Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

David Bohm Was Right: The Aharonov-Bohm Effect, Hidden Variables, and Quantum Measurement as Torsional Knot Coupling in TVS23

ALFREDO LUIS ACOSTA PADILLA

Published May 4, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The Structured Vacuum Theory TVS23 vindicates David Bohm on four points the physics establishment rejected. In TVS23, the vacuum is a discrete torsional network V23 with 23 channels and A5 symmetry. The vector potential A is the real torsional deformation of the 19 electromagnetic channels — not a gauge artifact. In the discrete network, only global gauge transformations are trivial; local gauge freedom is restricted, making A physically real. The electron is the trefoil knot T(2,3) with writhe w=−19 — Bohm's hidden variable, non-local as Bell requires, integer-valued, deterministic. Wavefunction collapse is topological coupling between knots with finite decoherence time τ_dec ~ 10⁻¹⁶ s derived from the Lagrangian — not instantaneous. Entanglement correlations propagate via the longitudinal vacuum mode at v = c(1+α/23), arriving 1057 femtoseconds per metre before light. The Aharonov-Bohm phase ΔΦ = eΦ/ℏ is derived from the interaction Lagrangian with a falsifiable correction of 0.031%. The magnetic flux quantum h/2e is reproduced with 0.18% error. Zero free parameters throughout.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.20030561

Related papers

No Dead Cats: Quantum Mechanics as Torsional Node Dynamics in the Structured Vacuum TVS23

ALFREDO LUIS ACOSTA PADILLA

We resolve the foundational problems of quantum mechanics — wave function collapse, measurement problem, Schrödinger's cat, Heisenberg uncertainty, and energy discretization — by deriving quantum behavior from the torsional node dynamics of TVS23. The wave function is the torsional oscillation amplitude of a topological knot in the 23-channel vacuum network V23 (symmetry group A₅, generated by x³−x−1=0). The Born rule |ψ|² follows from the elastic energy density of V23, not from postulate. Wave function collapse is network relaxation to minimum torsional energy upon knot-knot interaction — no observer required, no physical collapse process occurs. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle is the minimum spatial resolution of the V23 network node, not a fundamental property of nature. Energy discretization follows from the allowed harmonic modes of topological knots in V23, corresponding to the irreducible representations of A₅ (dimensions 1, 3, 3, 4, 5). The Schrödinger equation is derived as the wave equation in a medium with refractive index n(r) = (23/21)exp(GM/c²r). Schrödinger's cat is alive or dead from the moment of the nuclear event — macroscopic superposition is thermodynamically impossible in V23. Copenhagen interpretation, many-worlds, and pilot wave theories are structurally unnecessary. Zero free parameters. Zero postulates. One polynomial.

•Apr 4, 2026•0 citations

Topological Mechanics: Quantum Theory as the Envelope Dynamics of a Structured Vacuum

ALFREDO LUIS ACOSTA PADILLA

Topological Mechanics derives the complete mathematical content of quantum theory from the TVS23 structured vacuum network V23, a discrete elastic medium with icosahedral symmetry A5 generated by the polynomial x^3 - x - 1 = 0. The Schrodinger equation is not postulated but derived: it is the exact envelope equation of a real material torsion wave (a knot) oscillating at its Compton carrier frequency, with Planck's constant emerging as a derived network quantity. The wavefunction is identified as the complex envelope of this real wave, and its squared modulus as torsional energy density rather than probability. Quantum tunnelling is exhibited directly in a purely classical real field, matching the quantum period to 0.3%. The chemical bond is derived as a shared standing mode of the torsion field across two vacuum cells, restoring binding in H2+ where orbital treatments fail. Electron correlation is identified as topological exclusion between identical electron knots, confirmed as the entire binding mechanism of the H- ion and directionally compressed in H2. Finally, the discreteness of the network is shown to be exactly invisible to long-wavelength probes due to the lack of degree-4 invariants in the A5 symmetry group (isotropic to machine precision).

