Superdeterminism is a deterministic interpretation of quantum mechanics. It posits that all events are fundamentally predetermined. This includes the choices made by conscious observers. True randomness does not exist in this model. Every particle follows a strict, unalterable historical trajectory. The future is as fixed as the past. The universe unfolds according to absolute initial conditions.
Superdeterminism is a deterministic interpretation of quantum mechanics. It posits that all events are fundamentally predetermined. This includes the choices made by conscious observers. True randomness does not exist in this model. Every particle follows a strict, unalterable historical trajectory. The future is as fixed as the past. The universe unfolds according to absolute initial conditions.
Superdeterminism is the concept of a perfectly rigid clockwork universe where every single event, including human thought, was mathematically fixed at the beginning of time. In theoretical physics, this framework posits that the initial boundary conditions of the cosmos dictate the exact evolution of all quantum fields and macroscopic structures without exception. The entire physical system operates as a singular, unfolding equation where particles interact and transfer energy along strictly predefined geometric trajectories. This absolute rigidity is mathematically necessary to preserve the fundamental conservation of information and energy across the spacetime manifold. Just as the precise orbit of a planet can be calculated centuries in advance using gravitational mechanics, the exact firing of a human neuron is equally bound by these inescapable physical laws. By eliminating any possibility of uncaused events, this framework proves that the subjective feeling of making a free choice is merely a biological illusion masking a predetermined mechanical output. Understanding this foundational rigidity requires us to first dismantle the pervasive human belief that randomness exists anywhere in the natural world.
By positing a universe where all events are determined by initial conditions, superdeterminism as conceded by Bell frames correlations observed in quantum measurements as the consequence of an inherently predetermined cosmic order that shapes even our experimental choices. I use an axiomatic formulation of superdeterminism to demonstrate that Bell overstated the scope of determinism required. Assuming only the existence of a universe containing observers, I show that determinism in just the observer scope is sufficient. I then discuss how this sufficiency increases the theory's plausibility and suggest a path to its integration with results from other disciplines.
If the concept of “free will” is reduced to that of “choice” all physical world share the latter quality. Anyway the “free will” can be distinguished from the “choice”: The “free will” involves implicitly certain preliminary goal, and the choice is only the mean, by which it can be achieved or not by the one who determines the goal. Thus, for example, an electron has always a choice but not free will unlike a human possessing both. Consequently, and paradoxically, the determinism of classical physics is more subjective and more anthropomorphic than the indeterminism of quantum mechanics for the former presupposes certain deterministic goal implicitly following the model of human freewill behavior.The choice is usually linked to very complicated systems such as human brain or society and even often associated with consciousness. In its background, the material world is deterministic and absolutely devoid of choice. However, quantum mechanics introduces the choice in the fundament of physical world, in the only way, in which it can exist: All exists in the “phase transition” of the present between the uncertain future and the well-ordered past. Thus the present is forced to choose in order to be able to transform the coherent state of future into the well-ordering of past. The concept of choice as if suggests that there is one who chooses. However quantum mechanics involves a generalized case of choice, which can be called “subjectless”: There is certain choice, which originates from the transition of the future into the past. Thus that kind of choice is shared of all existing and does not need any subject: It can be considered as a low of nature.There are a few theorems in quantum mechanics directly relevant to the topic: two of them are called “free will theorems” by their authors, Conway and Kochen, and according to them: “Do we really have free will, or, as a few determined folk maintain, is it all an illusion? We don’t know, but will prove in this paper that if indeed there exist any experimenters with a modicum of free will, then elementary particles must have their own share of this valuable commodity” “The import of the free will theorem is that it is not only current quantum theory, but the world itself that is non-deterministic, so that no future theory can return us to a clockwork universe”.Those theorems can be considered as a continuation of the so-called theorems about the absence of “hidden variables” in quantum mechanics.
The quantum mechanical superposition state — the wave function — takes shape, and the rules for its deterministic evolution and probabilistic interpretation are developed. A clockwork macrocosm in which the Moon never wavers from its course gives way to a guesswork microcosm in which an electron follows no predetermined path at all. This leads to a quantum mechanical world in which the sharp values of position, velocity, momentum, energy, and all the other quantities of classical mechanics blur into the probability distributions of quantum mechanics.
Objectives: This review advocates absolute determinism in our universe and reinterprets Quantum mechanics while doing so. Then it discusses some of its consequences across fields. Method: This study starts by proposing the absolute postulate of the universe and derives absolute determinism using concepts from both the classical and quantum mechanics. Then it advocates that though the universe is deterministic, it is unpredictable. Statistical outcomes of a classical experiment and probabilistic outcomes of a quantum experiment are not due to the indeterministic nature of the experiment but due to theoretical limit of calculation/ practical limit of measurement. The study then proposes that the "free will is an illusion". As the paths of the particles are determined, the paths and interactions of neurons and neurotransmitters are determined and thus the thoughts and actions are determined. Thus, free will is an illusion. Then it focuses on some consequences like the outcome of a radioactivity experiment, resolution of Schrodinger’s Cat Paradox and that of EPR Paradox. The study also touches upon chaos theory, Big Bang theory and consciousness. Findings: Based on Bohmian Mechanics, Superdeterminism and Cellular Automata Interpretation, this study proposes a new interpretation of quantum mechanics. Using absolute determinism, it also argues that free will is an illusion and support it with Benjamin Libet’s experimental findings in neuroscience and fMRI scans done later. The study discusses deterministic but unpredictable identification of the particle that will disintegrate next among N particles collected in a block. It also attempts resolution of Schrodinger’s Cat Paradox and that of EPR Paradox. Towards the end, the study explores chaos theory, Big Bang theory and consciousness. Novelty: In the new deterministic interpretation of QM, a distinction is made between what is real in the universe and what is measurable or calculable. For example, it reiterates that a particle’s position and momentum are fixed even if they can’t be measured or calculated precisely and simultaneously (a re-interpretation of HUP). In other words, the study implies that the famous quote of Albert Einstein – “God Does Not Play Dice With The Universe” holds true in the realm of quantum mechanics also as it already does in classical mechanics. Keywords: Universe, Determinism, Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, Quantum Mechanics, Laplace Demon, Free Will, Benjamin Libet, Consciousness, Theory of Everything
Superdeterminism posits that every event, including the firing of human neurons, occupies a fixed coordinate sequence established at the universe’s singularity. Mathematical frameworks governing this reality dictate that the foundational assumption of statistical independence between measurement settings and hidden quantum variables is inherently false. Pre-existing geometric correlations deterministically synchronize the precise neural state of the observer with the state of the observed field excitation across the spacetime manifold. Systemic thermodynamic stability and energy conservation across the cosmos correlate directly with this absolute, inescapable structural synchronization. Rigorous scientific analyses of Bell’s theorem violations provide empirical evidence supporting this underlying, highly ordered non-local topology. Consequently, the subjective human experience of genuine, spontaneous autonomy reveals itself as a biological hallucination generated by a limited epistemic perspective. True autonomy remains mathematically impossible, meaning all biological entities function strictly as highly complex, mechanically driven field correlations embedded in a static block.