Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Ultrametric Code Spaces: The Bruhat-Tits Tree as a Quantum Error-Correction Geometry

Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas

Published Aug 6, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The Bruhat-Tits tree T_p is proposed as a geometric substrate for quantum error-correcting codes. The defining property of ultrametric geometry replaces continuous error accumulation with discrete redundancy steps. This topological reframing connects p-adic mathematical physics, quantum error correction theory, and quantum Darwinism. The central conjecture is that the redundancy-fidelity tradeoff, parameterized on a real quantum processor, may exhibit a staircase structure (ultrametric regime) rather than a smooth curve (Archimedean limit), and that this structure — if detected — would constitute a new QEC design parameter. An experimental protocol is presented for discriminating between these regimes on existing quantum processors. All claims are graded with certainty labels; the paper acknowledges that the experimental program is the path to evidence. [v0.2 — literature search completed 2026-08-06: prior holographic-code work (Marcolli 2018) acknowledged; novelty claim refined to device-level QEC with staircase detection.]

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.21824194

Related papers

Ultrametric Code Spaces: The Bruhat--Tits Tree as a Geometry for Quantum Error Correction

Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas

The Bruhat-Tits tree provides an ultrametric substrate for quantum error-correcting codes whose information topology differs from the Archimedean case in ways that may revise the redundancy-fidelity tradeoff established for quantum Darwinism. Two limiting regimes are identified: the large-p limit, in which the ultrametric bound converges to the Archimedean bound, and the deep ultrametric regime of small primes, in which discrete redundancy steps create windows where quantum error correction and classical objectivity may coexist. An experimental protocol is proposed to detect the staircase structure on real quantum processors. All claims are graded with epistemic certainty labels and subjected to an internal red-team audit. Licensed under QNFO Unified License Agreement (QNFO-ULA).

•Aug 6, 2026•0 citations

Computational Validation of Ultrametric Error Confinement in Bruhat–Tits Tree Quantum Circuits

Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas

The standard mathematical foundation of quantum computing—Archimedean (Euclidean) geometry—assumes that space is continuous, distances add linearly, and small errors can accumulate into large ones. This assumption creates a fundamental bottleneck: active quantum error correction generates heat that scales faster than cryogenic cooling capacity, producing a $20{,}000\times$ gap between required and available cooling at millikelvin temperatures. We propose an alternative: encoding quantum states on Bruhat–Tits trees, the geometric realization of $p$-adic (ultrametric) spaces, where the strong triangle inequality $d(x,z) \leq \max\{d(x,y), d(y,z)\}$ geometrically confines errors to their local branches. We present a computational validation suite (classical simulation) demonstrating this mechanism. Our results show that tree-encoded circuits produced zero observed logical errors in 500 trials at depths $d \geq 3$ for physical error rates up to $p_{\text{err}} = 0.40$, while equivalent flat (Archimedean) encodings failed with logical error rates up to $0.152$. The energy barrier protecting logical states scales as $E_{\text{barrier}}(d) = 2^d$, confirmed exhaustively for $d = 2, 3$ and computed analytically to $d = 10$. The strong triangle inequality is verified with zero violations in $15{,}000$ random trials across primes $p = 2, 3, 5$. These results provide computational evidence for a geometric threshold theorem in ultrametric quantum error correction and suggest a path toward passive fault tolerance—error suppression as a property of hardware geometry rather than active measurement protocols. The simulation uses classical bits with majority-vote decoding; full quantum validation with superposition and entanglement remains future work.

