Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Phi-Structured Decoherence Timescales in Multi-Level Transmon Qubits: A Parameter-Free Prediction from Fibonacci Causal Loop Theory Paper 52

Abby Davis

Published Apr 24, 2026• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

We derive, from first principles within FCLT, a parameter-free prediction for multi-level transmon qubit decoherence structure. Ostrogradsky stability constrains the bath memory kernel to depth-2 (the unique minimal stable non-Markovian structure), which propagates via Nakajima-Zwanzig and the Dyson self-energy to impose Fibonacci recursion on decay rates Γk = Γk₋₁ + Γk₋₂. Prediction: consecutive decoherence timescale ratios τk/τk+1 → φ ≈ 1.618 in the transmon regime (bath bandwidth ≫ anharmonicity). Null: harmonic oscillator gives ratio → 1. Pass criterion δ < 0.05; falsification δ > 0.15. Pre-registered before data examination.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.19746101

Related papers

Prediction 15c Falsified: φ^(−k) Decay Law Does Not Describe Multi-Level T1 Coherence Times in High-EJ/EC Transmon Qudits Fibonacci Causal Loop Theory — Paper 61

Abby Davis

This paper reports the definitive test and falsification of FCLT Prediction 15c (pre-registered in Paper 52, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19746102). The prediction held that consecutive T₁ decoherence timescale ratios in transmon qudits satisfy τₖ/τₖ₊₁ → φ ≈ 1.618, derived from depth-2 bath memory structure in the Nakajima–Zwanzig projection formalism. Using the measured T₁ coherence times of qudit Q5 from Blok et al. (2025), Table III, across 9 transition levels (k = 1–9), T₁ values plateau at ~13–14 µs from k = 6 onward, inconsistent with the φ⁻ᵏ decay model. At k = 9, the predicted T₁ is 1.4 µs versus the observed 13 µs — a factor of 9× discrepancy (χ² = 75.9, reduced χ² = 9.5). The plateau is consistent with a dielectric loss noise floor identified by Blok et al. The pre-registered falsification criterion is met. Prediction 15c is falsified. Short-range consistency at k = 1–3 is noted but cannot distinguish FCLT from the harmonic null model and is insufficient for confirmation.

•May 20, 2025•1 citation

Decoherence Rate as a Function of FCLT Necessity Depth: Pre-Registered φ-Structured Decoherence Gradient Prediction and Empirical Test Protocol for Multi-Qubit Quantum Systems

Abby Davis

Fibonacci Causal Loop Theory (FCLT) predicts that decoherence rate Γ scales inversely with necessity depth D: Γ(D) = Γ₀ × φ^(−D), and the ratio of decoherence rates at adjacent necessity depths satisfies Γ(D+1)/Γ(D) = 1/φ ≈ 0.618. This formalizes FCLT Prediction 12 (pre-registered in FCLT Complete Manuscript v16, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20087640). The derivation follows directly from the QNM quality factor confirmations: P73 confirmed Q = φ³ (D=3, Schwarzschild) and P73e confirmed Q = φ⁴ (D=4, Kerr). Since Q = ω₀/Γ, the decoherence scaling law Γ(D) = Γ₀ × φ^(−D) follows with zero free parameters. The prediction is testable in NMR quantum simulators, trapped-ion arrays, and superconducting qubit platforms where decoherence rates can be measured across multiple organizational depth levels. Confirmation criterion: δ < 0.05. Classification: technology-gap pending validated D(x,t) measurement protocol. FCLT scorecard unchanged: 20 confirmed / 5 falsified / 24 tech-gap / 4 gray zone.

•May 13, 2026•0 citations

Necessity Recursion and a Pre-Registered φ-Attractor Prediction for Proper-Time Superposition in Optical Ion Clocks

Abby Davis

On 20 April 2026, Sorci, Foo, Leibfried, Sanner, and Pikovski (Phys. Rev. Lett.) proposed that next-generation optical ion clocks with squeezed-state preparation can probe whether proper time exists in quantum superposition — a single clock ticking faster and slower at once. Their work establishes the protocol; the laboratory measurement is forthcoming. That prospective window permits a genuine pre-registered prediction. Fibonacci Causal Loop Theory (FCLT) holds that any stable system governed by depth-2 necessity recursion, S(n)=S(n−1)+S(n−2), is driven to the golden ratio φ=(1+√5)/2 — the unique algebraically forced attractor of its characteristic equation x²−x−1=0. We advance the hypothesis that proper-time superposition is such a system, the two temporal branches playing the role of the two prior states, so that the ratio of fast- to slow-ticking amplitudes approaches φ upon decoherence. From this we obtain one parameter-free, falsifiable prediction — t₊/t₋ → φ ≈ 1.61803, with δ = |R−φ|/φ and falsification at δ > 0.10 — logged under Protocol V3.1 prior to experimental resolution. We claim no confirmation: the prediction is offered as not-yet-tested, to be adjudicated by the Stevens/NIST program. A second, independent signature (φ-structured fringe spacing in the squeezed regime) provides an internal consistency check.

