This article is dedicated to the 100th anniversary of quantum mechanics, and in particular to electron spin Ð a phenomenon that has no counterpart in classical physics.The hypothesis of electron spin was proposed by Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit in 1925±1926 to explain numerous experimental data.Two years later, Dirac discovered the existence of electron spin when constructing the relativistic wave equation for a free particle.This came as a great surprise to Dirac, since, as he later claimed (in 1977), his goal was to obtain a relativistic wave equation for the simplest particle, which he considered to be a particle with zero spin.But it turned out that the simplest particle is one with spin 1a2.
This article is dedicated to the 100th anniversary of quantum mechanics, and in particular to electron spin Ð a phenomenon that has no counterpart in classical physics.The hypothesis of electron spin was proposed by Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit in 1925±1926 to explain numerous experimental data.Two years later, Dirac discovered the existence of electron spin when constructing the relativistic wave equation for a free particle.This came as a great surprise to Dirac, since, as he later claimed (in 1977), his goal was to obtain a relativistic wave equation for the simplest particle, which he considered to be a particle with zero spin.But it turned out that the simplest particle is one with spin 1a2.
‘Spin’ considers the movement of electrons orbiting around the nucleus of an atom. Physicists such as Wolfgang Pauli, Pieter Zeeman, Ralph Kronig, George Uhlenbeck, Samuel Goudsmit, Llewellyn Thomas, Otto Stern, and Walther Gerlach spent many years trying to solve the puzzle of electron spin through different experiments. The mathematical theory of spin began to be developed in the 1920s, but it was the work of Paul Dirac in 1928 that solved the problem. By fusing relativity and quantum mechanics, the two great products of the early 20th-century revolution in physics, Dirac had assembled an equation that describes the origin of spin, the fundamental element of the magnetism of the electron.
Most students of science and engineering know that every elementary particle, such as electrons, neutrons, photons, neutrinos, etc., has a quantum mechanical property called “spin” which can be measured (perhaps not easily, but at least in principle) and has a quantized value, including zero. The vast majority of these students mentally visualize spin as the angular momentum associated with the elementary particle spinning or rotating about its own axis (like a top or a planetary object). This mental picture, although convenient and comforting, is actually somewhat crude and certainly incomplete. Landau and Lifshitz, in their classic textbook on quantum mechanics [1], wrote “[the spin] property of elementary particles is peculiar to quantum theory. [It] has no classical interpretation... It would be wholly meaningless to imagine the ‘intrinsic’ angular momentum of an elementary particle as being the result of its rotation about its own axis.” The simplistic notion of self-rotation about an axis, shown in Fig. 1.1, can- not explain many features of spin, such as why its magnitude cannot assume continuous values and why it is quantized to certain specific values. It also causes serious problems if taken too literally. As we will see later (Problem 1.2), if we think of an electron as a solid sphere of radius equal to the Lorentz radius e2/(4πǫ0m0c 2) (where e is the electron’s charge, m0 is the mass, c is the speed of light in vacuum, and ǫ0 is the dielectric constant of vacuum), then the velocity on the surface of a rotating electron would have to be many times the velocity of light in vacuum if such a rotation were to generate an angular momentum equal to the electron’s spin. Obviously that would not be permitted by the theory of relativity. Indeed, a deep understanding of quantum mechanics is required to understand how the spin property comes about. Its origin is in relativistic quantum mechanics and really was first appreciated by Paul Andrew Maurice Dirac when he derived the Dirac equation which is the cornerstone of relativistic quantum mechanics. Richard Feynman, noted for his distaste for mysticism in physics, wrote about the notion of “spin”: “It appears to be one of the few places in physics where there is a rule which can be stated very simply, but for which no one has found a simple and easy explanation. The explanation is down deep in relativistic quantum mechanics.
Despite the success of the Dirac equation, the incorporation of the special theory of relativity into quantum mechanics predicts some paradoxes, like that the spin prediction from Dirac equation can be only identified with non- relativistic approximations (Pauli and Foldy-Wouthysen), as well as the spin predication is a relativistic quantum phenomena because the spin prediction is a necessary requirement of the relativistic quantum mechanics only. In this paper we show that the derivation of the spin and its magnetic moment can be done with a pure classical treatment. Since we start from the classical physical laws and the classical relativity principle to get the linear Schrödinger equation as a result the derivation of the spin and its magnetic moment can be done with a pure classical treatment. This approach result a Schrödinger equation, in which we show that the spin of the electron is a non relativistic quantum phenomenon too.
First, the experimental foundations for the existence of a new dynamical variable, the spin of particles, are presented. The Pauli equation is then derived in detail, two applications are given and the energy levels of a particle with spin in a constant magnetic field are studied. This is the analysis of Landau levels, which can be performed by using the known results on the spectrum of harmonic oscillators. In this chapter we also study in detail the addition of orbital angular momentum and spin, as well as the spin–orbit interaction with the resulting Thomas precession. Stern-Gerlach experiment and electron spin The hypothesis that the electron has an intrinsic magnetic moment and an angular momentum, in short a spin , was first suggested in Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit (1926). They noticed, even before the discovery of quantum mechanics, that a complete description of spectra was not possible unless a magnetic moment and a mechanical moment were ascribed to the electron, and hence the concept of an electron as a point charge was insufficient. First, let us therefore try to understand how a magnetic moment can be associated to an atomic system. For this purpose, consider for simplicity the Bohr model of an hydrogen atom, where the electron moves along a circular orbit and rotates with orbital angular momentum L .
In the introductory remarks to Chapter 5 mention was made of the 1925 proposal of Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit that to an electron there should be assigned an intrinsic angular momentum or spin S = (S x , S y , S z )—this in addition to its quantum angular momentum (or orbital angular momentum) M = (M x , M y , M z ) defined in (5.4.4). This is not to be taken to mean that an electron actually spins about an axis in some physical way. Experiments (in particular the noted Stern-Gerlach experiment) have provided adequate justification for the proposed concept of spin, a proposal also made by R. Bichowsky and H. Urey. Dirac has shown that the notion of spin is necessary if quantum mechanics and Einstein relativity are to be consistent theories. Chemical properties of atoms, and their ability to combine and form molecules, the splitting of spectral lines by a magnetic field applied to an atom (i.e., the Zeeman effect, which we discuss later), all depend on this important notion.