Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2102.05997 · Quantum Information Processing

Impact of graph structures for QAOA on MaxCut

Rebekah Herrman, Lorna Treffert, James Ostrowski, Phillip C. Lotshaw, Travis S. Humble, George Siopsis

Published Sep 1, 2021• 39 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s11128-021-03232-8

Related papers

Small graph perturbations, QAOA, and the MaxCut problem

Leonardo Lavagna, Simone Piperno, Andrea Ceschini +1 more

We investigate the Maximum Cut (MaxCut) problem on different graph classes with the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) using symmetries. In particular, heuristics on the relationship between graph symmetries and the approximation ratio achieved by a QAOA simulation are considered. To do so, we first solve the MaxCut problem on well-known graphs, then we consider simple and controllable perturbations of the graph and find again the approximate MaxCut with the QAOA. Through an analysis of the spectrum of the graphs and their perturbations, as well as a careful study of the associated automorphism groups, we aim to extract valuable insight into how symmetry impacts the performance of QAOA. These insights can then be leveraged to heuristically reduce the quantum circuit complexity, the number of training steps, or the number of parameters involved, thus enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of QAOA-based solutions.

arXiv:2408.15413•AVS Quantum Science•Oct 14, 2025•3 citations

Postprocessing Optimisation Algorithms for QAOA in MaxCut Problem

Emanouil I. Atanassov, Aleksandar Kirilov, Mariya K. Durchova +1 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Quantum approximate optimization algorithms for maximum cut on low-girth graphs

Tongyang Li, Yan‐Kun Su, Ziyi Yang +1 more

Abstract Maximum cut (MaxCut) on graphs is a classic NP-hard problem. In quantum computing, Farhi, Gutmann, and Goldstone proposed the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) for solving the MaxCut problem. Its guarantee on cut fraction (the fraction of edges in the output cut over all edges) was mainly studied for high-girth graphs, i.e., graphs with only long cycles. On the other hand, low-girth graphs are ubiquitous in theoretical computer science, including expander graphs being outstanding examples with wide applications in theory and beyond. In this paper, we apply QAOA to MaxCut on a set of expander graphs proposed by Mohanty and O'Donnell known as additive product graphs. Additionally, we apply multi-angle QAOA (ma-QAOA) to better utilize the graph structure of additive product graphs in ansatz design. In theory, we derive an iterative formula to calculate the expected cut fraction of such graphs. This formula also extends to the quantum MaxCut problem. On the other hand, we conduct numerical experiments to compare between best-known classical local algorithms and QAOA with constant depth. Our results demonstrate that QAOA outperforms the best-known classical algorithms by 0.3% to 5.2% on several additive product graphs, while ma-QAOA further enhances this advantage by an additional 0.6% to 2.5%. In particular, we observe cases that ma-QAOA exhibits superiority over best-known classical algorithms but QAOA does not. Furthermore, we extend our experiments to planar graphs such as tiling grid graphs, where QAOA also demonstrates an advantage.

arXiv:2410.04409•Physical Review Research•May 28, 2025•3 citations

Is the QAOA the Ultimate Solution for the MaxCut problem?

L. Lavagna, F. De Falco, M. Panella

•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

QAOA Performance Benchmarks using Max-Cut

Jonathan Ward, Johannes Otterbach, Gavin E. Crooks +2 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 8, 2018•5 citations

From Problem-Structured QAOA to Problem-Agnostic Variational MaxCut Solvers: Representation, Redundancy, and Optimization Landscapes

Leonardo Lavagna, Massimo Panella

Variational quantum optimization provides a useful setting for examining how circuit structure, parameterization, and trainability interact in practice. Objectives: Among the most promising variational quantum algorithms, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) depends critically on circuit architecture, but greater circuit complexity does not necessarily lead to easier optimization or better solutions. Using the Maximum Cut (MaxCut) problem on graphs as a controlled setting, we investigate how variational behavior changes as problem-specific QAOA structure is progressively removed, with particular attention to representational capacity, optimization geometry, and finite-budget trainability. Methods: We analytically characterize a graph-agnostic product-state formulation of MaxCut and derive exact equivalences, redundancies, and local-landscape properties. These results motivate a controlled comparison among separable product ansätze, a representative graphagnostic entangling circuit, and graph-structured QAOA at several depths, including a parameter-count-matched control. The numerical benchmark comprises 95 small unweighted graph instances optimized under a common objective-evaluation budget. Results: The product-state formulation preserves the exact discrete MaxCut optimum, while its strict local maxima correspond to classical cuts that are stable under singlevertex flips. Redundant phase parameters increase optimization effort without enlarging the objective-relevant family. Under the prescribed optimization budget, the productstate ansatz attains higher average solution quality than the tested QAOA depths while requiring substantially fewer objective evaluations. The graph-agnostic entangling comparator provides no consistent advantage over the separable baseline, and a simple classical local-search method remains highly competitive. Conclusion: In the regime considered here, objective-relevant parameterization and optimization geometry can be as important as circuit richness.

