Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Call for: Experimental Test of Emergent Time and Chronons in QED

samir dzolota

Published Jan 22, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

I am an independent researcher working on a theoretical framework in which time is not a fundamental dimension, but an emergent property arising from discrete energy oscillations within a network of ontological nodes. In this framework, each oscillation represents a minimal energy transition—analogous to a chronon in QED—and the passage of time corresponds to the sequential counting of these oscillations. Relativistic effects, including time dilation, and phenomena related to the time paradox, emerge naturally from variations in local network coherence (Γ). While the theory provides clear predictions, i currently do not have access to the laboratory resources and infrastructure required to test it experimentally. Therefore, I am seeking collaboration with research groups and laboratories equipped with ultra-stable atomic clocks, quantum cavities, and expertise in QED experiments to implement the following experimental concept:

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.18342380

Related papers

A Direct Ze-Type Experiment

Jaba Tkemaladze

The Ze framework proposes that proper time is not a geometric parameter but a count of effective information updates, with relativistic kinematics emerging statistically from the dynamics of event processing rather than from assumed spacetime structure. This paper presents a comprehensive experimental programme to test four core Ze postulates across multiple domains. The foundational digital experiment employs identical processors receiving identical input streams operating in maximally sequential versus maximally parallel modes, predicting update count ratios τ_B/τ_A = √(1 - v²) where v represents the proportion of parallel correlations—a functional form identical to the Lorentz factor of special relativity. Physical clock experiments compare internal transition counts in systems with different internal complexity (trapped ions, molecular clocks, optical lattice clocks) under identical relativistic conditions, testing whether proper time correlates with update statistics rather than merely with velocity. Non-inertial experiments subject systems to periodic correlation modulation without changing average velocity, predicting that proper time accumulation depends on causal structure rather than path length alone. Quantum-level experiments leverage programmable quantum computers (IBM, IonQ) to test whether interference corresponds to parallel update distribution and whether the quantum Zeno effect reflects mode switching with measurable update deficits. The Ze framework does not claim special relativity is incorrect but seeks to show it arises as an effective theory from deeper informational principles. Structural convergence with causal set theory, twistor theory, and emergent spacetime frameworks provides indirect support. The digital experiment offers the most direct test: if the relativistic curve emerges from pure information dynamics, it demonstrates that relativistic kinematics are not unique to physics but reflect universal constraints on information processing. Independent replication by multiple groups and derivation of relativity without assuming it would constitute sufficient evidence to attract serious scientific engagement. All proposed experiments are feasible with current technology, and their falsification conditions are clearly specified, ensuring the Ze framework meets the highest standards of empirical testability.

Longevity Horizon•Jan 1, 2025•3 citations

An experiment to test the discreteness of time

Pierre Martin-Dussaud, Andrea Di Biagio, Marios Christodoulou

Abstract Time at the Planck scale (∼10−44s) is an unexplored physical regime. It is widely believed that probing Planck time will remain for long an impossible task. Yet, we propose an experiment to test the discreteness of time at the Planck scale and show that it is not far removed from current technological capabilities.

arXiv:2007.08431•Quantum•Oct 6, 2022•8 citations

From Phase to Spacetime

Rob ten Napel

From Phase to Spacetime (Phase Ontology — Part II) develops the central consequence of Part I (Phase Without Ontology): if phase coherence is treated as an ontologically primary layer, then spacetime cannot be fundamental. This paper proposes a conceptual pathway by which temporal order, spatial geometry, and gravitational effects can be understood as emergent structures arising from stable phase relations—without introducing new dynamics or speculative entities. The core move is operational: clocks are oscillators, and what we call “time” is the comparison and synchronization of counted cycles across systems. Temporal order appears where phase relations are stable; divergence in clock rates appears where coherence conditions vary. In this framework, proper time corresponds to a system’s internal phase evolution, and relativistic phenomena (time dilation, gravitational redshift) are reinterpreted as changes in phase evolution induced by coherence gradients. Spatial distance and geometry are treated as doubly derivative: they are inferred through timing relations, synchronization procedures, and stable relational structure across extended systems. Uniform coherence yields an effectively “flat” geometry; varying coherence yields curvature-like behavior. The paper also sketches how inertia and acceleration can be viewed as resistance to reconfiguring phase-locked relations, aligning naturally with the equivalence principle. This work is Part II of a seven-part series that reframes foundational problems—unification, measurement, nonlocality, and the status of time—through the lens of phase coherence. Part III addresses measurement and classical definiteness; Part VII discusses experimental implications and falsifiability.

