Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics Conference Series

On the Curiously Retro-causal Effects of Quantum State Reduction in Quantum Reality

Roger Penrose

Published Mar 1, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract It has been argued that quantum state reduction is a gravitational effect. However, to make sense of it one needs to distinguish “Quantum Reality” from the more familiar “Classical Reality”. This notion of quantum reality is developed here, indicating its curious relation to the normal flow of time, most strikingly in the Einstein-Podolski-Rosen type of phenomena.

DOI
10.1088/1742-6596/3189/1/012003

Related papers

The Nature of Causality in Quantum Phenomena

Joseph Berkovitz

The correlations between distant systems in typical quantum situations, such as Einstein-Podolosky-Rosen experiments, strongly suggest that the quantum realm involves curious types of non-local influences. In this paper, I study in detail the nature of these non-local influences, as depicted by various quantum theories. I show how different quantum theories realise non-locality in different ways, which reflect different ontogical settings

•Jan 1, 2000•2 citations

The Nature of Reality: Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in Quantum Mechanics

Michele Caponigro

From conceptual point of view, we argue about the nature of reality inferred from EPR argument in quantum mechanics.

Prespacetime journal•Feb 1, 2019•0 citations

The GHZ Theorem Revisited within the Framework of Gauge Theory

David H. Oaknin

The Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger version of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox is widely regarded as a conclusive logical argument that rules out the possibility of reproducing the predictions of Quantum Mechanics within the framework of any physical theory sharing the notions of reality and relativistic causality that we acknowledge as a given in our classical descriptions of the macroscopic world. Thus, this renowned argument stands as a seemingly insurmountable roadblock on the path to a very desired, physically intuitive understanding of quantum phenomena and, in particular, quantum entanglement. In this paper, we notice, however, that the GHZ argument involves unaccounted spurious gauge degrees of freedom and that it can be overcome once these degrees are properly taken into account. It is then possible to explicitly build a successful statistical model for the GHZ experiment based on the usual notions of relativistic causality and physical reality. This model, thus, completes—in the EPR sense—the quantum description of the GHZ state and paves the way to a novel intuitive interpretation of the quantum formalism and a deeper understanding of the physical reality that it describes.

Symmetry•Jun 29, 2023•0 citations

On gravity's role in quantum state reduction

Roger Penrose

The problem of quantum state reduction The fundamental problem of quantum mechanics, as that theory is presently understood, is to make sense of the reduction of the state vector (i.e. collapse of the wave function ), denoted here by R . This issue is usually addressed in terms of the ‘quantum measurement problem’, which is to comprehend how, upon measurement of a quantum system, this (seemingly) discontinuous R -process can come about. A measurement, after all, merely consists of the quantum state under consideration becoming entangled with a more extended part of the physical universe, e.g. with a measuring apparatus. This measuring apparatus – together with the observing physicist and their common environment – should, according to conventional understanding, all also have some quantum description. Accordingly, there should be a quantum description of this entire quantum state, involving not only the original system under consideration but also the apparatus, physicist, and remaining environment – and this entire state would be expected to evolve continuously, solely according to the Schrödinger equation (unitary evolution), here denoted by the symbol U . Numerous different attitudes to R have been expressed over many years, ever since quantum mechanics was first clearly formulated. The most influential viewpoint has been the ‘Copenhagen interpretation’ of Niels Bohr, according to which the state vector │ψ〉 is not to be taken seriously as describing a quantum-level physical reality, but is to be regarded as merely referring to our (maximal) ‘knowledge’ of a physical system, and whose ultimate role is simply to provide us with a means to calculate probabilities when a measurement is performed on the system.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jan 29, 2001•18 citations

Time-symmetric electrodynamics and the Kocher-Commins experiment

David Thomas Pegg

A quantised version of Wheeler-Feynman time symmetric absorber theory sheds new light on an old problem at present experiencing a revival of interest. Some photon correlation experiments, when interpreted in terms of quantum electrodynamics, lead to conceptual difficulties of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen type. The results imply that one has to abandon either the concept of strict causality, which would make conventional quantum electrodynamics self-inconsistent, or the concept of an objective reality independent of the observer, which has far-reaching philosophical consequences. In terms of absorber theory, on the other thand, there is no need to abandon objective reality and, in fact, such an experiment is directly interpretable as an example of the manifestation of the future on the past, which is the important distinguishing feature of absorber theory.

