Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

Schrödinger equation in two dimensions for a zero-range potential and a uniform magnetic field: An exactly solvable model

J. Fernando Perez, Francisco Antônio Bezerra Coutinho

Published Jan 1, 1991• 45 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The spectrum and eigenfunctions of a particle moving in two dimensions under the influence of an external uniform magnetic field and in the presence of a ‘‘point interaction’’ is determined. This is done after an elementary discussion of how to construct a ‘‘point interaction’’ in two dimensions circumventing the well-known difficulties with the Dirac δ2(r) interaction.

DOI
10.1119/1.16714

Related papers

Exactly soluble model of two-dimensional interacting fermions in a uniform magnetic field

Erik C. Sowa, L. M. Falicov

The spectrum of a Hamiltonian for $N$ harmonically interacting two-dimensional particles in a constant perpendicular magnetic field is determined exactly by the transformation to normal coordinates. The energy of the ground state consistent with Fermi-Dirac statistics is calculated in the limit of a strong magnetic field. The Fermi energy is found to exhibit de Haas---van Alphen---like oscillations.

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Apr 15, 1984•0 citations

Dynamical symmetries of the Schrödinger equation

Thomas P. Mitchell

The conditions are derived under which a symmetry operator quadratic in the momenta exists for a spin-zero structureless point charge interacting with an externally applied uniform magnetic field in the presence of a potential field. The conditions apply to the possible forms of the potential. The explicit form of the symmetry operator in general is constructed and some particular examples are examined.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Sep 1, 1981•13 citations

A class of solvable Pauli–Schrödinger Hamiltonians

Miguel Calvo, Simón Codriansky

The Pauli–Schrödinger equation for a spin 1/2, neutral particle with a nonvanishing magnetic moment μ0, interacting with an external scalar potential V and a static magnetic field B, both functions of only one of the coordinates, is solved exactly for four different choices of the potential and the field. By choosing in the examples the coordinate y, we present these solutions in the following cases: (i) V( y)=0, B( y)=(B0sin κy, 0, B0cos κy) where B0 and κ are two arbitrary constants. (ii) V( y)=λ′y2, B( y)=‖αy‖(cos 2κy, 0, sin 2κy) where 6* λ=ℏ2/2m and α,κ arbitrary constants and λ′=λ(μ0/2κλ)2. (iii) V( y)=λ′(c̄1tan αy+c̄2cot αy)2, B( y)=B( y) (sin (2κy+2δ(y)), 0, cos (2κy+2δ( y)) where B2( y)=(c̄1tan αy+c̄2cot αy)2 (+α2/4κ2)(c̄1sec2αy−c̄2csc2αy)2 and tan 2δ( y)=(2κ/λ)((c̄1tan αy+c̄2cot αy) /(c̄1sec2αy−c̄2csc2αy)); c̄1, c̄2, α, and κ are arbitrary constants. (iv) V( y)=λ′(ā tanh z+b̄)2 where z =[(y−cd)/d], B2( y)=(ā tanh z+b̄)2+(ā2/4κ2d2)sech2z, tan 2δ( y)=(2κd/ā)((ā tanh z+b̄)/sech2z); ā, b̄, c, d, and κ are arbitrary constants restricted only by (μ0/2κλ)ā2+ā/d>0. The functions B( y) and δ( y) define the vector B( y) as in (iii). Our method of solution is based on the familiar factorization technique for solving the Schrödinger eigenvalue equation. Several interesting physical results of these solutions are discussed.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Mar 1, 1983•7 citations

Point interactions: boundary conditions or potentials with the Dirac delta function

Salvatore De Vincenzo, Carlet Sánchez

We study the problem of a nonrelativistic quantum particle moving on a real line with an idealized and localized singular interaction with zero range at x = 0 (i.e., a point interaction there). This kind of system can be described in two ways: (i) by considering an alternative free system (i.e., without the singular potential) but excluding the point x = 0 (In this case, the point interaction is exclusively encoded in the boundary conditions.) and (ii) by explicitly considering the singular interaction by means of a local singular potential. In this paper we relate, compare, and discuss, in a simple and pedagogical way these two equivalent approaches. Our main goal in this paper is to introduce the essential ideas about point interactions in a very accesible form to advanced undergraduates.