•Feb 15, 2026•0 citations

Clock Quantum Mechanics

coppola, VALERIO

This work aims to introduce a novel framework than elevates time to an operator in Quantum Mechanics.This work is intended as a draft, all necessary considerations will be developed in time together with the further development of the theory.

•Dec 8, 2025•0 citations

What is Time

İlker Uğurlu

What is time? Is it a dimension through which physical systems evolve, a continuous background against which change unfolds, or an emergent construct inferred from physical processes? Despite its central role in physics, time enters theory almost exclusively through measurement, and every operational realization of timekeeping ultimately reduces to the functioning of clocks. This raises a foundational question that is rarely addressed explicitly: what physical quantity do clocks actually count? In this work, we adopt an operational perspective and introduce the Geometric Phase-Projection (GPP) framework, in which time is treated not as a primitive background parameter but as an ordered count of physically readable sections generated under a universal finite propagation bound. Within this framework, relativistic time dilation arises as a geometric projection effect, and the Lorentz factor emerges as a consequence of phase allocation rather than as a primary postulate. Although the GPP construction is fully consistent with standard relativistic predictions at the level of expectation values, it indicates a distinct and testable implication when timekeeping is modeled as an event-counting process: synchronization jitter. This effect originates from an intrinsic mismatch between discrete section counts of systems in relative motion—a temporal Moir'e--type phenomenon that is absent in models assuming perfectly continuous time. We emphasize that the present work does not purport to introduce a new physical theory, nor does it seek to modify the dynamical structure of special relativity or quantum mechanics. Rather, it shows that if time is generated through discrete event formation, a specific and falsifiable operational signature must necessarily arise. By linking geometric projection directly to clock synchronization, the framework outlines a concrete experimental strategy based on high-precision phase-locked optical clocks to probe whether temporal structure is fundamentally continuous or discretely generated. The framework further offers a local, non-retrocausal account of delayed-choice interference experiments by identifying interference patterns with global phase coherence conditions required for section formation, rather than with backward-in-time influence. The predicted synchronization jitter is expected to scale with relative velocity and gravitational potential differences and to lie within the sensitivity range of existing optical-clock networks, thereby transforming a longstanding conceptual question about the nature of time into an empirically tractable hypothesis testable with current metrological technology.

•Mar 27, 2026•0 citations

Emergent Time: Origin, Quantization, and Hierarchy from Disentanglement Dynamics

R. Tang

Keywords: emergent time; discrete time; disentanglement dynamics; chronon; Planck scale;Zeno’s paradox; shot noise; equivalence principle; cosmological identity; quantum gravity

