Quantum computing has been identified as a rapidly developing area that has the potential to outperform classical computing systems for many computational problems. However, the reliability of quantum circuits is still a major challenge due to imperfections in their hardware systems and control errors. This paper examines the effect caused by Single Missing Rotation Faults (SMRF) in the quantum circuits. The method used in this paper works by the elimination of selected rotation gates to generate faulty circuits using statevector simulation to analyze the effect by various metrics such as state fidelity, process fidelity, phase and probability deviation. The experimental results are demonstrated that observable phase and amplitude deviations can be realized by even a single missing rotation fault in the quantum circuit, which are not observed by probability distribution alone. The SMRF analysis carried out provides knowledge about error prone areas in the quantum circuit, thus establishing a foundation for a comprehensive reliability evaluation in NISQ-era hardware.
Quantum computing has been identified as a rapidly developing area that has the potential to outperform classical computing systems for many computational problems. However, the reliability of quantum circuits is still a major challenge due to imperfections in their hardware systems and control errors. This paper examines the effect caused by Single Missing Rotation Faults (SMRF) in the quantum circuits. The method used in this paper works by the elimination of selected rotation gates to generate faulty circuits using statevector simulation to analyze the effect by various metrics such as state fidelity, process fidelity, phase and probability deviation. The experimental results are demonstrated that observable phase and amplitude deviations can be realized by even a single missing rotation fault in the quantum circuit, which are not observed by probability distribution alone. The SMRF analysis carried out provides knowledge about error prone areas in the quantum circuit, thus establishing a foundation for a comprehensive reliability evaluation in NISQ-era hardware.
This research paper provides an in-depth examination of verification and testing approaches for quantum circuits, focusing on methodologies essential for ensuring the correctness, reliability and operational efficiency of quantum computing systems. Since quantum circuits function on the fundamental principles of superposition and entanglement, they present verification challenges that cannot be effectively addressed using conventional classical testing techniques. As a result, the development of specialized quantum-specific verification strategies has become critically important. The study highlights simulation-based verification as a foundational technique, wherein the outcomes of quantum circuit simulations are systematically compared with results obtained from physical quantum hardware. This process enables the identification of functional inconsistencies and supports iterative refinement of circuit designs. In addition, randomized benchmarking is examined as a key evaluation method for estimating circuit fidelity and quantifying error rates through the application of random gate sequences and performance comparisons against established benchmarks. To further improve system robustness, the research investigates fault-tolerant mechanisms, particularly quantum error correction codes, which play a vital role in minimizing the effects of noise, decoherence and hardware imperfections. The integration of advanced quantum metrology and characterization techniques is also explored, enabling precise measurement and detailed analysis of quantum system behavior. These techniques provide deeper insights into circuit performance and contribute significantly to validation processes. By combining simulation-based verification, randomized benchmarking, fault-tolerant protocols and quantum metrology, this study proposes a comprehensive and reliable framework for quantum circuit verification and testing. The findings contribute to the advancement of dependable quantum technologies and support their growing applications in areas such as cryptography, materials science and other emerging domains.
Detecting and isolating faults is crucial for synthesis of quantum circuits. Under the single fault assumption that is now routinely accepted in circuit fault analysis, we show that the behaviour of faulty quantum circuits can be fully characterized by the single faulty gate and the corresponding fault model. This allows us to efficiently determine test input states as well as measurement strategy that can be used to detect every single-gate fault using very few test cases and with minimal probability of error; in fact we demonstrate that most commonly used quantum gates can be isolated without any error under the single missing gate fault (SMGF) model. We crucially exploit the quantum nature of circuits to show vast improvement upon the existing works of automatic test pattern generation (ATPG) for quantum circuits.
Detection and isolation of faults is a crucial step in the physical realization of quantum circuits. Even though quantum gates and circuits compute reversible functions, the standard techniques of automatic test pattern generation (ATPG) for classical reversible circuits are not directly applicable to quantum circuits. For faulty quantum circuits under the widely accepted single fault assumption, we show that their behavior can be fully characterized by the (single) faulty gate and the corresponding fault model. This allows us to efficiently determine test input states as well as measurement strategy for fault detection and diagnosis. Building on top of these, we design randomized algorithms which are able to detect every nontrivial single-gate fault with minimal probability of error. We also describe similar algorithms for fault diagnosis. We evaluate our algorithms by the number of output samples that needs to be collected and the probability of error. Both of these can be related to the eigenvalues of the operators corresponding to the circuit gates. We experimentally compare all our strategies with the state-of-the-art ATPG techniques for quantum circuits under the “single missing faulty gate” model and demonstrate that significant improvement is possible if we can exploit the quantum nature of circuits.