Applied Mathematics and Statistics•Oct 13, 2026•0 citations
We investigate the Maximum Cut (MaxCut) problem on different graph classes with the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) using symmetries. In particular, heuristics on the relationship between graph symmetries and the approximation ratio achieved by a QAOA simulation are considered. To do so, we first solve the MaxCut problem on well-known graphs, then we consider simple and controllable perturbations of the graph and find again the approximate MaxCut with the QAOA. Through an analysis of the spectrum of the graphs and their perturbations, as well as a careful study of the associated automorphism groups, we aim to extract valuable insight into how symmetry impacts the performance of QAOA. These insights can then be leveraged to heuristically reduce the quantum circuit complexity, the number of training steps, or the number of parameters involved, thus enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of QAOA-based solutions.
Abstract Maximum cut (MaxCut) on graphs is a classic NP-hard problem. In quantum computing, Farhi, Gutmann, and Goldstone proposed the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) for solving the MaxCut problem. Its guarantee on cut fraction (the fraction of edges in the output cut over all edges) was mainly studied for high-girth graphs, i.e., graphs with only long cycles. On the other hand, low-girth graphs are ubiquitous in theoretical computer science, including expander graphs being outstanding examples with wide applications in theory and beyond. In this paper, we apply QAOA to MaxCut on a set of expander graphs proposed by Mohanty and O'Donnell known as additive product graphs. Additionally, we apply multi-angle QAOA (ma-QAOA) to better utilize the graph structure of additive product graphs in ansatz design. In theory, we derive an iterative formula to calculate the expected cut fraction of such graphs. This formula also extends to the quantum MaxCut problem. On the other hand, we conduct numerical experiments to compare between best-known classical local algorithms and QAOA with constant depth. Our results demonstrate that QAOA outperforms the best-known classical algorithms by 0.3% to 5.2% on several additive product graphs, while ma-QAOA further enhances this advantage by an additional 0.6% to 2.5%. In particular, we observe cases that ma-QAOA exhibits superiority over best-known classical algorithms but QAOA does not. Furthermore, we extend our experiments to planar graphs such as tiling grid graphs, where QAOA also demonstrates an advantage.
Variational quantum optimization provides a useful setting for examining how circuit structure, parameterization, and trainability interact in practice. Objectives: Among the most promising variational quantum algorithms, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) depends critically on circuit architecture, but greater circuit complexity does not necessarily lead to easier optimization or better solutions. Using the Maximum Cut (MaxCut) problem on graphs as a controlled setting, we investigate how variational behavior changes as problem-specific QAOA structure is progressively removed, with particular attention to representational capacity, optimization geometry, and finite-budget trainability. Methods: We analytically characterize a graph-agnostic product-state formulation of MaxCut and derive exact equivalences, redundancies, and local-landscape properties. These results motivate a controlled comparison among separable product ansätze, a representative graphagnostic entangling circuit, and graph-structured QAOA at several depths, including a parameter-count-matched control. The numerical benchmark comprises 95 small unweighted graph instances optimized under a common objective-evaluation budget. Results: The product-state formulation preserves the exact discrete MaxCut optimum, while its strict local maxima correspond to classical cuts that are stable under singlevertex flips. Redundant phase parameters increase optimization effort without enlarging the objective-relevant family. Under the prescribed optimization budget, the productstate ansatz attains higher average solution quality than the tested QAOA depths while requiring substantially fewer objective evaluations. The graph-agnostic entangling comparator provides no consistent advantage over the separable baseline, and a simple classical local-search method remains highly competitive. Conclusion: In the regime considered here, objective-relevant parameterization and optimization geometry can be as important as circuit richness.