Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

On the Impossibility of Physical Completeness from an Instantaneous State Description: Part I. Structural State Extension and Emergent Reconstruction Time in Physical Dynamics

Castagna, Riccardo

Published Apr 3, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Research manuscript / preprint draft. This work examines whether an instantaneous observable description can be physically complete, and develops a formal framework based on structural state extension and finite reconstruction time in reduced dynamics. The manuscript is theoretical in scope and presents the logical structure, operational interpretation, and scale-bridging perspective of the proposed framework. This upload corresponds to a draft version.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.19409453

Related papers

An Informational Projection Constraint on Observable Physical States"

Abdul-Muhaymin Adel Al-Kilani Al-Kilani

This work proposes a minimal informational perspective on physical observability. Instead of treating spacetime and physical states as fundamentally given, the model suggests that what we observe emerges through a structural constraint that filters possible configurations into physically accessible ones. In this view, physical reality is not defined by dynamics alone, but by limits on what information can consistently appear as an observable state. The model introduces the idea that unobserved or excluded configurations are not lost arbitrarily, but contribute indirectly by shaping the structure within which observable states emerge. The framework does not introduce new forces or speculative entities. Rather, it provides a conceptual basis for interpreting physical constraints as consequences of informational selection. The approach is deliberately minimal and compatible with existing physical theories, serving as a foundational step toward more detailed theoretical and empirical developments.

•Jan 29, 2025•0 citations

Quantum Coherence Theory (QCT): A Constraint-Based Framework for Classical Emergence

Matthew Ainsworth

(This version has been superceeded, see v.3) Contemporary approaches to physical unification typically emphasize dynamical laws, interpretive frameworks, or information-theoretic reconstructions. Less attention is given to the structural constraints that determine which physical descriptions can remain coherent and stable under interaction, scale transition, and aggregation. This paper develops a constraint-first analysis of coherence, arguing that persistence and unification require restrictions on admissible physical continuations that are not reducible to dynamics alone. Within the framework referred to here as Quantum Coherence Theory (QCT), coherence is treated not as a fragile quantum resource but as a structural property governed by interaction geometry and constraint density. On this view, classical behavior emerges when accumulated constraints sufficiently narrow admissible evolution, while quantum behavior re-emerges when constraints are relaxed. The account does not introduce new dynamics, collapse mechanisms, or modifications of quantum formalism, but instead clarifies the conditions under which existing formalisms yield stable, unified descriptions. The resulting constraints distinguish QCT from observer-centric, intrinsic-collapse, and purely descriptive decoherence accounts, while remaining compatible with globally unitary dynamics. Formal analysis in later sections develops operational redundancy conditions, admissibility constraints on joint states, and rigidity-style arguments linking redundant record structure to the stability of classical descriptions. These results do not constitute a complete theory of unification, but they narrow the space of physically admissible descriptions and clarify the structural role of coherence in bridging quantum and classical regimes.

•Feb 8, 2026•0 citations

32. Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? (1935)

Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, N. Rosen

Princeton University Press eBooks•Dec 4, 2025•0 citations

The Volumetric Time Model 4.0

Ralph Clayton

Abstract The Volumetric Time Model (VTM) 4.0 presents a theoretical and computational framework for investigating the structure of time, globally constrained histories, causal accessibility, and the relationship between physical dynamics, information, and the space of admissible histories. The framework explores how temporal evolution may be described through constrained global histories while preserving operational consistency with established physical principles. It develops mathematical approaches to spacetime geometry, temporal reachability, counterfactual accessibility, information-theoretic reciprocity, quantum multi-time processes, and the distinction between global constraints and observable causal dynamics. VTM 4.0 extends these foundations through analyses of minimum-information reciprocity, large-deviation conditioning, finite-memory quantum processes, and correlated Gaussian field-generated history ensembles. These constructions provide explicit mathematical benchmarks for evaluating whether globally constrained descriptions produce physically distinguishable predictions. An important result emerges from the solvable Gaussian and additive sectors: their conditioned dynamics can be represented through conventional forward driven processes. Consequently, global-history descriptions, reciprocal conditioning, and temporal correlations do not, by themselves, establish new physical effects or departures from existing causal frameworks. The research therefore establishes both a mathematical framework and a set of falsifiability criteria. Any genuinely distinctive VTM dynamics must demonstrate measurable predictions that cannot be reproduced by the relevant conventional forward-process or quantum-process descriptions while satisfying positivity, normalization, and causal consistency. This release includes the complete VTM 4.0 manuscript in PDF and editable DOCX formats, together with an accompanying research archive. VTM 4.0 is an independent theoretical research preprint. Its mathematical constructions and computational investigations should not be interpreted as experimental confirmation of a new physical theory of time or as an established replacement for relativity or quantum mechanics. Version: 4.0Author: Ralph ClaytonPublication date: 24 October 2026

