Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Atomic Scale Characterization of Engineered Interfaces in Superconducting Qubits

David Andres Garcia

Published Jan 1, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.21985/n2-p6cd-8g79

Related papers

Atomic-Scale Characterization and Electronic Properties of Gold-Capped Niobium Films for Superconducting Qubits

Junki Makita, Seth Rice, G. Berti +17 more

Niobium thin films are central to superconducting qubits, but their complex native oxides contribute significantly to microwave losses. A promising mitigation strategy is to suppress oxide formation using engineered thin-film encapsulation layers. Recent experiments have shown that ∼10 nm metallic overlayers on Nb capacitor films can improve the energy relaxation time T 1 of transmon qubits. Here, we present a comparative study of Au-capped Nb films fabricated in situ by molecular beam epitaxy and ex situ by sequential deposition benchmarked against bare Nb films. Using complementary structural, chemical, and spectroscopic techniques, we correlate the interface quality with superconducting electronic properties of the Au surface. Low-temperature scanning tunneling spectroscopy (STS) provides spatially resolved quasiparticle density-of-states maps. While both Au-capped Nb samples exhibit large areas with uniform, fully gapped density of states, clear differences emerge between the two interfaces. Compared to in situ Nb–Au, ex situ Nb–Au exhibits a reduced induced superconducting gap, broadened coherence peak, and localized in-gap states, consistent with a residual Nb x O y layer at the interface. Supported by complementary structural and chemical analyses, these findings demonstrate that STS directly links nanoscale superconducting properties to interface preparation, highlighting the importance of controlled in situ encapsulation for minimizing dissipation and improving quantum coherence.

ACS Nano•Mar 4, 2026•1 citation

Materials Engineering in Superconducting Qubits

Alexander P. M. Place, Basil M. Smitham, Lila V. H. Rodgers +15 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 3, 2020•0 citations

Material and Interface Engineering Strategies to Mitigate Decoherence in Superconducting Qubits

Dominic P. Goronzy, Anthony McFadden, David A. Garcia Wetten +16 more

While significant strides have been made to increase the coherence time of superconducting qubits, further advancements are essential for realizing scalable quantum computing. Decoherence is often a result of loss and noise stemming from two-level systems and excess quasiparticles, arising due to material defects, fabrication processes, and ambient exposure, particularly at surfaces and interfaces. Our recent efforts to mitigate these decoherence mechanisms have employed a variety of strategies, including low-loss surface encapsulation materials, advanced substrate preparation techniques, modifications to metal film growth, and the development of novel fabrication processes. The structural and chemical properties of materials, surfaces, and interfaces are studied using scanning probe microscopy, electron microscopy, photoelectron spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and X-ray diffraction, which is correlated to device performance metrics, including superconducting resonator internal quality factor and qubit T1 time. This information is used to identify and understand material sources of loss and their origins in the device fabrication process. Through multi-institution efforts within SQMS we have identified the loss mechanism of interstitial hydrogen in niobium-based devices and shown how standard fabrication processes introduce these hydrides, developing strategies to mitigate their formation.1 Furthermore, we have characterized the metal-substrate interface, including the loss of niobium-silicides formed at that interface, and developed silicon surface treatments that reduce atomic scale roughness and oxygen content at the metal-substrate and Josephson junction interfaces.2-4 By developing the connection between materials properties and the overall performance of superconducting quantum circuitry, we can develop fabrication strategies to mitigate material losses, thus supporting the ongoing efforts to enhance coherence time in superconducting quantum devices. 1. Torres-Castanedo, C. G.*, Goronzy, D. P.*, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater., 2401365 (2024) 2. Lu, X., et al., Phys. Rev. Materials 6, 064402 (2022) 3. Berti, G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 122, 192605 (2023) 4. Kopas, C. J., Goronzy, D. P., et al., arXiv:2408.02863 (2024)

•Sep 23, 2024•0 citations

Superconducting qubits at scale

Katharina Zeissler

Nature Electronics•Oct 21, 2024•0 citations

Progress and Challenges for Engineering Superconducting Qubits

William D. Oliver

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 5, 2018•0 citations

Observation of Interface Piezoelectricity in Superconducting Devices on Silicon

Haoxin Zhou, Li, Eric, Kadircan Godeneli +7 more

The evolution of superconducting quantum processors is driven by the need to reduce errors and scale for fault-tolerant computation. Reducing physical qubit error rates requires further advances in the microscopic modeling and control of decoherence mechanisms in superconducting qubits. Piezoelectric interactions contribute to decoherence by mediating energy exchange between microwave photons and acoustic phonons. Centrosymmetric materials like silicon and sapphire do not display piezoelectricity and are the preferred substrates for superconducting qubits. However, the broken centrosymmetry at material interfaces may lead to piezoelectric losses in qubits. While this loss mechanism was predicted two decades ago, interface piezoelectricity has not been experimentally observed in superconducting devices. Here, we report the observation of interface piezoelectricity at an aluminum-silicon junction and show that it constitutes an important loss channel for superconducting devices. We fabricate aluminum interdigital surface acoustic wave transducers on silicon and demonstrate piezoelectric transduction from room temperature to millikelvin temperatures. We find an effective electromechanical coupling factor of $K^2\approx 2 \times 10^{-5}\%$ comparable to weakly piezoelectric substrates. We model the impact of the measured interface piezoelectric response on superconducting qubits and find that the piezoelectric surface loss channel limits qubit quality factors to $Q\sim10^4-10^8$ for designs with different surface participation ratios and electromechanical mode matching. These results identify electromechanical surface losses as a significant dissipation channel for superconducting qubits, and show the need for heterostructure and phononic engineering to minimize errors in next-generation superconducting qubits.

