Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

From Qubit Engineering to AI Control: Accelerating Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing through Neural Error Correction and Open-Source Frameworks

Douglas C. Youvan

Published Jan 1, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.13140/rg.2.2.29875.59687

Related papers

Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computer Architecture: Towards Scalable, AI-Assisted, and Energy-Aware Error Correction Frameworks

Harsh Singh

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Toward Intelligent Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing: A Review of Google’s Willow Processor and AI Integration

Tejaswini Ghosh, Shankaramma, R Charis Susanna

With quantum computing’s potential to solve classically insurmountable problems, quantum computation has emerged as a transformative paradigm across various fields such as cryptography, materials science, and artificial intelligence. The pursuit of scalable and fault-tolerant quantum computation is at the heart of this evolution. The examination examines the evolution of quantum computing architectures, such as superconducting qubits and quantum error correction (QEC) codes until the recent advancement in Google’s Willow processor. This review highlights this progression. We examine the development of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices and the first instances of below-threshold QEC, where an increase in qubit count leads to exponentially lower error rates. By using Willow’s 105-qubit architecture, it is possible to perform real-time error correction on a 77 logical qubit grid and complete random circuit sampling in under five minutes, which would otherwise be an insurmountable task. We examine the way Willow’s method is compared to other quantum platforms and discuss its potential impact on early fault-tolerant quantum computing (EFTQC), scalability, and the future of intelligent quantum systems. In conclusion, the paper highlights some of the open issues and opportunities in quantum hardware, artificial intelligence (AI), and fault-tolerant computation.

IEEE International Conference for Convergence in Computing Technology (I3CTCON)•Mar 14, 2026•1 citation

AI-Enabled Decoding of Qubit Loss for Quantum Error-Correcting Codes

Yuqing Wang, Xiaotian Nie, Jiale Dai +4 more

Qubit loss is a major source of error in quantum computation, as it invalidates the algebraic structure of the standard stabilizer formalism for quantum error-correcting codes. On the one hand, it complicates decoding; on the other hand, it introduces stochastic flicker patterns in stabilizers as a hallmark of qubit loss. Here, we develop an artificial-intelligence-enabled decoder based on a spatiotemporal Graph Neural Network (STGNN) architecture to extract spatial and temporal correlations from syndrome histories. Our decoder performs a dual-head task, simultaneously correcting standard Pauli errors and identifying the locations of qubit loss. Our decoder achieves significantly higher logical accuracy than both the traditional minimum-weight perfect matching (MWPM) algorithm and even delayed-erasure MWPM decoders that use qubit loss information from the final round as input. Our decoder can also identify more than 90% of loss locations after accumulating stabilizer measurements over the subsequent ten rounds, thereby facilitating qubit reinitialization, for instance, via the continuous loading technique on the atom array platform. For both tasks, our STGNN performs nearly identically to a modified version of AlphaQubit, but it employs a parallel input structure, giving it an advantage in inference time over modified AlphaQubit's recurrent input structure. This work provides a robust and scalable framework for correcting qubit loss errors, paving the way for more efficient fault-tolerant quantum computation.

quant-pharXiv:2604.14269•Apr 16, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Resource Requirements for Breaking Elliptic Curve Cryptography: How NISQ-Era Innovations Accelerate the Path to Fault-Tolerant Attacks