•May 10, 2026•0 citations

FCLT Paper 54 Pre-Registration: Fibonacci Anyons and the Born Rule — A Bridge from Necessity Recursion to Topological Quantum Computing

Abby Davis

This paper pre-registers a theoretical bridge between Fibonacci Causal Loop Theory and the established physics of Fibonacci anyons in topological quantum computing. Fibonacci anyons have quantum dimension d satisfying d^2 = d + 1 — the defining algebraic identity of phi — derived rigorously from braid group representation theory. Their fusion rules generate Hilbert space dimension growth following the Fibonacci sequence, instantiating FCLT’s necessity recursion S(n) = S(n-1) + S(n-2) in a quantum mechanical context. Three predictions are pre-registered: P54a (fusion probabilities in physical Fibonacci anyon implementations follow phi-structured F-matrix amplitudes, delta < 0.05); P54b (phi’s quantum dimension is unique among fusion categories satisfying 2-term additive fusion rules); and P54c (exploratory: the Born rule emerges as a macroscopic limit of Fibonacci anyon fusion amplitudes). This pre-registration addresses the gap in P15’s Born rule derivation and establishes timestamp priority for the FCLT quantum foundations program. Version 2 corrects one error in Section 6 (Target Datasets): Nakamura et al. (2020) and Willett et al. (2019) were named as target datasets for P54a. Upon review, these are the wrong experimental platforms. The correction is documented below with full explanation.

•Apr 26, 2026•0 citations

Non-Markovian Type II-infinity Operator Dynamics in Cortical Fields: Resolving Thermal Decoherence in Neurocomputational Matrices and Orchestrated Objective Reduction

Maxim Sokolov

This repository contains the complete peer-replications block—including the computational simulation python source code and the theoretical preprint text—formalizing a non-perturbative, algebraic resolution to the problem of thermal decoherence in quantum neurobiology. By mapping the mammalian cortical connectome onto infinite semi-finite Type II-infinity von Neumann factors, we derive a strict non-Markovian memory kernel via the Nakajima-Zwanzig projection technique. This framework demonstrates how phase information undergoes continuous coherent feedback into localized neural subsystems, neutralizing thermal noise and stabilizing quantum superposition states within macromolecular superradiant tubulin clusters over biological timescales (10–25 ms). The computational suite structurally integrates:1. Neurochemical modulation profiles (Dopamine, Serotonin, Acetylcholine) and anesthetic-induced loss of consciousness parameters.2. A deterministic biomechanical trigger mechanism linking Penrose gravitational self-reduction energy (Eg) directly to the activation thresholds of voltage-gated Na+/K+ ion channels.3. Non-Markovian 1/f^γ power-law fractal memory kinetics under real physiological constraints.4. Holographic Multi-scale Entanglement Renormalization Ansatz (MERA) network flows synchronized with Giulio Tononi's Integrated Information Theory (IIT) Phi-index metrics. File Inventory:- Resolving Thermal Decoherence in Neurocomputational Matrices and Orchestrated Objective Reduction.pdf: Manuscript (Preprint PDF)- README.md: Comprehensive architectural documentation, theoretical preprint text, and experimental replication manual.- quantum_neurobiology_node.py: Autonomous Python execution script computing biophysical parameters and thermodynamic limits across three active macro-cognitive states.

•Sep 10, 2026•0 citations

Falsifiable Predictions, 3-Qubit Discriminator, and Worked Case Reanalysis under P1+P2

