Passive decoy-state quantum key distribution (QKD) systems, proven to be more desirable than the active ones in some scenarios, also have the problem of device imperfections like intensity fluctuations. In this paper, the formula of key generation rate of the passive decoy-state protocol using the weak coherent pulse (WCP) source with intensity fluctuation is given, and then the influence of intensity fluctuations on the performance of the passive decoy-state protocol is rigorously characterized. From numerical simulations, it can be seen that intensity fluctuations have non-negligible influence on the performance of the passive decoy-state QKD protocol with WCP source. Most importantly, our simulations show that, under the same deviation of intensity fluctuations, the passive decoy-state method performs better than the active one decoy-state method and is close to the active vacuum + weak decoy-state method.
In this paper, we provide a simple approach for determining the rate of secure key production when single-photon and two-photon pulses are used to generate the secure key. For both BB84 and SARG04, we offer estimation and optimization of decoy-state parameters for a single decoy state protocol and two decoy state protocols. This method can be used to determine the lower bound on the fraction of single-photon counts ([Formula: see text]), the fraction of two-photon counts ([Formula: see text]), the upper bound on the QBER of single-photon pulses ([Formula: see text]), the upper bound on the QBER of two-photon pulses ([Formula: see text]), and the lower bound on the key generation rate for both BB84 and SARG04. Due to the limited data size in real-world experiments, we estimate the statistical fluctuations of several parameters, including the gain and QBER of the signal state, as well as the gain and QBER of the decoy state, which are used to estimate the lower bound of key generation rate. We propose formulae that specify the optimal decoy and signal state percentages and intensities. Then we can determine the maximum and optimal key generation rate. For both SARG04 and BB84, we simulated a free space-based QKD system using our decoy state strategy. The simulation results show that free space-based QKD systems that use the suggested approach for BB84 can achieve a higher secret key rate and a greater safe distance than SARG04-based systems.
For quantum key distribution (QKD) using spontaneous parametric-down-conversion sources (SPDCSs), the passive decoy-state protocol has been proved to be efficiently close to the theoretical limit of an infinite decoy-state protocol. In this paper, we apply a tight finite-key analysis for the passive decoy-state QKD using SPDCSs. Combining the security bound based on the uncertainty principle with the passive decoy-state protocol, a concise and stringent formula for calculating the key generation rate for QKD using SPDCSs is presented. The simulation shows that the secure distance under our formula can reach up to 182 km when the number of sifted data is 1010. Our results also indicate that, under the same deviation of statistical fluctuation due to finite-size effects, the passive decoy-state QKD with SPDCSs can perform as well as the active decoy-state QKD with a weak coherent source.