This working paper presents an exploratory framework for the Quantum Contact System (QCS), connecting a dual-photodiode differential configuration with a functional double-slit analogy and a speculative frozen-photon emission hypothesis. The document proposes falsifiable validation levels, including dark capture, controlled S1/S2 asymmetry, external SPDC source testing, and a future H4-encoded TX emission test. All claims are presented as exploratory and non-confirmatory.
This working paper presents an exploratory framework for the Quantum Contact System (QCS), connecting a dual-photodiode differential configuration with a functional double-slit analogy and a speculative frozen-photon emission hypothesis. The document proposes falsifiable validation levels, including dark capture, controlled S1/S2 asymmetry, external SPDC source testing, and a future H4-encoded TX emission test. All claims are presented as exploratory and non-confirmatory.
Bilingual exploratory working paper presenting the Quantum Contact System (QCS), an experimental framework for detecting and characterising anomalous structure in differential photonic signals using a dual-photodiode balanced receiver. The document includes the experimental setup, signal-processing pipeline, session results, statistical analysis, control protocol, and a speculative frozen-photon / quantum-memory transmission hypothesis. All claims are presented at exploratory level and require further controlled replication. Documento exploratorio bilingüe sobre el Sistema Quantum Contact (QCS), un marco experimental para detectar y caracterizar estructura anómala en señales fotónicas diferenciales mediante un receptor balanceado de dos fotodiodos. Incluye montaje experimental, proceso de señal, resultados de sesión, análisis estadístico, protocolo de control y una hipótesis especulativa basada en memoria cuántica / "fotón congelado". Todas las afirmaciones se presentan a nivel exploratorio y requieren replicación controlada.
Quantum Contact H10 is a bilingual (English–Spanish) preliminary scientific paper presenting a falsifiable experimental hypothesis and a prospective testing protocol. The project investigates whether a controlled physical intervention on one optical-fiber trajectory (S2) produces an additional, reproducible response in another trajectory (S1), both illuminated by a common laser source. The proposed five-module apparatus combines an ESP32-S3 microcontroller, BPW34 photodiodes, PMMA optical fibers, magnetic and electric interventions, and an auxiliary double-slit experiment. The paper describes the experimental architecture, hardware and software implementation, Python/Flask-based acquisition, calibration procedures, randomized real-versus-sham trials, statistical analysis, and criteria for supporting, constraining, or rejecting the hypothesis. The protocol explicitly addresses common-source fluctuations, electromagnetic interference, thermal effects, vibration, and other conventional explanations. **This is a hypothesis and experimental protocol, not a report of confirmed H10 results.** No novel quantum interaction or photon entanglement is claimed. Author: J.S.Baenacock — JSBC Labs, Independent Researcher. Version 1.1 — 24 October 2026.
This working paper synthesizes the H3 line of the Quantum Contact project. H3 asks whether the decoded output of a laser-based double-slit optical system can contain recurrent, structured patterns — preambles, beacons, or organized signals — rather than uncorrelated noise. The paper describes the physical channel (laser, tube, double slit, sensors S1-S3, state marker S4), the decoding pipeline, the search logic, and the competing hypotheses H3 is designed to separate (random coincidence, instrumental artifact, informational contamination, observer self-imprint, trans-temporal self-beacon, non-conventional external influence). Reconstructed findings include repeated preamble detections, old beacon recurrence (8 detections in one report), and structured blocks repeated up to 30 times in a consolidated summary. This edition is an exploratory anomaly report and methodological consolidation, not a closed proof of a non-conventional source. Raw datasets will be deposited in a future Zenodo v2 release.
This publication presents an exploratory analysis within the Quantum Contact / TORUS framework. Juan Sebastián Baena Cock is the originator of the term "Quantum Turing," proposed here as a conceptual framework for the interpretation of structured, potentially non-random signal patterns detected in a highly sensitive double-slit optical system. The document includes theoretical context, experimental logic, signal-processing criteria, exploratory results, and interpretive discussion. This bilingual paper is intended as an open research contribution for public review, replication, and critical evaluation.
This paper presents the 2013 double-slit experiment "Particle Solution to the Double Slit Experiment" (University of Arizona), together with a more rigorous 2026 reconstruction of the same test. Part I reproduces the original study verbatim. A slit was cut at a dark fringe on Screen 1 and the light was measured on Screen 2 behind it. The detector current behind the dark fringe was 1.4 mA, equal to the 1.4 mA laser-off noise. The result was interpreted as supporting the particle view. Part II specifies a high-precision modular protocol designed to discriminate between dark-fringe occupancy and interference: a common baseline (Module 0), the Screen-1 dark-fringe profile (A), an aperture-width series (B), Screen-2 profiles behind dark and bright apertures (C), an offset scan (D), and a closure map (E). The standard optical-field prediction is frozen before acquisition. If no light is observed on Screen 2 behind the dark-fringe aperture while the bright control transmits, the particle view is supported. If two fringes appear, matching the frozen template, the wave view is supported. Status: Part I includes the original 2013 detector readings. Part II is a prospective protocol; no data have been acquired under it. Files: manuscript (PDF), LaTeX source, supplementary forward model (double_slit_field_model.py), and example configuration (asbuilt_example.json), which reproduces the illustrative values in Section II.12.
This record contains a bilingual (EN/ES) protocol paper for the QuantumContact framework. The system digitises a double-slit interference field into optical sensor time series (S1–S3) plus a phase marker (S4) defining rest (S4=0) vs observation (S4=1). H1 tests observation-linked micro-stabilisation in S2 using micro-stochastic metrics (ΔCV, rolling variability, z-spikes) with spatial selectivity controls (S1). H2 tests EEG-linked micro-coherence using continuous correlation (Spearman) between ATT/MED and rolling micro-variability, gated via permutation p-values and selectivity (S1 control). H3 (TORUS/BEACON) formalises an active protocol where potential external influences are treated as binarisable anomaly signatures ("signal/no-signal"), strictly gated by statistical criteria; interpretive "levels" are secondary labels, not evidence of origin. Related public DOIs (examples): https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17887428 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17904842 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18290126 Este registro contiene un paper bilingüe (EN/ES) de protocolos del marco QuantumContact. El sistema digitaliza el campo de interferencia de la doble rendija en series temporales de sensores ópticos (S1–S3) más un marcador de fase (S4) que define reposo (S4=0) vs observación (S4=1). H1 contrasta micro-estabilización en S2 asociada a observación mediante métricas micro-estocásticas (ΔCV, variabilidad móvil, z-spikes) con control de selectividad espacial (S1). H2 evalúa micro-coherencia ligada a EEG con correlación continua (Spearman) entre ATT/MED y micro-variabilidad móvil, filtrada por p-values de permutación y selectividad (S1 como control). H3 (TORUS/BEACON) formaliza un protocolo activo donde posibles influencias externas se tratan como firmas binarizables ("señal/no señal"), filtradas estrictamente por criterios estadísticos; los "niveles" son etiquetas interpretativas, no prueba de origen.