•May 12, 2026•0 citations

Bruhat-Tits Quantum Processor: Ultrametric Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Holographic Tree Codes

Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas

We propose a fault-tolerant quantum computing architecture—the Bruhat-Tits Quantum Processor—that exploits the ultrametric geometry of the Bruhat-Tits tree $\mathcal{T}_p$ to achieve quantum error correction thresholds substantially exceeding those of conventional Euclidean-locality codes. The architecture uses holographic perfect-tensor codes on a truncated Bruhat-Tits tree, tree-automorphism logical gates, and fractal-multiplexed readout. We compute bit-flip, depolarizing, independent $X$+$Z$, gate-error, and magic-state distillation thresholds via analytical recursion, exact Gottesman-Knill stabilizer simulation, and Monte Carlo methods. The tree code achieves a bit-flip threshold of $p_c = 50.0\%$ ($4.6\times$ above surface codes at $\sim 10.9\%$), a depolarizing threshold of $p_c = 75.0\%$ ($75\times$ above surface codes at $\sim 1.0\%$), and an independent $X$+$Z$ threshold of $p_c = 17.30\%$. We benchmark the tree code against the surface code at matched physical qubit counts using Monte Carlo simulation with Minimum-Weight Perfect Matching (MWPM) decoding. A logical-level demonstration of Shor’s algorithm for $N = 15$ confirms algorithmic completeness and establishes physical resource requirements. All quantitative claims are verified by self-contained Python simulations. We identify open problems—including perfect tensor existence, tree automorphism gate generation, and physical noise modeling—as directions for future investigation. The architecture’s defining innovation is the use of ultrametricity as a quantum error correction resource: the strong triangle inequality $d(x,z) = \max(d(x,y), d(y,z))$ confines error clusters to disjoint subtrees, enabling parallel, local decoding in $O(s \log s)$ time.

•May 10, 2026•0 citations

Ultrametric Information Geometry: From p-Adic Spaces to Quantum Error Correction

Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas

Ultrametric spaces provide a natural geometry for hierarchically structured information. This paper synthesizes four independent research programs: Murtagh's data embedding in ultrametric spaces, Heydeman's holographic QEC on Bruhat-Tits trees, Palmer's p-adic quantum foundations, and Aniello's p-adic Hilbert space formalism. QNFO contributions: D=4 embedding theorem, adelic QEC, CMB analysis.

•Jul 5, 2026•0 citations

Ultrametric Information Geometry: From p-Adic Spaces to Quantum Error Correction

QNFO Research

Ultrametric spaces provide a natural geometry for systems organized hierarchically. This paper synthesizes research connecting ultrametric geometry to quantum information theory: Murtagh's data embedding, Heydeman's holographic QEC on Bruhat-Tits trees, Palmer's p-adic quantum foundations, and Aniello's p-adic Hilbert space formalism. QNFO contributions: D=4 embedding theorem, adelic QEC, CMB analysis.

•Jul 5, 2026•0 citations

Passive Error Resilience Through Ultrametric Geometry: A Proposal for p-Adic Quantum Metrology

Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas

Phase 5 Publication -- Ultrametric p-Adic Quantum Metrology. Proposal for passive quantum error resilience via Bruhat-Tits tree geometry, achieving Heisenberg-limited sensing without active QEC. 24,060 chars, 10 references, 7 sections with structured forecast and calibration register.

