Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

ULTRAMETRIC PHYSICS: Module 6: Quantum Gate Theory on Ratio-Based Trees

Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas

Published Apr 6, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Quantum computation traditionally operates on tensor product spaces of two-level systems (qubits), with gates represented by unitary matrices acting on these tensor factors. The ratio-based framework introduces a fundamentally different substrate: computation on Bruhat-Tits trees with scaling ratio $q$. In this paradigm, quantum gates emerge from tree automorphisms—symmetries of the hierarchical structure—and computation proceeds via scaling transformations along tree paths. This module develops the complete theory of quantum gate implementation on ratio-based trees.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.19437826

Related papers

Ultrametric Physics: Module 5: Ratio-Based Quantum Error Correction

Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas

Quantum error correction in conventional architectures faces the fundamental challenge of continuous error accumulation, requiring exponentially growing resources for active correction. The ratio-based framework offers a geometric alternative: hierarchical protection through tree structures with scaling ratio $q$, providing passive error suppression that scales as $\epsilon_L \sim q^{-d} \epsilon_P$, where $d$ is tree depth and $\epsilon_P$ is the physical error rate. This module develops the complete theory of ratio-based quantum error correction using Bruhat-Tits trees as the geometric substrate.

•Apr 6, 2026•0 citations

Ultrametric Physics: Module 7: Thermodynamic Limits with Scaling Ratios

Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas

The laws of thermodynamics impose fundamental limits on all physical computation, determining minimum energy requirements, maximum operating temperatures, and ultimate scalability. In the ratio-based framework, the hierarchical tree structure with scaling ratio $q$ creates a distinctive energy landscape with barriers scaling as $E_{\text{barrier}} \propto q^d$, where $d$ is tree depth. This fundamentally alters thermodynamic constraints compared to conventional quantum architectures, introducing the scaling ratio $q$ as a key optimization parameter in thermodynamic tradeoffs.

•Apr 6, 2026•0 citations

Ultrametric Code Spaces: The Bruhat-Tits Tree as a Quantum Error-Correction Geometry

Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas

The Bruhat-Tits tree T_p is proposed as a geometric substrate for quantum error-correcting codes. The defining property of ultrametric geometry replaces continuous error accumulation with discrete redundancy steps. This topological reframing connects p-adic mathematical physics, quantum error correction theory, and quantum Darwinism. The central conjecture is that the redundancy-fidelity tradeoff, parameterized on a real quantum processor, may exhibit a staircase structure (ultrametric regime) rather than a smooth curve (Archimedean limit), and that this structure — if detected — would constitute a new QEC design parameter. An experimental protocol is presented for discriminating between these regimes on existing quantum processors. All claims are graded with certainty labels; the paper acknowledges that the experimental program is the path to evidence. [v0.2 — literature search completed 2026-08-06: prior holographic-code work (Marcolli 2018) acknowledged; novelty claim refined to device-level QEC with staircase detection.]

•Aug 6, 2026•0 citations

Bruhat-Tits Quantum Processor: Ultrametric Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Holographic Tree Codes

Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas

We propose a fault-tolerant quantum computing architecture—the Bruhat-Tits Quantum Processor—that exploits the ultrametric geometry of the Bruhat-Tits tree $\mathcal{T}_p$ to achieve quantum error correction thresholds substantially exceeding those of conventional Euclidean-locality codes. The architecture uses holographic perfect-tensor codes on a truncated Bruhat-Tits tree, tree-automorphism logical gates, and fractal-multiplexed readout. We compute bit-flip, depolarizing, independent $X$+$Z$, gate-error, and magic-state distillation thresholds via analytical recursion, exact Gottesman-Knill stabilizer simulation, and Monte Carlo methods. The tree code achieves a bit-flip threshold of $p_c = 50.0\%$ ($4.6\times$ above surface codes at $\sim 10.9\%$), a depolarizing threshold of $p_c = 75.0\%$ ($75\times$ above surface codes at $\sim 1.0\%$), and an independent $X$+$Z$ threshold of $p_c = 17.30\%$. We benchmark the tree code against the surface code at matched physical qubit counts using Monte Carlo simulation with Minimum-Weight Perfect Matching (MWPM) decoding. A logical-level demonstration of Shor’s algorithm for $N = 15$ confirms algorithmic completeness and establishes physical resource requirements. All quantitative claims are verified by self-contained Python simulations. We identify open problems—including perfect tensor existence, tree automorphism gate generation, and physical noise modeling—as directions for future investigation. The architecture’s defining innovation is the use of ultrametricity as a quantum error correction resource: the strong triangle inequality $d(x,z) = \max(d(x,y), d(y,z))$ confines error clusters to disjoint subtrees, enabling parallel, local decoding in $O(s \log s)$ time.