Quantum computing promises revolutionary advancements across various fields, yet its realization hinges critically on the reliability of its hardware. Unlike classical computing, quantum systems are exceptionally sensitive to environmental noise and prone to errors, leading to significant challenges in maintaining coherence and accurate computation. This research presents a formal model designed to rigorously analyze the reliability of quantum computing hardware. The model incorporates probabilistic representations of quantum gates and qubits, alongside noise models that capture various sources of error, and evaluates the effectiveness of fault-tolerance techniques. The core of the model is a simulation framework allowing for comprehensive evaluation of the impact of these factors on the overall system performance. This approach provides a quantitative basis for designing more robust quantum computing systems and optimizing operational strategies, moving beyond intuitive estimations and towards a scientifically grounded understanding of quantum hardware reliability. The model is presented with detailed formulas and mathematical notations, offering a precise and verifiable framework for analysis.
In this research paper, I have thoroughly described about the topic “study on Verification and Testing Strategies for Quantum Circuits.” The research on quantum circuit verification and testing methodologies examines how to ensure the dependability and functioning of quantum computing systems, which are crucial to their transformational potential. Quantum circuits use superposition and entanglement, which need verification and testing methods. Innovative quantum circuit-specific methodologies are needed since conventional computing methods fail in quantum computing. A major research area is simulation-based verification, which compares simulated quantum circuit outputs to genuine hardware implementations. Developers may identify circuit design or implementation problems by comparing simulated and predicted results, enabling incremental improvement. Randomized benchmarking procedures may also evaluate quantum circuit integrity and error rates. These protocols quantify operational features of circuits by submitting them to randomized operations and evaluating their performance against preset benchmarks, leading attempts to enhance reliability and performance. Fault-tolerant methods, such as error correction codes, reduce quantum hardware noise and mistakes, improving quantum circuit reliability. The incorporation of error correcting techniques makes quantum circuits more resilient to environmental perturbations, making them more practical. Advanced quantum metrology and characterization methods provide accurate measurement and characterization of quantum systems, making quantum circuit testing and validation easier. These approaches help identify circuit performance improvements by correctly characterizing quantum features and behavior. This research integrates simulation-based verification, randomized benchmarking procedures, fault-tolerant approaches, and quantum metrology to ensure quantum circuit functioning and dependability. This research advances quantum technologies and realizes their transformative potential in cryptography, materials science, and other fields by explaining verification and testing strategies tailored to quantum computing systems
Quantum computing is an emerging technology that has the potential to change the perspectives and applications of computing in general. A wide range of applications are enabled: from faster algorithmic solutions of classically still difficult problems to theoretically more secure communication protocols. A quantum computer uses the quantum mechanical effects of particles or particle-like systems, and a major similarity between quantum and classical computers consists of both being abstracted as information processing machines. Whereas a classical computer operates on classical digital information, the quantum computer processes quantum information, which shares similarities with analog signals. One of the central differences between the two types of information is that classical information is more fault-tolerant when compared to its quantum counterpart. Faults are the result of the quantum systems being interfered by external noise, but during the last decades quantum error correction codes (QECC) were proposed as methods to reduce the effect of noise. Reliable quantum circuits are the result of designing circuits that operate directly on encoded quantum information, but the circuit’s reliability is also increased by supplemental redundancies, such as sub-circuit repetitions. Reliable quantum circuits have not been widely used, and one of the major obstacles is their vast associated resource overhead, but recent quantum computing architectures show promising scalabilities. Consequently the number of particles used for computing can be more easily increased, and that the classical control hardware (inherent for quantum computation) is also more reliable. Reliable quantum circuits haev been investigated for almost as long as general quantum computing, but their limited adoption (until recently) has not generated enough interest into their systematic design. The continuously increasing practical relevance of reliability motivates the present thesis to investigate some of the first answers to questions related to the background and the methods forming a reliable quantum circuit design stack. The specifics of quantum circuits are analysed from two perspectives: their probabilistic behaviour and their topological properties when a particular class of QECCs are used. The quantum phenomena, such as entanglement and superposition, are the computational resources used for designing quantum circuits. The discrete nature of classical information is missing for quantum information. An arbitrary quantum system can be in an infinite number of states, which are linear combinations of an exponential number of basis states. Any nontrivial linear combination of more than one basis states is called a state superposition. The effect of superpositions becomes evident when the state of the system is inferred (measured), as measurements are probabilistic with respect to their output: a nontrivial state superposition will collapse to one of the component basis states, and the measurement result is known exactly only after the measurement. A quantum system is, in general, composed from identical subsystems, meaning that a quantum computer (the complete system) operates on multiple similar particles (subsystems). Entanglement expresses the impossibility