•Mar 3, 2026•0 citations
I am an independent researcher working on a theoretical framework in which time is not a fundamental dimension, but an emergent property arising from discrete energy oscillations within a network of ontological nodes. In this framework, each oscillation represents a minimal energy transition—analogous to a chronon in QED—and the passage of time corresponds to the sequential counting of these oscillations. Relativistic effects, including time dilation, and phenomena related to the time paradox, emerge naturally from variations in local network coherence (Γ). While the theory provides clear predictions, i currently do not have access to the laboratory resources and infrastructure required to test it experimentally. Therefore, I am seeking collaboration with research groups and laboratories equipped with ultra-stable atomic clocks, quantum cavities, and expertise in QED experiments to implement the following experimental concept:
The Ze framework proposes that proper time is not a geometric parameter but a count of effective information updates, with relativistic kinematics emerging statistically from the dynamics of event processing rather than from assumed spacetime structure. This paper presents a comprehensive experimental programme to test four core Ze postulates across multiple domains. The foundational digital experiment employs identical processors receiving identical input streams operating in maximally sequential versus maximally parallel modes, predicting update count ratios τ_B/τ_A = √(1 - v²) where v represents the proportion of parallel correlations—a functional form identical to the Lorentz factor of special relativity. Physical clock experiments compare internal transition counts in systems with different internal complexity (trapped ions, molecular clocks, optical lattice clocks) under identical relativistic conditions, testing whether proper time correlates with update statistics rather than merely with velocity. Non-inertial experiments subject systems to periodic correlation modulation without changing average velocity, predicting that proper time accumulation depends on causal structure rather than path length alone. Quantum-level experiments leverage programmable quantum computers (IBM, IonQ) to test whether interference corresponds to parallel update distribution and whether the quantum Zeno effect reflects mode switching with measurable update deficits. The Ze framework does not claim special relativity is incorrect but seeks to show it arises as an effective theory from deeper informational principles. Structural convergence with causal set theory, twistor theory, and emergent spacetime frameworks provides indirect support. The digital experiment offers the most direct test: if the relativistic curve emerges from pure information dynamics, it demonstrates that relativistic kinematics are not unique to physics but reflect universal constraints on information processing. Independent replication by multiple groups and derivation of relativity without assuming it would constitute sufficient evidence to attract serious scientific engagement. All proposed experiments are feasible with current technology, and their falsification conditions are clearly specified, ensuring the Ze framework meets the highest standards of empirical testability.
From Phase to Spacetime (Phase Ontology — Part II) develops the central consequence of Part I (Phase Without Ontology): if phase coherence is treated as an ontologically primary layer, then spacetime cannot be fundamental. This paper proposes a conceptual pathway by which temporal order, spatial geometry, and gravitational effects can be understood as emergent structures arising from stable phase relations—without introducing new dynamics or speculative entities. The core move is operational: clocks are oscillators, and what we call “time” is the comparison and synchronization of counted cycles across systems. Temporal order appears where phase relations are stable; divergence in clock rates appears where coherence conditions vary. In this framework, proper time corresponds to a system’s internal phase evolution, and relativistic phenomena (time dilation, gravitational redshift) are reinterpreted as changes in phase evolution induced by coherence gradients. Spatial distance and geometry are treated as doubly derivative: they are inferred through timing relations, synchronization procedures, and stable relational structure across extended systems. Uniform coherence yields an effectively “flat” geometry; varying coherence yields curvature-like behavior. The paper also sketches how inertia and acceleration can be viewed as resistance to reconfiguring phase-locked relations, aligning naturally with the equivalence principle. This work is Part II of a seven-part series that reframes foundational problems—unification, measurement, nonlocality, and the status of time—through the lens of phase coherence. Part III addresses measurement and classical definiteness; Part VII discusses experimental implications and falsifiability.
What is time? Is it a dimension through which physical systems evolve, a continuous background against which change unfolds, or an emergent construct inferred from physical processes? Despite its central role in physics, time enters theory almost exclusively through measurement, and every operational realization of timekeeping ultimately reduces to the functioning of clocks. This raises a foundational question that is rarely addressed explicitly: what physical quantity do clocks actually count? In this work, we adopt an operational perspective and introduce the Geometric Phase-Projection (GPP) framework, in which time is treated not as a primitive background parameter but as an ordered count of physically readable sections generated under a universal finite propagation bound. Within this framework, relativistic time dilation arises as a geometric projection effect, and the Lorentz factor emerges as a consequence of phase allocation rather than as a primary postulate. Although the GPP construction is fully consistent with standard relativistic predictions at the level of expectation values, it indicates a distinct and testable implication when timekeeping is modeled as an event-counting process: synchronization jitter. This effect originates from an intrinsic mismatch between discrete section counts of systems in relative motion—a temporal Moir'e--type phenomenon that is absent in models assuming perfectly continuous time. We emphasize that the present work does not purport to introduce a new physical theory, nor does it seek to modify the dynamical structure of special relativity or quantum mechanics. Rather, it shows that if time is generated through discrete event formation, a specific and falsifiable operational signature must necessarily arise. By linking geometric projection directly to clock synchronization, the framework outlines a concrete experimental strategy based on high-precision phase-locked optical clocks to probe whether temporal structure is fundamentally continuous or discretely generated. The framework further offers a local, non-retrocausal account of delayed-choice interference experiments by identifying interference patterns with global phase coherence conditions required for section formation, rather than with backward-in-time influence. The predicted synchronization jitter is expected to scale with relative velocity and gravitational potential differences and to lie within the sensitivity range of existing optical-clock networks, thereby transforming a longstanding conceptual question about the nature of time into an empirically tractable hypothesis testable with current metrological technology.