•May 10, 2026•0 citations

GROUP THEORY AS A FRAMEWORK FOR QUANTUM COMPUTING: FROM UNITARY OPERATIONS TO QUANTUM ALGORITHMS

Akshay Kishanlal Jaiswal

Quantum computing represents a transformative paradigm that leverages the principles of quantum mechanics, such as superposition and entanglement, to perform computations beyond the capabilities of classical systems. The development of efficient quantum algorithms and architectures relies heavily on robust mathematical frameworks, among which group theory plays a fundamental role. Group-theoretic structures provide a systematic way to describe symmetries, unitary transformations, and state evolution in quantum systems. In particular, unitary and special unitary groups govern the behavior of quantum gates, while representation theory enables the analysis of multi-qubit operations and composite systems. Moreover, group theory underpins several key aspects of quantum computing, including the design of quantum algorithms, error correction schemes, and cryptographic protocols. Notable algorithms such as Shor’s Algorithm and Grover’s Algorithm exploit algebraic structures to achieve computational advantages. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the interplay between group theory and quantum computing, highlighting fundamental concepts, major applications, and recent developments. The paper also identifies current challenges and outlines future research directions, thereby offering a consolidated resource for researchers in mathematics, physics, and quantum information science.

International Journal of Engineering Research and Science & Technology•Apr 9, 2026•0 citations

Tensor Networks as Bruhat-Tits Tree Computation

Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas

The combinatorial tree encoding the completions of the rational numbers at every prime — the Bruhat-Tits building for PGL(2,Q_p) — provides a unifying geometric account of physical computation across quantum, classical, and biological substrates. Synthesized from 13 Obsidian research notes (2026-08-06). v0.2: Corrected terminology — 'Pythagorean semigroup' removed in favor of '5-smooth semigroup' per BP-2 (ACRP P3, 2026-08-02); added valuation-artifact qualification (qnfo-core Trap 4, REG-IPR-003 NULL result 2026-08-04).

