Is the QAOA the Ultimate Solution for the MaxCut problem?

The design of fast algorithms for combinatorial optimization greatly contributes to a plethora of domains such as logistics, finance, and chemistry. Quantum approximate optimization algorithms (QAOAs), which utilize the power of quantum machines and inherit the spirit of adiabatic evolution, are approaches to tackle combinatorial problems with potential runtime speedups. However, hurdled by the limited quantum resources nowadays, QAOAs are infeasible to manipulate large-scale problems. To address this issue, here we revisit the MaxCut problem via the divide-and-conquer heuristic: seek the solutions of subgraphs in parallel and then merge these solutions to obtain the global solution. Because of the ${\mathbb{Z}}_{2}$ symmetry in MaxCut, we prove that the merging process can be further cast into a new MaxCut problem and thus be addressed by QAOAs or other MaxCut solvers. In view of this, we propose QAOA-in-QAOA ( ${\mathrm{QAOA}}^{2}$ ) to solve arbitrary large-scale MaxCut problems using small quantum machines. We also prove that the performance of ${\mathrm{QAOA}}^{2}$ is lower bounded with respect to the divide-and-conquer process. Experiment results illustrate that, under different graph settings, ${\mathrm{QAOA}}^{2}$ attains a competitive or even better performance over classical algorithms when the node count is around $2000$ . Our method can be seamlessly embedded into other advanced strategies to enhance the capability of QAOAs in large-scale combinatorial optimization problems.The design of fast algorithms for combinatorial optimization greatly contributes to a plethora of domains such as logistics, finance, and chemistry. Quantum approximate optimization algorithms (QAOAs), which utilize the power of quantum machines and inherit the spirit of adiabatic evolution, are approaches to tackle combinatorial problems with potential runtime speedups. However, hurdled by the limited quantum resources nowadays, QAOAs are infeasible to manipulate large-scale problems. To address this issue, here we revisit the MaxCut problem via the divide-and-conquer heuristic: seek the solutions of subgraphs in parallel and then merge these solutions to obtain the global solution. Because of the ${\mathbb{Z}}_{2}$ symmetry in MaxCut, we prove that the merging process can be further cast into a new MaxCut problem and thus be addressed by QAOAs or other MaxCut solvers. In view of this, we propose QAOA-in-QAOA (${\mathrm{QAOA}}^{2}$) to solve arbitrary large-scale MaxCut problems using small quantum machines. We also prove that the performance of ${\mathrm{QAOA}}^{2}$ is lower bounded with respect to the divide-and-conquer process. Experiment results illustrate that, under different graph settings, ${\mathrm{QAOA}}^{2}$ attains a competitive or even better performance over classical algorithms when the node count is around $2000$. Our method can be seamlessly embedded into other advanced strategies to enhance the capability of QAOAs in large-scale combinatorial optimization problems.

arXiv:2205.11762Physical Review AppliedFeb 9, 202377 citations

Impact of graph structures for QAOA on MaxCut

Rebekah Herrman, Lorna Treffert, James Ostrowski +3 more

arXiv:2102.05997Quantum Information ProcessingSep 1, 202139 citations

Small graph perturbations, QAOA, and the MaxCut problem

Leonardo Lavagna, Simone Piperno, Andrea Ceschini +1 more

We investigate the Maximum Cut (MaxCut) problem on different graph classes with the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) using symmetries. In particular, heuristics on the relationship between graph symmetries and the approximation ratio achieved by a QAOA simulation are considered. To do so, we first solve the MaxCut problem on well-known graphs, then we consider simple and controllable perturbations of the graph and find again the approximate MaxCut with the QAOA. Through an analysis of the spectrum of the graphs and their perturbations, as well as a careful study of the associated automorphism groups, we aim to extract valuable insight into how symmetry impacts the performance of QAOA. These insights can then be leveraged to heuristically reduce the quantum circuit complexity, the number of training steps, or the number of parameters involved, thus enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of QAOA-based solutions.We investigate the Maximum Cut (MaxCut) problem on different graph classes with the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) using symmetries. In particular, heuristics on the relationship between graph symmetries and the approximation ratio achieved by a QAOA simulation are considered. To do so, we first solve the MaxCut problem on well-known graphs, then we consider simple and controllable perturbations of the graph and find again the approximate MaxCut with the QAOA. Through an analysis of the spectrum of the graphs and their perturbations, as well as a careful study of the associated automorphism groups, we aim to extract valuable insight into how symmetry impacts the performance of QAOA. These insights can then be leveraged to heuristically reduce the quantum circuit complexity, the number of training steps, or the number of parameters involved, thus enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of QAOA-based solutions.

