We present a unified theoretical framework based on a scalar temporal field to describe foundational quantum phenomena, including double-slit interference, the Quantum Zeno Effect, and delayed choice experiments. The dynamics of the field are governed by temporal stiffness and spatial rigidity , with the ratio naturally determining whether the system exhibits wave-like coherence or particle-like localization. Wave–particle duality, decoherence, and delayed choice behavior emerge dynamically from this single field model, providing a consistent interpretation of quantum measurement and superposition without invoking external collapse postulates or retrocausality. This approach offers a coherent, dynamical explanation for seemingly paradoxical quantum effects in a fully classical-looking Lagrangian framework.
We present a unified theoretical framework based on a scalar temporal field to describe foundational quantum phenomena, including double-slit interference, the Quantum Zeno Effect, and delayed choice experiments. The dynamics of the field are governed by temporal stiffness and spatial rigidity , with the ratio naturally determining whether the system exhibits wave-like coherence or particle-like localization. Wave–particle duality, decoherence, and delayed choice behavior emerge dynamically from this single field model, providing a consistent interpretation of quantum measurement and superposition without invoking external collapse postulates or retrocausality. This approach offers a coherent, dynamical explanation for seemingly paradoxical quantum effects in a fully classical-looking Lagrangian framework.
We present a unified theoretical framework based on a scalar temporal field to describe foundational quantum phenomena: double-slit interference, quantum eraser, delayed choice, and the Quantum Zeno Effect. The dynamics are governed by temporal stiffness and spatial rigidity . Wave-like or particle-like behavior emerges naturally from the ratio without invoking external collapse postulates. This framework allows quantitative predictions, a dynamical interpretation of measurement and superposition, and offers new insights into quantum decoherence and control of quantum states.
This work presents a unified, interpretive account of quantum interference and delayed-choice experiments that applies equally to photons and massive particles. Rather than invoking spacetime trajectories, wave–particle duality, retrocausality, or collapse postulates, the paper locates quantum interference in the coherent evolution of internal, pre-geometric degrees of freedom defined over classical spacetime. Within this framework, “which-path” questions are not merely unanswered but fundamentally ill-posed: interference arises from global coherence of an internal field subject to experimental boundary conditions, while spacetime itself remains single-valued and classical at laboratory scales. The approach reproduces all standard quantum-mechanical predictions without modification and is explicitly interpretive rather than predictive. A central result is a unified explanation of why interference occurs across disparate physical systems—photons, electrons, atoms, and molecules—while decoherence manifests through system-dependent physical mechanisms. Photons and massive particles differ in how internal coherence is lost (e.g., electromagnetic absorption versus collisional and thermal interactions), but not in the underlying principle. Delayed-choice experiments are reinterpreted without paradox: changes to the apparatus modify boundary conditions for the internal field rather than retroactively altering particle histories. By removing spacetime paths from the fundamental ontology, the framework offers a consistent, path-free account of interference, decoherence, and localized detection that preserves the empirical success of quantum mechanics while clarifying its conceptual foundations.
Traditional quantum mechanics interprets double-slit interference, delayed-choice experiment, quantum eraser experiment, and quantum Zeno effect as fundamental counter-intuitive characteristics of microscopic quantum systems. The conventional framework relies on wave-particle duality, abstract wavefunction collapse, observer-dependent quantum state switching, and information-dominated physical behavior. This paper abandons the traditional assumption of empty vacuum and wave-particle duality. Based on the discrete, elastic, compressible KuiQuark sea medium model, we provide a fully classical, deterministic, mechanical unification of the four core quantum interference phenomena. All quantum paradoxes are eliminated completely. The so-called quantum wave behavior is not an intrinsic property of microscopic particles, but a macroscopic statistical effect induced by particle-excited medium secondary waves and medium ordered structures in vacuum. We further classify two independent physical mechanisms of interference: multi-photon strong-light interference originates from the superposition of helical trajectories of real photon spherical shell clusters, while single-electron sequential interference originates purely from the coherent superposition of KuiQuark medium secondary waves. The delayed-choice effect contains no retro-causality; it only destroys the existing ordered medium channel field after the particle has passed the slit. The quantum eraser effect is a precise mechanical reverse compensation of medium deformation, realizing reversible recovery of medium coherence. The quantum Zeno effect is a dual mechanical locking mechanism: continuous high-frequency detection disrupts balanced medium distribution and forms large-scale reverse medium impact force, which counteracts the forward kinetic energy of particles and freezes microscopic evolution. This study fundamentally eliminates the non-classical hypothesis of traditional quantum mechanics and provides a new deterministic medium-based physical foundation for microscopic interference and quantum observation effects.
This paper presents an observational analysis of the Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser experiment through the framework of quantum mechanics. The Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser, a variation of the classic double-slit experiment, demonstrates the intricate relationship between quantum measurement, wave-particle duality, and the temporal ordering of observations. By utilizing the principles of quantum superposition, entanglement, and the non-local collapse of the wave function, we seek to rationalize the counterintuitive outcomes observed in the experiment. Specifically, we explore how the act of measurement retroactively influences the observed behavior of particles, depending on whether or not the which-path information is available. Our analysis underscores the significance of the quantum mechanical concept of wave function collapse across spacetime, providing a deeper understanding of how quantum mechanics reconciles the delayed-choice paradox.
This project presents a conceptual reinterpretation of wave–particle phenomena in quantum experiments by introducing a relational-temporal perspective on measurement and event formation. Rather than treating wave-like and particle-like behavior as competing ontological properties of quantum entities, the framework distinguishes between extended relational amplitude structures and localized measurement events. Interference phenomena are interpreted as manifestations of relational structures distributed across spacetime, while particle detections are understood as temporally stabilized events emerging through measurement interactions. By reviewing key experimental paradigms—including double-slit interference, which-path experiments, quantum erasers, weak measurements, and decoherence—the study demonstrates that many apparent paradoxes of quantum mechanics arise from classical assumptions about intrinsic properties and time as an external background parameter. Without modifying the formalism of quantum theory, the relational-temporal interpretation offers a physically conservative framework that reframes wave–particle duality as a distinction between structure and event rather than a dual ontology of physical objects.
This review paper examines foundational quantum experiments—such as the double-slit experiment, quantum erasers, weak measurements, and decoherence studies—through the lens of relational temporality. Rather than interpreting wave–particle duality as evidence for two competing ontological states, the paper proposes a conceptual shift: experimental results are better understood as distinguishing between relational structures extended across time and localized events that emerge through temporal fixation during measurement. By treating time as a relational process and measurement as a temporally constitutive interaction, several well-known paradoxes in quantum foundations can be reinterpreted without modifying the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics. The review integrates insights from quantum theory, dynamical systems, and relational models of time to propose a coherent framework in which interference phenomena reflect temporally distributed relational structures, while particle-like detections correspond to stabilized events. This perspective suggests that many conceptual difficulties in quantum mechanics arise not from the theory itself but from classical assumptions about objects, intrinsic properties, and time as a passive background.