We propose an elementary approach for introducing the quasi-classical quantum states of a spinless charged particle in a uniform magnetic field. By exploiting the similarity with the case of the two-dimensional harmonic oscillator as well as a property of the solutions of the pertinent Schrödinger equation, we derive two basic solutions. One of them is a stationary, minimum-uncertainty wavepacket centred at an arbitrary point. This corresponds to a classical particle at rest. The other solution is a minimum-uncertainty wavepacket that rotates at the classical angular speed. The expected value of the energy agrees with the classical prediction within the zero-point energy. These results are obtained without any knowledge of the energy eigenstates. An appendix suggests a brief and self-contained procedure for writing the Hamiltonian of a charged particle under the Lorentz force.
This 1-D Schrodinger equation describes the non relativistic motion of a single charged particle (mass m = 1, = 1) with a potential V in a uniform electric field t → u(t). With v = −u, (1) represents also the dynamics of a particle in a non Galilean frame of absolute position v (see, e.g., [9]). A change of independent variables (t, q) → (t, z) and dependent variable ψ → φ, transform (1) into (2) where the control appears as a shift on the space variable. These classical transformations are as follows (see, e.g., [2]). Instead of considering u as control, take v defined by v = −u as control. Then
A thorough unified treatment is given of the quantum-mechanical operators and wave functions for a molecular system (composed of
N moving charged particles) in static uniform electric and magnetic fields
E and
B. The treatment is rigorous within the nonrelativistic approximation. The system may either be neutral or charged. The fields may have arbitrary intensities and orientations. Close correspondence is maintained between the classical and quantum-mechanical treatments. The wave functions are expressed both in the time-independent energy representation and in time-dependent wave packets. Three types of momentum play important roles. For single-particle systems they are the canonical momentum
P, the mechanical momentum $\mathit{\ensuremath{\Pi}}=\mathit{P}\ensuremath{-}(\frac{e}{c})\mathit{A}=M\stackrel{\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{}}{R}$, and the pseudomomentum $\mathcal{K}=\mathit{\ensuremath{\Pi}}\ensuremath{-}(\frac{e}{c})\mathit{R}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}\mathit{B}\ensuremath{-}e\mathit{E}t$. The pseudomomentum is a constant of the motion. Except in the absence of magnetic fields, not all of the components of either $\mathit{\ensuremath{\Pi}}$ or
K commute. This complicates the quantum-mechanical formalism. The components of the pseudomomentum have simple classical interpretations, and in quantum mechanics they are related to the operator which performs a boost to a reference frame moving with constant velocity
v. In this moving frame, the electric field intensity is ${\mathit{E}}^{\ensuremath{'}}=\mathit{E}+(\frac{\mathit{v}}{c})\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}\mathit{B}$. Thus, in a frame moving with the drift velocity ${\mathit{v}}_{d}=(\frac{c}{{B}^{2}})\mathit{E}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}\mathit{B}$, the components of the electric field intensity perpendicular to
B vanish. In this paper, the velocity boost operators are used to show the relationships between wave functions expressed in reference frames moving with repsect to each other. The dynamics of the
N-particle systems are simplified by making the Power-Zienau-Woolley transformation (which reduces as a special case to a unitary transformation used by Lamb) and by using center-of-mass and internal coordinates. Generalizing previous works, it is shown how the pseudomomentum is involved in separating these degrees of freedom for
N particles in both
E and
B. For neutral molecules, the Schr\"odinger equation is "pseudoseparated" and the internal degrees of freedom are coupled to the center of mass motion only by the "motional Stark Effect," which involves the constant of motion
K. For ionic systems, only one component of the center of mass is coupled to the internal motion. Quantitative estimates of the weak center-of-mass coupling are made for both neutral and ionic
n=1 and
n=2 quantum states of two-body systems by perturbation expansions in powers of the field strengths. In the usual nonrigorous treatments of systems in magnetic fields, no distinction is made between $\mathit{\ensuremath{\Pi}}$ and
K and both are approximated by $M\stackrel{\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{}}{R}$, where
M is the mass of the molecule and
R is taken to be the classical orbital position of a single particle having the same mass and charge. This is an excellent approximation for ground-state molecules and ions in weak fields. However, the resulting errors can be much larger if the system is in either intense fields or high-lying states (e.g., Rydberg levels). These are the conditions under which the rigorous formalism should be most useful. The determination of the wave functions and energy levels for many-particle ionic systems is complicated due to the coupling with the center of mass. The suggestion is made that it might be useful to boost the reference frame so that it moves with the velocity $\stackrel{\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{}}{R}$ of a single classical particle. The Schr\"odinger equation in this frame could serve as a more suitable basis for perturbative or variational treatments.
We study the valence electron of an alkaline atom or a general charged particle with arbitrary spin and with magnetic moment moving in a rotating magnetic field. By using a time-dependent unitary transformation, the Schr\"odinger equation with the time-dependent Hamiltonian can be reduced to a Schr\"odinger-like equation with a time-independent effective Hamiltonian. Eigenstates of the effective Hamiltonian correspond to cyclic solutions of the original Schr\"odinger equation. The nonadiabatic geometric phase of a cyclic solution can be expressed in terms of the expectation value of the component of the total angular momentum along the rotating axis, regardless of whether the solution is explicitly available. For the alkaline atomic electron and a strong magnetic field, the eigenvalue problem of the effective Hamiltonian is completely solved, and the geometric phase turns out to be a linear combination of two solid angles. For a weak magnetic field, the same problem is solved partly. For a general charged particle, the problem is solved approximately in a slowly rotating magnetic field, and the geometric phases are also calculated.