This work presents a comparative evaluation of classical and quantum machine learning models applied to a real-world industrial classification task. The use case is provided by MBDA and involves classifying images of surface-mount technology solder joints into three defect severity classes. To investigate the viability and performance trade-offs of quantum models under realistic constraints, we followed two parallel processing strategies. The first employs conventional deep learning architectures, namely YOLOv8 and a custom Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), trained on augmented full-resolution images. The second strategy compresses image data via a domainspecific method, enabling compatibility with quantum hardware constraints. We trained and evaluated different quantum machine learning models, including a Quantum Support Vector Machine (QSVM), a Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC), and a Quantum Convolutional Neural Network (QCNN). Our results highlight the trade-offs between expressivity and feasibility across classical and quantum approaches and provide insights into the applicability of quantum models in industrial scenarios.
This work presents a comparative evaluation of classical and quantum machine learning models applied to a real-world industrial classification task. The use case is provided by MBDA and involves classifying images of surface-mount technology solder joints into three defect severity classes. To investigate the viability and performance trade-offs of quantum models under realistic constraints, we followed two parallel processing strategies. The first employs conventional deep learning architectures, namely YOLOv8 and a custom Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), trained on augmented full-resolution images. The second strategy compresses image data via a domainspecific method, enabling compatibility with quantum hardware constraints. We trained and evaluated different quantum machine learning models, including a Quantum Support Vector Machine (QSVM), a Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC), and a Quantum Convolutional Neural Network (QCNN). Our results highlight the trade-offs between expressivity and feasibility across classical and quantum approaches and provide insights into the applicability of quantum models in industrial scenarios.
Hybrid quantum-classical machine learning offers a promising direction for advancing automated quality control in industrial settings. In this study, we investigate two hybrid quantum-classical approaches for classifying defects in aluminium TIG welding images and benchmarking their performance against a conventional deep learning model. A convolutional neural network is used to extract compact and informative feature vectors from weld images, effectively reducing the higher-dimensional pixel space to a lower-dimensional feature space. Our first quantum approach encodes these features into quantum states using a parameterized quantum feature map composed of rotation and entangling gates. We compute a quantum kernel matrix from the inner products of these states, defining a linear system in a higher-dimensional Hilbert space corresponding to the support vector machine (SVM) optimization problem and solving it using a Variational Quantum Linear Solver (VQLS). We also examine the effect of the quantum kernel condition number on classification performance. In our second method, we apply angle encoding to the extracted features in a variational quantum circuit and use a classical optimizer for model training. Both quantum models are tested on binary and multiclass classification tasks and the performance is compared with the classical CNN model. Our results show that while the CNN model demonstrates robust performance, hybrid quantum-classical models perform competitively. This highlights the potential of hybrid quantum-classical approaches for near-term real-world applications in industrial defect detection and quality assurance.
Hybrid quantum–classical machine learning offers a promising direction for advancing automated quality control in industrial settings. In this study, we investigate two hybrid quantum–classical approaches for classifying defects in aluminum TIG welding images and benchmarking their performance against a conventional deep learning model. A convolutional neural network is used to extract compact and informative feature vectors from weld images, effectively reducing the higher-dimensional pixel space to a lower-dimensional feature space. Our first quantum approach encodes these features into quantum states using a parameterized quantum feature map composed of rotation and entangling gates. We compute a quantum kernel matrix from the inner products of these states, defining a linear system in a higher-dimensional Hilbert space corresponding to the support vector machine (SVM) optimization problem and solving it using a Variational Quantum Linear Solver (VQLS). We also examine the effect of the quantum kernel condition number on classification performance. In our second method, we apply angle encoding to the extracted features in a variational quantum circuit and use a classical optimizer for model training. Both quantum models are tested on binary and multiclass classification tasks, and the performance is compared with the classical CNN model. Our results show that while the CNN model demonstrates robust performance, hybrid quantum–classical models perform competitively. This highlights the potential of hybrid quantum–classical approaches for near-term real-world applications in industrial defect detection and quality assurance.
