Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

CRC Press eBooks

Angular Momentum and Spin

Martin Bojowald A

Published May 8, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

If we include all three spatial dimensions, the time-dependent wave function https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> Ψ ( x , y , z , t ) depends on four coordinates. A wave function of this form determines the probability density https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> ρ t ( x , y , z ) = | Ψ ( x , y , z , t ) | 2 for measurements of the spatial position https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> ( x , y , z ) . The product https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> | Ψ ( x , y , z , t ) | 2 d x d y d z therefore equals the probability of finding a particle in a small cubic volume with side lengths https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> ( d x , d y , d z ) around https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> ( x , y , z ) at time t . The normalization condition for this probability density is given by 4.1 https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block"> ∫ − ∞ ∞ ∫ − ∞ ∞ ∫ − ∞ ∞ | Ψ ( x , y , z , t ) | 2 d x d y d z = 1 for all t .

DOI
10.1201/9781003588702-5

Related papers

Quantum Information

Martin Bojowald A

There is more information in a quantum state than in the classical initial values https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> ( x 0 , p 0 ) that determine the complete 1-dimensional motion of a point particle for a given force. The initial wave function https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> Ψ ( x , 0 ) requires an infinite number of parameters, which can be expressed in observational terms as the two basic expectation values https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> ⟨ x ^ ⟩ and https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> ⟨ p ^ ⟩ together with the two variances https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> ( σ x 2 , σ p 2 ) and the covariance 5.1 https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block"> C x p = 1 2 ⟨ x ^ p ^ + p ^ x ^ ⟩ − ⟨ x ^ ⟩ ⟨ p ^ ⟩ ,

CRC Press eBooks•May 8, 2026•0 citations

Total Angular Momentum

Lukong Cornelius Fai

The infinitesimal symmetry transformation generator, https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> D ^ ϕ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math4_1.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> , is recognizable dynamical variable in a simple situation and so can be used to define a dynamical variable in a more complicated situation. We take an example of a particle possessing an internal degree of freedom related to an intrinsic angular momentum, the so-called spin (pseudo vector), described by the spin operator, https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> S ^ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math4_2.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> . So, the total wave function, considering the definition in Equation 3.314 should be 4.1 https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> Ψ r → , σ = Ψ r → X σ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math4_3.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/>

CRC Press eBooks•Apr 19, 2022•0 citations

Schrödinger Equation

Lukong Cornelius Fai

In the previous chapter, we did not examine the change of a state with time https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> t https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math2_1.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> . It has been assumed that we have been examining a state at a given moment https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> t https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math2_2.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> . In the general case, the state of a system changes with time https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> t https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math2_3.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> . For example, say the motion of an electron in a potential field, its wave function depends on time https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> t https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math2_4.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> : https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> Ψ = Ψ q , t https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math2_5.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> . Such a dependence has to be described by a differential equation in which we may have https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> ∂ Ψ ∂ t , ∂ 2 Ψ ∂ t 2 , ⋯ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math2_6.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> .

CRC Press eBooks•Apr 19, 2022•0 citations

Solving the time-independent Schrödinger equation

Nils O. Petersen

The solutions to the Time‐Independent Schrödinger Equation (TISE) can be found as long as we can define the Hamiltonian, which in the simplest cases, means defining the potential in which the particle of interest is moving. In the following sections, we will consider a single particle of mass, m p , moving in a potential that is time‐independent, but can vary in space. We will follow four steps: Define the Hamiltonian by defining the Potential Energy Operator since H ^ = - ħ 2 2 m p ∇ ^ 2 + V ^ ( r ) $ \hat{H} = - \frac{{{\hbar}^{2} }}{{2m_{p} }}\hat{\nabla }^{2} + \hat{V}(r) $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315381381/5a219413-b541-4543-a0c3-fab4f5358e87/content/inline-math4_1.tif"/> . Solve the TISE to get the wave functions ψ ( x , y , z ) $ \psi (x, y, z) $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315381381/5a219413-b541-4543-a0c3-fab4f5358e87/content/inline-math4_2.tif"/> and then the total stationary state wave functions Ψ ( x , y , z ; t ) = ψ ( x , y , z ) e - i ω t . $ \iPsi (x, y, z;t) = \psi (x, y, z)e^{ - i\omega t} . $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315381381/5a219413-b541-4543-a0c3-fab4f5358e87/content/inline-math4_3.tif"/> Determine the energies of the various states of the system. Examine the implications of the solutions to the Schrödinger equations.

