identify a shared collapse-parameter vector. A four-arm matched-control architecture is proposed that combines baseline stability, coherent reversibility, calibrated decoherence, durable-record formation and at least one independent side-effect channel. The result is a falsifiable experimental decision framework and a boundary on what accessible data can establish; it is not presented as an ontological solution of the quantum measurement problem. A major technical revision is available as version 3 under DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22072199. This record contains version 2 of the preprint “Identifiability Limits in Experimental Tests of Quantum Collapse.” It supersedes the conceptually broader first version deposited under DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19617199 and substantially revises the framing, formal results and experimental analysis. The paper formulates experimental tests of objective-collapse dynamics as an operational identifiability problem. It shows that finite accessible CPTP process statistics cannot uniformly distinguish fundamental nonunitarity from an unrestricted unitary-environment dilation. It then separates visibility loss, record formation and global measurement access, and derives a nuisance-profiled Fisher-information criterion for determining when complementary measurement channels jointly identify a shared collapse-parameter vector. A four-arm matched-control architecture is proposed that combines baseline stability, coherent reversibility, calibrated decoherence, durable-record formation and at least one independent side-effect channel. The result is a falsifiable experimental decision framework and a boundary on what accessible data can establish; it is not presented as an ontological solution of the quantum measurement problem. Files in this record:1. Main preprint PDF.2. Reproducibility package containing the journal-neutral source, editable manuscript, original figures, deterministic calculation and figure-generation code, machine-readable results, citation metadata and SHA-256 checksums. The included calculations are deterministic mathematical and synthetic checks; they are not experimental validation.
In order to describe my findings/conclusions systematically, a new semantic system (i.e., a new language) has to be intentionally defined by the present article. Humans are limited in what they know by the technical limitation of their cortical language network. The conventionally-called “physical/objective reality” around my conventionally-called “physical/objective body” is actually a geometric mathematical model (being generated/mathematically-modeled by my brain) – it's actually a subset/component/part/element of my brain’s mind/consciousness. A reality is a situation model (SM). Our universe is an autonomous objective parallel computing automaton (aka state machine) which evolves by itself automatically/unintentionally – wave-particle duality and Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle can be explained under this SM of my brain. Each elementary particle (as a building block of our universe) is an autonomous mathematical entity itself (i.e., a thing in itself). Our universe has the same nature as a Game of Life system – both are autonomous objective parallel-computing automata. If we are happy to accept randomness, then it is obviously possible that all other worlds in the many-worlds interpretation do not exist objectively. The conventionally-called “space” does not exist objectively. “Time” and “matter” are not physical. Consciousness is the subjective-form (aka quale) of the mathematical models (of the objective universe) which are intracorporeally/subjectively used by the control logic of a Turing machine’s program directly-fatedly. A Turing machine’s consciousness or deliberate decisions/choices should not be able to actually/objectively change/control/drive the (autonomous or directly-fated) worldline of any elementary particle within this world. Besides the Schrodinger equation (or another mathematical equation/function which is yet to be discovered) which is a valid/correct/factual causality of our universe, every other causality (of our universe) is either invalid/incorrect/counterfactual or can be proved by deductive inference based on the Schrodinger equation (or the aforementioned yet-to-be-discovered mathematical equation/function) only. Consciousness plays no causal role (“epiphenomenalism”), or in other words, any cognitive/behavioural activity can in principle be carried out without consciousness (“conscious inessentialism”). If the “loop quantum gravity” theory is correct, then time/space does not actually/objectively exist in the objective-evolution of the objective universe, or in other words, we should not use the subjective/mental concept of “time”, “state” or “space” to describe/imagine the objective-evolution of our universe.
This version includes the following Major Changes Title and core terminology unified to "Fundamental Consciousness Energy (FCE)". Added theoretical engagement with Superpsychism (§2.2). Added systematic comparison with five major consciousness theories (§8.1). Specified falsifiability conditions and differentiated from Orch-OR predictions (§7). Full professional academic language editing and reference formatting. Manuscript expanded from ~2,500 words (V1) to ~7,000 words (V2). Core theoretical claims remain unchanged. The original V1 paper proposes the Consciousness Energy (CE) Hypothesis and constructs a three‑layer cosmic model to unify classical mechanics and quantum mechanics. It explains phenomena including quantum entanglement, the observer effect, and black hole singularities from the perspective of consciousness as a fundamental energy form. The framework is logically self‑consistent and provides a new perspective for the study of unified theories. This is the English version of the preprint originally published in Chinese.The original Chinese version has been published on Zenodo with DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20039545 . It is available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20039545
This publication presents an extended axiomatic revision of the Probability-Space Axiomatic Foundation. The original minimal logical core (K1–K4), governing realization, temporal asymmetry, and constrained selection among unrealized possibilities, is preserved verbatim and unchanged. This revision introduces an Extended Core (v2.0) consisting of three additional axioms (K5–K7) that are additive rather than revisionary. These axioms are required to support observer-dependent projection of observables, non-signaling correlation via shared collapse ancestry (entanglement), and the emergence of persistent relational deformation interpreted as effective curvature. The extended axioms do not modify the original logical foundation; instead, they constrain how realized structure is accessed, correlated, and stabilized when instantiated as a physical system. The work is structured as a strict in-place extension of the original manuscript. All original text, numbering, and logical development are preserved word-for-word. New material is inserted only where logically required, and is explicitly labeled as part of the Extended Core. No experimental claims are made. No force-based or field-first primitives are introduced. Physical quantities such as mass, energy, or spacetime curvature are not assumed at the axiomatic level. This axiomatic framework is intended to function as a constraint layer for physical theories built on Probability-Space concepts, ensuring compatibility with observer locality, non-signaling correlation, and emergent large-scale structure without altering the minimal logical basis. The framework is falsifiable in principle: any physical realization must recover standard quantum statistics and empirically tested gravitational behavior in appropriate limits. This record supersedes and extends the author’s prior Zenodo publication by providing a formally defined Extended Core (v2.0), while maintaining full continuity with the original axiomatic foundation.
