Abstract In this study, we compare the performance of randomized classical and quantum neural networks (NNs) as well as classical and quantum-classical hybrid convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the task of supervised binary image classification. We keep the employed quantum circuits compatible with near-term quantum devices and use two distinct methodologies: applying randomized NNs on dimensionality-reduced data, and applying CNNs to full image data. We evaluate these approaches on three fully-classical data sets of increasing complexity: an artificial hypercube data set, MNIST handwritten digits and industrial images of practical relevance. Our study’s central goal is to shed more light on how quantum and classical models perform for various binary classification tasks and on what defines a good quantum model. To this end, our study involves a correlation analysis between classification accuracy and quantum model hyperparameters, and an analysis on the role of entanglement in quantum models, as well as on the impact of initial training parameters. We find classical and quantum-classical hybrid models achieve statistically-equivalent classification accuracies across most data sets with no approach consistently outperforming the other. Interestingly, we observe that quantum NNs show lower variance with respect to initial training parameters and that the role of entanglement is nuanced. While incorporating entangling gates seems to be generally advantageous, we also observe that their (optimizable) entangling power is not correlated with model performance. We also observe an inverse proportionality between the number of entangling gates and the average gate entangling power. Our study provides an industry perspective on quantum machine learning for practical binary image classification tasks, highlighting both current limitations and potential avenues for further research in quantum circuit design, entanglement utilization, and model transferability across varied applications.
Abstract In this study, we compare the performance of randomized classical and quantum neural networks (NNs) as well as classical and quantum-classical hybrid convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the task of supervised binary image classification. We keep the employed quantum circuits compatible with near-term quantum devices and use two distinct methodologies: applying randomized NNs on dimensionality-reduced data, and applying CNNs to full image data. We evaluate these approaches on three fully-classical data sets of increasing complexity: an artificial hypercube data set, MNIST handwritten digits and industrial images of practical relevance. Our study’s central goal is to shed more light on how quantum and classical models perform for various binary classification tasks and on what defines a good quantum model. To this end, our study involves a correlation analysis between classification accuracy and quantum model hyperparameters, and an analysis on the role of entanglement in quantum models, as well as on the impact of initial training parameters. We find classical and quantum-classical hybrid models achieve statistically-equivalent classification accuracies across most data sets with no approach consistently outperforming the other. Interestingly, we observe that quantum NNs show lower variance with respect to initial training parameters and that the role of entanglement is nuanced. While incorporating entangling gates seems to be generally advantageous, we also observe that their (optimizable) entangling power is not correlated with model performance. We also observe an inverse proportionality between the number of entangling gates and the average gate entangling power. Our study provides an industry perspective on quantum machine learning for practical binary image classification tasks, highlighting both current limitations and potential avenues for further research in quantum circuit design, entanglement utilization, and model transferability across varied applications.
This research explores quantum machine learning for image classification, comparing classical and quantum models. A classical convolutional neural network (CNN), based on the LeNet architecture, achieved 99.12% accuracy on MNIST, outperforming a quantum CNN, which attained 93.30%. Quantum encoders applied to Fashion-MNIST reached 85.60%, while quantum support vector machine (SVM), implemented for binary classification, obtained 71.34%. The study integrates hybrid quantum-classical models, leveraging quantum circuits for feature extraction. A quantum autoencoder-based classifier was introduced, demonstrating efficient data compression and classification without additional qubits. Feature encoding using RX gates mapped classical data into quantum states, and the impact of parameterized quantum circuit structures on classification accuracy was analyzed. Results indicate that specific ansatz structures yield superior accuracy, highlighting the significance of quantum circuit design. While classical models currently outperform quantum counterparts, quantum approaches reduce trainable parameters and computational complexity. Limitations in current quantum hardware, including noise and scalability, restrict performance. However, advancements in error mitigation, quantum gate efficiency, and scalable quantum architecture could bridge the gap with classical methods. These quantum techniques hold potential in aerospace applications, such as satellite image classification, anomaly detection in remote sensing, and real-time processing of high-dimensional image data. This study underscores the growing role of quantum circuits in machine learning, particularly in feature extraction and classification, suggesting that future quantum hardware could unlock new capabilities in end-to-end learning beyond hybrid approaches.
Image classification is a fundamental task in deep learning, and recent advances in quantum computing have generated significant interest in quantum neural networks. Traditionally, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are employed to extract image features, while Multilayer Perceptrons (MLPs) handle decision making. However, parameterized quantum circuits offer the potential to capture complex image features and define sophisticated decision boundaries. In this paper, we present a novel Hybrid Quantum–Classical Neural Network (H-QNN) for image classification, and demonstrate its effectiveness using the MNIST dataset. Our model combines quantum computing with classical supervised learning to enhance classification accuracy and computational efficiency. In this study, we detail the architecture of the H-QNN, emphasizing its capability in feature learning and image classification. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed H-QNN model outperforms conventional deep learning methods in various training scenarios, showcasing its effectiveness in high-dimensional image classification tasks. Additionally, we explore the broader applicability of hybrid quantum–classical approaches in other domains. Our findings contribute to the growing body of work in quantum machine learning, and underscore the potential of quantum-enhanced models for image recognition and classification.