•Jul 20, 2026•0 citations

Orbital Angular Momentum from Knot Topology in the Structured Vacuum: Lz=mℏL_z = m\hbar Lz=mℏ as an Algebraic Identity in Wexp/TW_{\exp}/T Wexp/T

ALFREDO LUIS ACOSTA PADILLA

We derive the orbital angular momentum operator Lz=mℏL_z = m\hbar Lz=mℏ and the orbital quantum number lmax⁡=3l_{\max}=3 lmax=3 for the electron entirely within the Wexp⁡/TW_{\exp}/T Wexp/T framework over Q(e)\mathbb{Q}(e) Q(e), without postulates from quantum mechanics. The electron is the trefoil knot T(2,3)T(2,3) T(2,3) in the V23 vacuum network. The crossing number c=3c=3 c=3 of the trefoil, forced by the degree of the Acosta polynomial x3−x−1=0x^3-x-1=0 x3−x−1=0, equals lmax⁡l_{\max} lmax. The angular momentum operator Lz=−iℏδϕL_z = -i\hbar\delta_\phi Lz=−iℏδϕ acting on eigenstates E(e,imϕ)E(e,im\phi) E(e,imϕ) of Wexp⁡/TW_{\exp}/T Wexp/T produces exact eigenvalues mℏm\hbar mℏ with mm m integer by the coherence condition of the orbital field in V23. The standard Heisenberg uncertainty explanation for atomic stability is replaced by a topological argument: the trefoil is a fibered knot with Alexander polynomial Δe(t)=t2−t+1≠0\Delta_e(t)=t^2-t+1\neq 0 Δe(t)=t2−t+1=0, and the Viète condition ρ1ρ2ρ3=1\rho_1\rho_2\rho_3=1 ρ1ρ2ρ3=1 on the roots of x3−x−1=0x^3-x-1=0 x3−x−1=0 guarantees it cannot dissolve. The quantum of action ℏ\hbar ℏ is derived as the total action of one complete phase cycle of the V23 network: ℏV23=(1/J0)⋅ℏJ0=ℏ\hbar_{V23} = (1/J_0)\cdot\hbar J_0 = \hbar ℏV23=(1/J0)⋅ℏJ0=ℏ exactly, where J0=ln⁡ρ/232J_0 = \ln\rho/23^2 J0=lnρ/232 is the torsional dissipation constant. The 2l+1=72l+1=7 2l+1=7 orientations of orbital l=3l=3 l=3 follow algebraically from l=3l=3 l=3 with no additional assumptions. The complete Class A chain: x3−x−1=0→c=3→T(2,3)→l=3→7x^3-x-1=0 \to c=3 \to T(2,3) \to l=3 \to 7 x3−x−1=0→c=3→T(2,3)→l=3→7 orientations. Zero free parameters. No quantum mechanical postulates.

•Apr 13, 2026•0 citations

From Primitives to the Aharonov–Bohm Phase

Allen Proxmire

In 1959, Yakir Aharonov and David Bohm pointed out an experiment that should be impossible according to the standard intuitions of classical electromagnetism. A charged particle is sent through a double‑slit apparatus with a long thin solenoid placed between the two paths. The solenoid contains a magnetic field; the regions traversed by the particle do not. In classical mechanics, the particle should be entirely unaffected — no force, no torque, no Lorentz coupling. The interference pattern should be unchanged whether the solenoid is on or off. It isn't. When the solenoid is energized, the interference pattern shifts by Δφ = (q/ℏ) Φ, where Φ = ∫B·dA is the magnetic flux threading the solenoid. The particle’s wavefunction registers a region of magnetic field through which the particle never travels. Chambers performed the experiment in 1960; Tonomura confirmed it definitively with superconducting measurements in 1986. The effect is now standard textbook material and one of the deepest empirical phenomena in quantum mechanics. The puzzle is structural. In classical electromagnetism, the magnetic vector potential A was treated as a mathematical convenience — a quantity from which B = ∇×A could be computed but with no independent physical reality. The AB effect breaks this picture: the interference shift depends on ∮A·dx around the closed path, a gauge‑invariant integral that is non‑zero in regions where B = 0. The vector potential carries physical information that the magnetic field alone does not. Standard QM accommodates this by accepting that A is the physically meaningful quantity in the quantum context. This works mathematically but leaves a deeper question open: why should A have physical reality at all? This walkthrough shows how the Event Density framework provides an answer through Theorem 17. T17 establishes that gauge fields are the continuum‑level appearance of the substrate’s rule‑type connection — the substrate object that carries rule‑type label information from one substrate region to another. The gauge potential is not a mathematical convenience; it is the substrate’s parallel‑transport infrastructure for the rule‑type relabeling group. The AB phase is the integral of this substrate connection around a non‑contractible loop in a multiply‑connected substrate channel — a substrate‑level monodromy with observable consequences whenever the substrate’s topology supports closed loops the wavefunction can wind around. Stokes’ theorem connects the monodromy to the enclosed flux: Δφ = qΦ/ℏ. The structural payoff: the AB phase is not a mysterious nonlocal effect of the gauge potential. It is the substrate‑level monodromy of the rule‑type connection around a closed loop in a multiply‑connected substrate region. The gauge potential’s physical reality is not a postulate; it is what T17 establishes the substrate to provide.