•Aug 1, 2026•0 citations
The Bruhat-Tits tree T_p is proposed as a geometric substrate for quantum error-correcting codes. The defining property of ultrametric geometry replaces continuous error accumulation with discrete redundancy steps. This topological reframing connects p-adic mathematical physics, quantum error correction theory, and quantum Darwinism. The central conjecture is that the redundancy-fidelity tradeoff, parameterized on a real quantum processor, may exhibit a staircase structure (ultrametric regime) rather than a smooth curve (Archimedean limit), and that this structure — if detected — would constitute a new QEC design parameter. An experimental protocol is presented for discriminating between these regimes on existing quantum processors. All claims are graded with certainty labels; the paper acknowledges that the experimental program is the path to evidence. [v0.2 — literature search completed 2026-08-06: prior holographic-code work (Marcolli 2018) acknowledged; novelty claim refined to device-level QEC with staircase detection.]
The Bruhat-Tits tree provides an ultrametric substrate for quantum error-correcting codes whose information topology differs from the Archimedean case in ways that may revise the redundancy-fidelity tradeoff established for quantum Darwinism. Two limiting regimes are identified: the large-p limit, in which the ultrametric bound converges to the Archimedean bound, and the deep ultrametric regime of small primes, in which discrete redundancy steps create windows where quantum error correction and classical objectivity may coexist. An experimental protocol is proposed to detect the staircase structure on real quantum processors. All claims are graded with epistemic certainty labels and subjected to an internal red-team audit. Licensed under QNFO Unified License Agreement (QNFO-ULA).
The standard mathematical foundation of quantum computing—Archimedean (Euclidean) geometry—assumes that space is continuous, distances add linearly, and small errors can accumulate into large ones. This assumption creates a fundamental bottleneck: active quantum error correction generates heat that scales faster than cryogenic cooling capacity, producing a 20,000×20{,}000\times20,000× gap between required and available cooling at millikelvin temperatures. We propose an alternative: encoding quantum states on Bruhat–Tits trees, the geometric realization of ppp-adic (ultrametric) spaces, where the strong triangle inequality d(x,z)≤max⁡{d(x,y),d(y,z)}d(x,z) \leq \max\{d(x,y), d(y,z)\}d(x,z)≤max{d(x,y),d(y,z)} geometrically confines errors to their local branches. We present a computational validation suite (classical simulation) demonstrating this mechanism. Our results show that tree-encoded circuits produced zero observed logical errors in 500 trials at depths d≥3d \geq 3d≥3 for physical error rates up to perr=0.40p_{\text{err}} = 0.40perr​=0.40, while equivalent flat (Archimedean) encodings failed with logical error rates up to 0.1520.1520.152. The energy barrier protecting logical states scales as Ebarrier(d)=2dE_{\text{barrier}}(d) = 2^dEbarrier​(d)=2d, confirmed exhaustively for d=2,3d = 2, 3d=2,3 and computed analytically to d=10d = 10d=10. The strong triangle inequality is verified with zero violations in 15,00015{,}00015,000 random trials across primes p=2,3,5p = 2, 3, 5p=2,3,5. These results provide computational evidence for a geometric threshold theorem in ultrametric quantum error correction and suggest a path toward passive fault tolerance—error suppression as a property of hardware geometry rather than active measurement protocols. The simulation uses classical bits with majority-vote decoding; full quantum validation with superposition and entanglement remains future work.
We propose a fault-tolerant quantum computing architecture—the Bruhat-Tits Quantum Processor—that exploits the ultrametric geometry of the Bruhat-Tits tree Tp\mathcal{T}_pTp​ to achieve quantum error correction thresholds substantially exceeding those of conventional Euclidean-locality codes. The architecture uses holographic perfect-tensor codes on a truncated Bruhat-Tits tree, tree-automorphism logical gates, and fractal-multiplexed readout. We compute bit-flip, depolarizing, independent XXX+ZZZ, gate-error, and magic-state distillation thresholds via analytical recursion, exact Gottesman-Knill stabilizer simulation, and Monte Carlo methods. The tree code achieves a bit-flip threshold of pc=50.0%p_c = 50.0\%pc​=50.0% (4.6×4.6\times4.6× above surface codes at ∼10.9%\sim 10.9\%∼10.9%), a depolarizing threshold of pc=75.0%p_c = 75.0\%pc​=75.0% (75×75\times75× above surface codes at ∼1.0%\sim 1.0\%∼1.0%), and an independent XXX+ZZZ threshold of pc=17.30%p_c = 17.30\%pc​=17.30%. We benchmark the tree code against the surface code at matched physical qubit counts using Monte Carlo simulation with Minimum-Weight Perfect Matching (MWPM) decoding. A logical-level demonstration of Shor’s algorithm for N=15N = 15N=15 confirms algorithmic completeness and establishes physical resource requirements. All quantitative claims are verified by self-contained Python simulations. We identify open problems—including perfect tensor existence, tree automorphism gate generation, and physical noise modeling—as directions for future investigation. The architecture’s defining innovation is the use of ultrametricity as a quantum error correction resource: the strong triangle inequality d(x,z)=max⁡(d(x,y),d(y,z))d(x,z) = \max(d(x,y), d(y,z))d(x,z)=max(d(x,y),d(y,z)) confines error clusters to disjoint subtrees, enabling parallel, local decoding in O(slog⁡s)O(s \log s)O(slogs) time.