Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics World

Researchers oppose ‘militarization’ of quantum science

Michael G. Banks

Published Mar 1, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

More than 250 quantum scientists have signed a “manifesto” opposing the use of quantum research for military purposes.
DOI
10.1088/2058-7058/39/03/03

Related papers

Quantum scientists for disarmament: a manifesto

Quantum Scientists for Disarmament

We, as researchers in quantum science and technology, are publishing this manifesto to express our deep concerns about the current geopolitical situation and the global race to rearm. We firmly oppose all forms of militarization in our societies and, in particular, within the academic world. We categorically reject the use of our research for military applications, population control, or surveillance. We stand against the practice of military funding for research. This manifesto is a call to action: to confront the elephant in the room of quantum research, and to unite all researchers who share our views. Our main goals are: i) To express, as a unified collective, our rejection of the use of our research for military purposes; ii) To open a debate in our community about the ethical implications of quantum research for military purposes; iii) To create a forum where concerned scientists can share their opinions and join forces in support of demilitarized research; iv) To advocate for the establishment of a public database listing all research projects at public universities funded by military or defense agencies. In what follows, we lay out our concerns and the rationale behind our opposition to the militarization of quantum research.

physics.soc-phCross-listedarXiv:2601.14282•Jan 14, 2026

Physicists release ‘quantum manifesto’ for Europe

Michael E. Allen

Researchers across Europe are calling on the European Union (EU) to launch a €1bn initiative in quantum technologies to ensure that the continent remains a leader in the field.

Physics World•Apr 1, 2016•1 citation

Military Relevance of Quantum Technologies

Ajey Lele

Advanced sciences and technologies for security applications•Jan 1, 2021•3 citations

Europe bets €1 billion on Quantum tech [News]

Alexander Hellemans

European quantum physicists have done some amazing things over the past few decades: sent single photons to Earth orbit and back, created quantum bits that will be at the heart of computers that can crack today's encryption, and "teleported" the quantum states of photons, electrons, and atoms. But they've had less success at turning the science into technology. At least that's the feeling of some 3,400 scientists who signed the "Quantum Manifesto," which calls for a big European project to support and coordinate quantum-tech R&D. The European Commission heard them, and answered in May with a ϵ1 billion, 10-year-long megaproject called the Quantum Technology Flagship, to begin in 2018.

IEEE Spectrum•Jun 28, 2016•5 citations

Meeting the Needs of the Global Quantum Science Community: A Call to Action

Tzula B. Propp, Brandy Todd, Sara A. Metwalli +8 more

2025 marks one hundred years since the discovery of quantum mechanics. In the century since then, quantum science has blossomed into a global community composed of academics, engineers, developers, and entrepreneurs. The world is currently in the middle of the so-called second quantum revolution, with increased public awareness of quantum science and technology, and growing investment in both quantum hardware and software applications. However, representation remains low among historically marginalized groups: women, LGBTQ+, BIPOC, and people from the global south make up disproportionately few physicists. There are numerous efforts to improve diversity within quantum science, including through workforce development. But many of the changes enacted at the highest levels have failed to result in real change, as highlighted and discussed in the recent Women For Quantum Manifesto of Values. Here, we seek to echo and amplify the need for real change in the quantum ecosystem, emphasizing intersectionality and a feminist approach that centers the most vulnerable members of the quantum community: young students and researchers, especially those communities historically marginalized from quantum science. This report is our attempt to help quantum communities meet this need; we have conducted a survey of quantum scientists all over the world, and here we include both a preliminary report of our findings and policy suggestions we have built to address them. The primary results of our survey are that, 1) marginalized quantum scientists are experiencing hardships and challenges more than their more privileged peers across all metrics, 2) that this fact is hurting retention of diverse, talented quantum scientists in our field, and 3) quantum EDI is an investment in talent retention and resilience building, which are essential for a thriving, globally competitive quantum ecosystem.

physics.soc-phCross-listedarXiv:2601.14297•Jan 19, 2026

‘Creative Mutual Interaction’as Manifesto, Research Program, and Regulative Ideal