•May 12, 2026•0 citations

Aharonov-Bohm Scattering From Knots

Kaustav Giri, V. V. Sreedhar

The celebrated Aharonov-Bohm effect is perhaps the first example in which the the interplay between classical topology and quantum theory was explored. This connection has continued to shed light on diverse areas of physics like quantum statistics, anomalies, condensed matter physics, and gauge theories. Several attempts were made to generalize the Aharonov-Bohm effect by modifying the simple solenoidal current distribution used by them to the case of multiple solenoids, and a toroidal solenoid, for example. A particularly ambitious task is to confine the magnetic flux to the interior of a knotted solenoid. While it is to be expected that a non-trivial phase factor will be picked up by the wave function of a charged particle travelling in the complement of the knot in three-dimensional space, the lack of symmetry defied attempts to explicitly solve the associated scattering problem. In this paper we report on a way to make progress towards this problem based on multipole expansions. The vector potential produced by a knot is obtained by making a multipole expansion, which is then used to calculate the S-matrix for the scattering of the charged particle, in the Born approximation. It is found that the S-matrix carries an imprint of the knottedness at the octopole order. For the case of a torus knot, a curious factorization property is seen to hold.

arXiv:2405.18956•May 29, 2024•0 citations

BEYOND THE GHOST IN THE VACUUM

Delája Schuppers

BEYOND THE GHOST IN THE VACUUM The Mechanical Derivation of the Aharonov-Bohm Phase Shift : Replacing Gauge Abstractions with Hydrodynamic Toroidal Vortex Dynamics Abstract Modern physics relies on the magnetic vector potential \(\vec{A}\) to explain the phase shift of electrons in the Aharonov-Bohm effect. This framework views the vector potential not as a mathematical convenience, but as a curve-fit approximation of a real, physical process unexplained in LCDM. UniPhiEd Realativity replaces this void abstract quantum vacuum assumption with a high-density, non-zero fluid substrate known as the neutrino ether. This paper provides a comprehensive, mechanical explanation of how a magnetic solenoid acts as a physical pump, creating a localized, twisting vortex in this substrate. We show that when a two-dimensional (2D) surface particle with a Möbius-torus topology—the electron—passes through this mechanical "micro-hurricane," its internal rotation phase is altered by one-dimensional (1D) linear neutrino streams. Using a hydrodynamic analogue of Ohm’s law, specific volumetric scaling (10 × 10 × 10), and strict matrix equations, we derive the exact experimental energy boundaries (10.2 keV, 20.4 keV, and 102.2 keV) and fully explain the observed pattern shift without resorting to non-local gauge actions.

