Prespacetime journal

The Nature of Reality: Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in Quantum Mechanics

Michele Caponigro

Published Feb 1, 2019• 0 citations

OpenAlex

Abstract

From conceptual point of view, we argue about the nature of reality inferred from EPR argument in quantum mechanics.

Related papers

The EPR paper: a pedagogical approach

Angel García-Chung

On the seminal paper written by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen [1], a critique to the completeness of quantum mechanics was posed. Part of the critique consisted in the following argument: if quantum mechanics is complete, then, two physical quantities, with non-commuting operators, can have simultaneous reality. In this paper I aim to provide a pedagogical approach to the notions used in the EPR's argument.

arXiv:2105.02384May 6, 20210 citations

Common misrepresentation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument

Vladimir Hnizdo

A frequently given version of the argument of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen against the completeness of the quantum mechanical description is criticized as a misrepresentation that lacks the cogency of the original EPR argument.

arXiv:quant-ph/0005131May 31, 20000 citations

Quantum mechanics and elements of reality inferred from joint measurements

Adán Cabello, Guillermo García-alcaine

The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument on quantum mechanics incompleteness is formulated in terms of elements of reality inferred from joint (as opposed to alternative) measurements, in two examples involving entangled states of three spin-1/2 particles. The same states allow us to obtain proofs of the incompatibility between quantum mechanics and elements of reality.

Jan 1, 19971 citation

Quantum mechanics and elements of reality inferred from joint measurements

Adán Cabello, Guillermo García-Alcaine

The Einstein - Podolsky - Rosen argument on quantum mechanics incompleteness is formulated in terms of elements of reality inferred from joint (as opposed to alternative) measurements, in two examples involving entangled states of three spin- particles. The same states allow us to obtain proofs of the incompatibility between quantum mechanics and elements of reality.

arXiv:quant-ph/9709056Journal of Physics A Mathematical and GeneralJan 21, 19972 citations

On the formal connection of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument to quantum mechanics and reality

Daniel Schoch

ErkenntnisSep 1, 19880 citations

On the solution of the EPR paradox and the explanation of the violation of Bell's inequality

Gyula Bene

A new interpretation offers a consistent conceptual basis for nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox is solved and the violation of Bell's inequality is explained by maintaining realism, inductive inference and Einstein separability.

arXiv:quant-ph/9708045Aug 27, 19971 citation