Quantum machine learning (QML) has generated significant excitement as a potential game-changer in artificial intelligence. At the heart of any QML model lies a fundamental challenge: how do we translate classical data into the language of quantum mechanics? This encoding process is crucial because the way we represent information in a quantum system can make or break model performance. While researchers have proposed several encoding strategies over the years, most studies focus on idealized conditions, leaving a significant gap in our understanding of how these methods actually behave under the noisy, imperfect conditions of real quantum hardware. In this work, we address this gap through a systematic, simulation-based comparison of three widely used encoding strategies—Angle Encoding, Amplitude Encoding, and the entangling ZZFeatureMap—within a variational quantum classification framework. We evaluate these approaches on standard benchmark datasets under both noiseless and noisy conditions that mimic real quantum devices. To ensure our findings are statistically reliable, each noisy experiment is repeated across 10 independent runs, with results reported using mean accuracy, standard deviation, and 95% confidence intervals. Our results reveal a nuanced but sobering story. While the entangling ZZFeatureMap outperforms simpler methods in ideal noise-free settings, these advantages largely vanish under realistic depolarizing noise. When statistically averaged, all encoding strategies converge to near-random classification accuracy under moderate noise levels. These findings highlight the fragility of quantum advantages on today's noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware and emphasize the critical need for noise-aware, statistically grounded evaluation protocols when assessing the practical viability of QML models.
Quantum machine learning (QML) has generated significant excitement as a potential game-changer in artificial intelligence. At the heart of any QML model lies a fundamental challenge: how do we translate classical data into the language of quantum mechanics? This encoding process is crucial because the way we represent information in a quantum system can make or break model performance. While researchers have proposed several encoding strategies over the years, most studies focus on idealized conditions, leaving a significant gap in our understanding of how these methods actually behave under the noisy, imperfect conditions of real quantum hardware. In this work, we address this gap through a systematic, simulation-based comparison of three widely used encoding strategies—Angle Encoding, Amplitude Encoding, and the entangling ZZFeatureMap—within a variational quantum classification framework. We evaluate these approaches on standard benchmark datasets under both noiseless and noisy conditions that mimic real quantum devices. To ensure our findings are statistically reliable, each noisy experiment is repeated across 10 independent runs, with results reported using mean accuracy, standard deviation, and 95% confidence intervals. Our results reveal a nuanced but sobering story. While the entangling ZZFeatureMap outperforms simpler methods in ideal noise-free settings, these advantages largely vanish under realistic depolarizing noise. When statistically averaged, all encoding strategies converge to near-random classification accuracy under moderate noise levels. These findings highlight the fragility of quantum advantages on today's noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware and emphasize the critical need for noise-aware, statistically grounded evaluation protocols when assessing the practical viability of QML models.
The rapid advancement of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices necessitates a systematic evaluation of quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms to determine their feasibility for near-term applications. This study aims to benchmark the Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC)and the Quantum Kernel Support Vector Machine (QSVM) under realistic noise conditions modeled using Qiskit Aer. The primary objective is to investigate the impact of depolarizing and amplitude damping noise on the classification performance of these algorithms. Using the Iris binary classification task, we simulated four noise levels (0, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1) and evaluated accuracy across 1024 measurement shots. Results show that QSVM achieves superior accuracy (70%) under ideal and lownoise conditions, while VQC exhibits higher resilience at moderate noise (50% at 0.05 noise level) due to its adaptive Variational parameters. At higher noise levels (0.1), both models converge to ~35–40% accuracy, indicating significant degradation. These findings provide actionable insights for algorithm selection on NISQ hardware, with VQC favored for moderately noisy devices and QSVM preferable for low-noise or error-mitigated systems. The study concludes by highlighting the need for noise-aware ansatz design and error mitigation techniques to enhance QML performance in NISQ regimes.
Near-term quantum machine learning (QML) models operate in environments wherein noise is unavoidable, arising from both imperfect classical data acquisition and the limitations of noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware. Although most existing studies have focused primarily on quantum circuit noise in isolation, the combined influence of corrupted classical inputs and quantum hardware noise has received comparatively little attention.