European Journal of Physics•Jan 1, 1982•18 citations

On the Gravitization of Quantum Mechanics 1: Quantum State Reduction

Roger Penrose

This paper argues that the case for “gravitizing” quantum theory is at least as strong as that for quantizing gravity. Accordingly, the principles of general relativity must influence, and actually change , the very formalism of quantum mechanics. Most particularly, an “Einsteinian”, rather than a “Newtonian” treatment of the gravitational field should be adopted, in a quantum system, in order that the principle of equivalence be fully respected. This leads to an expectation that quantum superpositions of states involving a significant mass displacement should have a finite lifetime, in accordance with a proposal previously put forward by Diósi and the author.

Foundations of Physics•Jan 10, 2014•343 citations
Abstract It has been argued that quantum state reduction is a gravitational effect. However, to make sense of it one needs to distinguish “Quantum Reality” from the more familiar “Classical Reality”. This notion of quantum reality is developed here, indicating its curious relation to the normal flow of time, most strikingly in the Einstein-Podolski-Rosen type of phenomena.
The Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger version of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox is widely regarded as a conclusive logical argument that rules out the possibility of reproducing the predictions of Quantum Mechanics within the framework of any physical theory sharing the notions of reality and relativistic causality that we acknowledge as a given in our classical descriptions of the macroscopic world. Thus, this renowned argument stands as a seemingly insurmountable roadblock on the path to a very desired, physically intuitive understanding of quantum phenomena and, in particular, quantum entanglement. In this paper, we notice, however, that the GHZ argument involves unaccounted spurious gauge degrees of freedom and that it can be overcome once these degrees are properly taken into account. It is then possible to explicitly build a successful statistical model for the GHZ experiment based on the usual notions of relativistic causality and physical reality. This model, thus, completes—in the EPR sense—the quantum description of the GHZ state and paves the way to a novel intuitive interpretation of the quantum formalism and a deeper understanding of the physical reality that it describes.
The problem of quantum state reduction The fundamental problem of quantum mechanics, as that theory is presently understood, is to make sense of the reduction of the state vector (i.e. collapse of the wave function ), denoted here by R . This issue is usually addressed in terms of the ‘quantum measurement problem’, which is to comprehend how, upon measurement of a quantum system, this (seemingly) discontinuous R -process can come about. A measurement, after all, merely consists of the quantum state under consideration becoming entangled with a more extended part of the physical universe, e.g. with a measuring apparatus. This measuring apparatus – together with the observing physicist and their common environment – should, according to conventional understanding, all also have some quantum description. Accordingly, there should be a quantum description of this entire quantum state, involving not only the original system under consideration but also the apparatus, physicist, and remaining environment – and this entire state would be expected to evolve continuously, solely according to the Schrödinger equation (unitary evolution), here denoted by the symbol U . Numerous different attitudes to R have been expressed over many years, ever since quantum mechanics was first clearly formulated. The most influential viewpoint has been the ‘Copenhagen interpretation’ of Niels Bohr, according to which the state vector │ψ〉 is not to be taken seriously as describing a quantum-level physical reality, but is to be regarded as merely referring to our (maximal) ‘knowledge’ of a physical system, and whose ultimate role is simply to provide us with a means to calculate probabilities when a measurement is performed on the system.
A quantised version of Wheeler-Feynman time symmetric absorber theory sheds new light on an old problem at present experiencing a revival of interest. Some photon correlation experiments, when interpreted in terms of quantum electrodynamics, lead to conceptual difficulties of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen type. The results imply that one has to abandon either the concept of strict causality, which would make conventional quantum electrodynamics self-inconsistent, or the concept of an objective reality independent of the observer, which has far-reaching philosophical consequences. In terms of absorber theory, on the other thand, there is no need to abandon objective reality and, in fact, such an experiment is directly interpretable as an example of the manifestation of the future on the past, which is the important distinguishing feature of absorber theory.
This paper argues that the case for “gravitizing” quantum theory is at least as strong as that for quantizing gravity. Accordingly, the principles of general relativity must influence, and actually change , the very formalism of quantum mechanics. Most particularly, an “Einsteinian”, rather than a “Newtonian” treatment of the gravitational field should be adopted, in a quantum system, in order that the principle of equivalence be fully respected. This leads to an expectation that quantum superpositions of states involving a significant mass displacement should have a finite lifetime, in accordance with a proposal previously put forward by Diósi and the author.