Paper 99: Coupling as a Parameter — From Geometric Phase to Geometric Coupling Theory. An Open Note to Lei Xing

James E. Dunn

Published Mar 23, 2026• 0 citations

Abstract

An open note connecting Lei Xing's foundational 2006 insight — that coupling belongs in parameter space (J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 39(30), doi:10.1088/0305-4470/39/30/010) — to Geometric Coupling Theory and its application in radiation oncology. Xing proved that the Berry phase is preserved when spin-spin coupling is assimilated into parameter space via a quasimagnetic field. GCT makes the identical architectural move across 40+ domains, treating coupling as a coordinate with geometric features (sign-flip boundary, irrational attractor, convergent ladder). Five open problems in Xing's current Stanford radiation oncology lab — auto-contouring in dense tissue, radiation field precision, tissue heterogeneity, density-independent screening, and pre-treatment density reduction — are each explained by the coupling geometry he identified twenty years ago. The bridge between quantum spin systems and tissue coupling is structural.

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19187885

Related papers

A new concept of geometric phase in parameter space: coupling as a parameter

Lei Xing

We have obtained the geometric phase of the tripartite spin-1/2 system with spin-spin coupling and discussed the influence of this coupling on the geometric phase. We have discovered the coupling-independent geometric phase and explained it. Based on this work, we propose the concept of quasimagnetic field and assimilate the coupling into the parameter space. By this theory, the relation between the geometric phase and the solid angle in parameter space still holds for a system with spin-spin coupling if the concept of the parameter is properly revised in the way we have elucidated.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and GeneralJul 12, 20066 citations

Note on Dirac monopole theory and Berry geometric phase

Li-Chen Zhao

Abstract This work revisit on the intrinsic connection between Dirac monopole theory and Berry geometric phases by extending Dirac's theory to the parameter space. Using the simplest two-mode Hamiltonian model, we explicitly visualize Dirac strings with endpoints in the parameter space, demonstrating that these endpoints correspond to accidental degeneracy points of energy eigenvalues in Hermitian systems. We show that non-integrable phase factors, induced by such Dirac strings, directly give rise to the well-known Berry connection and curvature, which can be re-derived by following the spirit of Dirac's monopole theory with the aid of the quantum adiabatic theorem. Our results indicate that the Berry geometric phase is essentially the non-integrable phase factor induced by Dirac strings with endpoints in the parameter space. These results further deepen our understanding on monopole and geometric phases, and would inspire more studies on them especially when Berry's framework is not applicable.

arXiv:2409.02144Chinese Physics BNov 14, 20251 citation

Investigation Of Geometrical Phase In Quantum Information And Computation Theory

Niloofar Karimi Dehkordi

The geometric phase is the comparison the of a physical quantity due to the changes on a closed cruve in the system state space. These phases are experimentally measurable because of, that the space of a time dependent quantum system may be a curveture, therefore the Holonomy arises from this curveture. The Berry phase has three key features, which makes it very important. First, the Berry phase is gauge invariance. Especial functions are defined by aequal linear equation, hence it has a multiplicative guage freedom in a general phase factor independent of the parameter. Berry phase (forget from on phase factor ) with this phase factor remains unchanged provided that the special function is on a single loop value. This makes the Berry phase to be a physical quantity that is experimentally measureable by inter ference phenomena. Secondly, Berry phase is a geometric concept. that’s mean it can be written as a linear integral of loop in parameter space, which does not depend on the rate of change on the loop. This property makes it mesureable the Berry phase in terms of local geometric quantites in the parameter space. In fact, Berry showed that this phase can be written as a find integral (Berry curve) on the surface. Berry curve plays an essential role in effective dynamics with variables with degrees of slow release. Third, the Berry phase is similar to that of guage field and differential geometry theory. This makes beauty, intuition and the same concept in physics.

