Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Construction of phase diagrams of spin models using unsupervised machine learning

Elguja Archemashvili

Published Jan 1, 2025• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Detection of Phase Transitions in Quantum Spin Chains via Unsupervised Machine Learning

Yutaka Akagi, Nobuyuki Yoshioka, Hosho Katsura

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 5, 2019•0 citations

Unsupervised machine learning of topological phase transitions

Joaquin F. Rodriguez-Nieva, Mathias S. Scheurer

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 4, 2020•0 citations

Unsupervised machine learning of phase transition in percolation

Wei Yu, Pin Lyu

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Aug 14, 2020•17 citations

Exploration of phase behavior of classical spin systems using machine learning

Danilo Rodrigues de Assis Elias

•Mar 24, 2023•0 citations

Unsupervised machine learning for identifying phase transition using two-times clustering

Nan Wu, Zhuohan Li, Wanzhou Zhang

In recent years, developing unsupervised machine learning for identifying phase transition is a research direction. In this paper, we introduce a two-times clustering method that can help select perfect configurations from a set of degenerate samples and assign the configuration with labels in a manner of unsupervised machine learning. These perfect configurations can then be used to train a neural network to classify phases. The derivatives of the predicted classification in the phase diagram, show peaks at the phase transition points. The effectiveness of our method is tested for the Ising, Potts, and Blume-Capel models. By using the ordered configuration from two-times clustering, our method can provide a useful way to obtain phase diagrams.

arXiv:2305.17687•May 28, 2023•0 citations

Phase diagram study of a two-dimensional frustrated antiferromagnet via unsupervised machine learning

Santiago Acevedo, Marcelo Arlego, Carlos Alberto Lamas

We apply unsupervised learning techniques to classify the different phases of the ${J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{2}$ antiferromagnetic Ising model on the honeycomb lattice. We construct the phase diagram of the system using convolutional autoencoders. These neural networks can detect phase transitions in the system via ``anomaly detection'' without the need for any label or a priori knowledge of the phases. We present different ways of training these autoencoders, and we evaluate them to discriminate between distinct magnetic phases. In this process, we highlight the case of high-temperature or even random training data. Finally, we analyze the capability of the autoencoder to detect the ground state degeneracy through the reconstruction error.

arXiv:2101.10161•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Apr 15, 2021•35 citations
In recent years, developing unsupervised machine learning for identifying phase transition is a research direction. In this paper, we introduce a two-times clustering method that can help select perfect configurations from a set of degenerate samples and assign the configuration with labels in a manner of unsupervised machine learning. These perfect configurations can then be used to train a neural network to classify phases. The derivatives of the predicted classification in the phase diagram, show peaks at the phase transition points. The effectiveness of our method is tested for the Ising, Potts, and Blume-Capel models. By using the ordered configuration from two-times clustering, our method can provide a useful way to obtain phase diagrams.
We apply unsupervised learning techniques to classify the different phases of the ${J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{2}$ antiferromagnetic Ising model on the honeycomb lattice. We construct the phase diagram of the system using convolutional autoencoders. These neural networks can detect phase transitions in the system via ``anomaly detection'' without the need for any label or a priori knowledge of the phases. We present different ways of training these autoencoders, and we evaluate them to discriminate between distinct magnetic phases. In this process, we highlight the case of high-temperature or even random training data. Finally, we analyze the capability of the autoencoder to detect the ground state degeneracy through the reconstruction error.