Abstract Reliable radar-based classification of small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs, drones) is hampered by low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), non-Gaussian clutter, and site-specific shifts. This motivates interest in Quantum Machine Learning (QML) as a potentially more noise-resilient alternative to classical methods, yet reproducible advantages over strong classical baselines remain unclear. This study presents a controlled, like-for-like comparison between feed-forward neural networks and pure QML models without a preceding classical dimensionality-reduction encoder. All models operate on the same binned Fourier features. The QML variants span two data encodings (angle, amplitude), two variational circuit families, and an optional Quantum Fourier Transform, and are trained either with Adam or the gradient-free Asexual Reproduction Optimization (ARO) under matched evaluation budgets.Across three regimes (noiseless, additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN), and colored AR(1) complex Gaussian noise (cAR(1)-GN)), QML achieves competitive accuracy with only tens of parameters and, in two settings (noiseless and AWGN), slightly exceeds the best classical baselines, although these differences are not statistically significant. Under temporally correlated cAR(1) Gaussian noise, the tuned classical network significantly outperforms the best QML configuration. Overall, QML provides parameter-efficient performance parity in two of three conditions but no definitive advantage. The results highlight a strong dependence on the noise regime and point to angle-encoded, ARO-trained circuits as the most promising QML candidates for noisy radar-based drone classification.
Abstract Reliable radar-based classification of small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs, drones) is hampered by low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), non-Gaussian clutter, and site-specific shifts. This motivates interest in Quantum Machine Learning (QML) as a potentially more noise-resilient alternative to classical methods, yet reproducible advantages over strong classical baselines remain unclear. This study presents a controlled, like-for-like comparison between feed-forward neural networks and pure QML models without a preceding classical dimensionality-reduction encoder. All models operate on the same binned Fourier features. The QML variants span two data encodings (angle, amplitude), two variational circuit families, and an optional Quantum Fourier Transform, and are trained either with Adam or the gradient-free Asexual Reproduction Optimization (ARO) under matched evaluation budgets.Across three regimes (noiseless, additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN), and colored AR(1) complex Gaussian noise (cAR(1)-GN)), QML achieves competitive accuracy with only tens of parameters and, in two settings (noiseless and AWGN), slightly exceeds the best classical baselines, although these differences are not statistically significant. Under temporally correlated cAR(1) Gaussian noise, the tuned classical network significantly outperforms the best QML configuration. Overall, QML provides parameter-efficient performance parity in two of three conditions but no definitive advantage. The results highlight a strong dependence on the noise regime and point to angle-encoded, ARO-trained circuits as the most promising QML candidates for noisy radar-based drone classification.
Intrusion detection in unmanned-aerial-vehicle (UAV) swarms is complicated by high mobility, non-stationary traffic, and severe class imbalance. Leveraging a 120 k-flow simulation corpus that covers five attack types, we benchmark three quantum-machine-learning (QML) approaches - quantum kernels, variational quantum neural networks (QNNs), and hybrid quantum-trained neural networks (QT-NNs) - against strong classical baselines. All models consume an 8-feature flow representation and are evaluated under identical preprocessing, balancing, and noise-model assumptions. We analyse the influence of encoding strategy, circuit depth, qubit count, and shot noise, reporting accuracy, macro-F1, ROC-AUC, Matthews correlation, and quantum-resource footprints. Results reveal clear trade-offs: quantum kernels and QT-NNs excel in low-data, nonlinear regimes, while deeper QNNs suffer from trainability issues, and CNNs dominate when abundant data offset their larger parameter count. The complete codebase and dataset partitions are publicly released to enable reproducible QML research in network security.
In this paper, we investigate the performance of a Hybrid Quantum Neural Network (HQNN) and a comparable classical Convolution Neural Network (CNN) for detection and classification problem using a radar. Specifically, we take a fairly complex radar time-series model derived from electromagnetic theory, namely the Martin-Mulgrew model, that is used to simulate radar returns of objects with rotating blades, such as drones. We find that when that signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is high, CNN outperforms the HQNN for detection and classification. However, in the low SNR regime (which is of greatest interest in practice) the performance of HQNN is found to be superior to that of the CNN of a similar architecture.