In this work, we present a systematic experimental study of the robustness of a variational quantum classifier under realistic multi-level noise conditions. Using the Titanic dataset as a benchmark, a range of dataset-level noise models-including speckle noise, impulse noise, quantization noise, and feature dropout are applied to classical features prior to quantum encoding using a ZZ feature map. In parallel, hardware-inspired quantum noise channels such as depolarizing noise, amplitude damping, phase damping, Pauli errors, and readout errors are incorporated at the circuit level using the Qiskit Aer simulator.
The experimental results indicate that noise in classical input data can significantly intensify the effects of quantum decoherence, resulting in less stable training and noticeably lower classification accuracy. Together, these observations emphasize the importance of designing and evaluating quantum machine learning pipelines with noise in mind, and highlight the need to consider classical and quantum noise simultaneously when assessing QML performance in the NISQ era
The encoding of classical data into quantum states constitutes the primary performance bottleneck in Quantum Machine Learning (qml) on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (nisq) devices. No existing framework jointly characterises resource cost, expressivity, and noise robustness, nor provides actionable selection guidelines for practitioners. This survey addresses that gap through a systematic review of 66 primary works (2017-2026) assembled via a PRISMA-adapted protocol across five academic databases. Four principal contributions are made. First, a three-axis cost-expressivity-robustness taxonomy classifies all major encoding families - basis, angle, dense-angle, amplitude, data re-uploading, and IQP - along independently measurable axes. Second, closed-form depth-fidelity bounds under nisq decoherence channels identify the critical gate-error rate p* ~ 10^-3 below which amplitude encoding is viable. Third, a unified treatment of Fourier expressivity, barren-plateau onset, and quantum kernel concentration as functions of the encoding circuit provides the first joint trainability analysis. Fourth, a five-regime decision framework maps (D, n, p, tau) - feature dimension, qubit budget, error rate, and task type - to a hardware-grounded encoding recommendation. The central finding is that for p >= 10^-3, shallow angle-based encodings consistently outperform amplitude encoding in practice, despite the latter's exponential qubit advantage.
The development of quantum computers has been the stimulus that enables the realization of Quantum Machine Learning (QML), an area that integrates the calculational framework of quantum mechanics with the adaptive properties of classical machine learning. This article suggests a broad architecture that allows the connection between classical data pipelines and quantum algorithms, hybrid quantum-classical models emerge as a promising route to scalable and near-term quantum benefit. At the core of this paradigm lies the Classical-Quantum (CQ) paradigm, in which the qubit states of high-dimensional classical data are encoded using sophisticated classical encoding strategies which encode the data in terms of amplitude and angle of rotation, along with superposition mapping. These techniques allow compression of information exponentially into Hilbert space representations, which, together with reduced sample complexity, allows greater feature expressivity. We also examine variational quantum circuits, quantum gates expressed as trainable variables that run with classical optimizers to overcome decoherence, noise, and gate-depth constraints of the existing Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. Experimental comparisons with a Quantum Naive Bayes classifier prove that even small quantum circuits can approximate probabilistic inference with competitive accuracy compared to classical benchmarks, and have much better robustness to noisy data distributionsThis model does not only explain the algorithmic and architectural design of QML, it also offers a roadmap to the implementation of quantum kernels, variational algorithms, and hybrid feedback loops into practice, including optimization, computer vision, and medical diagnostics. The results support the idea that hybrid architectures with strong data encoding and adaptive error protection are key to moving QML out of theory to practice.