Canadian Journal of Physics•Nov 1, 2010•9 citations

Singular interactions in quantum mechanics: solvable models

Gianfausto Dell’Antonio, Pavel Exner, Vladimir A. Geyler

This issue comprises two dozen research papers which are all in one sense or another devoted to models in which the interaction is singular and sharply localized; a typical example is a quantum particle interacting with a family of δ-type potentials. Such an idealization usually makes analysis of their properties considerably easier, sometimes allowing us to reduce it to a simple algebraic problem—this is why one speaks about solvable models. The subject can be traced back to the early days of quantum mechanics; however, the progress in this field was slow and uneven until the 1960s, mostly because singular interactions are often difficult to deal with mathematically and intuitive arguments do not work. After overcoming the initial difficulties the `classical' theory of point interactions was developed, and finally summarized in 1988 in a monograph by Albeverio, Gesztesy, Høegh-Krohn, and Holden, which you will find quoted in numerous places within this issue. A reliable way to judge theories is to observe the progress they make within one or two decades. In this case there is no doubt that the field has witnessed a continuous development and covered areas which nobody had thought of when the subject first emerged. The reader may see it in the second edition of the aforementioned book which was published by AMS Chelsea only recently and contained a brief survey of these new achievements. It is no coincidence that this topical issue appears at the same time; it has been conceived as its counterpart and a forum at which fresh results in the field can demonstrated. Let us briefly survey the contents of the issue. While the papers included have in common the basic subject, they represent a broad spectrum philosophically as well as technically, and any attempt to classify them is somewhat futile. Nevertheless, we will divide them into a few groups. The first comprises contributions directly related to the usual point-interaction ideology. M Correggi and one of the editors study a toy model of a decay under the influence of a time-periodic δ potential. E Demiralp describes the spectrum of a spherical harmonic oscillator amended with a concentric family of δ-shell interactions. Another of the editors presents an isoperimetric problem for point interactions arranged at vertices of a polygon. W Huddell and R Hughes show how singular perturbations of a one-dimensional Dirac operator can be approximated by regular potentials, and J Brasche constructs a family of Hamiltonians in which the singular interaction has a more complicated support, namely a Brownian path. Finally, B Pavlov and I Antoniou apply the singular perturbation technique to another classical Hamiltonian, that of a generalized Friedrichs model; no matter that the unperturbed observable is called momentum in their paper. The three papers in the following group are distinguished by the fact that they consider systems which are fully or partially periodic. F Bentosela and M Tater analyse scattering on a crystalline `slab' modelled by point interactions distributed periodically on a finite number of parallel plates. E de Prunelé studies evolution of wavepackets in crystal models of different geometries, and M Avdonin et al discuss a simple model of a spin-dependent scattering on a one-dimensional array of quantum dots. The next group of papers is devoted to a topic which was untouched at the time of the aforementioned first edition, namely quantum graphs, which became a subject of interest after numerous applications of such systems to semiconductor, carbon and other nanostructures. Most contributions here deal with the `usual' model in which the Hamiltonian is a Schrödinger operator supported by the graph. P Kuchment describes spectral properties of such graphs, in particular periodic ones and those with decorations. S Albeverio and K Pankrashkin present a modification of Krein's formula which is suitable for constructing Hamiltonians of quantum graphs using boundary conditions at vertices directly. Two papers are devoted to inverse problems in this context: M Harmer studies inverse scattering for the matrix Schrödinger operator on the halfline with applications to star graphs, while P Kurasov and M Nowaczyk give a mathematically rigorous version of the known Gutkin–Smilansky result on the inverse spectral problem. The paper by O Post contributes to the question of how graphs can be approximated by more realistic `fat' graphs, and describes a class leading to disconnected quantum graphs. Finally, S Kondej and one of the editors study scattering in the context of `leaky' graphs which takes quantum tunnelling into account. While most results in this field describe one-particle Hamiltonians, more complicated systems have also been studied. In this issue we have three examples. C Cacciapuito, R Carlone, and R Figari discuss decoherence in a simple model of two particles, one heavy and one light, interacting through a δ potential; they give a rigorous meaning to a formula derived by Joos and Zeh. A related model by R Figari and A Teta is used to describe ionization. M Hallnäs, E Langmann, and C Paufler treat a true N -body situation, namely a model of one-dimensional gas of distinguishable particles interacting through generalized point interactions; they write the Bethe ansatz and present the solution of a particular case. The last group is a collection of contributions which in one sense or another are outside quantum mechanics, either modifying its postulates or applying it to a different physical situation. The latter applies to the paper of D Noja and A Posilicano in which they study nonlinear wave equations with point perturbations and show the existence of a solution to the Cauchy problem. F Coutinho et al discuss one-dimensional point interactions with energy-dependent coupling constant, S Albeverio and S Kuzhel examine a class of point interactions which are not symmetric but P-symmetric, where P is the parity operator, and M Znojil and V Jakubský consider a `double-well' PT-symmetric model with two δ interactions with an imaginary coupling. The last two papers present mathematical constructions. Yu Shondin demonstrates a way to define an interaction more singular than the usual δ potentials obtained by means of self-adjoint extensions, and V Koshmanenko presents a construction of strongly singular perturbations leading to rather unusual `Hamiltonians'.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•May 18, 2005•6 citations

