Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Theory of Superposition within quantum states, An Hypothetical answer

Amitesh Kumar Singam

Published Dec 29, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Our Quantum Approach relies on an hypothetical experiment were we interpret actual nature of reality within quantum mechanics and networks based on theoritical assumption of how nature of particle or properties of real data changes to imaginary due to superposition within multiple states.
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.18082199

Related papers

Quantum Physics: From Imaginary to Reality

Isabella Taylor

Quantum physics has long occupied a space between imagination and reality, captivating scientists and philosophers with its strange, counterintuitive principles: superposition, entanglement, uncertainty, and nonlocality. What once appeared as hypothetical mathematics now manifests in real technologies—lasers, semiconductors, superconductors, atomic clocks, MRI machines, and emerging quantum computers. This mini-review traces the conceptual journey of quantum physics from an abstract theory born in early twentieth-century thought experiments to a practical framework shaping modern engineering, computation, communication, and materials science. It highlights key developments in interpretation, experimental validation, and application, while reflecting on how quantum physics reshapes our understanding of nature, reality, and information. Although quantum mechanics remains philosophically perplexing, it has become a powerful and indispensable foundation for technological innovation. By examining how imaginary constructs transitioned into concrete implementations, this article illustrates the remarkable interplay between theory and experiment that continues to redefine what is possible.

Science Insights•Dec 29, 2025•0 citations

Discussions on the superposition principle of states in quantum mechanics

Guan Hong

The meaning of superposition principle of states in quantum mechanics is discussed.Comments on some expressions and explanations of it,and some statements of it using simple and plain words are given.

College Physics•Jan 1, 2007•0 citations

The physical reality of the quantum wave function

Gerd Leuchs

Can it possibly be that the proper interpretation of quantum theory, which allows a quantum system to be in a superposition of mutually exclusive states, is itself a superposition of seemingly contradicting interpretations?

arXiv:1501.07199•Jan 28, 2015•2 citations

Quantum Mechanics and Reality: An Interpretation of Everett's Theory.

Christoph Lehner

The central part of Everett's formulation of quantum mechanics is a quantum mechanical model of memory and of observation as the recording of information in a memory. To use this model as an answer to the measurement problem, Everett has to assume that a conscious observer can be in a superposition of such memory states and be unaware of it. This assumption has puzzled generations of readers. The fundamental aim of this dissertation is to find a set of simpler assumptions which are sufficient to show that Everett's model is empirically adequate. I argue that Everett's model needs three assumptions to account for the process of observation: an assumption of decoherence of observers as quantum mechanical systems; an assumption of supervenience of mental states (qualities) over quantum mechanical properties; and an assumption about the interpretation of quantum mechanical states in general: quantum mechanical states describe ensembles of states of affairs coexisting in the same system. I argue that the only plausible understanding of such ensembles is as ensembles of possibilities, and that all standard no-collapse interpretations agree in this reading of quantum mechanical states. Their differences can be understood as different theories about what marks the real state within this ensemble, and Everett's theory as the claim that no additional 'mark of reality' is necessary. Using the three assumptions, I argue that introspection cannot determine the objective quantum mechanical state of an observer. Rather, the introspective qualities of a quantum mechanical state can be represented by a (classical) statistical ensemble of subjective states. An analysis of these subjective states and their dynamics leads to the conclusion that they suffice to give empirically correct predictions. The argument for the empirical adequacy of the subjective state entails that knowledge of the objective quantum mechanical state is impossible in principle. Empirical reality for a conscious observer is not described by the objective state, but by a Everettian relative state conditional on the subjective state, and no theoretical 'mark of reality' is necessary for this concept of reality. I compare the resulting concept of reality to Kant's distinction between empirical and transcendental reality.

•Jan 1, 1997•6 citations

Analysis on the Theoretical Bias of Quantum Superposition and Schrödinger's Cat Thought Experiment

Jiaqing Yan

Within the modern quantum mechanics system, the principle of superposition, instantaneous energy level transition, and the derived discourse of superposed states from Schrödinger's cat have long been mainstream theories for interpreting phenomena in the microscopic field. From the perspective of the inherent motion properties of real particles and the unified physical law of causality, such theoretical expressions show obvious cognitive deviations and logical shortcomings. Based on the actual motion of electrons outside the hydrogen nucleus, this paper clarifies that the energy change of electrons is only a continuous and steady change of orbital scale, without orbital jumping with no trajectory or process. This paper objectively points out that the establishment of special concepts such as superposition state, to a large extent, avoids the exploration of the core mechanism of microscopic motion, deliberately blurs the essential physical contradictions, so as to stabilize the existing theoretical framework and weaken rational discussions from different academic perspectives. Based on a neutral academic perspective, this paper clarifies theoretical deviations, returns to the original laws of material motion, and promotes the research of microscopic physics to the essence of objective reality.