•Oct 8, 2026•0 citations
The Structured Vacuum Theory TVS23 vindicates David Bohm on four points the physics establishment rejected. In TVS23, the vacuum is a discrete torsional network V23 with 23 channels and A5 symmetry. The vector potential A is the real torsional deformation of the 19 electromagnetic channels — not a gauge artifact. In the discrete network, only global gauge transformations are trivial; local gauge freedom is restricted, making A physically real. The electron is the trefoil knot T(2,3) with writhe w=−19 — Bohm's hidden variable, non-local as Bell requires, integer-valued, deterministic. Wavefunction collapse is topological coupling between knots with finite decoherence time τ_dec ~ 10⁻¹⁶ s derived from the Lagrangian — not instantaneous. Entanglement correlations propagate via the longitudinal vacuum mode at v = c(1+α/23), arriving 1057 femtoseconds per metre before light. The Aharonov-Bohm phase ΔΦ = eΦ/ℏ is derived from the interaction Lagrangian with a falsifiable correction of 0.031%. The magnetic flux quantum h/2e is reproduced with 0.18% error. Zero free parameters throughout.
We resolve the foundational problems of quantum mechanics — wave function collapse, measurement problem, Schrödinger's cat, Heisenberg uncertainty, and energy discretization — by deriving quantum behavior from the torsional node dynamics of TVS23. The wave function is the torsional oscillation amplitude of a topological knot in the 23-channel vacuum network V23 (symmetry group A₅, generated by x³−x−1=0). The Born rule |ψ|² follows from the elastic energy density of V23, not from postulate. Wave function collapse is network relaxation to minimum torsional energy upon knot-knot interaction — no observer required, no physical collapse process occurs. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle is the minimum spatial resolution of the V23 network node, not a fundamental property of nature. Energy discretization follows from the allowed harmonic modes of topological knots in V23, corresponding to the irreducible representations of A₅ (dimensions 1, 3, 3, 4, 5). The Schrödinger equation is derived as the wave equation in a medium with refractive index n(r) = (23/21)exp(GM/c²r). Schrödinger's cat is alive or dead from the moment of the nuclear event — macroscopic superposition is thermodynamically impossible in V23. Copenhagen interpretation, many-worlds, and pilot wave theories are structurally unnecessary. Zero free parameters. Zero postulates. One polynomial.
Topological Mechanics derives the complete mathematical content of quantum theory from the TVS23 structured vacuum network V23, a discrete elastic medium with icosahedral symmetry A5 generated by the polynomial x^3 - x - 1 = 0. The Schrodinger equation is not postulated but derived: it is the exact envelope equation of a real material torsion wave (a knot) oscillating at its Compton carrier frequency, with Planck's constant emerging as a derived network quantity. The wavefunction is identified as the complex envelope of this real wave, and its squared modulus as torsional energy density rather than probability. Quantum tunnelling is exhibited directly in a purely classical real field, matching the quantum period to 0.3%. The chemical bond is derived as a shared standing mode of the torsion field across two vacuum cells, restoring binding in H2+ where orbital treatments fail. Electron correlation is identified as topological exclusion between identical electron knots, confirmed as the entire binding mechanism of the H- ion and directionally compressed in H2. Finally, the discreteness of the network is shown to be exactly invisible to long-wavelength probes due to the lack of degree-4 invariants in the A5 symmetry group (isotropic to machine precision).
We derive the orbital angular momentum operator Lz=mℏL_z = m\hbar Lz=mℏ and the orbital quantum number lmax⁡=3l_{\max}=3 lmax=3 for the electron entirely within the Wexp⁡/TW_{\exp}/T Wexp/T framework over Q(e)\mathbb{Q}(e) Q(e), without postulates from quantum mechanics. The electron is the trefoil knot T(2,3)T(2,3) T(2,3) in the V23 vacuum network. The crossing number c=3c=3 c=3 of the trefoil, forced by the degree of the Acosta polynomial x3−x−1=0x^3-x-1=0 x3−x−1=0, equals lmax⁡l_{\max} lmax. The angular momentum operator Lz=−iℏδϕL_z = -i\hbar\delta_\phi Lz=−iℏδϕ acting on eigenstates E(e,imϕ)E(e,im\phi) E(e,imϕ) of Wexp⁡/TW_{\exp}/T Wexp/T produces exact eigenvalues mℏm\hbar mℏ with mm m integer by the coherence condition of the orbital field in V23. The standard Heisenberg uncertainty explanation for atomic stability is replaced by a topological argument: the trefoil is a fibered knot with Alexander polynomial Δe(t)=t2−t+1≠0\Delta_e(t)=t^2-t+1\neq 0 Δe(t)=t2−t+1=0, and the Viète condition ρ1ρ2ρ3=1\rho_1\rho_2\rho_3=1 ρ1ρ2ρ3=1 on the roots of x3−x−1=0x^3-x-1=0 x3−x−1=0 guarantees it cannot dissolve. The quantum of action ℏ\hbar ℏ is derived as the total action of one complete phase cycle of the V23 network: ℏV23=(1/J0)⋅ℏJ0=ℏ\hbar_{V23} = (1/J_0)\cdot\hbar J_0 = \hbar ℏV23=(1/J0)⋅ℏJ0=ℏ exactly, where J0=ln⁡ρ/232J_0 = \ln\rho/23^2 J0=lnρ/232 is the torsional dissipation constant. The 2l+1=72l+1=7 2l+1=7 orientations of orbital l=3l=3 l=3 follow algebraically from l=3l=3 l=3 with no additional assumptions. The complete Class A chain: x3−x−1=0→c=3→T(2,3)→l=3→7x^3-x-1=0 \to c=3 \to T(2,3) \to l=3 \to 7 x3−x−1=0→c=3→T(2,3)→l=3→7 orientations. Zero free parameters. No quantum mechanical postulates.
