Observer-Centric Interpretation of Observation and Time

ingle

This project proposes an alternative ontological interpretation of the double-slit experiment, arguing that photons exist in a singularity-like wave state prior to interaction. The transition to particle behavior occurs not through measurement, but due to physical conditions such as energy attenuation or medium traversal. This theory offers testable predictions via a modified double-slit setup, challenging the standard observer-centric interpretations of quantum mechanics.

Andreas Schlatter

Radhakrishnan Jayaraman

Part 38 examines measurement not as an external act performed by observers, but as a physical referencing process embedded within lawful structure. Measurement is treated as constraint-aligned comparison, not information extraction in the Shannon sense.These papers establish that:Measurement requires stable reference frames, not observers.Physical quantities gain meaning only through law-consistent relational anchoring.Reference precedes observation; observation does not create reality.Measurement limits arise from physical constraints, not epistemic ignorance.This part dismantles observer-centric interpretations and replaces them with a law-first, structure-first framework, where measurement is a consequence of physical alignment, not collapse or choice. Part 39 addresses records and memory as physical persistence phenomena, not abstract storage of information. Records are shown to be lawful stabilizations of state, governed by energy, material limits, and irreversible constraints.Key conclusions include:Memory is physical persistence, not symbolic encoding.Records emerge from constraint-respecting stabilization, not intention.All memory systems are bounded by thermodynamic, temporal, and material limits.Perfect memory is physically impossible; erasure and decay are fundamental.Information survives only insofar as physical structure allows.This part closes the loop between measurement, time, and information, grounding records firmly within physical law rather than interpretation

Naoki Kanazawa, Yuto Morohoshi, Hitomi Takahashi +3 more

Quantum-centric supercomputing (QCSC) workflows often involve hybrid classical-quantum algorithms that are inherently probabilistic and executed on remote quantum hardware, making them difficult to interpret and limiting the ability to monitor runtime performance and behavior. The high cost of quantum circuit execution and large-scale high-performance computing (HPC) infrastructure further restricts the number of feasible trials, making comprehensive evaluation of execution results essential for iterative development. We propose an observability architecture tailored for QCSC workflows that decouples telemetry collection from workload execution, enabling persistent monitoring across system and algorithmic layers and retaining detailed execution data for reproducible and retrospective analysis, eliminating redundant runs. Applied to a representative workflow involving sample-based quantum diagonalization, our system reveals solver behavior across multiple iterations. This approach enhances transparency and reproducibility in QCSC environments, supporting infrastructure-aware algorithm design and systematic experimentation.

A. D. Crowell

Alexey Alyushin