Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical review. B./Physical review. B

Quantum phases in a two-dimensional generalized interacting Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model

Rahul Ghosh

Published Mar 9, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1103/zbdr-v7tr

Related papers

Dynamical quantum phase transition in the non-Hermitian generalized Su–Schrieffer–Heeger model

Jiawen Yao, Ruohan Zhang, Siyuan Cheng +2 more

The European Physical Journal B•Jun 1, 2026•0 citations

Phase quench effects on dynamical quantum phase transitions in the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model

Meiyu Zhang, Wen-Hui Nie, Lincheng Wang

Physics Letters A•Nov 24, 2025•4 citations

Magnetic, charge, and bond order in the two-dimensional Su-Schrieffer-Heeger-Holstein model

Max Casebolt, Chunhan Feng, Richard T. Scalettar +2 more

Most nonperturbative numerical studies of electron-phonon interactions focus on model Hamiltonians where the electrons interact with a phonon branch via a single type of microscopic mechanism. Two commonly explored couplings in this context are the Holstein and Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) interactions, which describe phonons modulating the on-site energy and intersite electron hopping, respectively. Many materials, however, have multiple phonon branches that can each interact with electronic degrees of freedom in different ways. We present here a determinant quantum Monte Carlo study of the half-filled two-dimensional (bond) SSH-Holstein Hamiltonian, where electrons couple to different phonon branches via either the Holstein or SSH mechanism. We map the model's phase diagram and determine the nature of the transitions between charge-density wave, bond-order wave, and antiferromagnetic order.

arXiv:2403.15386•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Jul 8, 2024•5 citations

Topological phases and spontaneous symmetry breaking: the revenge of the original Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model

Polina Matveeva, Dmitri B. Gutman, Sam T. Carr

We study the interplay of spontaneous symmetry breaking and topological properties in interacting one-dimensional models. We solve these models using bozonization and identify topologically non-trivial phases by counting the additional degeneracy (affiliated with the edge modes) of a finite-size system relative to the infinite one. We find even if the mean-field solution is topological, this may not be true when it arises from spontaneous symmetry breaking, including in the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model. This implies that the original SSH model, as presented by Su, Schrieffer, and Heeger, is topologically trivial, as opposed to its mean-field version. A spinful version, on the other hand, does exhibit a topologically non-trivial phase. In that state, both mean-field solutions are topologically non-trivial and correspond to non-interacting SSH chains in the opposite phases with the winding number $ν=1$. We show that this phase is protected by a chiral symmetry, similar to the non-interacting phases.

arXiv:2508.01985•Aug 4, 2025•0 citations

Phase diagram of the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger-Hubbard model on a square lattice

Chunhan Feng, Bo Xing, Dario Poletti +2 more

The Hubbard and Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) Hamiltonians are iconic models for understanding the qualitative effects of electron-electron and electron-phonon interactions, respectively. In the two-dimensional square lattice Hubbard model at half filling, the on-site Coulomb repulsion $U$ between up and down electrons induces antiferromagnetic (AFM) order and a Mott insulating phase. On the other hand, for the SSH model, there is an AFM phase when the electron-phonon coupling $\ensuremath{\lambda}$ is less than a critical value ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{c}$ and a bond order wave when $\ensuremath{\lambda}>{\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{c}$. In this Letter, we perform numerical studies on the square lattice optical Su-Schrieffer-Heeger-Hubbard Hamiltonian, which combines both interactions. We use the determinant quantum Monte Carlo method which does not suffer from the fermionic sign problem at half filling. We map out the phase diagram and find that it exhibits a direct first-order transition between an antiferromagnetic phase and a bond-ordered wave as $\ensuremath{\lambda}$ increases. The AFM phase is characterized by two different regions. At smaller $\ensuremath{\lambda}$ the behavior is similar to that of the pure Hubbard model; the other region, while maintaining long-range AFM order, exhibits larger kinetic energies and double occupancy, i.e., larger quantum fluctuations, similar to the AFM phase found in the pure SSH model.

arXiv:2109.09206•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Aug 18, 2022•45 citations

A study of quantum phase transitions in two dimensional electron systems

Xin Wan

•Oct 1, 2000•1 citation
Most nonperturbative numerical studies of electron-phonon interactions focus on model Hamiltonians where the electrons interact with a phonon branch via a single type of microscopic mechanism. Two commonly explored couplings in this context are the Holstein and Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) interactions, which describe phonons modulating the on-site energy and intersite electron hopping, respectively. Many materials, however, have multiple phonon branches that can each interact with electronic degrees of freedom in different ways. We present here a determinant quantum Monte Carlo study of the half-filled two-dimensional (bond) SSH-Holstein Hamiltonian, where electrons couple to different phonon branches via either the Holstein or SSH mechanism. We map the model's phase diagram and determine the nature of the transitions between charge-density wave, bond-order wave, and antiferromagnetic order.
We study the interplay of spontaneous symmetry breaking and topological properties in interacting one-dimensional models. We solve these models using bozonization and identify topologically non-trivial phases by counting the additional degeneracy (affiliated with the edge modes) of a finite-size system relative to the infinite one. We find even if the mean-field solution is topological, this may not be true when it arises from spontaneous symmetry breaking, including in the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model. This implies that the original SSH model, as presented by Su, Schrieffer, and Heeger, is topologically trivial, as opposed to its mean-field version. A spinful version, on the other hand, does exhibit a topologically non-trivial phase. In that state, both mean-field solutions are topologically non-trivial and correspond to non-interacting SSH chains in the opposite phases with the winding number ν=1ν=1ν=1. We show that this phase is protected by a chiral symmetry, similar to the non-interacting phases.
The Hubbard and Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) Hamiltonians are iconic models for understanding the qualitative effects of electron-electron and electron-phonon interactions, respectively. In the two-dimensional square lattice Hubbard model at half filling, the on-site Coulomb repulsion UUU between up and down electrons induces antiferromagnetic (AFM) order and a Mott insulating phase. On the other hand, for the SSH model, there is an AFM phase when the electron-phonon coupling $\ensuremath{\lambda}$ is less than a critical value ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{c}$ and a bond order wave when $\ensuremath{\lambda}>{\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{c}$. In this Letter, we perform numerical studies on the square lattice optical Su-Schrieffer-Heeger-Hubbard Hamiltonian, which combines both interactions. We use the determinant quantum Monte Carlo method which does not suffer from the fermionic sign problem at half filling. We map out the phase diagram and find that it exhibits a direct first-order transition between an antiferromagnetic phase and a bond-ordered wave as $\ensuremath{\lambda}$ increases. The AFM phase is characterized by two different regions. At smaller $\ensuremath{\lambda}$ the behavior is similar to that of the pure Hubbard model; the other region, while maintaining long-range AFM order, exhibits larger kinetic energies and double occupancy, i.e., larger quantum fluctuations, similar to the AFM phase found in the pure SSH model.