Kirk Wegter‐McNelly

Over the last few decades there has been a steadily increasing amount of useful discussion between the fields of science and theology. Robert John Russell has played a major role both as an important scholar and in forming the very effective Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences. Before the twentieth century, science was already remarkably successful and seemed to say that everything happening in our world was completely deterministic. Science now has fundamental laws predicting the probability of particular things happening. The basic and challenging problems or puzzles which the author has selected are of course well recognized by many, and confront any synthesis of science and religion. An electron can never be located at a precise place, nor be known to head in a precise direction. Early in the history of quantum mechanics, many scientists thought that perhaps the unpredictability of phenomena which had been discovered provided a place where God could and was acting.

Routledge eBooks•Apr 22, 2016•0 citations
We, as researchers in quantum science and technology, are publishing this manifesto to express our deep concerns about the current geopolitical situation and the global race to rearm. We firmly oppose all forms of militarization in our societies and, in particular, within the academic world. We categorically reject the use of our research for military applications, population control, or surveillance. We stand against the practice of military funding for research. This manifesto is a call to action: to confront the elephant in the room of quantum research, and to unite all researchers who share our views. Our main goals are: i) To express, as a unified collective, our rejection of the use of our research for military purposes; ii) To open a debate in our community about the ethical implications of quantum research for military purposes; iii) To create a forum where concerned scientists can share their opinions and join forces in support of demilitarized research; iv) To advocate for the establishment of a public database listing all research projects at public universities funded by military or defense agencies. In what follows, we lay out our concerns and the rationale behind our opposition to the militarization of quantum research.
European quantum physicists have done some amazing things over the past few decades: sent single photons to Earth orbit and back, created quantum bits that will be at the heart of computers that can crack today's encryption, and "teleported" the quantum states of photons, electrons, and atoms. But they've had less success at turning the science into technology. At least that's the feeling of some 3,400 scientists who signed the "Quantum Manifesto," which calls for a big European project to support and coordinate quantum-tech R&D. The European Commission heard them, and answered in May with a ϵ1 billion, 10-year-long megaproject called the Quantum Technology Flagship, to begin in 2018.
2025 marks one hundred years since the discovery of quantum mechanics. In the century since then, quantum science has blossomed into a global community composed of academics, engineers, developers, and entrepreneurs. The world is currently in the middle of the so-called second quantum revolution, with increased public awareness of quantum science and technology, and growing investment in both quantum hardware and software applications. However, representation remains low among historically marginalized groups: women, LGBTQ+, BIPOC, and people from the global south make up disproportionately few physicists. There are numerous efforts to improve diversity within quantum science, including through workforce development. But many of the changes enacted at the highest levels have failed to result in real change, as highlighted and discussed in the recent Women For Quantum Manifesto of Values. Here, we seek to echo and amplify the need for real change in the quantum ecosystem, emphasizing intersectionality and a feminist approach that centers the most vulnerable members of the quantum community: young students and researchers, especially those communities historically marginalized from quantum science. This report is our attempt to help quantum communities meet this need; we have conducted a survey of quantum scientists all over the world, and here we include both a preliminary report of our findings and policy suggestions we have built to address them. The primary results of our survey are that, 1) marginalized quantum scientists are experiencing hardships and challenges more than their more privileged peers across all metrics, 2) that this fact is hurting retention of diverse, talented quantum scientists in our field, and 3) quantum EDI is an investment in talent retention and resilience building, which are essential for a thriving, globally competitive quantum ecosystem.
Over the last few decades there has been a steadily increasing amount of useful discussion between the fields of science and theology. Robert John Russell has played a major role both as an important scholar and in forming the very effective Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences. Before the twentieth century, science was already remarkably successful and seemed to say that everything happening in our world was completely deterministic. Science now has fundamental laws predicting the probability of particular things happening. The basic and challenging problems or puzzles which the author has selected are of course well recognized by many, and confront any synthesis of science and religion. An electron can never be located at a precise place, nor be known to head in a precise direction. Early in the history of quantum mechanics, many scientists thought that perhaps the unpredictability of phenomena which had been discovered provided a place where God could and was acting.