Abstract Hybrid quantum machine learning (QML) relies on quantum variational circuits (QVCs) trained together with classical components. While gradient-based training is standard, it is costly on near-term hardware and vulnerable to barren plateaus, motivating gradient-free alternatives. However, there is limited systematic evidence comparing gradient-free methods to strong gradient baselines under matched quantum-evaluation budgets. A benchmark of 15 gradient-based, gradient-free, and hybrid optimizers is conducted on four binary classification datasets and two three-qubit QVC architectures using a unified experimental protocol under a fixed per-step quantum-evaluation budget. Across tasks, Adam is the strongest gradient-based method. Among the purely gradient-free schemes, Asexual Reproduction Optimization is the strongest optimizer; tournament-selection and elite-pool genetic algorithms (GA-Tourn, GA-Elite) also frequently match the best gradient-based configurations. Among the hybrid schemes, Gradient Lexicase Selection with Adam (GLS- Adam ) performs comparably. In contrast, the two gradient-free methods big bang–big crunch and a cross-entropy method variant often fail to improve beyond chance. Additional sensitivity analyses show that circuit depth can change the preferred optimizer, whereas finite-shot sampling budget and post-training backend-specific noise do not materially change the main conclusions. Overall, gradient-based methods remain robust defaults for hybrid QML, while a small subset of gradient-free and hybrid approaches provides viable alternatives under realistic quantum-evaluation constraints.
Frequency-modulated continuous-wave radar sensing often relies on labeled measurements that are costly, restricted, or difficult to collect at scale. This work evaluates physics-informed digital twins as controlled testbeds for early-stage quantum-classical radar learning. Two synthetic radar benchmarks are considered: unmanned aerial vehicle classification from range-Doppler maps and human fall detection from Doppler-time spectrograms. For both tasks, inputs are standardized, reduced using principal component analysis, and classified using either a radial basis function support vector classifier or a quantum support vector classifier. All quantum-kernel results are obtained using noiseless classical simulation; no quantum hardware is used, and no quantum-advantage claim is made. Across five random seeds, the quantum support vector classifier improves the UAV benchmark from four principal components onward, reaching an accuracy of 0.941 +/- 0.012 at eight components, compared with 0.880 +/- 0.029 for the classical baseline. On the fall-detection benchmark, both classifiers perform similarly, with a small quantum-kernel improvement at higher feature dimensions. A Gaussian-noise robustness study shows limited performance degradation across the tested noise levels, while preserving the UAV quantum-kernel gain. These results support digital twins as useful, controlled environments for radar-QML benchmarking prior to measured-data validation and hardware execution.
Quantum machine learning has emerged as a promising paradigm that leverages quantum computational principles to potentially outperform classical approaches on specific learning tasks. This paper presents a comprehensive empirical investigation comparing Quantum Machine Learning (QML), specifically Quantum Support Vector Machines (QSVM) against Classical Machine Learning (CML) baselines including Logistic Regression, K Nearest Neighbors and classical SVMs. We implement quantum kernel methods using variational quantum circuits with angle embedding, IQP and ZZ feature maps on datasets exhibiting varying structural complexity. Our experiments on synthetic quantum generated datasets (Quantum Parity, Quantum Entanglement, Quantum Interference) demonstrate that QSVM achieves superior classification accuracy with improvements ranging from 2.9 % to 60 % over the best classical baselines achieving a 55.6 % overall win rate. Notably, on the Quantum Parity dataset, QSVM consistently outperformed all classical models across multiple configurations. On real-world benchmark datasets (Breast Cancer, Iris, Wine), QSVM Angle achieved 88% accuracy on Breast Cancer compared to 76% for classical SVM Linear a 15.8 % relative improvement while matching the best classical performance on Iris(100%)and Wine(92%). All experiments were conducted using quantum circuit simulation on classical hardware. These results provide empirical evidence that quantum kernel methods offer meaningful advantages over classical approaches on datasets with complex feature interactions. We discuss the theoretical foundations of these improvements including quantum feature space expressivity and kernel alignment.
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are cyber-physical systems whose attack surface spans networked avionics and on-board sensor fusion: a compromised GPS or battery module can mimic a benign mission segment and evade naive anomaly detectors. We present a leakage-free evaluation of quantum machine learning for UAV anomaly detection on the multi-sensor TLM:UAV benchmark. Three contributions support the study. (i) A group-aware temporal protocol (B2) partitions the dataset into ten contiguous TimeUS blocks and evaluates over ten seeds, eliminating the inflation produced by random stratified splits that mix neighbouring samples. (ii) A three-mode feature audit (full/loose/strict) quantifies how much accuracy stems from instantaneous physical signals versus contextual proxies (cumulative energy, battery state, GPS trajectory). (iii) A hybrid XGBoost + Data Reuploading (DRU) classifier is benchmarked against five paired non-linear controls (raw, PCA, polynomial-2, random-RBF, and an untrained DRU map) under identical budgets. The standalone DRU does not consistently match the strongest classical baseline across seeds; however, the trained-DRU hybrid is the only model whose mean F1 macro shifts upward from full to strict (+0.05), a directional signal that the per-seed standard deviations prevent from being interpreted as a statistically established difference. The trained-DRU hybrid also records the lowest mean false-alarm rate under proxy-free evaluation, subject to the inter-seed variance reported. We frame this as an incremental, reproducible quantum-enhanced hybrid benefit, and provide an open Qiskit 2.x implementation as a benchmark for cybersecurity analytics in NISQ-era aerospace systems.