•May 20, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Superposition as Entanglement

Matheus Pereira Lobo

We propose as a hypothesis that quantum superposition can be described by mathematical relations of entanglement.

•Dec 25, 2019•17 citations
Quantum physics has long occupied a space between imagination and reality, captivating scientists and philosophers with its strange, counterintuitive principles: superposition, entanglement, uncertainty, and nonlocality. What once appeared as hypothetical mathematics now manifests in real technologies—lasers, semiconductors, superconductors, atomic clocks, MRI machines, and emerging quantum computers. This mini-review traces the conceptual journey of quantum physics from an abstract theory born in early twentieth-century thought experiments to a practical framework shaping modern engineering, computation, communication, and materials science. It highlights key developments in interpretation, experimental validation, and application, while reflecting on how quantum physics reshapes our understanding of nature, reality, and information. Although quantum mechanics remains philosophically perplexing, it has become a powerful and indispensable foundation for technological innovation. By examining how imaginary constructs transitioned into concrete implementations, this article illustrates the remarkable interplay between theory and experiment that continues to redefine what is possible.
The central part of Everett's formulation of quantum mechanics is a quantum mechanical model of memory and of observation as the recording of information in a memory. To use this model as an answer to the measurement problem, Everett has to assume that a conscious observer can be in a superposition of such memory states and be unaware of it. This assumption has puzzled generations of readers. The fundamental aim of this dissertation is to find a set of simpler assumptions which are sufficient to show that Everett's model is empirically adequate. I argue that Everett's model needs three assumptions to account for the process of observation: an assumption of decoherence of observers as quantum mechanical systems; an assumption of supervenience of mental states (qualities) over quantum mechanical properties; and an assumption about the interpretation of quantum mechanical states in general: quantum mechanical states describe ensembles of states of affairs coexisting in the same system. I argue that the only plausible understanding of such ensembles is as ensembles of possibilities, and that all standard no-collapse interpretations agree in this reading of quantum mechanical states. Their differences can be understood as different theories about what marks the real state within this ensemble, and Everett's theory as the claim that no additional 'mark of reality' is necessary. Using the three assumptions, I argue that introspection cannot determine the objective quantum mechanical state of an observer. Rather, the introspective qualities of a quantum mechanical state can be represented by a (classical) statistical ensemble of subjective states. An analysis of these subjective states and their dynamics leads to the conclusion that they suffice to give empirically correct predictions. The argument for the empirical adequacy of the subjective state entails that knowledge of the objective quantum mechanical state is impossible in principle. Empirical reality for a conscious observer is not described by the objective state, but by a Everettian relative state conditional on the subjective state, and no theoretical 'mark of reality' is necessary for this concept of reality. I compare the resulting concept of reality to Kant's distinction between empirical and transcendental reality.
Within the modern quantum mechanics system, the principle of superposition, instantaneous energy level transition, and the derived discourse of superposed states from Schrödinger's cat have long been mainstream theories for interpreting phenomena in the microscopic field. From the perspective of the inherent motion properties of real particles and the unified physical law of causality, such theoretical expressions show obvious cognitive deviations and logical shortcomings. Based on the actual motion of electrons outside the hydrogen nucleus, this paper clarifies that the energy change of electrons is only a continuous and steady change of orbital scale, without orbital jumping with no trajectory or process. This paper objectively points out that the establishment of special concepts such as superposition state, to a large extent, avoids the exploration of the core mechanism of microscopic motion, deliberately blurs the essential physical contradictions, so as to stabilize the existing theoretical framework and weaken rational discussions from different academic perspectives. Based on a neutral academic perspective, this paper clarifies theoretical deviations, returns to the original laws of material motion, and promotes the research of microscopic physics to the essence of objective reality.