Robert Campbell

We present a comprehensive synthesis of how innovations developed during the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era are reducing the resource requirements for future fault-tolerant quantum attacks on elliptic curve cryptography (ECC). While pure Shor’s algorithm requires NL = 2, 330 logical qubits and ∼ 1.29 × 1011 Toffoli gates (or ∼ 9.0 × 1011 T-gates) for NIST P-256—well beyond current NISQ capabilities—we demonstrate that hybrid quantum-classical techniques, AI-driven error correction decoders, and full-stack co-optimization pioneered today are creating a bridge to more efficient fault-tolerant quantum computers (FTQC). A critical engineering challenge remains: the memory-to-computation gap. While Google’s Willow processor (2025) demonstrates exponential error suppression for quantum memory, translating this to the ∼ 1011 fault-tolerant logical gate operations required for Shor’s algorithm involves fundamentally different engineering requirements and unresolved architectural complexity. This gap represents the primary technical uncertainty qualifying our projections. Recent developments provide critical but incomplete progress: Google’s Willow processor experimentally demonstrates exponential error suppression with 2.14× improvement per code distance for quantum memory, though logical gate operations remain undemonstrated. IBM’s roadmap projects 200 logical qubits by 2029 and scaling to 2,000 qubits on Blue Jay by 2033+, though the roadmap does not specify whether all 2,000 are logical qubits—a critical distinction given error correction overhead. Recent breakthroughs have achieved 3,000-6,100 qubit arrays proving physical scale is feasible, though computational capabilities await demonstration. The IBM-HSBC quantum bond trading trial (September 2025) confirms industrial deployment of hybrid quantum-classical systems for optimization, though these techniques do not directly apply to fault-tolerant implementations of Shor’s algorithm. Our analysis—the first to synthesize these convergent breakthroughs into a unified threat model—reveals that NISQ-era engineering innovations could reduce future FTQC requirements by factors of 1.5-2.3×. We present projections with varying probabilities of technological success: Conservative (high probability): NL ∈ [1,2,200,800] with timeline 2033-2035; Realistic (moderate probability): NL ∈ [1, 200, 1, 600] with timeline 2031-2033; Optimistic (lower probability): NL ∈ [900, 1, 100] with timeline 2029-2031. These engineering-based projections represent the predictable component of progress.We separately analyze an Algorithmic Breakthrough scenario based on Litinski’s work suggesting 2,580× gate reduction, whichcould accelerate timelines to 2027-2029. We emphasize that such algorithmic innovations, while unpredictable, have historically dominated incremental improvements and represent a critical uncertainty in quantum threat assessment. We acknowledge the reflexive nature of such analysis—credible threat projections can influence investment, policy, and migration decisions in ways that may accelerate or decelerate actual progress toward cryptographically-relevant quantum computers. Our projections thus serve not merely as predictions but as potential catalysts within the quantum ecosystem.

•Sep 29, 2025•0 citations

Towards Scalable, Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computers: Multi-Logical-Qubit Architectures and Error Correction Advances

