Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

ISTE , Wiley eBooks

Quantum Models

Kamel Ourabah

Published Jan 5, 2024• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In the previous two chapters, we have seen two statistical descriptions of plasmas, and more generally, of complex systems where collective phenomena take place. These two approaches have been developed in a classic framework, that is to say without taking into account principles emanating from quantum mechanics. So, it is natural to ask the following questions: does such a description necessarily have to remain classic or is it possible to extend it to the framework of quantum mechanics? We will see in this chapter that such an extension is indeed possible.

DOI
10.1115/1.862ppe_ch3

Related papers

Logic and Complementarity

T. Bergstein

From the preceding exposition it follows that the quantum statistical representation of an individual atomic system does not imply any renunciation regarding further knowledge about the system. On the contrary the statistical character of quantum physics directly reflects the fundamental non-causal appearance of quantal recordings, and through the discovery of the complementarity of quantal phenomena a complete but necessarily statistical description of the atom has been accomplished. Furthermore quantum physics has afforded a statistical description of macroscopic bodies through their representation as assemblies of huge numbers of identical atomic systems, and, apart from accounting in a more fundamental way for the properties already described in classical physics(the correspondence principle, p. 36), quantum statistics explains several macroscopic phenomena which cannot be understood within the conceptual frame of classical physics only. It must be maintained, however, that when observing the properties of individual atomic objects the macroscopic observational apparatus cannot be represented in terms of atomic constituents because this would destroy the unambiguity of the description. The observational apparatus fulfils its basic function of being the spacetime frame of reference for the quantal recordings precisely through its description in classical physics alone. However, when refraining from the analysis of individual quantal processes it is possible to apply quantum statistics to macroscopic phenomena, that is, the causality of classical physical phenomena can be interpreted in the quantum formalism as the statistical result of the interplay of enormous numbers of atomic processes. It is possible, then, to talk of statistical causality as a fundamental aspect of physical reality.

•Jan 1, 1972•0 citations

Is quantum mechanics complete?

James T. Cushing

When we are presented with apparently bizarre properties of microsystems governed by quantum mechanics (as in our discussion of the double-slit experiment in the previous chapter), we naturally ask whether it might be possible to find another theory, or at least another story to go with the equations, that would make more sense to us. We might seek a theory and a view of fundamental physical processes that would accord more with our classically based, everyday common sense. This typically takes the form of the question of the possibility of the existence of a more detailed description of atomic processes than that afforded by the wave function (that is, by the Copenhagen interpretation of the previous chapter). In this chapter we discuss some of the central interpretive problems of the Copenhagen version of quantum mechanics. Then, in the next two chapters, we look at the severe, general restrictions that are placed on any such completion of quantum mechanics and at one particular extension of quantum mechanics. First, though, we begin here with the struggle that ensued over the status of causality in quantum theory. THE COMPLETENESS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS Although the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (Section 20.4) and the lack of absolute predictive power are an inherent feature of quantum mechanics, there have been attempts to preserve an in principle completely deterministic structure for physics. Even classically, in a macroscopic sample of gas there are so many molecules that it would be hopeless, as a practical matter, to predict the future locations of all these molecules from Newton's laws of motion.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jan 29, 1998•0 citations

Quantum Ensembles

Robert H. Swendsen

This chapter begins Part 4 of the text, which is concerned with quantum statistical mechanics. A brief review of quantum mechanics is followed by an extension of statistical mechanics to include averages over microscopic quantum states.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Mar 1, 2012•0 citations

Higher-order correlations in optical fields

L. Mandeļ, E. Wolf

Introduction In the preceding chapters we have been largely concerned with the simplest coherence effects of optical fields, namely those which depend on the correlation of the field variable at two space-time points ( r 1 , t 1 ) and ( r 2 , t 2 ). As we have seen, these effects include the most elementary coherence phenomena involving interference, diffraction and radiation from fluctuating sources. In this chapter we present an extension of the theory to cover more complicated situations, which have to be described by correlations of higher order, i.e. by correlations of the field variables at more than two space-time points or the expectation values involving various powers and products of the field variables. Situations of this kind have become of considerable importance since the development of the laser and of nonlinear optics. The basic difference between the statistical properties of thermal light and laser light can, in fact, only be understood by going beyond the elementary second-order correlation theory. Many of the higher-order coherence phenomena are most clearly manifest in the photoelectric detection process, which can only be adequately described by the quantum theory of detection or by taking into account the quantum features of the field, both of which will be studied in the succeeding chapters. However, because the field is still described classically in the semi-classical theory of light detection, and also because the classical field description provides a natural stepping stone to the quantum description of field correlations, we will now discuss the general description of field correlations of all orders on the basis of the classical theory of the fluctuating wavefield.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 29, 1995•0 citations

Some basic notions of classical and quantum statistical physics

Daniel I. Khomskii

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 2, 2010•0 citations

Nonequilibrium (quantum)

