Markov categories allow formalization of probabilistic and causal reasoning in a general setting that applies uniformly to many different kinds of classical probabilistic processes. It has so far been challenging, however, to generalize these techniques to reasoning about quantum processes, as the quantum no-cloning theorem forbids "copy" maps of the sort that have been used to axiomatize conditional independence, and the related notions of complete common causes and Markovianity, in classical Bayesian networks. Here, we introduce a new categorical notion of Markovian causal model, according to which a distinguished subcategory of "common cause" maps plays a similar role to that of "copy" maps in the categorical formulation of Bayesian networks. Moreover, defining causal models as second-order processes yields a clean and flexible formulation of interventions. Our formalism is both rich enough to handle "complete common cause" assumptions and general enough to encompass not only standard classical causal identification scenarios, but also quantum causal scenarios and new kinds of classical causal identification based on imperfect observations. Furthermore, we show that one can reason uniformly across all of these cases using string-diagrammatic techniques.
Markov categories allow formalization of probabilistic and causal reasoning in a general setting that applies uniformly to many different kinds of classical probabilistic processes. It has so far been challenging, however, to generalize these techniques to reasoning about quantum processes, as the quantum no-cloning theorem forbids "copy" maps of the sort that have been used to axiomatize conditional independence, and the related notions of complete common causes and Markovianity, in classical Bayesian networks. Here, we introduce a new categorical notion of Markovian causal model, according to which a distinguished subcategory of "common cause" maps plays a similar role to that of "copy" maps in the categorical formulation of Bayesian networks. Moreover, defining causal models as second-order processes yields a clean and flexible formulation of interventions. Our formalism is both rich enough to handle "complete common cause" assumptions and general enough to encompass not only standard classical causal identification scenarios, but also quantum causal scenarios and new kinds of classical causal identification based on imperfect observations. Furthermore, we show that one can reason uniformly across all of these cases using string-diagrammatic techniques.
Markov categories allow formalization of probabilistic and causal reasoning in a general setting that applies uniformly to many different kinds of classical probabilistic processes. It has so far been challenging, however, to generalize these techniques to reasoning about quantum processes, as the quantum no-cloning theorem forbids "copy" maps of the sort that have been used to axiomatize conditional independence, and the related notions of complete common causes and Markovianity, in classical Bayesian networks. Here, we introduce a new categorical notion of Markovian causal model, according to which a distinguished subcategory of "common cause" maps plays a similar role to that of "copy" maps in the categorical formulation of Bayesian networks. Moreover, defining causal models as second-order processes yields a clean and flexible formulation of interventions. Our formalism is both rich enough to handle "complete common cause" assumptions and general enough to encompass not only standard classical causal identification scenarios, but also quantum causal scenarios and new kinds of classical causal identification based on imperfect observations. Furthermore, we show that one can reason uniformly across all of these cases using string-diagrammatic techniques.
Though the topic of causal inference is typically considered in the context of classical statistical models, recent years have seen great interest in extending causal inference techniques to quantum and generalized theories. Causal identification is a type of causal inference problem concerned with recovering from observational data and qualitative assumptions the causal mechanisms generating the data, and hence the effects of hypothetical interventions. A major obstacle to a theory of causal identification in the quantum setting is the question of what should play the role of "observational data," as any means of extracting data at a certain locus will almost certainly disturb the system. Hence, one might think a priori that quantum measurements are already too much like interventions, so that the problem of causal identification trivializes. This is not the case. Fixing a limited class of quantum instruments (namely the class of all projective measurements) to play the role of "observations," we note that as in the classical setting, there exist scenarios for which causal identification is not possible. We then present sufficient conditions for quantum causal identification, starting with a quantum analogue of the well-known "front-door criterion" and finishing with a broader class of scenarios for which the effect of a single intervention is identifiable. These results emerge from generalizing the process-theoretic account of classical causal inference due to Jacobs, Kissinger, and Zanasi beyond the setting of Markov categories, and thereby treating the classical and quantum problems uniformly.
