The geometric phase is the comparison the of a physical quantity due to the changes on a closed cruve in the system state space. These phases are experimentally measurable because of, that the space of a time dependent quantum system may be a curveture, therefore the Holonomy arises from this curveture. The Berry phase has three key features, which makes it very important. First, the Berry phase is gauge invariance. Especial functions are defined by aequal linear equation, hence it has a multiplicative guage freedom in a general phase factor independent of the parameter. Berry phase (forget from on phase factor ) with this phase factor remains unchanged provided that the special function is on a single loop value. This makes the Berry phase to be a physical quantity that is experimentally measureable by inter ference phenomena. Secondly, Berry phase is a geometric concept. that’s mean it can be written as a linear integral of loop in parameter space, which does not depend on the rate of change on the loop. This property makes it mesureable the Berry phase in terms of local geometric quantites in the parameter space. In fact, Berry showed that this phase can be written as a find integral (Berry curve) on the surface. Berry curve plays an essential role in effective dynamics with variables with degrees of slow release. Third, the Berry phase is similar to that of guage field and differential geometry theory. This makes beauty, intuition and the same concept in physics.
The geometric phase is the comparison the of a physical quantity due to the changes on a closed cruve in the system state space. These phases are experimentally measurable because of, that the space of a time dependent quantum system may be a curveture, therefore the Holonomy arises from this curveture. The Berry phase has three key features, which makes it very important. First, the Berry phase is gauge invariance. Especial functions are defined by aequal linear equation, hence it has a multiplicative guage freedom in a general phase factor independent of the parameter. Berry phase (forget from on phase factor ) with this phase factor remains unchanged provided that the special function is on a single loop value. This makes the Berry phase to be a physical quantity that is experimentally measureable by inter ference phenomena. Secondly, Berry phase is a geometric concept. that’s mean it can be written as a linear integral of loop in parameter space, which does not depend on the rate of change on the loop. This property makes it mesureable the Berry phase in terms of local geometric quantites in the parameter space. In fact, Berry showed that this phase can be written as a find integral (Berry curve) on the surface. Berry curve plays an essential role in effective dynamics with variables with degrees of slow release. Third, the Berry phase is similar to that of guage field and differential geometry theory. This makes beauty, intuition and the same concept in physics.
In 1984 Berry addressed a quantum system undergoing a unitary and cyclic evolution under the action of a time-dependent Hamiltonian (M. V. Berry, 1984). The process was supposed to be adiabatic, meaning that the time scale of the system’s evolution was much shorter than the time scale of the changing Hamiltonian. Until Berry’s study, it was assumed that for a cyclic Hamiltonian the quantum state would acquire only so-called dynamical phases, deprived of physical meaning. Such phases could be eliminated by redefining the quantum state through a “gauge” transformation of the form |ψ〉 → eiα |ψ〉. However, Berry discovered that besides the dynamical, there was an additional phase that could not be “gauged away” and whose origin was geometric or topological. It depended on the path that |ψ〉 describes in the parameter space spanned by those parameters to which the Hamiltonian owed its time dependence. Berry’s discovery was the starting point for a great amount of investigations that brought to light topological aspects of both quantum and classical systems. Berry’s phase was soon recognized as a special case of more general phases that showed up when dealing with topological aspects of different systems. For example, the Aharonov-Bohm phase could be understood as a geometric phase. The rotation angle acquired by a parallel-transported vector after completing a closed loop in a gravitationally curved space-time region, is also a geometric, Berry-like phase. Another example is the precession of the plane of oscillation of a Foucault pendulum. Berry’s original formulation was directly applicable to the case of a spin-1/2 system evolving under the action of a slowly varying magnetic field that undergoes cyclic changes. A spin-1/2 system is a special case of a two-level system. Another instances are two-level atoms and polarized light, so that also in these cases we should expect to find geometric phases. In fact, the first experimental test of Berry’s phase was done using polarized, classical light (A. Tomita, 1986). Pancharatnam (S. Pancharatnam, 1956) anticipated Berry’s phase when he proposed, back in 1956, how to decide whether two polarization states are “in phase”. Pancharatnam’s prescription is an operational one, based upon observing whether the intensity of the interferogram formed by two polarized beams has maximal intensity. In that case, the two polarized beams are said to be “in phase”. Such a definition is analogous to the definition of distant parallelism in differential geometry. Polarized states can be subjected to different transformations which could be cyclic or not, adiabatic or not, unitary or not. The Pancharatnam-Berry Phase: Theoretical and Experimental Aspects