•Oct 24, 2026•0 citations

Foundations of Predictive Dynamics: State–Space Flow as the Unique Invariant Structure of Physical Theory

Mircea BULINSKI

This upload contains a restricted-access version of a manuscript. The work establishes a necessity (no-go) result concerning the minimal structural conditions required for predictability in physical theory. The file is not publicly accessible and is intended solely for version control and private archival purposes.

•Dec 27, 2025•0 citations

A Geometric Reconstruction of Schr¨odinger Dynamics via Axial–Phase Transport

Stephan Hueffer

This preprint presents a geometric reconstruction of Schrödinger dynamics based on coherent transport in an axial–phase configuration space. Within this framework, physical evolution is represented as a spiral process combining irreversible axial progression with transverse phase rotation. The approach seeks to provide a minimal geometric interpretation of quantum dynamics while preserving the established empirical structure of quantum mechanics. By imposing phase closure, preservation of superposition structure, and invariance of overlap relations, the admissible evolution law is constrained to a linear first-order transport equation generated by a Hermitian operator. When intrinsic evolution is projected onto an observational frame in which laboratory time is effectively defined, the resulting transport law reduces to the conventional Schrödinger equation. The framework suggests that laboratory time need not coincide with the fundamental evolution parameter but may emerge as an effective coordinate through projection. This perspective is consistent with ongoing discussions in both quantum theory and cosmology regarding the possibility that conventional notions of time are incomplete while leaving the successful predictive structure of quantum mechanics unchanged. Potential deviations from the standard description are expected only in regimes where intrinsic axial support becomes experimentally accessible or where the effective time-local approximation breaks down. The work therefore provides a geometric interpretation of Schrödinger dynamics that reproduces standard quantum mechanics within its established domain of validity while identifying possible directions for future theoretical and experimental investigation. This manuscript was originally prepared for submission to a peer-reviewed journal and is archived here as a preprint. Keywords: quantum mechanics, Schrödinger equation, geometric interpretation, time, phase space, Hermitian operators, quantum foundations, wave mechanics, coherent transport, emergent time.