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are extensively utilized for image classification due to their ability to exploit data correlations effectively. However, traditional CNNs encounter several challenges, including limitations in accuracy improvement, computational efficiency, explain ability, and generalization. As data dimensionality or model complexity increases, CNNs often become more difficult to train efficiently, leading to slower processing times. To overcome these challenges, Quantum Convolutional Neural Networks (QCNNs) offer a promising quantum-based approach to enhance existing models, particularly by improving training efficiency and reducing processing times. This paper provides a comparative analysis of classical CNNs and a novel quantum circuit architecture tailored for image-based tasks. The analysis emphasizes the adaptability and potential of quantum circuits to enhance feature extraction, recognition accuracy, and processing efficiency.We applied various QCNN architectures to the Chinese-MNIST dataset and compared their performance with traditional CNN models. Although QCNNs achieved slightly lower accuracy, they demonstrated significantly greater stability. These findings high- light QCNNs’ potential to overcome the computational limitations of conventional deep learning, offering a promising pathway for quantum-enhanced solutions in computer vision. Future work will focus on refining quantum circuit designs, developing hybrid quantum-classical models, and extending QCNN applications to larger and more diverse datasets.
Machine learning (ML) has proven its efficacy in acquiring information from previous data and lever-aging that understanding to handle practical problems. The recent development of quantum computing, based on the principles of quantum physics, has made the integration of quantum computing and machine learning a prominent area of research. Nonetheless, the practical utilization of quantum computing in machine learning continues to present considerable obstacles, especially regarding implementation and the management of real-world tasks. This research presents a hybrid quantum-classical convolutional neural network model (HQ-CNN) and evaluates its performance on binary image classification tasks using subsets of the MNIST and EMNIST datasets. The study also presents an in-depth discussion of the challenges that arise from integrating quantum computing into machine learning, emphasizing the training procedure, the results obtained post-training, and the number of qubits used in the research. The experimental findings indicate that increasing the number of qubits generally enhances image classification efficacy. However, an increased number of qubits does not inherently ensure enhanced overall model performance.
Machine learning (ML) has proven its efficacy in acquiring information from previous data and lever-aging that understanding to handle practical problems. The recent development of quantum computing, based on the principles of quantum physics, has made the integration of quantum computing and machine learning a prominent area of research. Nonetheless, the practical utilization of quantum computing in machine learning continues to present considerable obstacles, especially regarding implementation and the management of real-world tasks. This research presents a hybrid quantum-classical convolutional neural network model (HQ-CNN) and evaluates its performance on binary image classification tasks using subsets of the MNIST and EMNIST datasets. The study also presents an in-depth discussion of the challenges that arise from integrating quantum computing into machine learning, emphasizing the training procedure, the results obtained post-training, and the number of qubits used in the research. The experimental findings indicate that increasing the number of qubits generally enhances image classification efficacy. However, an increased number of qubits does not inherently ensure enhanced overall model performance.
This study presents a systematic comparison between hybrid quantum-classical neural networks and purely classical models across three benchmark datasets (MNIST, CIFAR100, and STL10) to evaluate their performance, efficiency, and robustness. The hybrid models integrate parameterized quantum circuits with classical deep learning architectures, while the classical counterparts use conventional convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Experiments were conducted over 50 training epochs for each dataset, with evaluations on validation accuracy, test accuracy, training time, computational resource usage, and adversarial robustness (tested with ε=0.1 perturbations).Key findings demonstrate that hybrid models consistently outperform classical models in final accuracy, achieving {99.38\% (MNIST), 41.69\% (CIFAR100), and 74.05\% (STL10) validation accuracy, compared to classical benchmarks of 98.21\%, 32.25\%, and 63.76\%, respectively. Notably, the hybrid advantage scales with dataset complexity, showing the most significant gains on CIFAR100 (+9.44\%) and STL10 (+10.29\%). Hybrid models also train 5--12× faster (e.g., 21.23s vs. 108.44s per epoch on MNIST) and use 6--32\% fewer parameters} while maintaining superior generalization to unseen test data.Adversarial robustness tests reveal that hybrid models are significantly more resilient on simpler datasets (e.g., 45.27\% robust accuracy on MNIST vs. 10.80\% for classical) but show comparable fragility on complex datasets like CIFAR100 ($\sim$1\% robustness for both). Resource efficiency analyses indicate that hybrid models consume less memory (4--5GB vs. 5--6GB for classical) and lower CPU utilization (9.5\% vs. 23.2\% on average).These results suggest that hybrid quantum-classical architectures offer compelling advantages in accuracy, training efficiency, and parameter scalability, particularly for complex vision tasks.