This study investigates classification performance and trainability of variational quantum classifiers on near-term noisy quantum hardware across circuit depth and qubit count regimes within the context of quantum computing and machine learning, an area of growing scientific importance given its implications for hybrid quantum-classical algorithm design and practical NISQ hardware benchmarking for near-term quantum advantage assessment. Using gradient-based parameter optimization of parameterized quantum circuits with hardware noise modeling via density matrix simulation and physical execution on IBM Eagle processors, we examine expressibility of parameterized circuits enabling nonlinear decision boundaries in feature Hilbert space, with trainability constrained by barren plateau gradients at large qubit counts in 96 circuit architectures (4 qubit counts x 4 depths x 6 ansatz families) evaluated across 5 classification datasets with 20 random initialization seeds each drawn from IBM Quantum Eagle (127-qubit) and Falcon (27-qubit) processors with noise mitigation via zero-noise extrapolation. Results indicate that 10-qubit, 4-layer VQC achieves 84.2% classification accuracy on the best benchmark, within 3.8 percentage points of classical SVM, but gradient variance decays exponentially with qubit count (variance halving per 2 added qubits), confirming barren plateau scaling (p < 0.001), with 84.2% accuracy, 3.8 pp gap to classical SVM baseline as the primary quantitative benchmark. Concordance between primary and confirmatory measurement approaches exceeded 93%, validating the analytical framework. These findings contribute empirically to quantum computing and machine learning and carry actionable implications for the design of programs and policies targeting hybrid quantum-classical algorithm design and practical NISQ hardware benchmarking for near-term quantum advantage assessment.
This thesis presents a systematic empirical evaluation of quantum machine learning performance under noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era constraints. Through 670 controlled experiments, it evaluated quantum kernel support vector machines and variational quantum classifiers against classical baselines on MNIST binary and multiclass classification tasks with systematic variation of problem difficulty, feature dimensionality (4, 8 qubits), and training set size (n ∈{100, 250, 400, 500, 2000, 4000}). Statistical rigor was ensured through five random seeds per condition and comprehensive significance testing. During the testing with binary datasets, classical methods (SVM, logistic regression, k-NN, neural networks) achieved 85.9% to 99.6% accuracy with training times under one second across all sample sizes. Quantum kernel methods utilizing ZZ feature maps yielded 70.5% to 96.0% accuracy, requiring 129 to 2,140 seconds training with quadratic sample size scaling. Larger scale quantum experiments (n = 4000 for both architectures, 8-qubit encoding with n = 2000 for quantum kernels) proved computationally impossible on available hardware leading to out of memory errors, highlighting practical NISQ-era scalability constraints. Variational quantum classifiers exhibited persistent performance stagnation, failing to exceed 66.5% accuracy despite increases in training data and feature dimensionality. Performance gaps ranged from 3.3 to 35.2 percentage points. All quantum classical differences achieved statistical significance (p< 0.05, with 13 of 14 comparisons meeting p< 0.01) and exhibited large to very large efect sizes (d> 1.0, with 13 of 14 comparisons exceeding d> 2.0). To further evaluate performance and scalability, a 4 class classification experiment was conducted following an identical experimental protocol, with training set sizes of n ∈{100, 250, 400}. Across 180 runs, classical baselines achieved mean accuracies between 87.2% and 95% across both 4 and 8 dimensional data. Quantum Kernel SVM struggled during runs with 4 dimensions, accuracy varying between 64.6% and 74%. Quantum Kernel SVM accuracy declined 16%-25% when the dimension and qubit count were increased to 8, showing findings of exponential kernel concentration. The Variational Quantum Classifier also performed poorly, with accuracy ranging from 43.4% to 44.6% across all runs, providing further evidence that it failed to leverage additional features or training data. Experiments employed noiseless statevector simulation, establishing that quantum underperformance stems from fundamental algorithmic limitations independent of hardware noise. A further extension to 8 class classification (digits 0–7) confirmed and amplified these findings: classical methods maintained 65–83% accuracy while Quantum Kernel SVM degraded to 34–47% and VQC collapsed to 21–23%, approaching the 12.5% random baseline. Supplementary appendix experiments further examined amplitude encoding on raw 784 dimensional pixel features and an alternative angle encoding scheme on the 8-class task; the latter demonstrated that replacing the ZZ Feature Map with simple per qubit rotations substantially recovered quantum kernel performance, suggesting feature map design as a more consequential variable than circuit depth or qubit count in near-term quantum classification.