•Jun 2, 2026•0 citations
Research manuscript / preprint draft. This work examines whether an instantaneous observable description can be physically complete, and develops a formal framework based on structural state extension and finite reconstruction time in reduced dynamics. The manuscript is theoretical in scope and presents the logical structure, operational interpretation, and scale-bridging perspective of the proposed framework. This upload corresponds to a draft version.
This work proposes a minimal informational perspective on physical observability. Instead of treating spacetime and physical states as fundamentally given, the model suggests that what we observe emerges through a structural constraint that filters possible configurations into physically accessible ones. In this view, physical reality is not defined by dynamics alone, but by limits on what information can consistently appear as an observable state. The model introduces the idea that unobserved or excluded configurations are not lost arbitrarily, but contribute indirectly by shaping the structure within which observable states emerge. The framework does not introduce new forces or speculative entities. Rather, it provides a conceptual basis for interpreting physical constraints as consequences of informational selection. The approach is deliberately minimal and compatible with existing physical theories, serving as a foundational step toward more detailed theoretical and empirical developments.
(This version has been superceeded, see v.3) Contemporary approaches to physical unification typically emphasize dynamical laws, interpretive frameworks, or information-theoretic reconstructions. Less attention is given to the structural constraints that determine which physical descriptions can remain coherent and stable under interaction, scale transition, and aggregation. This paper develops a constraint-first analysis of coherence, arguing that persistence and unification require restrictions on admissible physical continuations that are not reducible to dynamics alone. Within the framework referred to here as Quantum Coherence Theory (QCT), coherence is treated not as a fragile quantum resource but as a structural property governed by interaction geometry and constraint density. On this view, classical behavior emerges when accumulated constraints sufficiently narrow admissible evolution, while quantum behavior re-emerges when constraints are relaxed. The account does not introduce new dynamics, collapse mechanisms, or modifications of quantum formalism, but instead clarifies the conditions under which existing formalisms yield stable, unified descriptions. The resulting constraints distinguish QCT from observer-centric, intrinsic-collapse, and purely descriptive decoherence accounts, while remaining compatible with globally unitary dynamics. Formal analysis in later sections develops operational redundancy conditions, admissibility constraints on joint states, and rigidity-style arguments linking redundant record structure to the stability of classical descriptions. These results do not constitute a complete theory of unification, but they narrow the space of physically admissible descriptions and clarify the structural role of coherence in bridging quantum and classical regimes.
Abstract The Volumetric Time Model (VTM) 4.0 presents a theoretical and computational framework for investigating the structure of time, globally constrained histories, causal accessibility, and the relationship between physical dynamics, information, and the space of admissible histories. The framework explores how temporal evolution may be described through constrained global histories while preserving operational consistency with established physical principles. It develops mathematical approaches to spacetime geometry, temporal reachability, counterfactual accessibility, information-theoretic reciprocity, quantum multi-time processes, and the distinction between global constraints and observable causal dynamics. VTM 4.0 extends these foundations through analyses of minimum-information reciprocity, large-deviation conditioning, finite-memory quantum processes, and correlated Gaussian field-generated history ensembles. These constructions provide explicit mathematical benchmarks for evaluating whether globally constrained descriptions produce physically distinguishable predictions. An important result emerges from the solvable Gaussian and additive sectors: their conditioned dynamics can be represented through conventional forward driven processes. Consequently, global-history descriptions, reciprocal conditioning, and temporal correlations do not, by themselves, establish new physical effects or departures from existing causal frameworks. The research therefore establishes both a mathematical framework and a set of falsifiability criteria. Any genuinely distinctive VTM dynamics must demonstrate measurable predictions that cannot be reproduced by the relevant conventional forward-process or quantum-process descriptions while satisfying positivity, normalization, and causal consistency. This release includes the complete VTM 4.0 manuscript in PDF and editable DOCX formats, together with an accompanying research archive. VTM 4.0 is an independent theoretical research preprint. Its mathematical constructions and computational investigations should not be interpreted as experimental confirmation of a new physical theory of time or as an established replacement for relativity or quantum mechanics. Version: 4.0Author: Ralph ClaytonPublication date: 24 October 2026
This preprint presents a geometric reconstruction of Schrödinger dynamics based on coherent transport in an axial–phase configuration space. Within this framework, physical evolution is represented as a spiral process combining irreversible axial progression with transverse phase rotation. The approach seeks to provide a minimal geometric interpretation of quantum dynamics while preserving the established empirical structure of quantum mechanics. By imposing phase closure, preservation of superposition structure, and invariance of overlap relations, the admissible evolution law is constrained to a linear first-order transport equation generated by a Hermitian operator. When intrinsic evolution is projected onto an observational frame in which laboratory time is effectively defined, the resulting transport law reduces to the conventional Schrödinger equation. The framework suggests that laboratory time need not coincide with the fundamental evolution parameter but may emerge as an effective coordinate through projection. This perspective is consistent with ongoing discussions in both quantum theory and cosmology regarding the possibility that conventional notions of time are incomplete while leaving the successful predictive structure of quantum mechanics unchanged. Potential deviations from the standard description are expected only in regimes where intrinsic axial support becomes experimentally accessible or where the effective time-local approximation breaks down. The work therefore provides a geometric interpretation of Schrödinger dynamics that reproduces standard quantum mechanics within its established domain of validity while identifying possible directions for future theoretical and experimental investigation. This manuscript was originally prepared for submission to a peer-reviewed journal and is archived here as a preprint. Keywords: quantum mechanics, Schrödinger equation, geometric interpretation, time, phase space, Hermitian operators, quantum foundations, wave mechanics, coherent transport, emergent time.