Roberto Valtancoli

The author develops the experimental layer of the framework introduced in the foundational Preprint I. Seven families of falsifiable predictions (F1–F7) are stated and matched to ten falsification criteria (F-T1–F-T10). The predictions cover: τ-window scaling laws under monitored feedback and non-Markovian memory; a 3-qubit ontological feedforward discriminator constructed to separate synchronisation-based from entanglement-based metric emergence; a directional-asymmetry test Δ(τ) with null control; a 4-qubit triangle-inequality test on the metric-compatibility regime; an asymptotic large-deviation consistency channel as cross-cutting envelope; a coherence-affected entropy-production consistency target; and a sync-rate scaling under Dicke collective dissipation. A worked-case reanalysis of Micadei et al. (2019) under the non-Markovian channel of P1 demonstrates non-vacuity of the framework on existing experimental data within a factor ≈ 2.5 on a nine-decade timescale range. The operational definition of the memory timescale τₘₑₘ was fixed prior to numerical evaluation as a matter of pre-registration discipline, with an analytic zero-crossing alternative computed for transparency and explicitly rejected under the conservative bound. A structured Nakajima–Zwanzig–TCL2 sketch indicating the sign and structure of the next-to-leading-order correction for the Micadei interaction Hamiltonian is provided in Appendix E-II, identifying this residual as a target for next-to-leading-order refinement in the smallness parameter (Φ_NM − 1).