We are accustomed to think the phase of single particle states does not matter. After all, the phase cancels out when calculating physical observables. However, the geometric phase can cause interference even in single particle states and can be measured. Berry’s phase is a geometric phase the system accumulates as its time-dependent Hamiltonian is subjected to closed adiabatic excursion in parameter space. In this report, we explore how Berry’s phase manifests itself in various fields of physics, both classical and quantum mechanical. The Hannay angle is a classical analogue to Berry’s phase and they are related by a derivative. The Aharonov-Bohm effect is a manifestation of Berry’s phase. Net rotation of deformable bodies in the language of gauge theory can be translated as a Berry phase. The well-known BornOppenheimer approximation is a molecular Aharonov-Bohm effect and is another manifestation of Berry’s Phase.
This special issue celebrates the discovery of two of the most important aspects of quantum mechanics: the Aharonov–Bohm effect and the Berry phase. The issue includes work presented at two conferences, 50 Years of the Aharonov–Bohm Effect, 11–14 October 2009, Tel Aviv University, Israel, and the Aharonov–Bohm Effect and Berry Phase 50/25 Anniversary, 14–15 December 2009, Bristol University, UK. The Aharonov–Bohm (AB) effect and the Berry phase have many things in common, apart from the happy coincidence that they were discovered 25 years apart, making possible such a joint anniversary. First, they were both discovered in the same place, the H H Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, UK. Second, they both were there for everybody to see from day one, from the very beginning of quantum mechanics. They were, so to say, right on the surface; there was no need for sophisticated mathematics or involved constructions. Yet it took so long for somebody to see them. The explanation, we dare to speculate, is that they are so unusual, they challenge so much our everyday experience and ingrained intuitions about physics that it was difficult to recognise them. Third, both the AB effect and the Berry phase are quintessentially quantum; they both manifest themselves as topological/geometric quantum phases. The AB effect revolutionized our understanding of the role of potentials in physics. For the first time, it was shown that a particle moving in a field-free region could be affected by a field in a disjoint region. In doing so, it shattered one of the strongest held principles of physics. In the case of the Berry phase, the importance lies in its absolute generality—the topological/geometric phase named after Berry is acquired by all physical systems when the external parameters they depend upon undergo an adiabatic cyclic change. Remarkably this phase depends only on the geometry of the cyclic path in the abstract parameter space, a fact which deepens our appreciation of the underlying geometry of quantum mechanics. The AB effect and the Berry phase are ubiquitous in modern physics and have implications ranging from the most fundamental to the very applied. First and foremost, they give a deeper understanding of the nature of quantum mechanics itself. Furthermore, we find them in fields as varied as cosmology, particle physics, non-abelian gauge theories, condensed matter, chemical and molecular physics, and laser dynamics. Generalizations of the AB effect to non-abelian gauge theories, such as the Wilson and `t Hooft loops, are important tools for studying confinement and spontaneous symmetry breaking. They explain charge quantization, the quantum Hall effect and the Josephson junction and also play a crucial role in electron microscope holography. Without them an understanding of many effects in the new field of mesoscopic physics, where tiny electronic circuits exhibit quantum behaviour, would be impossible. Like good wine, the AB effect and the Berry phase become finer and more appreciated with time. Even though they appear in textbooks and encyclopaedias, the number of researchers thinking and publishing papers on these two effects is increasing annually. The AB effect and the Berry phase keep being observed in new systems and with every day that passes novel applications are routinely found. This special issue is just a small snapshot of the state of the art 50 and 25 years, respectively, from their discoveries.