In 1959, Yakir Aharonov and David Bohm pointed out an experiment that should be impossible according to the standard intuitions of classical electromagnetism. A charged particle is sent through a double‑slit apparatus with a long thin solenoid placed between the two paths. The solenoid contains a magnetic field; the regions traversed by the particle do not. In classical mechanics, the particle should be entirely unaffected — no force, no torque, no Lorentz coupling. The interference pattern should be unchanged whether the solenoid is on or off. It isn't. When the solenoid is energized, the interference pattern shifts by Δφ = (q/ℏ) Φ, where Φ = ∫B·dA is the magnetic flux threading the solenoid. The particle’s wavefunction registers a region of magnetic field through which the particle never travels. Chambers performed the experiment in 1960; Tonomura confirmed it definitively with superconducting measurements in 1986. The effect is now standard textbook material and one of the deepest empirical phenomena in quantum mechanics. The puzzle is structural. In classical electromagnetism, the magnetic vector potential A was treated as a mathematical convenience — a quantity from which B = ∇×A could be computed but with no independent physical reality. The AB effect breaks this picture: the interference shift depends on ∮A·dx around the closed path, a gauge‑invariant integral that is non‑zero in regions where B = 0. The vector potential carries physical information that the magnetic field alone does not. Standard QM accommodates this by accepting that A is the physically meaningful quantity in the quantum context. This works mathematically but leaves a deeper question open: why should A have physical reality at all? This walkthrough shows how the Event Density framework provides an answer through Theorem 17. T17 establishes that gauge fields are the continuum‑level appearance of the substrate’s rule‑type connection — the substrate object that carries rule‑type label information from one substrate region to another. The gauge potential is not a mathematical convenience; it is the substrate’s parallel‑transport infrastructure for the rule‑type relabeling group. The AB phase is the integral of this substrate connection around a non‑contractible loop in a multiply‑connected substrate channel — a substrate‑level monodromy with observable consequences whenever the substrate’s topology supports closed loops the wavefunction can wind around. Stokes’ theorem connects the monodromy to the enclosed flux: Δφ = qΦ/ℏ. The structural payoff: the AB phase is not a mysterious nonlocal effect of the gauge potential. It is the substrate‑level monodromy of the rule‑type connection around a closed loop in a multiply‑connected substrate region. The gauge potential’s physical reality is not a postulate; it is what T17 establishes the substrate to provide.
The celebrated Aharonov-Bohm effect is perhaps the first example in which the the interplay between classical topology and quantum theory was explored. This connection has continued to shed light on diverse areas of physics like quantum statistics, anomalies, condensed matter physics, and gauge theories. Several attempts were made to generalize the Aharonov-Bohm effect by modifying the simple solenoidal current distribution used by them to the case of multiple solenoids, and a toroidal solenoid, for example. A particularly ambitious task is to confine the magnetic flux to the interior of a knotted solenoid. While it is to be expected that a non-trivial phase factor will be picked up by the wave function of a charged particle travelling in the complement of the knot in three-dimensional space, the lack of symmetry defied attempts to explicitly solve the associated scattering problem. In this paper we report on a way to make progress towards this problem based on multipole expansions. The vector potential produced by a knot is obtained by making a multipole expansion, which is then used to calculate the S-matrix for the scattering of the charged particle, in the Born approximation. It is found that the S-matrix carries an imprint of the knottedness at the octopole order. For the case of a torus knot, a curious factorization property is seen to hold.
BEYOND THE GHOST IN THE VACUUM The Mechanical Derivation of the Aharonov-Bohm Phase Shift : Replacing Gauge Abstractions with Hydrodynamic Toroidal Vortex Dynamics Abstract Modern physics relies on the magnetic vector potential A⃗\vec{A}A to explain the phase shift of electrons in the Aharonov-Bohm effect. This framework views the vector potential not as a mathematical convenience, but as a curve-fit approximation of a real, physical process unexplained in LCDM. UniPhiEd Realativity replaces this void abstract quantum vacuum assumption with a high-density, non-zero fluid substrate known as the neutrino ether. This paper provides a comprehensive, mechanical explanation of how a magnetic solenoid acts as a physical pump, creating a localized, twisting vortex in this substrate. We show that when a two-dimensional (2D) surface particle with a Möbius-torus topology—the electron—passes through this mechanical "micro-hurricane," its internal rotation phase is altered by one-dimensional (1D) linear neutrino streams. Using a hydrodynamic analogue of Ohm’s law, specific volumetric scaling (10 × 10 × 10), and strict matrix equations, we derive the exact experimental energy boundaries (10.2 keV, 20.4 keV, and 102.2 keV) and fully explain the observed pattern shift without resorting to non-local gauge actions.