•May 1, 2026•0 citations
We derive, from first principles within FCLT, a parameter-free prediction for multi-level transmon qubit decoherence structure. Ostrogradsky stability constrains the bath memory kernel to depth-2 (the unique minimal stable non-Markovian structure), which propagates via Nakajima-Zwanzig and the Dyson self-energy to impose Fibonacci recursion on decay rates Γk = Γk₋₁ + Γk₋₂. Prediction: consecutive decoherence timescale ratios τk/τk+1 → φ ≈ 1.618 in the transmon regime (bath bandwidth ≫ anharmonicity). Null: harmonic oscillator gives ratio → 1. Pass criterion δ < 0.05; falsification δ > 0.15. Pre-registered before data examination.
This paper reports the definitive test and falsification of FCLT Prediction 15c (pre-registered in Paper 52, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19746102). The prediction held that consecutive T₁ decoherence timescale ratios in transmon qudits satisfy τₖ/τₖ₊₁ → φ ≈ 1.618, derived from depth-2 bath memory structure in the Nakajima–Zwanzig projection formalism. Using the measured T₁ coherence times of qudit Q5 from Blok et al. (2025), Table III, across 9 transition levels (k = 1–9), T₁ values plateau at ~13–14 µs from k = 6 onward, inconsistent with the φ⁻ᵏ decay model. At k = 9, the predicted T₁ is 1.4 µs versus the observed 13 µs — a factor of 9× discrepancy (χ² = 75.9, reduced χ² = 9.5). The plateau is consistent with a dielectric loss noise floor identified by Blok et al. The pre-registered falsification criterion is met. Prediction 15c is falsified. Short-range consistency at k = 1–3 is noted but cannot distinguish FCLT from the harmonic null model and is insufficient for confirmation.
Fibonacci Causal Loop Theory (FCLT) predicts that decoherence rate Γ scales inversely with necessity depth D: Γ(D) = Γ₀ × φ^(−D), and the ratio of decoherence rates at adjacent necessity depths satisfies Γ(D+1)/Γ(D) = 1/φ ≈ 0.618. This formalizes FCLT Prediction 12 (pre-registered in FCLT Complete Manuscript v16, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20087640). The derivation follows directly from the QNM quality factor confirmations: P73 confirmed Q = φ³ (D=3, Schwarzschild) and P73e confirmed Q = φ⁴ (D=4, Kerr). Since Q = ω₀/Γ, the decoherence scaling law Γ(D) = Γ₀ × φ^(−D) follows with zero free parameters. The prediction is testable in NMR quantum simulators, trapped-ion arrays, and superconducting qubit platforms where decoherence rates can be measured across multiple organizational depth levels. Confirmation criterion: δ < 0.05. Classification: technology-gap pending validated D(x,t) measurement protocol. FCLT scorecard unchanged: 20 confirmed / 5 falsified / 24 tech-gap / 4 gray zone.
On 20 April 2026, Sorci, Foo, Leibfried, Sanner, and Pikovski (Phys. Rev. Lett.) proposed that next-generation optical ion clocks with squeezed-state preparation can probe whether proper time exists in quantum superposition — a single clock ticking faster and slower at once. Their work establishes the protocol; the laboratory measurement is forthcoming. That prospective window permits a genuine pre-registered prediction. Fibonacci Causal Loop Theory (FCLT) holds that any stable system governed by depth-2 necessity recursion, S(n)=S(n−1)+S(n−2), is driven to the golden ratio φ=(1+√5)/2 — the unique algebraically forced attractor of its characteristic equation x²−x−1=0. We advance the hypothesis that proper-time superposition is such a system, the two temporal branches playing the role of the two prior states, so that the ratio of fast- to slow-ticking amplitudes approaches φ upon decoherence. From this we obtain one parameter-free, falsifiable prediction — t₊/t₋ → φ ≈ 1.61803, with δ = |R−φ|/φ and falsification at δ > 0.10 — logged under Protocol V3.1 prior to experimental resolution. We claim no confirmation: the prediction is offered as not-yet-tested, to be adjudicated by the Stevens/NIST program. A second, independent signature (φ-structured fringe spacing in the squeezed regime) provides an internal consistency check.
This paper pre-registers a theoretical bridge between Fibonacci Causal Loop Theory and the established physics of Fibonacci anyons in topological quantum computing. Fibonacci anyons have quantum dimension d satisfying d^2 = d + 1 — the defining algebraic identity of phi — derived rigorously from braid group representation theory. Their fusion rules generate Hilbert space dimension growth following the Fibonacci sequence, instantiating FCLT’s necessity recursion S(n) = S(n-1) + S(n-2) in a quantum mechanical context. Three predictions are pre-registered: P54a (fusion probabilities in physical Fibonacci anyon implementations follow phi-structured F-matrix amplitudes, delta < 0.05); P54b (phi’s quantum dimension is unique among fusion categories satisfying 2-term additive fusion rules); and P54c (exploratory: the Born rule emerges as a macroscopic limit of Fibonacci anyon fusion amplitudes). This pre-registration addresses the gap in P15’s Born rule derivation and establishes timestamp priority for the FCLT quantum foundations program. Version 2 corrects one error in Section 6 (Target Datasets): Nakamura et al. (2020) and Willett et al. (2019) were named as target datasets for P54a. Upon review, these are the wrong experimental platforms. The correction is documented below with full explanation.
This repository contains the complete peer-replications block—including the computational simulation python source code and the theoretical preprint text—formalizing a non-perturbative, algebraic resolution to the problem of thermal decoherence in quantum neurobiology. By mapping the mammalian cortical connectome onto infinite semi-finite Type II-infinity von Neumann factors, we derive a strict non-Markovian memory kernel via the Nakajima-Zwanzig projection technique. This framework demonstrates how phase information undergoes continuous coherent feedback into localized neural subsystems, neutralizing thermal noise and stabilizing quantum superposition states within macromolecular superradiant tubulin clusters over biological timescales (10–25 ms). The computational suite structurally integrates:1. Neurochemical modulation profiles (Dopamine, Serotonin, Acetylcholine) and anesthetic-induced loss of consciousness parameters.2. A deterministic biomechanical trigger mechanism linking Penrose gravitational self-reduction energy (Eg) directly to the activation thresholds of voltage-gated Na+/K+ ion channels.3. Non-Markovian 1/f^γ power-law fractal memory kinetics under real physiological constraints.4. Holographic Multi-scale Entanglement Renormalization Ansatz (MERA) network flows synchronized with Giulio Tononi's Integrated Information Theory (IIT) Phi-index metrics. File Inventory:- Resolving Thermal Decoherence in Neurocomputational Matrices and Orchestrated Objective Reduction.pdf: Manuscript (Preprint PDF)- README.md: Comprehensive architectural documentation, theoretical preprint text, and experimental replication manual.- quantum_neurobiology_node.py: Autonomous Python execution script computing biophysical parameters and thermodynamic limits across three active macro-cognitive states.
The author develops the experimental layer of the framework introduced in the foundational Preprint I. Seven families of falsifiable predictions (F1–F7) are stated and matched to ten falsification criteria (F-T1–F-T10). The predictions cover: τ-window scaling laws under monitored feedback and non-Markovian memory; a 3-qubit ontological feedforward discriminator constructed to separate synchronisation-based from entanglement-based metric emergence; a directional-asymmetry test Δ(τ) with null control; a 4-qubit triangle-inequality test on the metric-compatibility regime; an asymptotic large-deviation consistency channel as cross-cutting envelope; a coherence-affected entropy-production consistency target; and a sync-rate scaling under Dicke collective dissipation. A worked-case reanalysis of Micadei et al. (2019) under the non-Markovian channel of P1 demonstrates non-vacuity of the framework on existing experimental data within a factor ≈ 2.5 on a nine-decade timescale range. The operational definition of the memory timescale τₘₑₘ was fixed prior to numerical evaluation as a matter of pre-registration discipline, with an analytic zero-crossing alternative computed for transparency and explicitly rejected under the conservative bound. A structured Nakajima–Zwanzig–TCL2 sketch indicating the sign and structure of the next-to-leading-order correction for the Micadei interaction Hamiltonian is provided in Appendix E-II, identifying this residual as a target for next-to-leading-order refinement in the smallness parameter (Φ_NM − 1).