START HERE (read order / canonical artefacts): 1) Front Door notes (falsifiers & theorem/lemma map): DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18075645 2) Fork paper (Hard CNC + certified overlap + T=3 fork): DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18075546 3) Gravity paper (PAW / BR‑PAW + anomaly witness): DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18075607 4) Runner bundle (prereg mechanics + 30‑sec demo): DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18075677 Integrity rule (PAW/BR‑PAW): A null PAW result (no observed loop defect) does NOT, by itself, upper‑bound the worst‑case anomaly norm ||A||∞. PAW is soundness‑only in this direction; null‑result upper bounds require explicitly justified restricted norms (e.g., BR‑PAW with a physically motivated support/ensemble/code restriction) as stated in preregistered assumptions and budgets. Reference implementation for the CNC T=3 locked fork preregistration and the PAW/BR‑PAW inference pipeline. What it does: - Accepts preregistered inputs (including either externally supplied ε upper bound or tomography sufficient statistics + shot counts). - Produces preregistered bounds in two modes: (i) Bernstein/empirical‑Bernstein tightener; (ii) confidence‑region + SDP option (with preregistered solver tolerances and deterministic fallback). Included: - CNC_T3_Prereg_v7_bundle.zip - CNC_Release_Manifest_sha256_v2.txt Quick demo: - The bundle contains a one‑screen DEMO.md and a demo_simulation.py that generates synthetic data and runs the pipeline. Expected qualitative outcomes: signal run should be conclusive and reject Hard CNC; the two “bad” inputs should be inconclusive.
START HERE (read order / canonical artefacts): 1) Front Door notes (falsifiers & theorem/lemma map): DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18075645 2) Fork paper (Hard CNC + certified overlap + T=3 fork): DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18075546 3) Gravity paper (PAW / BR‑PAW + anomaly witness): DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18075607 4) Runner bundle (prereg mechanics + 30‑sec demo): DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18075677 Integrity rule (PAW/BR‑PAW): A null PAW result (no observed loop defect) does NOT, by itself, upper‑bound the worst‑case anomaly norm ||A||∞. PAW is soundness‑only in this direction; null‑result upper bounds require explicitly justified restricted norms (e.g., BR‑PAW with a physically motivated support/ensemble/code restriction) as stated in preregistered assumptions and budgets. Reference implementation for the CNC T=3 locked fork preregistration and the PAW/BR‑PAW inference pipeline. What it does: - Accepts preregistered inputs (including either externally supplied ε upper bound or tomography sufficient statistics + shot counts). - Produces preregistered bounds in two modes: (i) Bernstein/empirical‑Bernstein tightener; (ii) confidence‑region + SDP option (with preregistered solver tolerances and deterministic fallback). Included: - CNC_T3_Prereg_v7_bundle.zip - CNC_Release_Manifest_sha256_v2.txt Quick demo: - The bundle contains a one‑screen DEMO.md and a demo_simulation.py that generates synthetic data and runs the pipeline. Expected qualitative outcomes: signal run should be conclusive and reject Hard CNC; the two “bad” inputs should be inconclusive.
This report records and interprets the first real-device execution of the preregistered CNC T=3 two-clock fork experiment (runner v7) and specifies a certifiable follow-up protocol in the T=2 binary-clock setting. First, we note a certified overlap set I_cert where the clocks are demonstrably aligned well enough to talk about a common tick. Second, the runner certifies a lower bound delta' on the standard-QM disagreement that should be present in that overlap set. At that point, the question is not philosophical. It is a specific experimental question: does the observed disagreement survive after the non-invasive correction, or does it collapse toward zero? Run metadata (from locked runner output): run_id: cnc_t3_20260105T133840Z backend: ibm_fez UTC timestamp: 2026-01-05T13:40:11Z key outputs: D_bar = 0.213982, nu = 0.162114, epsilon_inv = 0.109279 decision: inconclusive (fails nu and epsilon_inv gates) Raw run artefacts and outputs are archived by Morgan Cameron on Zenodo: DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18177156 This report is a forensic note and planning document.
