Risk-Adaptive Framework for Enterprise Post-Quantum Cryptography Readiness and Transition

Ivan Soto Maciá

Vidyasagar Palla

Abhinav Patel, Aryan Upadhyay, Ayush Vashishth +2 more

Hybrid enterprise environments combining public cloud, private infrastructure, and edge devices—rely fundamentally on classical public-key cryptography (PKC) for secure key exchange, authentication, and digital signatures. The emergence of cryptographically relevant quantum computers (CRQCs) threatens to dismantle these foundations via algorithms such as Shor's, rendering current data confidentiality and long-term security guarantees obsolete.1 This systematic review transitions the focus from pure cloud security to the complex architectural challenge of integrating Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) across distributed enterprise landscapes. The analysis examines the foundational PQC candidates (NIST selection), assesses architectural dependencies (PKI, KMS, ZTA), reviews implementation hurdles (side-channels, performance overhead in IoT), and details the strategic necessity of crypto-agility. Furthermore, this report critically examines the global regulatory framework, including US CNSA 2.0 and FIPS 140-3, highlighting critical gaps in migration planning, governance, and compliance readiness required to mitigate the systemic risk of the "Harvest Now, Decrypt Later" threat model.

Volkan Erol

Quantum computing poses an existential threat to public-key cryptography, with Shor's algorithm capable of breaking RSA and elliptic curve systems once cryptographically relevant quantum computers (CRQCs) emerge. While post-quantum cryptography (PQC) offers algorithmic solutions, organizational readiness extends beyond technical implementation to encompass governance, interoperability, and adaptive capacity. This review synthesizes the quantum threat landscape, evaluates NIST-standardized PQC algorithms through quantitative performance analysis, and examines global standardization dynamics. We introduce a novel Quantum Readiness Maturity Model (QRMM) that enables organizations to assess and advance their preparedness across five dimensions: cryptographic infrastructure, governance frameworks, sectoral adaptation, interoperability resilience, and strategic agility. Applying this model to finance, telecommunications, and defense sectors reveals systematic gaps in migration planning and crypto-agility. Our analysis demonstrates that quantum readiness requires treating cryptographic transformation as a strategic enterprise capability rather than a purely technical upgrade. The proposed framework provides actionable pathways for practitioners while identifying critical research directions in hybrid deployment strategies, post-quantum PKI architectures, and algorithmic diversity.

Sakshyam Panda, Debasish Jena, Iakovos Pittaras +7 more

David Joseph, Rafael Misoczki, Marc Manzano +7 more