Total State–Space Coexistence Theory (Author's Preprint)

Hemant Kumar Kushwaha

Published Jan 1, 2026• 0 citations

Abstract

This document presents the author’s preprint version of Total State–Space Coexistence Theory, a structural framework addressing time, probability, multiplicity, and experience. The work treats time as an ordering relation rather than a flowing entity, probability as a structural measure over coexisting outcomes, and experience as index-local access within a complete state-space. Classical paradoxes related to time, measurement, and single-history assumptions are handled through structural separation rather than elimination. This preprint is intended for academic reference and archival purposes.The formally published edition of this work is available via Amazon KDP in paperback and Kindle formats.

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18174632

Related papers

Dynamic Probability Space Theory

Yugo Matsumoto

I’ve shared updated versions of my work on Dynamic Probability Space Theory (DPS). These papers develop a framework in which probability itself is treated as a fundamental structural principle of existence, formalized through the Existence Field Equation and dynamic probability flow. Versions 1.2 and 1.3 are presented here as independent preprints, reflecting an ongoing theoretical exploration of reality, observation, and cognition. Related updates may be available at: patreon.com/NMStructuralTheoryLab

Dec 20, 20250 citations

Phase-Relative Branch Multiplicity and the Illusion of Parallel Worlds

John F. Ryder

Quantum mechanics does not require parallel universes — only phase-relative structure within a shared spacetime manifold. This preprint presents an interpretive framework for quantum multiplicity that avoids spatial “parallel universe” metaphors. Building on standard quantum field theory, Everettian quantum mechanics, and decoherence theory, it argues that apparent multiplicity can be understood as phase-relative branch structure within a single shared spacetime manifold, rather than as spatially separate worlds. The work introduces no new dynamics, equations, or empirical predictions. Its contribution is conceptual: clarifying how mutually exclusive classical outcomes arise through branch-relative accessibility and loss of correlation, while preserving all governing invariants, including conservation laws and universal gravitational coupling in the semiclassical regime. A companion supplementary document presents the standard mathematical formalism—Hilbert space structure, density matrices, decoherence, and expectation-value stress–energy—to demonstrate that the interpretation remains fully consistent with established physics. In approaches to quantum gravity where spacetime is emergent—such as loop quantum gravity or holographic dualities—the framework would naturally reformulate in relational or entanglement-theoretic terms. In that context, branch-relative multiplicity corresponds not to multiple times or geometries, but to multiple decohered relational histories or bulk reconstructions supported by a single underlying quantum state. This paper is intended as a foundations-level reinterpretation for physicists and philosophers of physics interested in quantum ontology, decoherence, and the conceptual structure of spacetime.

Feb 6, 20260 citations

Total State–Space Coexistence Theory: A Structural Framework for Time, Probability, and Experience

Hemant Kumar Kushwaha

Jan 1, 20260 citations

Foundations of Predictive Dynamics: State–Space Flow as the Unique Invariant Structure of Physical Theory

Mircea BULINSKI

This upload contains a restricted-access version of a manuscript. The work establishes a necessity (no-go) result concerning the minimal structural conditions required for predictability in physical theory. The file is not publicly accessible and is intended solely for version control and private archival purposes.

Dec 27, 20250 citations

Entangled histories

Jordan S. Cotler, Frank A. Wilczek

We introduce quantum history states and their mathematical framework, thereby reinterpreting and extending the consistent histories approach to quantum theory. Through thought experiments, we demonstrate that our formalism allows us to analyze a quantum version of history in which we reconstruct the past by observations. In particular, we can pass from measurements to inferences about ‘what happened’ in a way that is sensible and free of paradox. Our framework allows for a richer understanding of the temporal structure of quantum theory, and we construct history states that embody peculiar, non-classical correlations in time.

arXiv:1502.02480Physica ScriptaMay 12, 201634 citations

Entangled History

Jordan S. Cotler, Frank A. Wilczek

We introduce quantum history states and their mathematical framework, thereby reinterpreting and extending the consistent histories approach to quantum theory. Through thought experiments, we demonstrate that our formalism allows us to analyze a quantum version of history in which we reconstruct the past by observations. In particular, we can pass from measurements to inferences about what happened in a way that is sensible and free of paradox. Our framework allows for a richer understanding of the temporal structure of quantum theory, and we construct history states that embody peculiar, non-classical correlations in time.

Feb 9, 20150 citations