Azizi Othman

•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

Quantum Error Correction and Fault Tolerant Quantum Computing

Markus Grassl, Martin Rötteler

Springer eBooks•Nov 2, 2011•2 citations
With quantum computing’s potential to solve classically insurmountable problems, quantum computation has emerged as a transformative paradigm across various fields such as cryptography, materials science, and artificial intelligence. The pursuit of scalable and fault-tolerant quantum computation is at the heart of this evolution. The examination examines the evolution of quantum computing architectures, such as superconducting qubits and quantum error correction (QEC) codes until the recent advancement in Google’s Willow processor. This review highlights this progression. We examine the development of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices and the first instances of below-threshold QEC, where an increase in qubit count leads to exponentially lower error rates. By using Willow’s 105-qubit architecture, it is possible to perform real-time error correction on a 77 logical qubit grid and complete random circuit sampling in under five minutes, which would otherwise be an insurmountable task. We examine the way Willow’s method is compared to other quantum platforms and discuss its potential impact on early fault-tolerant quantum computing (EFTQC), scalability, and the future of intelligent quantum systems. In conclusion, the paper highlights some of the open issues and opportunities in quantum hardware, artificial intelligence (AI), and fault-tolerant computation.
Qubit loss is a major source of error in quantum computation, as it invalidates the algebraic structure of the standard stabilizer formalism for quantum error-correcting codes. On the one hand, it complicates decoding; on the other hand, it introduces stochastic flicker patterns in stabilizers as a hallmark of qubit loss. Here, we develop an artificial-intelligence-enabled decoder based on a spatiotemporal Graph Neural Network (STGNN) architecture to extract spatial and temporal correlations from syndrome histories. Our decoder performs a dual-head task, simultaneously correcting standard Pauli errors and identifying the locations of qubit loss. Our decoder achieves significantly higher logical accuracy than both the traditional minimum-weight perfect matching (MWPM) algorithm and even delayed-erasure MWPM decoders that use qubit loss information from the final round as input. Our decoder can also identify more than 90% of loss locations after accumulating stabilizer measurements over the subsequent ten rounds, thereby facilitating qubit reinitialization, for instance, via the continuous loading technique on the atom array platform. For both tasks, our STGNN performs nearly identically to a modified version of AlphaQubit, but it employs a parallel input structure, giving it an advantage in inference time over modified AlphaQubit's recurrent input structure. This work provides a robust and scalable framework for correcting qubit loss errors, paving the way for more efficient fault-tolerant quantum computation.
We present a comprehensive synthesis of how innovations developed during the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era are reducing the resource requirements for future fault-tolerant quantum attacks on elliptic curve cryptography (ECC). While pure Shor’s algorithm requires NL = 2, 330 logical qubits and ∼ 1.29 × 1011 Toffoli gates (or ∼ 9.0 × 1011 T-gates) for NIST P-256—well beyond current NISQ capabilities—we demonstrate that hybrid quantum-classical techniques, AI-driven error correction decoders, and full-stack co-optimization pioneered today are creating a bridge to more efficient fault-tolerant quantum computers (FTQC). A critical engineering challenge remains: the memory-to-computation gap. While Google’s Willow processor (2025) demonstrates exponential error suppression for quantum memory, translating this to the ∼ 1011 fault-tolerant logical gate operations required for Shor’s algorithm involves fundamentally different engineering requirements and unresolved architectural complexity. This gap represents the primary technical uncertainty qualifying our projections. Recent developments provide critical but incomplete progress: Google’s Willow processor experimentally demonstrates exponential error suppression with 2.14× improvement per code distance for quantum memory, though logical gate operations remain undemonstrated. IBM’s roadmap projects 200 logical qubits by 2029 and scaling to 2,000 qubits on Blue Jay by 2033+, though the roadmap does not specify whether all 2,000 are logical qubits—a critical distinction given error correction overhead. Recent breakthroughs have achieved 3,000-6,100 qubit arrays proving physical scale is feasible, though computational capabilities await demonstration. The IBM-HSBC quantum bond trading trial (September 2025) confirms industrial deployment of hybrid quantum-classical systems for optimization, though these techniques do not directly apply to fault-tolerant implementations of Shor’s algorithm. Our analysis—the first to synthesize these convergent breakthroughs into a unified threat model—reveals that NISQ-era engineering innovations could reduce future FTQC requirements by factors of 1.5-2.3×. We present projections with varying probabilities of technological success: Conservative (high probability): NL ∈ [1,2,200,800] with timeline 2033-2035; Realistic (moderate probability): NL ∈ [1, 200, 1, 600] with timeline 2031-2033; Optimistic (lower probability): NL ∈ [900, 1, 100] with timeline 2029-2031. These engineering-based projections represent the predictable component of progress.We separately analyze an Algorithmic Breakthrough scenario based on Litinski’s work suggesting 2,580× gate reduction, whichcould accelerate timelines to 2027-2029. We emphasize that such algorithmic innovations, while unpredictable, have historically dominated incremental improvements and represent a critical uncertainty in quantum threat assessment. We acknowledge the reflexive nature of such analysis—credible threat projections can influence investment, policy, and migration decisions in ways that may accelerate or decelerate actual progress toward cryptographically-relevant quantum computers. Our projections thus serve not merely as predictions but as potential catalysts within the quantum ecosystem.