Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Observer Locked Temporarity

Divyanshu Kumar

Published Feb 13, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

So this proposal of mine talks about how time is not fundamental and I redifine time as information updates. (I'm a 16 year old trying out physics psychological theories looking out new angle to the world)
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.18633143

Related papers

Physics as Information Theory

Giacomo Mauro D’Ariano

The experience from Quantum Information of the last twenty years has lead theorists to look at Quantum Theory and the whole of Physics from a different angle. A new information-theoretic paradigm is emerging, long time ago prophesied by John Archibald Wheeler with his popular coinage 'It from bit'. Theoretical groups are now addressing the problem of deriving Quantum Theory from informational principles, and similar lines are investigated in new approaches to Quantum Gravity. In my talk I will review some recent advances on these lines. The general idea synthesizing the new paradigm is that there is only Quantum Theory (without quantization rules): the whole Physics--including space-time and relativity--is emergent from quantum-information processing. And, since Quantum Theory itself is made with purely informational principles, the whole Physics must be reformulated in information-theoretical terms. The review is divided into the following parts: (a) The informational axiomatization of Quantum Theory; (b) How space-time and relativistic covariance emerge from the quantum computation; (c) What is the information-theoretical meaning of inertial mass and Planck constant, and how the quantum field emerges; (d) Observational consequences: mass-dependent refraction index of vacuum. I then conclude with some possible future research lines.

•Oct 20, 2010•0 citations

Time Observables within a Timeless Universe

Tommaso Favalli

Springer theses•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

Observer-Centric Interpretation of Observation and Time

Cheolhoon Cheong

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics (QM) and Psychology: A New Field of Cooperation?

Salvatore Matteo Giacomuzzi

We will try to present critically published works on Quantum Mechanics (QM) and Psychology (perhaps more generally regarding the so called social sciences), partly by ourselves (Giacomuzzi, 2008, 2002), in an overview. It is of course impossible to give a complete summary here, but critical points should be emphasized, which perhaps leave a more differentiated view on the problems of "psychological reality". Nowadays QM is “hip” in scientific literature. But common approaches doesn`t take into consideration that physicists already 80 years ago tried to establish a connection between life sciences and physics. But do neuroscientific findings really validate essential psychological basic assumptions? Do they really open up new, interdisciplinary research perspectives? Physics itself today struggles with its theories and we`ve a big gap between on what we experience and on what we really understand. Maybe this gap of understanding our own reality is much bigger than 120 years ago when QM was born by the work of Max Planck.

Psychological Counseling and Psychotherapy•Jan 1, 2020•1 citation

1913–1921: From the Second to the Third Council

P. Marage, Grégoire Wallenborn

The first Council in 1911 had made clear the need for a new physics, which would introduce a principle of discontinuity into the microscopic world. Ten years later, from the 1 st – 6 th April, 1921, the third Physics Council was to take place. The crucial advances made during this period can be summed up as follows: on the one hand, there was considerable progress on understanding the structure of the atom, notably thanks to Rutherford, and on the other, what might be called “the old theory of quanta” was updated, chiefly by Bohr, to take into account the emission of radiation by atoms. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Birkhäuser Basel eBooks•Jan 1, 1999•0 citations

Time as an emerging property of observation

Andreas Schlatter

Physics Essays•Aug 24, 2011•1 citation
The experience from Quantum Information of the last twenty years has lead theorists to look at Quantum Theory and the whole of Physics from a different angle. A new information-theoretic paradigm is emerging, long time ago prophesied by John Archibald Wheeler with his popular coinage 'It from bit'. Theoretical groups are now addressing the problem of deriving Quantum Theory from informational principles, and similar lines are investigated in new approaches to Quantum Gravity. In my talk I will review some recent advances on these lines. The general idea synthesizing the new paradigm is that there is only Quantum Theory (without quantization rules): the whole Physics--including space-time and relativity--is emergent from quantum-information processing. And, since Quantum Theory itself is made with purely informational principles, the whole Physics must be reformulated in information-theoretical terms. The review is divided into the following parts: (a) The informational axiomatization of Quantum Theory; (b) How space-time and relativistic covariance emerge from the quantum computation; (c) What is the information-theoretical meaning of inertial mass and Planck constant, and how the quantum field emerges; (d) Observational consequences: mass-dependent refraction index of vacuum. I then conclude with some possible future research lines.
We will try to present critically published works on Quantum Mechanics (QM) and Psychology (perhaps more generally regarding the so called social sciences), partly by ourselves (Giacomuzzi, 2008, 2002), in an overview. It is of course impossible to give a complete summary here, but critical points should be emphasized, which perhaps leave a more differentiated view on the problems of "psychological reality". Nowadays QM is “hip” in scientific literature. But common approaches doesn`t take into consideration that physicists already 80 years ago tried to establish a connection between life sciences and physics. But do neuroscientific findings really validate essential psychological basic assumptions? Do they really open up new, interdisciplinary research perspectives? Physics itself today struggles with its theories and we`ve a big gap between on what we experience and on what we really understand. Maybe this gap of understanding our own reality is much bigger than 120 years ago when QM was born by the work of Max Planck.
The first Council in 1911 had made clear the need for a new physics, which would introduce a principle of discontinuity into the microscopic world. Ten years later, from the 1 st – 6 th April, 1921, the third Physics Council was to take place. The crucial advances made during this period can be summed up as follows: on the one hand, there was considerable progress on understanding the structure of the atom, notably thanks to Rutherford, and on the other, what might be called “the old theory of quanta” was updated, chiefly by Bohr, to take into account the emission of radiation by atoms. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.