arXiv:2408.15413AVS Quantum ScienceOct 14, 20253 citations

Beyond quantum annealing: optimal control solutions to maxcut problems

Giovanni Pecci, Ruiyi Wang, Pietro Torta +2 more

Abstract Quantum Annealing (QA) relies on mixing two Hamiltonian terms, a simple driver and a complex problem Hamiltonian, in a linear combination. The time-dependent schedule for this mixing is often taken to be linear in time: improving on this linear choice is known to be essential and has proven to be difficult. Here, we present different techniques for improving on the linear-schedule QA along two directions, conceptually distinct but leading to similar outcomes: 1) the first approach consists of constructing a Trotter-digitized QA (dQA) with schedules parameterized in terms of Fourier modes or Chebyshev polynomials, inspired by the Chopped Random Basis algorithm for optimal control in continuous time; 2) the second approach is technically a Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), whose solutions are found iteratively using linear interpolation or expansion in Fourier modes. Both approaches emphasize finding smooth optimal schedule parameters, ultimately leading to hybrid quantum–classical variational algorithms of the alternating Hamiltonian Ansatz type. We apply these techniques to MaxCut problems on weighted 3-regular graphs with N = 14 sites, focusing on hard instances that exhibit a small spectral gap, for which a standard linear-schedule QA performs poorly. We characterize the physics behind the optimal protocols for both the dQA and QAOA approaches, discovering shortcuts to adiabaticity -like dynamics. Furthermore, we study the transferability of such smooth solutions among hard instances of MaxCut at different circuit depths. Finally, we show that the smoothness pattern of these protocols obtained in a digital setting enables us to adapt them to continuous-time evolution, contrarily to generic non-smooth solutions. This procedure results in an optimized QA schedule that is implementable on analog devices.Abstract Quantum Annealing (QA) relies on mixing two Hamiltonian terms, a simple driver and a complex problem Hamiltonian, in a linear combination. The time-dependent schedule for this mixing is often taken to be linear in time: improving on this linear choice is known to be essential and has proven to be difficult. Here, we present different techniques for improving on the linear-schedule QA along two directions, conceptually distinct but leading to similar outcomes: 1) the first approach consists of constructing a Trotter-digitized QA (dQA) with schedules parameterized in terms of Fourier modes or Chebyshev polynomials, inspired by the Chopped Random Basis algorithm for optimal control in continuous time; 2) the second approach is technically a Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), whose solutions are found iteratively using linear interpolation or expansion in Fourier modes. Both approaches emphasize finding smooth optimal schedule parameters, ultimately leading to hybrid quantum–classical variational algorithms of the alternating Hamiltonian Ansatz type. We apply these techniques to MaxCut problems on weighted 3-regular graphs with N = 14 sites, focusing on hard instances that exhibit a small spectral gap, for which a standard linear-schedule QA performs poorly. We characterize the physics behind the optimal protocols for both the dQA and QAOA approaches, discovering shortcuts to adiabaticity -like dynamics. Furthermore, we study the transferability of such smooth solutions among hard instances of MaxCut at different circuit depths. Finally, we show that the smoothness pattern of these protocols obtained in a digital setting enables us to adapt them to continuous-time evolution, contrarily to generic non-smooth solutions. This procedure results in an optimized QA schedule that is implementable on analog devices.

arXiv:2405.08630Quantum Science and TechnologyJul 9, 20248 citations

{\mathbb{Z}}_{2}

symmetry in MaxCut, we prove that the merging process can be further cast into a new MaxCut problem and thus be addressed by QAOAs or other MaxCut solvers. In view of this, we propose QAOA-in-QAOA (

{\mathrm{QAOA}}^{2}

) to solve arbitrary large-scale MaxCut problems using small quantum machines. We also prove that the performance of

{\mathrm{QAOA}}^{2}

is lower bounded with respect to the divide-and-conquer process. Experiment results illustrate that, under different graph settings,

{\mathrm{QAOA}}^{2}

attains a competitive or even better performance over classical algorithms when the node count is around

2000

. Our method can be seamlessly embedded into other advanced strategies to enhance the capability of QAOAs in large-scale combinatorial optimization problems.