Alexander Altland, Benjamin D. Simons

In the previous chapter we have seen that departures from equilibrium generate a plethora of new phenomena in statistical physics. While our discussion so far has been limited to classical phenomena, in this chapter we want to ask how quantum mechanics interferes with the conditions of nonequilibrium. Experience shows that, in some cases, nonequilibrium quantum systems can be understood in terms of reasonably straightforward quantization of their classical limits. In others, an interplay of quantum coherence and nonequilibrium driving leads to entirely new phenomena – such as lasing, a paradigm for a steady state nonequilibrium quantum system. At any rate, we have every reason to anticipate that quantum nonequilibrium physics will be as diverse and colourful as its classical counterpart. Even minor departures from equilibrium call for a theoretical description entirely different from the ‘Matsubara formalism’ developed in earlier chapters of this book. The applicability of the latter is rigidly tied to the existence of a quantum grand canonical density operator, the hallmark of a many particle equilibrium system. But how then, can an functional theory of nonequilibrium quantum systems be developed? An obvious idea would be to once more go through the different elements of classical nonequilibrium theory developed in the previous chapter, and subject every one of them to an individual quantization scheme. Luckily, there are more efficient ways to achieve our goal: some decades ago, a many particle formalism suitable to describe nonequilibrium systems under the most general conditions was introduced by Keldysh.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 11, 2010•2 citations
In the previous two chapters, we have seen two statistical descriptions of plasmas, and more generally, of complex systems where collective phenomena take place. These two approaches have been developed in a classic framework, that is to say without taking into account principles emanating from quantum mechanics. So, it is natural to ask the following questions: does such a description necessarily have to remain classic or is it possible to extend it to the framework of quantum mechanics? We will see in this chapter that such an extension is indeed possible.
From the preceding exposition it follows that the quantum statistical representation of an individual atomic system does not imply any renunciation regarding further knowledge about the system. On the contrary the statistical character of quantum physics directly reflects the fundamental non-causal appearance of quantal recordings, and through the discovery of the complementarity of quantal phenomena a complete but necessarily statistical description of the atom has been accomplished. Furthermore quantum physics has afforded a statistical description of macroscopic bodies through their representation as assemblies of huge numbers of identical atomic systems, and, apart from accounting in a more fundamental way for the properties already described in classical physics(the correspondence principle, p. 36), quantum statistics explains several macroscopic phenomena which cannot be understood within the conceptual frame of classical physics only. It must be maintained, however, that when observing the properties of individual atomic objects the macroscopic observational apparatus cannot be represented in terms of atomic constituents because this would destroy the unambiguity of the description. The observational apparatus fulfils its basic function of being the spacetime frame of reference for the quantal recordings precisely through its description in classical physics alone. However, when refraining from the analysis of individual quantal processes it is possible to apply quantum statistics to macroscopic phenomena, that is, the causality of classical physical phenomena can be interpreted in the quantum formalism as the statistical result of the interplay of enormous numbers of atomic processes. It is possible, then, to talk of statistical causality as a fundamental aspect of physical reality.
When we are presented with apparently bizarre properties of microsystems governed by quantum mechanics (as in our discussion of the double-slit experiment in the previous chapter), we naturally ask whether it might be possible to find another theory, or at least another story to go with the equations, that would make more sense to us. We might seek a theory and a view of fundamental physical processes that would accord more with our classically based, everyday common sense. This typically takes the form of the question of the possibility of the existence of a more detailed description of atomic processes than that afforded by the wave function (that is, by the Copenhagen interpretation of the previous chapter). In this chapter we discuss some of the central interpretive problems of the Copenhagen version of quantum mechanics. Then, in the next two chapters, we look at the severe, general restrictions that are placed on any such completion of quantum mechanics and at one particular extension of quantum mechanics. First, though, we begin here with the struggle that ensued over the status of causality in quantum theory. THE COMPLETENESS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS Although the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (Section 20.4) and the lack of absolute predictive power are an inherent feature of quantum mechanics, there have been attempts to preserve an in principle completely deterministic structure for physics. Even classically, in a macroscopic sample of gas there are so many molecules that it would be hopeless, as a practical matter, to predict the future locations of all these molecules from Newton's laws of motion.
Introduction In the preceding chapters we have been largely concerned with the simplest coherence effects of optical fields, namely those which depend on the correlation of the field variable at two space-time points ( r 1 , t 1 ) and ( r 2 , t 2 ). As we have seen, these effects include the most elementary coherence phenomena involving interference, diffraction and radiation from fluctuating sources. In this chapter we present an extension of the theory to cover more complicated situations, which have to be described by correlations of higher order, i.e. by correlations of the field variables at more than two space-time points or the expectation values involving various powers and products of the field variables. Situations of this kind have become of considerable importance since the development of the laser and of nonlinear optics. The basic difference between the statistical properties of thermal light and laser light can, in fact, only be understood by going beyond the elementary second-order correlation theory. Many of the higher-order coherence phenomena are most clearly manifest in the photoelectric detection process, which can only be adequately described by the quantum theory of detection or by taking into account the quantum features of the field, both of which will be studied in the succeeding chapters. However, because the field is still described classically in the semi-classical theory of light detection, and also because the classical field description provides a natural stepping stone to the quantum description of field correlations, we will now discuss the general description of field correlations of all orders on the basis of the classical theory of the fluctuating wavefield.
In the previous chapter we have seen that departures from equilibrium generate a plethora of new phenomena in statistical physics. While our discussion so far has been limited to classical phenomena, in this chapter we want to ask how quantum mechanics interferes with the conditions of nonequilibrium. Experience shows that, in some cases, nonequilibrium quantum systems can be understood in terms of reasonably straightforward quantization of their classical limits. In others, an interplay of quantum coherence and nonequilibrium driving leads to entirely new phenomena – such as lasing, a paradigm for a steady state nonequilibrium quantum system. At any rate, we have every reason to anticipate that quantum nonequilibrium physics will be as diverse and colourful as its classical counterpart. Even minor departures from equilibrium call for a theoretical description entirely different from the ‘Matsubara formalism’ developed in earlier chapters of this book. The applicability of the latter is rigidly tied to the existence of a quantum grand canonical density operator, the hallmark of a many particle equilibrium system. But how then, can an functional theory of nonequilibrium quantum systems be developed? An obvious idea would be to once more go through the different elements of classical nonequilibrium theory developed in the previous chapter, and subject every one of them to an individual quantization scheme. Luckily, there are more efficient ways to achieve our goal: some decades ago, a many particle formalism suitable to describe nonequilibrium systems under the most general conditions was introduced by Keldysh.