Breast cancer is rated as one of the top leading diagnosed and deadliest cancers affecting women worldwide and causing high mortality rate among cancers. With the data-driven applications, hybrid quantum-classical machine learning models have evolved as significant alternatives for handling complex feature spaces with the growing interest in quantum computing. This paper presents a systematic comparative study of classical and quantum machine learning approaches for breast cancer classification using the Wisconsin Breast Cancer Dataset. In this architecture we have preprocessed classical feature vectors using standard normalized techniques and parallelly quantum states are mapped through data embedding techniques which relies on parameterized rotational gates. In this work we have implemented all quantum models using the Pennylane library, resulting in hybrid quantum–classical optimization on near-term quantum simulators. The comparison results in multiple classical and quantum models. In classical we have Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), which are compared with the quantum-based models such as the Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC), Quantum Support Vector Machine (QSVM) and Quantum Convolutional Neural Network (QCNN). In QSVM, we have performed dimensionality reduction using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) before to quantum embedding, and quantum-generated features are used to train a classical linear SVM. The evaluation metrics results in accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, ROC curves and confusion matrices. The classical models achieves the accuracy in the range of 94%-96%, whereas competitive performance of quantum models demonstrate depending on the embedding strategy and circuit configuration. In the implemented quantum models, the variational quantum classifier achieved the highest classification accuracy of 96.06%, surpassing other evaluated models. These results demonstrate quantum embedding combined with variational quantum circuits can effectively capture discriminative patterns in medical datasets, indicating the implementation of quantum machine learning models for breast cancer diagnosis with the present quantum simulating platforms.
Abstract In this study, we compare the performance of randomized classical and quantum neural networks (NNs) as well as classical and quantum-classical hybrid convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the task of supervised binary image classification. We keep the employed quantum circuits compatible with near-term quantum devices and use two distinct methodologies: applying randomized NNs on dimensionality-reduced data, and applying CNNs to full image data. We evaluate these approaches on three fully-classical data sets of increasing complexity: an artificial hypercube data set, MNIST handwritten digits and industrial images of practical relevance. Our study’s central goal is to shed more light on how quantum and classical models perform for various binary classification tasks and on what defines a good quantum model. To this end, our study involves a correlation analysis between classification accuracy and quantum model hyperparameters, and an analysis on the role of entanglement in quantum models, as well as on the impact of initial training parameters. We find classical and quantum-classical hybrid models achieve statistically-equivalent classification accuracies across most data sets with no approach consistently outperforming the other. Interestingly, we observe that quantum NNs show lower variance with respect to initial training parameters and that the role of entanglement is nuanced. While incorporating entangling gates seems to be generally advantageous, we also observe that their (optimizable) entangling power is not correlated with model performance. We also observe an inverse proportionality between the number of entangling gates and the average gate entangling power. Our study provides an industry perspective on quantum machine learning for practical binary image classification tasks, highlighting both current limitations and potential avenues for further research in quantum circuit design, entanglement utilization, and model transferability across varied applications.
The classification and regression of particle collision events constitute a persistent computational challenge in experimental high energy physics, where large volumes of simulated data must be processed with both speed and precision. This work carries out a systematic comparison of four classical machine learning architectures, support vector machines (SVM), artificial neural networks (ANN), convolutional neural networks (CNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM) networks against their quantum counterparts: quantum SVM (QSVM), quantum neural networks (QNN), quantum CNN (QCNN), and quantum LSTM (QLSTM). All models are trained on simulated proton-proton collision events with electron-positron and muon-antimuon final states from the CERN Open Data portal, using transverse-momentum components as input features and transverse-momentum magnitude as the regression target. Classical architectures, and in particular the CNN and LSTM, achieve marginally better quantitative performance under current hardware and dataset constraints. Quantum models, however, reach competitive accuracy with substantially fewer trainable parameters: the QCNN reproduces the performance of the deep classical CNN using only four qubits and a circuit of depth three, pointing to a genuine parameter-efficiency advantage on near-term quantum devices. A baseline analysis confirms that the regression problem is non-trivial for shallow polynomial fits, supporting the relevance of the architectural comparison. These results characterize the trade-offs between classical and quantum approaches under realistic, resource-constrained conditions and provide a benchmark for future studies on actual quantum hardware.
This study explores the application of Quantum Convolutional Neural Networks (QCNNs) in the realm of image classification, particularly focusing on datasets with a highly reduced number of features. We investigate the potential quantum computing holds in processing and classifying image data efficiently, even with limited feature availability. This research investigates QCNNs’ application within a highly constrained feature environment, using chest X-ray images to distinguish between normal and pneumonia cases. Our findings demonstrate QCNNs’ utility in classifying images from the dataset with drastically reduced feature dimensions, highlighting QCNNs’ robustness and their promising future in machine learning and computer vision. Additionally, this study sheds light on the scalability of QCNNs and their adaptability across various training-test splits, emphasizing their potential to enhance computational efficiency in machine learning tasks. This suggests a possibility of paradigm shift in how we approach data-intensive challenges in the era of quantum computing. We are looking into quantum paradigms like Quantum Support Vector Machine (QSVM) going forward so that we can explore trade offs effectiveness of different classical and quantum computing techniques.