•Aug 6, 2026•0 citations
Quantum computation traditionally operates on tensor product spaces of two-level systems (qubits), with gates represented by unitary matrices acting on these tensor factors. The ratio-based framework introduces a fundamentally different substrate: computation on Bruhat-Tits trees with scaling ratio qqq. In this paradigm, quantum gates emerge from tree automorphisms—symmetries of the hierarchical structure—and computation proceeds via scaling transformations along tree paths. This module develops the complete theory of quantum gate implementation on ratio-based trees.
Quantum error correction in conventional architectures faces the fundamental challenge of continuous error accumulation, requiring exponentially growing resources for active correction. The ratio-based framework offers a geometric alternative: hierarchical protection through tree structures with scaling ratio qqq, providing passive error suppression that scales as ϵL∼q−dϵP\epsilon_L \sim q^{-d} \epsilon_PϵL​∼q−dϵP​, where ddd is tree depth and ϵP\epsilon_PϵP​ is the physical error rate. This module develops the complete theory of ratio-based quantum error correction using Bruhat-Tits trees as the geometric substrate.
The laws of thermodynamics impose fundamental limits on all physical computation, determining minimum energy requirements, maximum operating temperatures, and ultimate scalability. In the ratio-based framework, the hierarchical tree structure with scaling ratio qqq creates a distinctive energy landscape with barriers scaling as Ebarrier∝qdE_{\text{barrier}} \propto q^dEbarrier​∝qd, where ddd is tree depth. This fundamentally alters thermodynamic constraints compared to conventional quantum architectures, introducing the scaling ratio qqq as a key optimization parameter in thermodynamic tradeoffs.
The Bruhat-Tits tree T_p is proposed as a geometric substrate for quantum error-correcting codes. The defining property of ultrametric geometry replaces continuous error accumulation with discrete redundancy steps. This topological reframing connects p-adic mathematical physics, quantum error correction theory, and quantum Darwinism. The central conjecture is that the redundancy-fidelity tradeoff, parameterized on a real quantum processor, may exhibit a staircase structure (ultrametric regime) rather than a smooth curve (Archimedean limit), and that this structure — if detected — would constitute a new QEC design parameter. An experimental protocol is presented for discriminating between these regimes on existing quantum processors. All claims are graded with certainty labels; the paper acknowledges that the experimental program is the path to evidence. [v0.2 — literature search completed 2026-08-06: prior holographic-code work (Marcolli 2018) acknowledged; novelty claim refined to device-level QEC with staircase detection.]
We propose a fault-tolerant quantum computing architecture—the Bruhat-Tits Quantum Processor—that exploits the ultrametric geometry of the Bruhat-Tits tree Tp\mathcal{T}_pTp​ to achieve quantum error correction thresholds substantially exceeding those of conventional Euclidean-locality codes. The architecture uses holographic perfect-tensor codes on a truncated Bruhat-Tits tree, tree-automorphism logical gates, and fractal-multiplexed readout. We compute bit-flip, depolarizing, independent XXX+ZZZ, gate-error, and magic-state distillation thresholds via analytical recursion, exact Gottesman-Knill stabilizer simulation, and Monte Carlo methods. The tree code achieves a bit-flip threshold of pc=50.0%p_c = 50.0\%pc​=50.0% (4.6×4.6\times4.6× above surface codes at ∼10.9%\sim 10.9\%∼10.9%), a depolarizing threshold of pc=75.0%p_c = 75.0\%pc​=75.0% (75×75\times75× above surface codes at ∼1.0%\sim 1.0\%∼1.0%), and an independent XXX+ZZZ threshold of pc=17.30%p_c = 17.30\%pc​=17.30%. We benchmark the tree code against the surface code at matched physical qubit counts using Monte Carlo simulation with Minimum-Weight Perfect Matching (MWPM) decoding. A logical-level demonstration of Shor’s algorithm for N=15N = 15N=15 confirms algorithmic completeness and establishes physical resource requirements. All quantitative claims are verified by self-contained Python simulations. We identify open problems—including perfect tensor existence, tree automorphism gate generation, and physical noise modeling—as directions for future investigation. The architecture’s defining innovation is the use of ultrametricity as a quantum error correction resource: the strong triangle inequality d(x,z)=max⁡(d(x,y),d(y,z))d(x,z) = \max(d(x,y), d(y,z))d(x,z)=max(d(x,y),d(y,z)) confines error clusters to disjoint subtrees, enabling parallel, local decoding in O(slog⁡s)O(s \log s)O(slogs) time.
Quantum computing represents a transformative paradigm that leverages the principles of quantum mechanics, such as superposition and entanglement, to perform computations beyond the capabilities of classical systems. The development of efficient quantum algorithms and architectures relies heavily on robust mathematical frameworks, among which group theory plays a fundamental role. Group-theoretic structures provide a systematic way to describe symmetries, unitary transformations, and state evolution in quantum systems. In particular, unitary and special unitary groups govern the behavior of quantum gates, while representation theory enables the analysis of multi-qubit operations and composite systems. Moreover, group theory underpins several key aspects of quantum computing, including the design of quantum algorithms, error correction schemes, and cryptographic protocols. Notable algorithms such as Shor’s Algorithm and Grover’s Algorithm exploit algebraic structures to achieve computational advantages. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the interplay between group theory and quantum computing, highlighting fundamental concepts, major applications, and recent developments. The paper also identifies current challenges and outlines future research directions, thereby offering a consolidated resource for researchers in mathematics, physics, and quantum information science.
The combinatorial tree encoding the completions of the rational numbers at every prime — the Bruhat-Tits building for PGL(2,Q_p) — provides a unifying geometric account of physical computation across quantum, classical, and biological substrates. Synthesized from 13 Obsidian research notes (2026-08-06). v0.2: Corrected terminology — 'Pythagorean semigroup' removed in favor of '5-smooth semigroup' per BP-2 (ACRP P3, 2026-08-02); added valuation-artifact qualification (qnfo-core Trap 4, REG-IPR-003 NULL result 2026-08-04).