CRC Press eBooks•Apr 7, 2017•0 citations

POSTULATES OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

Mircea S. Rogalski, Stuart B. Palmer

The solution is essentially a complex function which accounts for the matter wave spreading illustrated in Figure 28.3. As the wave function itself cannot be identified with a physical property of the free particle, an indirect interpretation was suggested by Born. He pointed out that its modulus ( tx,Ψ ) ( ),x tΨ is large where the particle becomes localized and small elsewhere, and hence ( ) ( ) 2, ,P x t dx x t dx= Ψ (29.1) is the probability of finding the particle described by ( )tx,Ψ at a point between x and at a time t. Therefore the matter wave spreading is associated with a decrease in the probability density . As the total probability of finding the particle somewhere on the x-axis must be unity, the wave function must be normalized to unity, that is dxx + ( txP , ) ( ) ( ) ( ), , ,P x t dx x t x t dx∞ ∞ ∗ −∞ −∞ = Ψ Ψ∫ ∫ = (29.2) The behaviour of the wave function ( )tx,Ψ is determined by Eq.(28.38), which may be rewritten as ( ) ( ) ( ) t x tx m itxttx ∆∂ Ψ∂+Ψ=∆+Ψ 2 2 , 2 ,, = (29.3) where the expression ( ) ( )/ , ,t x t t x t⎡∂Ψ ∂ ≅ Ψ + ∆ −Ψ ∆⎣ / t⎤⎦ ) , which holds for a small , has been used. In view of Eq.(29.3) the values of the wave function at any time can be derived from the initial value that describes a reference state of the particle.

CRC Press eBooks•Jan 8, 2014•0 citations

Many-Particle Systems

M.S. Rogalski, Stuart B. Palmer

The postulates of quantum mechanics and their consequences, which have been developed to describe a single particle, are still valid when applied to a system of N particles. The system can be described by a wave function Ψ which depends on the time and on the 3 N coordinates of all the particles: 10.1 Ψ = Ψ ( r → 1 , … r → i , … r → N , t ) = Ψ ( x 1 , y 1 , z 1 , … , x i , y i , z i , … x N , y N , z N , t ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn10_1_B.tif"/>