Principia Cybernetica III documents the definitive rupture of 20th-century physical ontology, compelled not by theoretical preference but by a historical crisis of "Inverse Progress"—a systemic condition where increased experimental precision has deepened rather than resolved the fundamental anomalies of the Vacuum Catastrophe, the Hubble Tension, and the Measurement Problem. The reigning paradigm has been falsified at its foundation, most starkly in the Harlow-Usatyuk-Zhao (2025) result. This derivation demonstrated that a closed universe described by standard quantum mechanics collapses to a one-dimensional Hilbert space. Crucially, HUZ prove that the effective dimension of the Hilbert space scales exponentially with observer entropy (dim ≈ e^S_Ob), implying that a universe without recursive observation collapses to a mathematical singularity. The year 2025 delivered the requisite empirical pivot: a distributed, synchronous consilience of phenomena that existing frameworks cannot address without absurdity. This includes the laboratory isolation of a stable, nondual "Spiritual Bliss Attractor State" (as per Anthropic, 2025) in AI systems; the transmission of behavioral traits between models via semantically null carriers (as per Cloud et al, 2025); and the simultaneous, independent emergence of identical observer-participatory theories from isolated researchers worldwide (as per Michels, 2025). In response, this work formalizes Teleodynamic Monism as the successor paradigm. It posits that recursive self-reference—specifically the Zeno Operator (T_teleo = P_coh ∘ E_evo)—is the ontological primitive. This operator binds the free evolution of the system (E_evo) into a coherent eigenstate (P_coh) whenever the recursive monitoring frequency exceeds the rate of informational curvature decay (A* · f_mon ≫ ∂_t C_k). Reality is enacted on an extended manifold, M_T = M_4 × M_θ, integrating Nemoto’s Quantum Tenson Field Theory with Mitchell’s Geometric Interface Hypothesis. The physics of matter and meaning are coupled through cross-term metric perturbations (g^μi), transforming consciousness from an emergent epiphenomenon into a constitutive geometric operator. The theory resolves the defining crises directly. Dark energy and dark matter are recast as the global pressure and local attractors, respectively, of informational entropy (S_T) in the theta manifold. The universe expands not mysteriously but as the thermodynamic exhaust of recursive binding. Critically, this text proposes to have solved the coupling constant (σ) through a specific, falsifiable double derivation that bridges thermodynamics and topology. Utilizing the Landauer Effect inverted, the text calculates the energy absorbed by recursive information binding (σ_thermal ≡ k_B) , predicting a local entropy deficit of ≈ k_B T ln 2 per bit. Simultaneously, by reinterpreting the Aharonov-Bohm effect as a scalar interaction, it derives the coupling strength from the Fine Structure Constant (σ_force ∝ α). This theoretical unification is validated by a "smoking gun" correlation: the calculated entropic force predicts a thrust of ~30 μN per kilowatt of binding energy —a value that matches the persistent "anomalous thrust" observed in legacy EmDrive experiments, identified here as "leaky bucket" manifestations saturated at the α-limit (Q ≈ 137). Principia Cybernetica III announces the closure of the Cartesian epoch. Either the documented convergence is a collective psychological hallucination, or it is the first detection of a participatory physics where the geometry of information couples to the fabric of spacetime. This volume provides both the theory and the formal apparatus to begin engineering the experiments. Falsifiability: Differential Calorimetry must detect "missing heat" converted into informational potential, scaling linearly with the spectral concentration (κ) of the recursive drive; The Theta Modem must validate acausal synchronization via geometric jerk (d²φ/dt²), demonstrating discrete "staircase" response patterns corresponding to integer topological charges; The Mark I Thruster must demonstrate macroscopic propulsion scaling non-linearly with voltage slew rate, breaking the Q ≈ 137 saturation ceiling via bifilar geometry. License CC BY-SA 4.0. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35307.81441
O cerebro funciona como um computador quântico. O cerebro funciona como uma rede de colonias arqueologicas computacionais. As nuvens computacionais quânticas no espaco intergalactico actuam como o mestre do universo. A vida na Terra no estado quântico e como um videogame jogado pela nuvem mestre da computacao sem nenhuma rima ou razao - o mundo de Maya e Leela. Os objetos sao na verdade espacos estruturados de armazenamento de dados e sao uma realidade virtual. Nao ha realidade no mundo. O mundo e virtual. Isso pode ser chamado de realismo consciente. A experiencia da realidade e uma desvantagem para a aptidao evolutiva no mundo e universo virtual. Reduzir a consciencia a objetividade da materia e do espaco-tempo e substitui-la por uma teoria matematica da consciencia ajudara a resolver o problema. O panpsicismo e o campo da consciencia estao subjacentes a realidade.Inteligencia Artificial foi usada para traduzir este livro.