Comparing the Schrödinger and Dirac Descriptions of an Electron in a Uniform Magnetic Field

David Velasco Villamizar, Benjamin Russell

Abstract In this article we present a detailed description, using ladder operators, of an electron in a uniform magnetic field evolving under the Schrödinger equation. We go on to describe the same physical system in terms of relativistic quantum mechanics using the Dirac equation and to compare the two models in detail. The main differences between these two quantum mechanical approaches are discussed and we observe specifically how the relativistic phenomena modify the description of this particular quantum system by isolating effects which only exist in the relativistic model.

•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations
The spectrum and eigenfunctions of a particle moving in two dimensions under the influence of an external uniform magnetic field and in the presence of a ‘‘point interaction’’ is determined. This is done after an elementary discussion of how to construct a ‘‘point interaction’’ in two dimensions circumventing the well-known difficulties with the Dirac δ2(r) interaction.
The spectrum of a Hamiltonian for NNN harmonically interacting two-dimensional particles in a constant perpendicular magnetic field is determined exactly by the transformation to normal coordinates. The energy of the ground state consistent with Fermi-Dirac statistics is calculated in the limit of a strong magnetic field. The Fermi energy is found to exhibit de Haas---van Alphen---like oscillations.
The Pauli–Schrödinger equation for a spin 1/2, neutral particle with a nonvanishing magnetic moment μ0, interacting with an external scalar potential V and a static magnetic field B, both functions of only one of the coordinates, is solved exactly for four different choices of the potential and the field. By choosing in the examples the coordinate y, we present these solutions in the following cases: (i) V( y)=0, B( y)=(B0sin κy, 0, B0cos κy) where B0 and κ are two arbitrary constants. (ii) V( y)=λ′y2, B( y)=‖αy‖(cos 2κy, 0, sin 2κy) where 6* λ=ℏ2/2m and α,κ arbitrary constants and λ′=λ(μ0/2κλ)2. (iii) V( y)=λ′(c̄1tan αy+c̄2cot αy)2, B( y)=B( y) (sin (2κy+2δ(y)), 0, cos (2κy+2δ( y)) where B2( y)=(c̄1tan αy+c̄2cot αy)2 (+α2/4κ2)(c̄1sec2αy−c̄2csc2αy)2 and tan 2δ( y)=(2κ/λ)((c̄1tan αy+c̄2cot αy) /(c̄1sec2αy−c̄2csc2αy)); c̄1, c̄2, α, and κ are arbitrary constants. (iv) V( y)=λ′(ā tanh z+b̄)2 where z =[(y−cd)/d], B2( y)=(ā tanh z+b̄)2+(ā2/4κ2d2)sech2z, tan 2δ( y)=(2κd/ā)((ā tanh z+b̄)/sech2z); ā, b̄, c, d, and κ are arbitrary constants restricted only by (μ0/2κλ)ā2+ā/d>0. The functions B( y) and δ( y) define the vector B( y) as in (iii). Our method of solution is based on the familiar factorization technique for solving the Schrödinger eigenvalue equation. Several interesting physical results of these solutions are discussed.
We study the problem of a nonrelativistic quantum particle moving on a real line with an idealized and localized singular interaction with zero range at x = 0 (i.e., a point interaction there). This kind of system can be described in two ways: (i) by considering an alternative free system (i.e., without the singular potential) but excluding the point x = 0 (In this case, the point interaction is exclusively encoded in the boundary conditions.) and (ii) by explicitly considering the singular interaction by means of a local singular potential. In this paper we relate, compare, and discuss, in a simple and pedagogical way these two equivalent approaches. Our main goal in this paper is to introduce the essential ideas about point interactions in a very accesible form to advanced undergraduates.
This issue comprises two dozen research papers which are all in one sense or another devoted to models in which the interaction is singular and sharply localized; a typical example is a quantum particle interacting with a family of δ-type potentials. Such an idealization usually makes analysis of their properties considerably easier, sometimes allowing us to reduce it to a simple algebraic problem—this is why one speaks about solvable models. The subject can be traced back to the early days of quantum mechanics; however, the progress in this field was slow and uneven until the 1960s, mostly because singular interactions are often difficult to deal with mathematically and intuitive arguments do not work. After overcoming the initial difficulties the `classical' theory of point interactions was developed, and finally summarized in 1988 in a monograph by Albeverio, Gesztesy, Høegh-Krohn, and Holden, which you will find quoted in numerous places within this issue. A reliable way to judge theories is to observe the progress they make within one or two decades. In this case there is no doubt that the field has witnessed a continuous development and covered areas which nobody had thought of when the subject first emerged. The reader may see it in the second edition of the aforementioned book which was published by AMS Chelsea only recently and contained a brief survey of these new achievements. It is no coincidence that this topical issue appears at the same time; it has been conceived as its counterpart and a forum at which fresh results in the field can demonstrated. Let us briefly survey the contents of the issue. While the papers