This report records and interprets the second real-device execution of the CNC fork experiment in the certifiable T = 2 “binary-clock” design (runner v3), including a software-forensics correction: an obsolete analysis JSON incorrectly reported ν = 1.0 even though all 2-bit clock patterns are legal by construction in T = 2. It also specifies a final replication run (“Test 3”) intended to be maximally robust against the dominant remaining failure mode (near-threshold readout invasiveness on ibm_fez). A conclusive outcome of Test 3 is meaningful regardless of direction, because (as preregistered) the runner only emits a conclusive label after certifying overlap and bounding nuisance effects (mismatch and readout invasiveness). Run metadata (from locked runner output): backend: ibm_fez output created (UTC): 2026-01-10T19:03:16.074947+00:00 IBM Runtime job id: d5ha332gim5s73ahnueg physical layout (C1,C2,S): [1, 2, 3] protocol blocks: ε ∈ {0.40, 0.20} (primary block ε = 0.40) Qiskit versions (recorded by harness): qiskit 2.2.3, qiskit-ibm-runtime 0.43.1 Key certified outputs (primary block, ε = 0.40): D̄ = 0.381793 ν = 0.016503 (≤ ν_max = 0.020) ε_inv = 0.047647 (≤ ε_inv,max = 0.050) δ′ = 0.313209 decision (locked runner): reject hard CNC The Test 3 OSF preregistration is complete and time‑stamped, but remains embargoed until execution; the public link will be added here immediately after the embargo is lifted. Raw run artefacts and outputs to be archived as a separate Zenodo Dataset record by the hardware executor (Morgan Cameron). This report is a forensic note and replication/protocol document.
This registration freezes the preregistration document and the exact reference implementation (code, configs, and SHA256 manifest) for a single scarce “heavy” run of the CNC fork experiment in the T=2 binary-clock setting. The goal is to maximize the chance of a conclusive decision either way while extracting high-value diagnostics from the same dataset. Execution: Planned to be performed by an external hardware operator with IBM Quantum access. At the time of registration, Morgan Cameron has offered to execute the run, subject to availability. If executed by another operator, the executor identity and run artefacts DOI will be recorded in the post run dataset deposit. The preregistered protocol, code, and decision rule are independent of executor identity. Protocol, analysis, and report: Dale James Raymond. The authoritative analysis plan is CNC_T2_Fork_Heavy_Prereg_v2.pdf. The exact runnable artefacts are: cnc_t2_qiskit_harness_v3.py cnc_t2_runner_v3.py cnc_t2_config_heavy_v3.json (intended run) cnc_t2_config_lean_v3.json (sanity/layout scout only) RUNBOOK_T2_FORK_HEAVY_V3.md Integrity: SHA256SUMS.txt contains hashes for all files in this registration.
Este depósito contiene el protocolo experimental completo, pre-registrado y auditable, diseñado para evaluar de forma falsable si la atención consciente enfocada (o la intención dirigida) produce desviaciones estadísticas medibles en sistemas cuánticos, más allá del azar y de los artefactos conocidos. El diseño incluye dos protocolos complementarios: Protocolo A: Generador Cuántico de Números Aleatorios (QRNG) basado en división de haz de fotones individuales. Protocolo B: Interferometría de fotón único (Mach-Zehnder / doble rendija) con medición de visibilidad de franjas. Características metodológicas principales: Pre-registro formal del plan de análisis estadístico y bayesiano antes de la captura de datos. Adquisición de datos con escritura inmutable (HDF5 + cadena HMAC-SHA256 / Merkle tree). Cegamiento criptográfico de las etiquetas de condición. Motor de veto ambiental en tiempo real (temperatura, campos electromagnéticos, vibración) con umbrales predefinidos. Análisis primario: tests frecuentistas (Mann-Whitney, t-test) con corrección FDR/Bonferroni y umbral α = 10⁻⁶; co-primario: Factor de Bayes BF₁₀ (Beta-Binomial). Tamaño muestral calculado para detectar efectos del orden d ≈ 0.001 con potencia ≥ 0.95. Regla de parada estricta y ausencia de análisis intermedios. Controles explícitos: atención enfocada, atención pasiva y control máquina (sala vacía). Replicación independiente como condición sine qua non de aceptación de resultados positivos. El paquete incluye: Documento maestro del protocolo experimental (diseño, hipótesis, métricas, potencia, ética y cronograma). Código fuente del pipeline unificado de adquisición y análisis (v2.0.0). Protocolo de calibración del QRNG (ICQ-CAL-001) en cinco fases. Acta de inicio de la Fase 1 de estabilización térmica y electromagnética. Especificaciones de software, umbrales de exclusión y esquema de datos. Este registro no afirma la existencia del efecto. Su único objetivo es convertir una hipótesis audaz en un experimento rigurosamente falsable, reproducible y auditable por terceros independientes. Identificador de sistema: QCAL-SYMBIO-BRIDGE v2.0.0 Frecuencia de referencia operativa: f₀ = 141.7001 Hz Fecha de depósito: 2026-08-22