of separating the state of the subsystems from the state of the complete system: the nontrivial interactions between the subsystems result into a single indivisible state. Entanglement is an additional source of probabilistic behaviour: by measuring the state of a subsystem, the states of the unmeasured subsystems will probabilistically collapse to states from a well defined set of possible states. Superposition and entanglement are the building blocks of quantum information teleportation protocols, which in turn are used in state-of-the-art fault-tolerant quantum computing architectures. Information teleportation implies that the state of a subsystem is moved to a second subsystem without copying any information during the process. The probabilistic approach towards the design of quantum circuits is initiated by the extension of classical test and diagnosis methods. Quantum circuits are modelled similarly to classical circuits by defining gate-lists, and missing quantum gates are modelled by the single missing gate fault. The probabilistic approaches towards quantum circuits are facilitated by comparing these to stochastic circuits, which are a particular type of classical digital circuits. Stochastic circuits can be considered an emulation of analogue computing using digital components. A first proposed design method, based on the direct comparison, is the simulation of quantum circuits using stochastic circuits by mapping each quantum gate to a stochastic computing sub-circuit. The resulting stochastic circuit is compiled and simulated on FPGAs. The obtained results are encouraging and illustrate the capabilities of the proposed simulation technique. However, the exponential number of possible quantum basis states was translated into an exponential number of stochastic computing elements. A second contribution of the thesis is the proposal of test and diagnosis methods for both stochastic and quantum circuits. Existing verification (tomographic) methods of quantum circuits were targeting the reconstruction of the gate-lists. The repeated execution of the quantum circuit was followed by different but specific measurement at the circuit outputs. The similarities between stochastic and quantum circuits motivated the proposal of test and diagnosis methods that use a restricted set of measurement types, which minimise the number of circuit executions. The obtained simulation results show that the proposed validation methods improve the feasibility of quantum circuit tomography for small and medium size circuits. A third contribution of the thesis is the algorithmic formalisation of a problem encountered in teleportation-based quantum computing architectures. The teleportation results are probabilistic and require corrections represented as quantum gates from a particular set. However, there are known commutation properties of these gates with the gates used in the circuit. The corrections are not applied as dynamic gate insertions (during the circuit’s execution) into the gate-lists, but their effect is tracked through the circuit, and the corrections are applied only at circuit outputs. The simulation results show that the algorithmic solution is applicable for very large quantum circuits. Topological quantum computing (TQC) is based on a class of fault-tolerant quantum circuits that use the surface code as the underlying QECC. Quantum information is encoded in lattice-like structures and error protection is enabled by the topological properties of the lattice. The 3D structure of the lattice allows TQC computations to be visualised similarly to knot diagrams. Logical information is abstracted as strands and strand interactions (braids) represent logical quantum gates. Therefore, TQC circuits are abstracted using a geometrical description, which allows circuit input-output transformations (correlations) to be represented as geometric sub-structures. TQC design methods were not investigated prior to this work, and the thesis introduces the topological computational model by first analysing the necessary concepts. The proposed TQC design stack follows a top-down approach: an arbitrary quantum circuit is decomposed into the TQC supported gate set; the resulting circuit is mapped to a lattice of appropriate dimensions; relevant resulting topological properties are extracted and expressed using graphs and Boolean formulas. Both circuit representations are novel and applicable to TQC circuit synthesis and validation. Moreover, the Boolean formalism is broadened into a formal mechanism for proving circuit correctness. The thesis introduces TQC circuit synthesis, which is based on a novel logical gate geometric description, whose formal correctness is demonstrated. Two synthesis methods are designed, and both use a general planar representation of the circuit. Initial simulation results demonstrate the practicality and performance of the methods. An additional group of proposed design methods solves the problem of automatic correlation construction. The methods use validity criteria which were introduced and analysed beforehand in the thesis. Input-output correlations existing in the circuit are inferred using both the graph and the Boolean representation. The thesis extends the TQC state-of-the-art by recognising the importance of correlations in the validation process: correlation construction is used as a sub-routine for TQC circuit validation. The presented cross-layer validation procedure is useful when investigating both the QECC and the circuit, while a second proposed method is QECC-independent. Both methods are scalable and applicable even to very large circuits. The thesis completes with the analysis of TQC circuit identities, where the developed Boolean formalism is used. The proofs of former known circuit identities were either missing or complex, and the presented approach reduces the length of the proofs and represents a first step towards standardising them. A new identity is developed and detailed during the process of illustrating the known circuit identities. Reliable quantum circuits are a necessity for quantum computing to become reality, and specialised design methods are required to support the quest for scalable quantum computers. This thesis used a twofold approach towards this target: firstly by focusing on the probabilistic behaviour of quantum circuits, and secondly by considering the requirements of a promising quantum computing architecture, namely TQC. Both approaches resulted in a set of design methods enabling the investigation of reliable quantum circuits. The thesis contributes with the proposal of a new quantum simulation technique, no