Jan 1, 20170 citations

Phase space formulation of the Abelian and non-Abelian quantum geometric tensor

Diego González, Daniel Gutiérrez‐Ruiz, J. David Vergara

Abstract The geometry of the parameter space is encoded by the quantum geometric tensor, which captures fundamental information about quantum states and contains both the quantum metric tensor and the curvature of the Berry connection. We present a formulation of the Berry connection and the quantum geometric tensor in the framework of the phase space or Wigner function formalism. This formulation is obtained through the direct application of the Weyl correspondence to the geometric structure under consideration. In particular, we show that the quantum metric tensor can be computed using only the Wigner functions, which opens an alternative way to experimentally measure the components of this tensor. We also address the non-Abelian generalization and obtain the phase space formulation of the Wilczek–Zee connection and the non-Abelian quantum geometric tensor. In this case, the non-Abelian quantum metric tensor involves only the non-diagonal Wigner functions. Then, we verify our approach with examples and apply it to a system of N coupled harmonic oscillators, showing that the associated Berry connection vanishes and obtaining the analytic expression for the quantum metric tensor. Our results indicate that the developed approach is well adapted to study the parameter space associated with quantum many-body systems.

arXiv:2011.14310Journal of Physics A Mathematical and TheoreticalNov 2, 202015 citations

GEOMETRIC METHODS AND THE GAUGE STRUCTURE OF BERRY'S PHASE

Bernard Francis Bednarz

The use of geometric methods to obtain the connection associated with Berry's phase is discussed. Failures and successes in past attempts at using only geometry are presented. It is argued that this approach is most useful for Hamiltonians rotated on the parameter space.

International Journal of Modern Physics AOct 10, 19892 citations

From Primitives to Berry Phase

Allen Proxmire

This walkthrough derives, from substrate primitives, three closely related quantities of standard quantum mechanics: the Berry connection Aₙ(R) = i⟨n(R) | ∇ᴿ n(R)⟩ on parameter space; the Berry phase γₙ[C] = ∮₍C₎ Aₙ(R) · dR accumulated under adiabatic cyclic evolution around a closed loop; and the Berry curvature Ωₙ(R) = ∇ᴿ × Aₙ(R), with γₙ[C] = ∫₍S₎ Ωₙ · dS for any surface S bounded by C. Each is derived, not posited. Berry’s 1984 derivation observed that adiabatic cyclic evolution leaves an instantaneous eigenstate |n(R)⟩ unchanged in identity but multiplied by a phase factor e^{iγₙ} above and beyond the standard dynamical phase. The construction proceeds: write |ψ(t)⟩ = e^{−i∫₀ᵗ Eₙ(t′) dt′ / ℏ} e^{iγₙ(t)} |n(R(t))⟩, substitute into Schrödinger, project onto ⟨n|, and read off γ̇ₙ = i⟨n | ∇ᴿ n⟩ · Ṙ. This is mathematically correct. It is also mechanistically opaque. Standard QM does not say what makes the parameter‑dependent eigenstate |n(R)⟩ a coherent object across R‑values that are never simultaneously instantiated, why parallel transport produces a connection rather than a flat structure, what makes the geometric phase rate‑independent, or what physical object the Berry curvature describes. The construction is presented as a derived consequence of QM postulates, but the postulates themselves are unexplained at any deeper ontological level. The Berry connection and curvature are objects in parameter space, not physical space — their meaning at the level of underlying ontology is left unstated. This walkthrough shows how the Event Density framework forces all three quantities from substrate ontology when participation rules are parameter‑dependent. The connection one‑form is the substrate‑level statement that adiabatic identity‑preservation under parameter change requires a path‑dependent compensation. The geometric‑phase rate‑independence is the substrate‑level statement that the connection lives on parameter space rather than time. The curvature is the substrate‑level rule‑type curvature in parameter space — directly analogous to the rule‑type curvature of a gauge field in physical space (T17), but lifted to the space of rule parameters. The substrate‑level mechanism, in one sentence: the Berry phase is the holonomy of the rule‑type connection on the bundle of parameter‑dependent participation rules. The derivation chain runs from five substrate primitives (parameter‑dependent participation rule, identity alignment with pre‑individuation amplitudes, channels and adiabatic evolution as slow parameter change, global ED‑geometry in parameter space, closed loops as closed families of rules) through parallel‑transport‑forced connection and Stokes‑theorem‑related curvature, with the geometric‑vs‑dynamical phase separation made explicit.

May 12, 20260 citations