It is known that the classical framework of causal models is not general enough to allow for causal reasoning about quantum systems. While the framework has been generalized in a variety of different ways to the quantum case, much of this work leaves open whether causal concepts are fundamental to quantum theory, or only find application at an emergent level of classical devices and measurement outcomes. Here, we present a framework of quantum causal models, with causal relations defined in terms intrinsic to quantum theory, and the central object of study being the quantum process itself. Following Allen et al., Phys. Rev. X 7, 031021 (2017), the approach defines quantum causal relations in terms of unitary evolution, in a way analogous to an approach to classical causal models that assumes underlying determinism and situates causal relations in functional dependences between variables. We show that any unitary quantum circuit has a causal structure corresponding to a directed acyclic graph, and that when marginalising over local noise sources, the resulting quantum process satisfies a Markov condition with respect to the graph. We also prove a converse to this statement. We introduce an intrinsically quantum notion that plays a role analogous to the conditional independence of classical variables, and (generalizing a central theorem of the classical framework) show that d-separation is sound and complete for it in the quantum case. We present generalizations of the three rules of the classical do-calculus, in each case relating a property of the causal structure to a formal property of the quantum process, and to an operational statement concerning the outcomes of interventions. In addition, we introduce and derive similar results for classical split-node causal models, which are more closely analogous to quantum causal models than the classical causal models that are usually studied.
We present a categorical construction for modelling causal structures within a general class of process theories that include the theory of classical probabilistic processes as well as quantum theory. Unlike prior constructions within categorical quantum mechanics, the objects of this theory encode fine-grained causal relationships between subsystems and give a new method for expressing and deriving consequences for a broad class of causal structures. We show that this framework enables one to define families of processes which are consistent with arbitrary acyclic causal orderings. In particular, one can define one-way signalling (a.k.a. semi-causal) processes, non-signalling processes, and quantum n-combs. Furthermore, our framework is general enough to accommodate recently-proposed generalisations of classical and quantum theory where processes only need to have a fixed causal ordering locally, but globally allow indefinite causal ordering. To illustrate this point, we show that certain processes of this kind, such as the quantum switch, the process matrices of Oreshkov, Costa, and Brukner, and a classical three-party example due to Baumeler, Feix, and Wolf are all instances of a certain family of processes we refer to as SOCn in the appropriate category of higher-order causal processes. After defining these families of causal structures within our framework, we give derivations of their operational behaviour using simple, diagrammatic axioms.
Abstracting from a low level to a more explanatory high level of description, and ideally while preserving causal structure, is fundamental to scientific practice, to causal inference problems, and to robust, efficient and interpretable AI. We present a general account of abstractions between low and high level models as natural transformations, focusing on the case of causal models. This provides a new formalisation of causal abstraction, unifying several notions in the literature, including constructive causal abstraction, Q-τ consistency, abstractions based on interchange interventions, and `distributed' causal abstractions. Our approach is formalised in terms of category theory, and uses the general notion of a compositional model with a given set of queries and semantics in a monoidal, cd- or Markov category; causal models and their queries such as interventions being special cases. We identify two basic notions of abstraction: downward abstractions mapping queries from high to low level; and upward abstractions, mapping concrete queries such as Do-interventions from low to high. Although usually presented as the latter, we show how common causal abstractions may, more fundamentally, be understood in terms of the former. Our approach also leads us to consider a new stronger notion of `component-level' abstraction, applying to the individual components of a model. In particular, this yields a novel, strengthened form of constructive causal abstraction at the mechanism-level, for which we prove characterisation results. Finally, we show that abstraction can be generalised to further compositional models, including those with a quantum semantics implemented by quantum circuits, and we take first steps in exploring abstractions between quantum compositional circuit models and high-level classical causal models as a means to explainable quantum AI.
Recent years have seen great interest in extending causal inference concepts developed in the context of classical statistical models to quantum theory. So far, this program has only barely addressed causal identification, a type of causal inference problem concerned with recovering from observational data and qualitative assumptions the causal relationships generating the data, and hence the effects of hypothetical interventions. A major obstacle to a theory of causal identification in the quantum setting is the question of what should play the role of “observational data,” as any means of extracting data at a locus will almost certainly disturb the system. One might think that quantum measurements are already too much like interventions, so that the problem of causal identification is trivialized. This is not the case: when we fix a limited class of quantum measurement instruments (namely, the class of all projective measurements) to play the role of “observations,” there exist scenarios for which causal identification is impossible. In this paper, we present a framework, based on process theories (also known as strict symmetric monoidal categories), for studying quantum causal identification scenarios on the same footing as their classical counterparts. Within this framework, we present sufficient conditions for quantum causal identification in networks with unobserved confounding systems, including quantum analogs of the well-known “back-door” and “front-door” criteria. These results arise from a type of causal model designed to facilitate the transfer of inference techniques from the classical to the quantum setting. Published by the American Physical Society 2024