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 5, 2020•0 citations
If we include all three spatial dimensions, the time-dependent wave function https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> Ψ ( x , y , z , t ) depends on four coordinates. A wave function of this form determines the probability density https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> ρ t ( x , y , z ) = | Ψ ( x , y , z , t ) | 2 for measurements of the spatial position https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> ( x , y , z ) . The product https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> | Ψ ( x , y , z , t ) | 2 d x d y d z therefore equals the probability of finding a particle in a small cubic volume with side lengths https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> ( d x , d y , d z ) around https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> ( x , y , z ) at time t . The normalization condition for this probability density is given by 4.1 https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block"> ∫ − ∞ ∞ ∫ − ∞ ∞ ∫ − ∞ ∞ | Ψ ( x , y , z , t ) | 2 d x d y d z = 1 for all t .
There is more information in a quantum state than in the classical initial values https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> ( x 0 , p 0 ) that determine the complete 1-dimensional motion of a point particle for a given force. The initial wave function https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> Ψ ( x , 0 ) requires an infinite number of parameters, which can be expressed in observational terms as the two basic expectation values https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> ⟨ x ^ ⟩ and https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> ⟨ p ^ ⟩ together with the two variances https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> ( σ x 2 , σ p 2 ) and the covariance 5.1 https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block"> C x p = 1 2 ⟨ x ^ p ^ + p ^ x ^ ⟩ − ⟨ x ^ ⟩ ⟨ p ^ ⟩ ,
The infinitesimal symmetry transformation generator, https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> D ^ ϕ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math4_1.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> , is recognizable dynamical variable in a simple situation and so can be used to define a dynamical variable in a more complicated situation. We take an example of a particle possessing an internal degree of freedom related to an intrinsic angular momentum, the so-called spin (pseudo vector), described by the spin operator, https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> S ^ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math4_2.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> . So, the total wave function, considering the definition in Equation 3.314 should be 4.1 https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> Ψ r → , σ = Ψ r → X σ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math4_3.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/>
In the previous chapter, we did not examine the change of a state with time https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> t https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math2_1.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> . It has been assumed that we have been examining a state at a given moment https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> t https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math2_2.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> . In the general case, the state of a system changes with time https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> t https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math2_3.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> . For example, say the motion of an electron in a potential field, its wave function depends on time https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> t https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math2_4.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> : https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> Ψ = Ψ q , t https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math2_5.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> . Such a dependence has to be described by a differential equation in which we may have https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> ∂ Ψ ∂ t , ∂ 2 Ψ ∂ t 2 , ⋯ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math2_6.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> .
The solutions to the Time‐Independent Schrödinger Equation (TISE) can be found as long as we can define the Hamiltonian, which in the simplest cases, means defining the potential in which the particle of interest is moving. In the following sections, we will consider a single particle of mass, m p , moving in a potential that is time‐independent, but can vary in space. We will follow four steps: Define the Hamiltonian by defining the Potential Energy Operator since H ^ = - ħ 2 2 m p ∇ ^ 2 + V ^ ( r ) $ \hat{H} = - \frac{{{\hbar}^{2} }}{{2m_{p} }}\hat{\nabla }^{2} + \hat{V}(r) $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315381381/5a219413-b541-4543-a0c3-fab4f5358e87/content/inline-math4_1.tif"/> . Solve the TISE to get the wave functions ψ ( x , y , z ) $ \psi (x, y, z) $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315381381/5a219413-b541-4543-a0c3-fab4f5358e87/content/inline-math4_2.tif"/> and then the total stationary state wave functions Ψ ( x , y , z ; t ) = ψ ( x , y , z ) e - i ω t . $ \iPsi (x, y, z;t) = \psi (x, y, z)e^{ - i\omega t} . $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315381381/5a219413-b541-4543-a0c3-fab4f5358e87/content/inline-math4_3.tif"/> Determine the energies of the various states of the system. Examine the implications of the solutions to the Schrödinger equations.
The solution is essentially a complex function which accounts for the matter wave spreading illustrated in Figure 28.3. As the wave function itself cannot be identified with a physical property of the free particle, an indirect interpretation was suggested by Born. He pointed out that its modulus ( tx,Ψ ) ( ),x tΨ is large where the particle becomes localized and small elsewhere, and hence ( ) ( ) 2, ,P x t dx x t dx= Ψ (29.1) is the probability of finding the particle described by ( )tx,Ψ at a point between x and at a time t. Therefore the matter wave spreading is associated with a decrease in the probability density . As the total probability of finding the particle somewhere on the x-axis must be unity, the wave function must be normalized to unity, that is dxx + ( txP , ) ( ) ( ) ( ), , ,P x t dx x t x t dx∞ ∞ ∗ −∞ −∞ = Ψ Ψ∫ ∫ = (29.2) The behaviour of the wave function ( )tx,Ψ is determined by Eq.(28.38), which may be rewritten as ( ) ( ) ( ) t x tx m itxttx ∆∂ Ψ∂+Ψ=∆+Ψ 2 2 , 2 ,, = (29.3) where the expression ( ) ( )/ , ,t x t t x t⎡∂Ψ ∂ ≅ Ψ + ∆ −Ψ ∆⎣ / t⎤⎦ ) , which holds for a small , has been used. In view of Eq.(29.3) the values of the wave function at any time can be derived from the initial value that describes a reference state of the particle.
The postulates of quantum mechanics and their consequences, which have been developed to describe a single particle, are still valid when applied to a system of N particles. The system can be described by a wave function Ψ which depends on the time and on the 3 N coordinates of all the particles: 10.1 Ψ = Ψ ( r → 1 , … r → i , … r → N , t ) = Ψ ( x 1 , y 1 , z 1 , … , x i , y i , z i , … x N , y N , z N , t ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn10_1_B.tif"/>