included have in common the basic subject, they represent a broad spectrum philosophically as well as technically, and any attempt to classify them is somewhat futile. Nevertheless, we will divide them into a few groups. The first comprises contributions directly related to the usual point-interaction ideology. M Correggi and one of the editors study a toy model of a decay under the influence of a time-periodic δ potential. E Demiralp describes the spectrum of a spherical harmonic oscillator amended with a concentric family of δ-shell interactions. Another of the editors presents an isoperimetric problem for point interactions arranged at vertices of a polygon. W Huddell and R Hughes show how singular perturbations of a one-dimensional Dirac operator can be approximated by regular potentials, and J Brasche constructs a family of Hamiltonians in which the singular interaction has a more complicated support, namely a Brownian path. Finally, B Pavlov and I Antoniou apply the singular perturbation technique to another classical Hamiltonian, that of a generalized Friedrichs model; no matter that the unperturbed observable is called momentum in their paper. The three papers in the following group are distinguished by the fact that they consider systems which are fully or partially periodic. F Bentosela and M Tater analyse scattering on a crystalline `slab' modelled by point interactions distributed periodically on a finite number of parallel plates. E de Prunelé studies evolution of wavepackets in crystal models of different geometries, and M Avdonin et al discuss a simple model of a spin-dependent scattering on a one-dimensional array of quantum dots. The next group of papers is devoted to a topic which was untouched at the time of the aforementioned first edition, namely quantum graphs, which became a subject of interest after numerous applications of such systems to semiconductor, carbon and other nanostructures. Most contributions here deal with the `usual' model in which the Hamiltonian is a Schrödinger operator supported by the graph. P Kuchment describes spectral properties of such graphs, in particular periodic ones and those with decorations. S Albeverio and K Pankrashkin present a modification of Krein's formula which is suitable for constructing Hamiltonians of quantum graphs using boundary conditions at vertices directly. Two papers are devoted to inverse problems in this context: M Harmer studies inverse scattering for the matrix Schrödinger operator on the halfline with applications to star graphs, while P Kurasov and M Nowaczyk give a mathematically rigorous version of the known Gutkin–Smilansky result on the inverse spectral problem. The paper by O Post contributes to the question of how graphs can be approximated by more realistic `fat' graphs, and describes a class leading to disconnected quantum graphs. Finally, S Kondej and one of the editors study scattering in the context of `leaky' graphs which takes quantum tunnelling into account. While most results in this field describe one-particle Hamiltonians, more complicated systems have also been studied. In this issue we have three examples. C Cacciapuito, R Carlone, and R Figari discuss decoherence in a simple model of two particles, one heavy and one light, interacting through a δ potential; they give a rigorous meaning to a formula derived by Joos and Zeh. A related model by R Figari and A Teta is used to describe ionization. M Hallnäs, E Langmann, and C Paufler treat a true N -body situation, namely a model of one-dimensional gas of distinguishable particles interacting through generalized point interactions; they write the Bethe ansatz and present the solution of a particular case. The last group is a collection of contributions which in one sense or another are outside quantum mechanics, either modifying its postulates or applying it to a different physical situation. The latter applies to the paper of D Noja and A Posilicano in which they study nonlinear wave equations with point perturbations and show the existence of a solution to the Cauchy problem. F Coutinho et al discuss one-dimensional point interactions with energy-dependent coupling constant, S Albeverio and S Kuzhel examine a class of point interactions which are not symmetric but P-symmetric, where P is the parity operator, and M Znojil and V Jakubský consider a `double-well' PT-symmetric model with two δ interactions with an imaginary coupling. The last two papers present mathematical constructions. Yu Shondin demonstrates a way to define an interaction more singular than the usual δ potentials obtained by means of self-adjoint extensions, and V Koshmanenko presents a construction of strongly singular perturbations leading to rather unusual `Hamiltonians'.
Abstract In this article we present a detailed description, using ladder operators, of an electron in a uniform magnetic field evolving under the Schrödinger equation. We go on to describe the same physical system in terms of relativistic quantum mechanics using the Dirac equation and to compare the two models in detail. The main differences between these two quantum mechanical approaches are discussed and we observe specifically how the relativistic phenomena modify the description of this particular quantum system by isolating effects which only exist in the relativistic model.