T HE BERRY PHASE, A CENTRAL CONCEPT IN QUANTUM physics, is rooted in the state space structure of quantum theory and has a profound observable impact within a wide range of phenomena. The remarkably elegant interpretation of this geometric phase as the holonomy of a fiber bundle provides it with a mathematical framework capable of accounting for a broad spectrum of classical and quantum phenomena, such as, for example, the precession of a Foucault pendulum, the parallel transport of a vector on a sphere, the Aharonov-Bohm effect, the gauge theory of molecular physics, the electric polarization and orbital magnetization of solids, and the integer and fractional quantum Hall effects. The Berry phase is the central concept in topological band theory and provides the mechanism responsible for anyonic statistics in correlated many-body systems, a key element that could be used to achieve fault-tolerant quantum computation. In other words, the Berry phase is not just some fashionable idea useful for explaining a few exotic phenomena, but a generic feature of quantum mechanics and an essential ingredient necessary for a coherent understanding of basic quantum phenomena, such as, for example, the electronic properties of materials. It is therefore rather surprising that the full significance of geometric phases was practically ignored for more than fifty years prior to the publication of Berry’s work in 1984 [50]. In this chapter we discuss the basic physics that gives rise to these geometric phases, point out the elements that allow us to distinguish different types of holonomies, summarize the basic concepts relevant to understanding the mathematical structure of geometric phases, and mention a few relevant applications. The concepts and the mathematical framework introduced here will be used in subsequent chapters as the basis for describing the topological properties of condensed matter systems.
Berry’s phase is typically realized in a system consisting of fast and slow variables, when the trajectory of the slow variable makes a closed loop. The quantum mechanical phase picked up by the fast variable while the slow variable traverses the loop has turned out to produce real physical effects through quantum interference. In this article, we investigate origins of Berry’s geometric phase and show that they are in general attributable to the broken time-reversal symmetry of the system. Our analysis leads to the classification of Berry’s phase for Hamiltonian systems in terms of symmetry properties under time-reversal operations. Spontaneous time-reversal symmetry-breaking of state vectors is shown to give rise to Berry’s phase as exemplified by a quantum-mechanical rotated hoop. A system with an explicitly time-reversal symmetry-breaking Hamiltonian is also demonstrated to exhibit nontrivial Berry’s phase. The quantization of the geometric phase associated with the real two-dimensional Hamiltonian having topological singularity is explained within the same framework. The unique role of the time-reversal operator among general antiunitary operators is also discussed.
Non-Hermitian systems exhibit spectral and topological phenomena absent in Hermitian physics; however, their geometric characterization remains subtle due to the intrinsic ambiguity of biorthogonal eigenspaces. Since left and right eigenvectors are not related by Hermitian conjugation, the associated Berry connection is generally nonunique, leading to complex geometric phases and ambiguously defined holonomies. Here we formulate a covariant geometric framework for non-Hermitian quantum systems based on the metric structure of the underlying Hilbert space. We show that, in the quantum regime with continuous state evolution, the conventional Berry connection and the associated Berry holonomy over closed parameter-space loops can be consistently defined only in the pseudo-Hermitian limit, where the spectrum is real. For generic non-Hermitian Hamiltonians with complex spectra, the relevant geometric object is instead the Aharonov--Anandan holonomy associated with cyclic evolution in projective Hilbert space. Within the pseudo-Hermitian regime, we construct a unique Hermitian Berry connection that is covariant under arbitrary GL(N,C) frame transformations and reduces to the standard Berry connection in the Hermitian limit. The resulting formalism separates the intrinsic geometry of the Hamiltonian eigenspace from contributions arising from the parameter dependence of the Hilbert-space metric, revealing that the conventional biorthogonal formulation generally mixes these distinct geometric effects. Consequently, geometric phases, synthetic gauge fields, and topological characteristics commonly attributed to non-Hermitian eigenspace geometry may, in part, originate from the underlying metric structure. Our framework therefore provides a consistent geometric foundation for Berry phases, non-Abelian holonomies, and topological invariants in non-Hermitian quantum systems.