arXiv:2409.10626•Sep 16, 2024•0 citations
Niobium thin films are central to superconducting qubits, but their complex native oxides contribute significantly to microwave losses. A promising mitigation strategy is to suppress oxide formation using engineered thin-film encapsulation layers. Recent experiments have shown that ∼10 nm metallic overlayers on Nb capacitor films can improve the energy relaxation time T 1 of transmon qubits. Here, we present a comparative study of Au-capped Nb films fabricated in situ by molecular beam epitaxy and ex situ by sequential deposition benchmarked against bare Nb films. Using complementary structural, chemical, and spectroscopic techniques, we correlate the interface quality with superconducting electronic properties of the Au surface. Low-temperature scanning tunneling spectroscopy (STS) provides spatially resolved quasiparticle density-of-states maps. While both Au-capped Nb samples exhibit large areas with uniform, fully gapped density of states, clear differences emerge between the two interfaces. Compared to in situ Nb–Au, ex situ Nb–Au exhibits a reduced induced superconducting gap, broadened coherence peak, and localized in-gap states, consistent with a residual Nb x O y layer at the interface. Supported by complementary structural and chemical analyses, these findings demonstrate that STS directly links nanoscale superconducting properties to interface preparation, highlighting the importance of controlled in situ encapsulation for minimizing dissipation and improving quantum coherence.
While significant strides have been made to increase the coherence time of superconducting qubits, further advancements are essential for realizing scalable quantum computing. Decoherence is often a result of loss and noise stemming from two-level systems and excess quasiparticles, arising due to material defects, fabrication processes, and ambient exposure, particularly at surfaces and interfaces. Our recent efforts to mitigate these decoherence mechanisms have employed a variety of strategies, including low-loss surface encapsulation materials, advanced substrate preparation techniques, modifications to metal film growth, and the development of novel fabrication processes. The structural and chemical properties of materials, surfaces, and interfaces are studied using scanning probe microscopy, electron microscopy, photoelectron spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and X-ray diffraction, which is correlated to device performance metrics, including superconducting resonator internal quality factor and qubit T1 time. This information is used to identify and understand material sources of loss and their origins in the device fabrication process. Through multi-institution efforts within SQMS we have identified the loss mechanism of interstitial hydrogen in niobium-based devices and shown how standard fabrication processes introduce these hydrides, developing strategies to mitigate their formation.1 Furthermore, we have characterized the metal-substrate interface, including the loss of niobium-silicides formed at that interface, and developed silicon surface treatments that reduce atomic scale roughness and oxygen content at the metal-substrate and Josephson junction interfaces.2-4 By developing the connection between materials properties and the overall performance of superconducting quantum circuitry, we can develop fabrication strategies to mitigate material losses, thus supporting the ongoing efforts to enhance coherence time in superconducting quantum devices. 1. Torres-Castanedo, C. G.*, Goronzy, D. P.*, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater., 2401365 (2024) 2. Lu, X., et al., Phys. Rev. Materials 6, 064402 (2022) 3. Berti, G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 122, 192605 (2023) 4. Kopas, C. J., Goronzy, D. P., et al., arXiv:2408.02863 (2024)
The evolution of superconducting quantum processors is driven by the need to reduce errors and scale for fault-tolerant computation. Reducing physical qubit error rates requires further advances in the microscopic modeling and control of decoherence mechanisms in superconducting qubits. Piezoelectric interactions contribute to decoherence by mediating energy exchange between microwave photons and acoustic phonons. Centrosymmetric materials like silicon and sapphire do not display piezoelectricity and are the preferred substrates for superconducting qubits. However, the broken centrosymmetry at material interfaces may lead to piezoelectric losses in qubits. While this loss mechanism was predicted two decades ago, interface piezoelectricity has not been experimentally observed in superconducting devices. Here, we report the observation of interface piezoelectricity at an aluminum-silicon junction and show that it constitutes an important loss channel for superconducting devices. We fabricate aluminum interdigital surface acoustic wave transducers on silicon and demonstrate piezoelectric transduction from room temperature to millikelvin temperatures. We find an effective electromechanical coupling factor of K2≈2×10−5%K^2\approx 2 \times 10^{-5}\%K2≈2×10−5% comparable to weakly piezoelectric substrates. We model the impact of the measured interface piezoelectric response on superconducting qubits and find that the piezoelectric surface loss channel limits qubit quality factors to Q∼104−108Q\sim10^4-10^8Q∼104−108 for designs with different surface participation ratios and electromechanical mode matching. These results identify electromechanical surface losses as a significant dissipation channel for superconducting qubits, and show the need for heterostructure and phononic engineering to minimize errors in next-generation superconducting qubits.